Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Networking II: The Link and Network Layers. 2 Announcements Prelim II will be Thursday, November 20 th, in class Homework 5 available later today, November.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Networking II: The Link and Network Layers. 2 Announcements Prelim II will be Thursday, November 20 th, in class Homework 5 available later today, November."— Presentation transcript:

1 Networking II: The Link and Network Layers

2 2 Announcements Prelim II will be Thursday, November 20 th, in class Homework 5 available later today, November 4 th Vote today

3 3 Review: OSI Levels Physical Layer –electrical details of bits on the wire Data Link Layer –sending “frames” of bits and error detection Network Layer –routing packets to the destination Transport Layer –reliable transmission of messages, disassembly/assembly, ordering, retransmission of lost packets Session Layer –really part of transport, typically Not implemented Presentation Layer –data representation in the message Application –high-level protocols (mail, ftp, etc.)

4 4 Review: OSI Levels Presentation Transport Network Data Link Physical Application Presentation Transport Network Data Link Physical Application Node A Node B Network Session

5 5 What is purpose of this layer? Invoke Physical Layer –Physically encode bits on the wire Link = pipe to send information –E.g. point to point or broadcast Can be built out of: –Twisted pair, coaxial cable, optical fiber, radio waves, etc Links should only be able to send data –Could corrupt, lose, reorder, duplicate, (fail in other ways)

6 6 Broadcast Networks Details Delivery: When you broadcast a packet, how does a receiver know who it is for? (packet goes to everyone!) –Put header on front of packet: [ Destination | Packet ] –Everyone gets packet, discards if not the target –In Ethernet, this check is done in hardware No OS interrupt if not for particular destination –This is layering: we’re going to build complex network protocols by layering on top of the packet Header (Dest:2) Body (Data) Message ID:1 (ignore) ID:2 (receive) ID:4 (ignore) ID:3 (sender)

7 7 Point-to-point networks Why have a shared broadcast medium? Why not simplify and only have point-to-point links + routers/switches? –Didn’t used to be cost-effective –Now, easy to make high-speed switches and routers that can forward packets from a sender to a receiver. Point-to-point network: a network in which every physical wire is connected to only two computers Switch: a bridge that transforms a shared-bus configuration into a point-to-point network. Router: a device that acts as a junction between two networks to transfer data packets among them. Router Internet Switch

8 8 Point-to-Point Networks Discussion Advantages: –Higher link performance Can drive point-to-point link faster than broadcast link since less capacitance/less echoes (from impedance mismatches) –Greater aggregate bandwidth than broadcast link Can have multiple senders at once –Can add capacity incrementally Add more links/switches to get more capacity –Better fault tolerance (as in the Internet) –Lower Latency No arbitration to send, although need buffer in the switch Disadvantages: –More expensive than having everyone share broadcast link –However, technology costs now much cheaper Examples –ATM (asynchronous transfer mode) The first commercial point-to-point LAN Inspiration taken from telephone network –Switched Ethernet Same packet format and signaling as broadcast Ethernet, but only two machines on each ethernet.

9 9 How to connect routers/machines? WAN/Router Connections –Commercial: T1 (1.5 Mbps), T3 (44 Mbps) OC1 (51 Mbps), OC3 (155 Mbps) ISDN (64 Kbps) Frame Relay (1-100 Mbps, usually 1.5 Mbps) ATM (some Gbps) –To your home: DSL Cable Local Area: –Ethernet: IEEE 802.3 (10 Mbps, 100 Mbps, 1 Gbps) –Wireless: IEEE 802.11 b/g/a (11 Mbps, 22 Mbps, 54 Mbps)

10 10 Link level Issues Encoding: map bits to analog signals Framing: Group bits into frames (packets) Arbitration: multiple senders, one resource Addressing: multiple receivers, one wire

11 11 Encoding Map 1s and 0s to electric signals Simple scheme: Non-Return to Zero (NRZ) –0 = low voltage, 1 = high voltage Problems: –How to tell an error? When jammed? When is bus idle? –When to sample? Clock recovery is difficult. Idea: Recover clock using encoding transitions 1 0 1 1 0

12 12 Manchester Encoding Used by Ethernet Idea: Map 0 to low-to-high transition, 1 to high-to-low Plusses: can detect dead-link, can recover clock Bad: reduce bandwidth, i.e. bit rate = ½ baud rate –If wire can do X transition per second? 0 1 1 0

13 13 Framing Why send packets? –Error control How do you know when to stop reading? –Sentinel approach: send start and end sequence –For example, if sentinel is 11111 –11111 00101001111100 11111 10101001 11111 010011 11111 –What if sentinel appears in the data? map sentinel to something else, receiver maps it back –Bit stuffing

14 14 Example: HDLC High-Level Data Link Control (HLDC) –Data link layer protocol developed by the ISO Same sentinel for begin and end: 0111 1110 packet format: Bit stuffing –Sender: If 5 1s then insert a 0 –Receiver: if 5 1s followed by a 0, remove 0 Else read next bit Packet size now depends on the contents 0111 1110 header data CRC 0111 1110 0111 1110 0111 1101 0 0111 1101 0 0111 1110

15 15 Broadcast Network Arbitration Arbitration: Act of negotiating use of shared medium –What if two senders try to broadcast at same time? –Concurrent activity but can’t use shared memory to coordinate! Aloha network (70’s): packet radio within Hawaii –Blind broadcast, with checksum at end of packet. If received correctly (not garbled), send back an acknowledgement. If not received correctly, discard. Need checksum anyway – in case airplane flies overhead –Sender waits for a while, and if doesn’t get an acknowledgement, re-transmits. –If two senders try to send at same time, both get garbled, both simply re-send later. –Problem: Stability: what if load increases? More collisions  less gets through  more resent  more load…  More collisions… Unfortunately: some sender may have started in clear, get scrambled without finishing

16 16 Arbitration One medium, multiple senders –What did we do for CPU, memory, readers/writers? –New Problem: No centralized control Approaches –TDMA: Time Division Multiple Access Divide time into slots, round robin among senders If you exceed the capacity  do not admit more (busy signal) –FDMA: Frequency Division Multiple Access (AMPS) Divide spectrum into channels, give each sender a channel If no more channels available, give a busy signal –Good for continuous streams: fixed delay, constant data rate –Bad for bursty Internet traffic: idle slots

17 17 Ethernet Developed in 1976, Metcalfe and Boggs at Xerox Uses CSMA/CD: –Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection Easy way to connect LANs Metcalfe’s Ethernet sketch

18 18 CSMA/CD Carrier Sense: –Listen before you speak Multiple Access: –Multiple hosts can access the network Collision Detection: –Can make out if someone else started speaking Older Ethernet Frame

19 19 CSMA Wait until carrier free

20 20 CSMA/CD Garbled signals If the sender detects a collision, it will stop and then retry! What is the problem?

21 21 CSMA/CD Packet? Sense Carrier Discard Packet Send Detect Collision Jam channel b=CalcBackoff(); wait(b); attempts++; No Yes attempts < 16 attempts == 16

22 22 Ethernet’s CSMA/CD (more) Jam Signal: make sure all other transmitters are aware of collision; 48 bits; Exponential Backoff: Goal: adapt retransmission attempts to estimated current load –heavy load: random wait will be longer Adaptive and Random –First time, pick random wait time with some initial mean. If collide again, pick random value from bigger mean wait time. Etc. –Randomness is important to decouple colliding senders –Scheme figures out how many people are trying to send! Example –first collision: choose K from {0,1}; delay is K x 512 bit transmission times –after second collision: choose K from {0,1,2,3}… –after ten or more collisions, choose K from {0,1,2,3,4,…,1023}

23 23 Packet Size If packets are too small, the collision goes unnoticed  Limit packet size  Limit network diameter  Use CRC to check frame integrity  truncated packets are filtered out

24 24 Ethernet Problems What if there is a malicious user? –Might not use exponential backoff –Might listen promiscuously to packets Integrating Fast and Gigabit Ethernet

25 25 Addressing & ARP ARP is used to discover physical addresses ARP = Address Resolution Protocol “What is the physical address of the host named 128.84.96.89” 128.84.96.90 128.84.96.89 128.84.96.91 “I’m at 1a:34:2c:9a:de:cc”

26 26 Addressing & RARP RARP is used to discover virtual addresses RARP = Reverse Address Resolution Protocol “I just got here. My physical address is 1a:34:2c:9a:de:cc. What’s my name ?” 128.84.96.90 RARP Server ??? 128.84.96.91 “Your name is 128.84.96.89”

27 27 Repeaters and Bridges Both connect LAN segments Usually do not originate data Repeaters (Hubs): physical layer devices –forward packets on all LAN segments –Useful for increasing range –Increases contention Bridges: link layer devices –Forward packets only if meant on that segment –Isolates congestion –More expensive

28 28 Backbone Bridge

29 29 Summary Data Link Layer –layer two of the seven-layer OSI model Layer two of the five-layer TCP/IP reference model as well. –Responds to service requests from the network layer and issues service requests to the physical layer. Broadcast vs Point-to-point –Point-to-point is often higher performance, but traditionally higher cost as well –Switched Ethernet is common now Data Link Layer Issues –Encoding: map bits to analog signals Manchester encoding –Framing: Group bits into frames (packets) Bit stuffing –Arbitration: multiple senders, one resource Ethernet uses CSMA/CD (carrier sense multiple access/collision detection) –Addressing: multiple receivers, one wire ARP (address resolution protocol)

30 The Network Layer

31 31 Review: OSI Levels Physical Layer –electrical details of bits on the wire Data Link Layer –sending “frames” of bits and error detection Network Layer –routing packets to the destination Transport Layer –reliable transmission of messages, disassembly/assembly, ordering, retransmission of lost packets Session Layer –really part of transport, typically Not implemented Presentation Layer –data representation in the message Application –high-level protocols (mail, ftp, etc.)

32 32 Review: OSI Levels Presentation Transport Network Data Link Physical Application Presentation Transport Network Data Link Physical Application Node A Node B Network Session

33 33 Review: OSI Levels Presentation Transport Network Data Link Physical Application Presentation Transport Network Data Link Physical Application Node A Node B Network Session Network Data Link Physical Router

34 34 Purpose of Network layer Given a packet, send it across the network to destination 2 key issues: –Portability: connect different technologies –Scalability To the Internet scale network data link physical network data link physical network data link physical network data link physical network data link physical network data link physical network data link physical network data link physical application transport network data link physical application transport network data link physical

35 35 What does it involve? Two important functions: routing: determine path from source to dest. forwarding: move packets from router’s input to output T1 T3 Sts-1 T3 T1

36 36 Network service model Q: What service model for “channel” transporting packets from sender to receiver? guaranteed bandwidth? preservation of inter-packet timing (no jitter)? loss-free delivery? in-order delivery? congestion feedback to sender? ? ? ? virtual circuit or datagram? The most important abstraction provided by network layer: service abstraction Which things can be “faked” at the transport layer?

37 37 Two connection models Connectionless (or “datagram”): –each packet contains enough information that routers can decide how to get it to its final destination Connection-oriented (or “virtual circuit”) –first set up a connection between two nodes –label it (called a virtual circuit identifier (VCI)) –all packets carry label B A bb C B A 11 C 1

38 38 Virtual circuits: signaling protocols used to setup, maintain teardown VC setup gives opportunity to reserve resources –used in ATM (Asynchronous Transfer Mode), frame-relay, X.25 (or OSI protocol suite) not used in today’s Internet application transport network data link physical application transport network data link physical 1. Initiate call 2. incoming call 3. Accept call 4. Call connected 5. Data flow begins 6. Receive data

39 39 Virtual circuit switching Forming a circuit: –send a connection request from A to B. Contains VCI + address of B VCI is the Virtual Circuit Identifier –rule: VCI must be unique on the link its used on –switch creates an entry mapping input messages with VCI to output port –switch picks a new VCI unique between it and next switch a b 2 5 2 1 c 1 2 1

40 40 (Input link,VCI) (output link, new VCI) (1, 2) (?, ?) (1, 5) (?, ?) Virtual circuit forwarding For each VCI switch has a table which maps input link to output link and gives the new VCI to use –if a’s messages come into switch 1 on link 2 and go out on link 3 then the table will be: a b 2 5 2 1 c 1 2 1 Switch 1 Switch 2 Switch 3

41 41 Virtual Circuits: Discussion Plusses: easy to associate resources with VC –Easy to provide QoS guarantees (bandwidth, delay) –Very little state in packet Minuses: –Not good in case of crashes Requires explicit connect and teardown phases –What if teardown does not get to all routers? –What if one switch crashes? Will have to teardown and rebuild route

42 42 Datagram networks no call setup at network layer routers: no state about end-to-end connections –no network-level concept of “connection” packets typically routed using destination host ID –packets between same source-dest pair may take different paths Best effort: data corruption, packet drops, route loops application transport network data link physical application transport network data link physical 1. Send data 2. Receive data

43 43 Datagrams: Forwarding How does packet get to the destination? switch creates a “forwarding table”, mapping destinations to output port (ignores input ports) when a packet with a destination address in the table arrives, it pushes it out on the appropriate output port when a packet with a destination address not in the table arrives, it must find out more routing information (next problem) a b c 1 d 2 2 0 0 S1 S2 S3 1 0 1

44 44 Datagrams Plusses: –No round trip connection setup time –No explicit route teardown –No resource reservation  each flow could get max bandwidth –Easily handles switch failures; routes around it Minuses –Difficult to provide resource guarantees –Higher per packet overhead Internet uses datagrams: IP (Internet Protocol)

45 45 Datagrams Forwarding How to build forwarding tables? –Manually enter it What if nodes crashed What about scale? The graph-theoretic routing problem –Given a graph, with vertices (switches), edges (links), and edge costs (cost of sending on that link) –Find the least cost path between any two nodes Path cost =  (cost of edges in path)

46 46 Simple Routing Algorithm Choose a central node –All nodes send their (nbr, cost) information to this node –Central node uses info to learn entire topology of the network –It then computes shortest paths between all pairs of nodes Using All Pair Shortest Path Algorithm –Sends the new matrix to every node Nice, simple, elegant! What is the problem? –Scalability: centralization hurts scalability –Central node is “crushed” with traffic

47 47 Link State Routing Basic idea: –Every node propagates its (nbr, cost) information –This information at all nodes is enough to construct topology –Can use a graph algorithm to find the shortest routes Mechanisms required: –Reliable flooding of link information –Method to calculate shortest route (Dijkstra’s algorithm) Example link state update packet: –[node id, (nbr, cost) list, seq. no., ttl] Seq. no. to identify latest updates, ttl specifies when to stop msg.

48 48 Reliable flooding receive(pkt) If already have a copy of LSP from pkt.ID or if pkt’s sequence number <= copy’s discard pkt else decrement pkt.TTL replace copy with pkt forward pkt to all links besides the one that we received it on # done every 10 minutes or so gen_LSP() increment node’s sequence # by one recompute cost vector send created LSP to all neighbors

49 49 Discussion: Link-State Routing Plusses: –Simple, determines the optimal route most of the time –Used by OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) Minuses: –Might have oscillations –Avoid using load as cost metric, reduce herding effect A D C B 1 1+e e 0 e 1 1 0 0 A D C B 2+e 0 0 0 1+e 1 A D C B 0 2+e 1+e 1 0 0 A D C B 2+e 0 e 0 1+e 1 Initially start with almost equal routes … everyone goes with least loaded … recompute Least loaded => Most loaded … recompute

50 50 Is our routing algo scalable? Route table size grows with size of network –Because our address structure is flat! Solution: have a hierarchical structure –Used by OSPF –Divide the network into areas, each area has unique number Nodes carry their area number in the address 1.A, 2.B, etc. –Nodes know complete topology in their area –Area border routers (ABR) know how to get to any other area

51 51 Hierarchical Addressing 1.a 3.b 2.b 1 1.b 2 2 0 0 S1 S2 S3 1 0 1 2.a 3 3.a 2 Zone 3 Zone 2 Forwarding table for switch 1 Destination switch port 2.? 3. ? 1.b ? 1.a ?

52 52 IP has 2-layer addressing Each IP address is 32 bits –Network part: which network the host is on? –Host part: identifies the host. All hosts on same network have the same network part 3 classes of addresses: A, B and C 18.26.0.1 network 32-bits host 0 net host 1 7 24 bits 1 0 net host 2 14 16 bits 110 net host 3 21 8 bits

53 53 IP addressing The different classes: Problems: inefficient, address space exhaustion –cornell.edu is a class B network (can address 64K hosts) –mit.edu is a class A network (can address 4M hosts) 0 network host 10 network host 110 networkhost 1110 multicast address A B C D class 1.0.0.0 to 127.255.255.255 128.0.0.0 to 191.255.255.255 192.0.0.0 to 223.255.255.255 224.0.0.0 to 239.255.255.255 32 bits Unicast Multicast 1111 reserved E 240.0.0.0 to 255.255.255.255 Reserved

54 54 IP addressing: CIDR Classless InterDomain Routing –network portion of address of arbitrary length –address format: a.b.c.d/x, where x is # bits in network portion –Examples: Class A: /8 Class B: /16 Class C: /24 11001000 00010111 00010000 00000000 network part host part 200.23.16.0/23

55 55 Internet Protocol Datagram ver length 32 bits data (variable length, typically a TCP or UDP segment) 16-bit identifier Internet checksum time to live 32 bit source IP address IP protocol version Number header length max number remaining hops (decremented at each router) for fragmentation/ reassembly total datagram length (bytes) upper layer protocol to deliver payload to head. len type of service “type” of data flgs fragment offset upper layer 32 bit destination IP address Options (if any) E.g. timestamp, record route taken, pecify list of routers to visit.

56 56 Datagram Portability IP Goal: To create one logical network from multiple physical networks –All intermediate routers should understand IP –IP header information sufficient to carry the packet to destination –Goal: Run over anything! Problem: –Physical networks have different MTUs (maximum transfer units) –“max. transmission unit”: 1500 for Ethernet, 48 for ATM Solution 1: –Fit everything in the MTU (!)

57 57 IP Fragmentation & Reassembly Solution 2: (the one used) –If packet size > MTU of network, then fragment into pieces Each fragment is less than MTU size Each has IP headers + frag bit set + frag id + offset –Packets may get refragmented on the way to destination –Reassembly only done at the destination –What is a good initial packet size? fragmentation: in: one large datagram out: 3 smaller datagrams reassembly

58 58 Summary Virtual Circuit –Plusses: easy to associate resources with VC Easy to provide QoS guarantees (bandwidth, delay) Very little state in packet –Minuses: Not good in case of crashes Datagrams –Plusses: Easily handles switch failures; routes around it No round trip connection setup time No explicit route teardown No resource reservation  each flow could get max bandwidth –Minuses Difficult to provide resource guarantees Higher per packet overhead –Forwarding Link-state routing: OSPF Hierarchical addressing: IP and OSPF


Download ppt "Networking II: The Link and Network Layers. 2 Announcements Prelim II will be Thursday, November 20 th, in class Homework 5 available later today, November."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google