1. Comparative Study of the Treatment Outcomes of Osteoporotic Compression Fractures without Neurologic Injury Using a Rigid Brace, a Soft Brace, and No Brace by Ho-Joong Kim, Je-Min Yi, Hyeon-Guk Cho, Bong-Soon Chang, Choon-Ki Lee, Jee Hyoung Kim, and Jin S. Yeom J Bone Joint Surg Am Volume 96(23):1959-1966 December 3, 2014 ©2014 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

2. A CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) flow diagram showing the enrollment, randomization, assigned interventions, and follow-up of the study participants. Ho-Joong Kim et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96:1959- 1966 ©2014 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

3. Line graphs showing treatment outcomes at follow-up of two, six, and twelve weeks: ODI with non-inferior comparison at twelve weeks as the primary end point (Fig. 2-A), VAS for back pain (Fig. 2-B), and anterior body compression ratio at the fractured level... Ho-Joong Kim et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96:1959- 1966 ©2014 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

4. Bar graphs showing the quality of life represented by the SF-36 PCS (Fig. 3-A) and SF-36 MCS (Fig. 3-B) at initial enrollment and at twelve weeks after fracture. Ho-Joong Kim et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96:1959- 1966 ©2014 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

5. A bar graph showing treatment satisfaction among the three groups. Ho-Joong Kim et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96:1959- 1966 ©2014 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.