Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

N. Camden Kneeland, M.D., D.A.B.A.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "N. Camden Kneeland, M.D., D.A.B.A."— Presentation transcript:

1 When & How to Utilize Interventional Procedures Utility and Predictive Factors
N. Camden Kneeland, M.D., D.A.B.A. The Montana Center for Wellness & Pain Management Kalispell, MT

2 Disclosures Research Stipend from St. Jude Medical

3 Objectives Present evidence regarding the predictive value of psychosocial evaluation in chronic pain patients undergoing interventional procedures Define the role of diagnostic and therapeutic interventional pain management procedures in an interdisciplinary pain management paradigm

4 Psychosocial Background
Biopsychosocial complexity of chronic pain cannot be underappreciated 41% with Axis I disorder % increased association with depression and anxiety Cost of chronic pain treatment annually exceeds $600 Billion annually Daubs, MD SPINE Volume 36, Number 21S, pp S96–S109

5 Fusion Versus Nonoperative Care for Chronic Low Back Pain
Systematic review of randomized controlled trials 18 Studies met inclusion criteria for the period Beck Depression Inventory, Fear Avoidance Belief Questionaire, Zung Depression Scale, Spielberger Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Distress and Risk Assessment Method Patients with a personality disorder appear to respond more favorably to conservative management and those without a personality disorder more favorably to fusion Daubs, MD SPINE Volume 36, Number 21S, pp S96–S

6 Prospective Cohort study
Can the Outcome of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I Patients Be Predicted by Catastrophizing Thoughts? 32 Patients Prospective Cohort study Dutch version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale Efficacy of SCS was not predicted by pain catastrophizing Lame´ et al, Anesthesia and Analgesia 109(2):

7 Prospective cohort study Spine surgery and spinal cord stimulation
Psychological Risk Factors for Poor Outcome of Spine Surgery and Spinal Cord Stimulator Implant: A Review of the Literature and Their Assessment With the MMPI-2-RF 197 patients Prospective cohort study Spine surgery and spinal cord stimulation No significant difference between groups Depression, anxiety, pain sensitivity, and anger were associated with poor outcomes Block, AR. Psychological Risk Factors for Poor Outcome of Spine Surgery and Spinal Cord Stimulator Implant: A Review of the Literature and Their Assessment With the MMPI-2-RF, The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27:1,

8 The Impact of Psychological Factors on Outcomes for Spinal Cord Stimulation: An Analysis with Long-term Follow-up Retrospective Analysis 60 patients Hospital Anxiety and Depression Test and Pain Disability Index No significant difference in PDI scores with successful and unsuccessful SCS implants No significant difference in HADS scores with successful and unsuccessful SCS implants Wolter et al, Pain Physician 16(3)

9 Prognostic Value of Psychological Testing in Patients Undergoing Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Prospective Study Prospective study MMPI 58 patients Some statistically significant association between high indices of depression and trial period, but no association with permanent implant North R, Neurosurgery Issue: Volume 39(2), pp

10 Psychology and the Diagnosis of Facet Joint Pain
Retrospective Analysis 438 patients Survey based on DSM IV criteria for depression, anxiety, and somatization disorder No statistically significant influence of depression, anxiety, somatization disorder, or a combination of the above on the prevalence of facet joint pain Response to comparative medial branch blocks with different anesthetics Manchikanti et al, Pain Physician, 11(2)

11 Summary Limited Data for Screening outside SCS Mixed Results
Common Sense When in doubt, evaluate, but don’t sacrifice patient care Comprehensive Approach

12 The Role of Interventions
Diagnostic Value Physician and Patient Education Better Treatment Plans Variety of Pain Generators = Variety of Interventions Breaking the Cycle of Pain Improving Function

13 Interventional Pearls
Radicular Pain vs. Axial vs. Diffuse Pain Shotgun Approach Safety of Epidural Steroids Adhesive arachnoiditis <1000 cases in 2002* Myofascial/Musculoskeletal Pain Interspinous Ligment *Rice M, et al, BJA 92:

14 Interventional Pearls
Facet Pain Second most common source of axial spine pain

15 Interventional Pearls
Lumbar Myofascial Pain Iliopsoas & Quadratus Lumborum

16 Interventional Pearls
Sacroiliac Joint Pain Lateral Branch Blocks Cooled RF Ablation

17 Summary Use interventional approach diagnostically and to break pain cycles Long term analgesia and cure is possible Informed consent is critical


Download ppt "N. Camden Kneeland, M.D., D.A.B.A."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google