Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

February 11, 2008 Ensuring Compliance In The Email Realm.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "February 11, 2008 Ensuring Compliance In The Email Realm."— Presentation transcript:

1 February 11, 2008 Ensuring Compliance In The Email Realm

2 The compliance basics Third-parties and affiliates—compliance for experts The big “take aways” Agenda

3 The compliance basics Third-parties and affiliates—compliance for experts The big “take aways” Agenda

4 While most of the law’s prohibitions are aimed at the worst actors, CAN-SPAM’s required inclusions target all senders of commercial email Clear and conspicuous notice that email is commercial (not “ADV:”) 1.Does not apply if sender has “affirmative consent” of recipient Clear and conspicuous notice of ability to opt-out Working unsubscribe functionality 1.Internet-based mechanism 2.Of the sender’s choosing 3.Applied within ten business days Subject lines that are not misleading or deceptive Valid physical postal address The Compliance Basics

5 The Commercial Notice Requirement Clear and conspicuous notice that email is commercial (not “ADV:”) While not a “flashpoint” of FTC litigation, the FTC has made this a “rider” offense under CAN-SPAM cases 1.United States of America v. Jumpstart Technologies—emails appeared to be personal and were playing upon that notion 2.Federal Trade Commission v. Optin Global—email portrayed as a confirmation without commercial notice Generally prevalent in all FTC actions that involved “predatory and abusive” practices

6 Clear and conspicuous notice of ability to opt out According to the FTC, 80% of its spam cases alleged violation of the opt-out requirement Clearly a compliance concern, an obvious way to unsubscribe should be the cornerstone for commercial email campaigns 1.United States of America v. Jumpstart Technologies—emails contained unsubscribe links like: –“Go Here to Manage Your Mailing Preferences” –“Visit the BonusBonez Mailing Manager” –“Why wait? You can stop getting mail at any time” 2.So how does a marketer know when their opt-out disclosure is “clear and conspicuous?” –The placement of the disclosure –The prominence of the disclosure –The clarity of the language—is it understandable to the intended audience Managers should avoid the fancy or esoteric 1.“To stop receiving commercial email from us…” The Understandable Unsubscribe

7 Working unsubscribe functionality Part of the 80%, ensuring that your unsubscribe link works is essential for CAN-SPAM compliance Two cases establish the need to ensure nearly perfect unsubscribe functionality 1.United States of America v. ICE.com –6,000 emails sent over 40 days –Sent more than 10 day business days after receipt of opt-out –Purported to be a technical outage –Resulted in settlement with FTC 2.United States of America v. Yesmail –Defendant utilized a reply-to address as its unsubscribe functionality –Spam filter blocked opt-out requests from getting processed Ensuring the Honored Opt-Out

8 Rethinking the Subject Line Subject lines that are not misleading or deceptive Next to unsubscribe issues, deceptive or misleading subject lines are a lightning rod of activity for the FTC The FTC cases have been clear that, when taken on their own, subject lines must rise above deceptive or misleading: 1.Jumpstart Technologies –“Hiya!” –“Invite” –“Happy Valentine’s Day” “A subject heading that the defendant knew, or had reason to know, would be likely to mislead a recipient, acting reasonably under the circumstances, about a material fact regarding the contents or subject matter of the message.”

9 The Valid Physical Postal Address Not As Difficult As the Law Makes It Sound Other than cases involving a failure to include an address, the FTC has yet to prosecute where some valid address is present FTC guidance on what it means? 1. May 2005 NPR provides something to think on 2. The FTC proposed defining “Valid Physical Postal Address” as including: –Private Mail Boxes –Post Office Boxes –Street address

10 Agenda The compliance basics Third-parties and affiliates—compliance for experts The big “take aways”

11 Working with other companies Ad networks Affiliate programs & networks Third-party email marketers Offline direct marketers Various payment approaches Pay-Per-Click /Action Pay-Per-Lead Shared revenues Pay for delivery Way to leverage own database more effectively PII often necessary to share for affiliate monitoring, but also as part of the leverage What Is Affiliate Marketing?

12 Potentially joint ownership/use of consumer data Multiple privacy and contractual representations Transparency of transactions How Does Affiliate Marketing Differ From Conventional Marketing?

13 Regulatory framework to be accountable for acts of affiliates CAN-SPAM: obligations imposed on advertiser, additional obligations on initiators 1. Implicit need to monitor actions of affiliates Gramm-Leach-Bliley: financial institutions must also require compliance by their vendors and service providers Section 5: prohibits unfair and deceptive trade practices. Application to affiliates? Getting To Accountability

14 FTC Actions Cases brought by the FTC in several areas have suggested that marketers, leveraging affiliates, should monitor affiliate behavior TJ Web – Jan 2007 settlement includes obligations on affiliate review, based on CAN-SPAM Optin Global Cleverlink Trading Ltd. Zango Cart Manager – March 2005 1. Director of Bureau of Consumer Protection’s press release statement of monitoring activities: “Companies and [vendors] must make sure that their privacy policies are in sync. A [vendor] cannot secretly collect and rent consumers’ personal information, contrary to a merchant’s privacy policy. At the same time, merchants have an obligation to know what their [vendors] are doing with consumers’ personal information.” Getting To Accountability

15 New York Attorney General Actions New NY AG Cuomo settles with major advertisers in Jan 2007 -- online promotion of products and services through another’s alleged deceptively-installed adware programs Priceline Travelocity Cingular Getting To Accountability

16 In what circumstances do companies have a legal obligation to monitor affiliates? What affirmative actions should your company take to avoid any law enforcement action?

17 Establish necessary and reasonable policies and procedures, depending on the level of relationship. It’s your playground, make the rules. Know thy affiliate. Don’t turn a blind eye. Policies & Procedures

18 Establish standard operating procedures for the relationship. Keep standards consistent. If company doesn’t meet standards, don’t bend rules – could be weak link. Develop deployment strategies. Rules for marketing: channels, media, frequency. Playground Rules

19 Agenda The compliance basics Third-parties and affiliates—compliance for experts The big “take aways”

20 Develop monitoring techniques to detect abuse Utilize seeds Leverage brand-monitoring solutions that identify brand abuse Ensure marketers are honoring channel representations Verify/contractually require affiliates to use reputable partners Understand data collection and use policies (and get contractual representations re: same) Review applicable privacy policies as appropriate (PII in particular) Monitor suppression list and complaint activities Know Thy Affiliate

21 The recent enforcement activities indicates that if you have a close relationship with purportedly bad actors, you could be held liable for their actions, even if you did not dictate them. Blindness

22 Quinn Jalli, Esq. Chief Privacy Officer and Vice President of ISP Relations Datran Media 345 Hudson Street, 5th floor New York, NY 10014 Tel: (212) 706-4897 Fax: (212) 706-9758 Email: QJalli@datranmedia.comQJalli@datranmedia.com Contact Information


Download ppt "February 11, 2008 Ensuring Compliance In The Email Realm."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google