Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 The Relational Model Mapping the ER Model to a Database Implementation.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 The Relational Model Mapping the ER Model to a Database Implementation."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 The Relational Model Mapping the ER Model to a Database Implementation

2 2 The Relational Model Mathematically based Can develop theoretical design improvements & enhancements that result in applications to many different applications Can use exact mathematical notation Basic structure is simple, easy to understand –Separates logical from physical level –Operations do not require user to know storage structures used –Data operations easy to express, using a few powerful commands

3 3 Tables Relations are represented logically as tables –Tables are related to one another –Table holds information about entities Table rows correspond to individual records Table columns correspond to attributes –A column contains values from one domain –Domains consist of atomic (single) values

4 4 Properties of Tables Each cell contains at most one value –It is a single piece of data Each column has a distinct name –This is the name of the attribute it represents Values in a column all come from the same domain Each tuple is distinct – no duplicate tuples

5 5 Sample: ER to Relational Model Student stuIdlastNamefirstNamemajorcredits S1001SmithTomHistory90 S1002ChinAnnMath36 S1005LeePerryHistory3 S1010BurnsEdwardArt63 S1013McCarthyOwenMath0 S1015JonesMaryMath42 S1020RiveraJaneCSC15 Faculty facIdnamedepartmentrank F101AdamsArtProfessor F105TanakaCSCInstructor F110ByrneMathAssistant F115SmithHistoryAssociate F221SmithCSCProfessor STUDENTCLASSFACULTY Enrolls Taught by Class classNumfacIdscheduleroom ART103AF101MWF9H221 CSC201AF105TuThF10M110 CSC203AF105MThF12M110 HST205AF115MWF11H221 MTH101BF110MTuTh9H225 MTH103CF110MWF11H225 Enroll stuIdclassNumgrade S1001ART103AA S1001HST205AC S1002ART103AD S1002CSC201AF S1002MTH103CB S1010ART103A S1010MTH103C S1020CSC201AB S1020MTH101BA Student (stuId, lastName, firstName, major, credits) Class (classNum, facId, schedule, room) Faculty (facId, name, department, rank) Enroll(stuId,classNum,grade)

6 6 Representing Relational Database Schemas Can have any number of relation schemas Example: University database schema Student (stuId, lastName, firstName, major, credits) Class (classNumber, facId, schedule, room) Faculty (facId, name, department, rank) Enroll(stuId,classNumber,grade) This could also be represented by the relationships screen of the DBMS.

7 7 Properties of Relations (Tables) Degree: the number of attributes –Binary, ternary, n-ary Connectivity: –1:1, 1:N, M:N Cardinality: the number of tuples –Changes as tuples are added or deleted Keys Constraints

8 8 Keys Relations never have duplicate tuples (rows) –You can always tell tuples apart / there is always a key Superkey: set of attributes that uniquely identifies tuples Candidate key: minimal superkey –No proper subset of itself is also a superkey Primary key (PK): candidate key chosen to uniquely identify tuples –You cannot verify a key by looking at an instance – why? Foreign key (FK) is an attribute or combination of attributes of a relation that is the PK of another relation

9 9 Selecting the Primary Key An ideal primary key is short, numeric, and seldom changing If there is more than one candidate key, each should be carefully evaluated If the entity has no identifier, some attribute must be selected as the PK –In some situations, a surrogate key may be defined

10 10 Surrogate Keys These are unique, DBMS-supplied identifiers used as the PK of a relation The values of a surrogate key have no meaning to users and are normally hidden on forms and reports The DBMS does not allow the value of a surrogate key to be changed Disadvantages: –FK’s based on surrogate keys have no meaning to users –When data shared among different databases contain the same ID, merging those tables might yield unexpected results

11 11 Constraints Integrity constraints – to ensure “correctness and internal consistency” –Rules or restrictions that apply to all instances of the database –Enforcing them ensures only legal states of the database are created Types of integrity constraints –Domain constraint - limits set of values for an attribute –Entity integrity - no part of a PK can be null –Referential integrity - each FK value must match the primary key value of some tuple in its related relation, or be null General constraints are the business rules –These may be expressed as table constraints or assertions Participation constraints reflect the extent of entities’ involvement in given relationships

12 12 The Database Implementation Process This is the step in the database design process that follows the conceptual design/ERD –Create tables and columns from entities and attributes –Select primary keys –Represent relationships –Specify constraints –Performance tuning

13 13 Mapping the ERD to a Relational Model Entities –Issues with composite & multi-valued attributes –Issues with weak entities Relationships –1:1, 1:N and M:N –Participation constraints

14 14 Mapping an Entity to a Table Each entity maps onto a table –Its non-composite, single-valued attributes comprise the table’s column headings –For composite attributes, there are 3 possible ways: Make the composite into a single attribute Create several individual attributes to replace the composite Create a new entity –For multi-valued attributes, we create a new table The PK of this new table is the composite of the original attribute coupled with the PK of the original table This new table is created as a weak entity –Example: multiple email accounts

15 15 Mapping a Relationship Binary Relationships: –1:M PK of 1-side becomes a FK of the M-side table –1:1 First, make sure they are not the same entity. If not, use either PK as the FK in the other table –M:M Create a relationship table (bridge, composite) with a composite PK consisting of the PK’s of the related entities, along with any relationship attributes Ternary or higher degree relationships: construct relationship table of keys, along with any relationship attributes With all relationships, we must preserve referential integrity, participation & cardinality constraints

16 16 1:1 Relationship EMPLOYEEAUTO Has 1 1

17 17 1:N Relationship Class classNumfacIdscheduleroom ART103AF101MWF9H221 CSC201AF105TuThF10M110 CSC203AF105MThF12M110 HST205AF115MWF11H221 MTH101BF110MTuTh9H225 MTH103CF110MWF11H225 FACULTYCLASS Teaches 1 N Faculty facIdnamedepartmentrank F101AdamsArtProfessor F105TanakaCSCInstructor F110ByrneMathAssistant F115SmithHistoryAssociate F221SmithCSCProfessor

18 18 M:N Relationship Student stuIdlastNamefirstNamemajorcredits S1001SmithTomHistory90 S1002ChinAnnMath36 S1005LeePerryHistory3 S1010BurnsEdwardArt63 S1013McCarthyOwenMath0 S1015JonesMaryMath42 S1020RiveraJaneCSC15 STUDENTCLASS Enrolls Class classNumfacIdscheduleroom ART103AF101MWF9H221 CSC201AF105TuThF10M110 CSC203AF105MThF12M110 HST205AF115MWF11H221 MTH101BF110MTuTh9H225 MTH103CF110MWF11H225 Enroll stuIdclassNumgrade S1001ART103AA S1001HST205AC S1002ART103AD S1002CSC201AF S1002MTH103CB S1010ART103A S1010MTH103C S1020CSC201AB S1020MTH101BA Student (stuId, lastName, firstName, major, credits) Enroll(stuId,classNum,grade) Class (classNum, facId, schedule, room)

19 19 Weak entities Weak entities become tables by adding the PK of the parent (strong) entity –What is the primary key in such a table? What about the total participation (and existence dependence) constraint? –What do we need to ensure? –How do we do this?

20 20 RDBMS Rules Regarding FK’s Choices made when relationships are established between tables –Cascade deletes If parent instance is deleted, so are all its children –Restrict deletes Cannot delete a parent instance if it has a child –Set to NULL If parent instance is deleted, set the FK of the child to NULL –Cascade updates If parent instance gets new PK, change the FK of all its children

21 21 Total participation Referential integrity actions need to be specified to ensure that –When the parent entity instance is deleted, the weak entity instance is deleted as well –Each new weak entity instance must have a parent instance with which to connect Other participation situations also require careful attention. –They must be reasoned out.

22 22 Weak Entity Example

23 23 Enforcing Minimum Cardinality If the minimum cardinality on the child is 1, at least one child row must be connected to the parent A required parent can be specified by making the foreign key value NOT NULL A required child can be represented by creating update and delete referential integrity actions on the child and insert referential integrity actions on the parent Such referential integrity actions must be declared during database design and trigger codes must be written during implementation

24 24 Subtype Relationship

25 25 Entity Supertypes and Subtypes Generalization hierarchy –Depicts a relationship between a higher- level supertype entity and a lower-level subtype entity Supertype entity –Contains shared attributes Subtype entity –Contains unique attributes

26 26 Nulls Created with No Supertypes/Subtypes

27 27 A Generalization Hierarchy

28 28 Disjoint Subtypes Also known as non-overlapping subtypes –Subtypes that contain a subset of the supertype entity set –Each entity instance (row) of the supertype can appear in only one of the disjoint subtypes Supertype and its subtype(s) maintain a 1:1 relationship –So, how is it implemented in an rdbms?

29 29 EMPLOYEE/PILOT Supertype/Subtype Relationship

30 30 A Generalization Hierarchy with Overlapping Subtypes

31 31 Recursive Relationships A recursive relationship is a relationship among entities of the same class For 1:1 and 1:N recursive relationships, add a foreign key to the relation that represents the entity

32 32 1:1 Recursive Relationships

33 33 1:N Recursive Relationships

34 34 Some issues with conceptual design using the ER model Design choices: – Should a concept be modeled as an entity or an attribute? – Should a concept be modeled as an entity or a relationship? – Identifying relationships: Binary or ternary? – When to allow NULL values? – How should privacy concerns/sensitive data collection be handled? Constraints in the ER Model: – A lot of data semantics can (and should) be captured. – But some constraints cannot be captured in ER diagrams.

35 35 Entity vs. Attribute Should address be an attribute of EMPLOYEE or an entity (connected to EMPLOYEE by a relationship)? Depends upon the use we want to make of address data, and the semantics of the data: –If we have several addresses per employee, address must be an entity –If the structure (city, street, etc.) is important, e.g., we want to retrieve employees in a given city, address can be modeled as an entity or as several attributes

36 36 Entity vs. Attribute example Works_In does not allow an employee to work in a department for two or more periods. Similar to the problem of wanting to record several addresses for an employee: We want to record several values of the descriptive attributes for each instance of this relationship. Accomplished by introducing new entity set, Duration. name Employees eid lot Works_In from to dname budget did Departments dname budget did name Departments eid lot Employees Works_In Duration from to

37 37 Entity vs. Relationship First ER diagram OK if a manager gets a separate discretionary budget for each dept. What if a manager gets a discretionary budget that covers all managed depts? Manages name dname budget did Employee Department eid lot dbudget since dname budget did Department Manages Employee name eid lot since Managerdbudget Is a Could also be a supertyp e

38 38 Binary vs. Ternary Relationships What are the differences between these two diagrams? age pname Covers name Employee eid lot Policy policyid cost Beneficiary age pname Dependent policyid cost Policy Purchaser name Employee eid lot Design 1 Design 2 Dependent

39 39 Binary vs. Ternary Relationships An example where a ternary relation is required –Contracts relates entity sets PART, DEPT and SUPPLIER, and has attribute qty. No combination of binary relationships is an adequate substitute: S “can-supply” P, D “needs” P, and D “deals-with” S does not imply that D has agreed to buy P from S. And, furthermore, how would we record qty?

40 40 Null values A null value is an attribute value that has not been supplied Null values are ambiguous as they can mean –The value is unknown –The value is inappropriate –The value is known to be blank Inappropriate nulls can be avoided by –Defining subtype or category entities –Forcing attribute values through the use of not null –Supplying initial values Ignore nulls if the ambiguity is not a problem to the users

41 41 Surrogate Key Example


Download ppt "1 The Relational Model Mapping the ER Model to a Database Implementation."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google