1. (16 JUNE 2015) WP Leader: Neil Holdsworth, ICES EMODnet Chemistry II (2013-2016) WP5 Analysis and Recommendations

2. BACKGROUND: and the tools they have... DG-MARE (Maritime Affairs) Data Collection Framework (DCF) and DC-MAP Marine Knowledge 2020 EMODNET DG-ENV (Environment) & EEA Water and Marine Framework Directive (WFD/MSFD) Habitats, Bathing water etc. Directives INSPIRE (Public body spatial data) WISE and WISE-Marine

3. EMODnet Chemistry II (2013-2016) WP5 Analysis and Recommendations WP description: inputs Specific MSFD feedback through WG-DIKE and TG DATA Additional workshops i.e. EMD-MSFD interaction Feedback from Chemistry project partners including data providers (see next presentation by Matteo) Overall EMODNet strategy developments at EU and Member States levels

4. EMODnet Chemistry II (2013-2016) WP5 Analysis and Recommendations WP description: objectives Engage with MSFD stakeholders and align/revise chemical portal and products through dialogue identify key users and report on the effectiveness of the system in meeting the needs of end-users provide a summary feedback to the products work package (WP3) To establish efficient tools to obtain users feedback

5. Data –> Information flow for MSFD (coordinated) Monitoring Data provision Ingestion Data assembly (products) Indicator provision Assessment product(s) datainformationknowledge [National] and [Regional bodies] Regional Conventions and EEA [EMODnet] and [Regional Systems]

6. INSPIRE: Marine Pilot WS (8-9 June), Copenhagen Lead: JRC Participants: DGENV, EEA, national experts (NL, DE, DK) and RSC’s -Capacity building; Training on transformation of data for INSPIRE compliance -Reporting for MSFD using INSPIRE compliant/based services

7. INSPIRE: Marine Pilot WS (8-9 June), Copenhagen -Would services harvested by EEA with a timestamp, be a legal reporting for MSFD? -Report to be drafted for DIKE meeting in October by EEA/DG ENV and some MS -Next meeting 5 September in the Netherlands -EMODnet Steering will meet with JRC/INSPIRE in late June

8. -WISE-Marine ‘knowledge’ mapping Assessment Data Collection (sources of observations) Data assembly Indicators WG-DIKE WG-GES WISE Marine – slowly taking shape

9. a web-based portal for sharing information to the marine community on the marine environment WISE-M http://marine.europa.eu WISE Marine

10. WISE-Marine landing page (ENV) http://marine.europa.eu/ State of the marine environment (EEA) Policy (ENV)Data (EEA) JRC competence center (JRC) State of the marine environment (EEA) DriversPressures State of marine ecosystem Impacts on ecosystem services and natural capital Response

11. Data (EEA) Data products (information shown) Indicators Assessment tools Data services (e.g. EMODNET) Reference layers and MSFD maps MS reported data (inputs to WISE-M) MSFD Art 8, 9 and 10 MSFD Art 13 MSFD Art 11 MSFD Art 19.3 (RSC data?) WISE SOE (TCM) WISE-Marine landing page (ENV) http://marine.europa.eu/ State of the marine environment (EEA) Policy (ENV)Data (EEA) JRC competence center (JRC)

12. The MIS structure ( still being revisited under level2 and 3 ) Marine Information Schema (RSC support contract)

13. MIS 1: DPSIR RESPONSES Ecosystem Services State Pressures Human Activities Drivers Based on, but not identical to, the Marine Information Schema (RSC support project, 2015 – in development) MIS 2: Integrated Ecosystem Assessment Programme of measures Evaluation of measures Reporting Art 13: Management GES Objectives Temporal and Spatial Scope Targets Arts 9 & 10: Scoping and Targets Art 7: Competent Authorities Art 8 Initial Assessment Indicators Methodology etc Monitoring network Monitoring methods/guidelines Art 11: Monitoring Programme MIS 3: Evidence base Art 19.3 Data underpinning Art. 8 and 11 Datasets Station Area Timeseries Sample method QC information Vocabs Station Species/Habitats Parameters Units etc. QC flags Data assembly Methodology Spatial units

14. MIS 1: DPSIR RESPONSES Ecosystem Services State Pressures Human Activities Drivers Indicators are the connector between evidence and status MIS 2: Integrated Ecosystem Assessment Programme of measures Evaluation of measures Reporting Art 13: Management GES Objectives Temporal and Spatial Scope Targets Arts 9 & 10: Scoping and Targets Art 7: Competent Authorities Art 8 Initial Assessment Indicators Methodology etc Monitoring network Monitoring methods/guidelines Art 11: Monitoring Programme MIS 3: Evidence base Art 19.3 Data underpinning Art. 8 and 11 Datasets Station Area Timeseries Sample method QC information Vocabs Station Species/Habitats Parameters Units etc. QC flags Data assembly Methodology Spatial units

15. MSFD key interactions (2014/2015) Sept ’14 EMODnet – MSFD interaction meeting DGMARE, DGENV, EEA, 2 member states, OSPAR and HELCOM, EMODnet Bio, Chem and Sec -Focus was more on biological than chemical -Chemistry presented by Alessandra and ‘data product preparation’ exercise for EEA presented by Neil

16. MSFD key interactions (2014/2015) Sept ’14 EMODnet – MSFD interaction meeting DISCUSSIONS -Chemical buffer -Regional focus: Mediterranean -Northern RSC’s heavily invested in current systems/process. Little incentive to change in short term

17. MSFD key interactions (2014/2015) Feb ’15 EMODnet – MSFD interaction meeting The usual suspects -relevance of EMODnet chemistry (data) to OSPAR/HELCOM? -Concentrating on the Mediterranean and Black Sea -Appropriate information in the metadata to identify chemistry data suitable for inclusion in MSFD reporting based on QA and QC procedures

18. MSFD key interactions (2014/2015) Feb ’15 EMODnet – MSFD interaction meeting The usual suspects -HELCOM and OSPAR indicator specifications should identify the appropriate metadata needed -EMODnet Chemistry to report back on progress to next meeting, including possibilities to filter data on these metadata fields -Progress in developing mechanisms for accessing data from non-EMODnet partner sources.

19. RSC Indicators WGDIKE paper DIKE_11-2015-04

20. RSC Indicators as of June 2015 -200 regional indicators -28 equate to D5 Eutrophication -47 equate to D8ish Contaminants -Operational status unknown for most -Most are under development, developed but not adopted or no information

21. Indicators elements HELCOM and OSPAR indicator specifications should identify the appropriate metadata needed

22. Indicators elements analysis WGDIKE paper DIKE_11-2015-05

23. Indicators elements Common core (draft) WGDIKE paper DIKE_11-2015-05 EEAHELCOMOSPAR