Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

STAR J/  Simulations for RUN III Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Analysis Meeting at BNL October 23, 2002.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "STAR J/  Simulations for RUN III Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Analysis Meeting at BNL October 23, 2002."— Presentation transcript:

1 STAR J/  Simulations for RUN III Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Analysis Meeting at BNL October 23, 2002

2 STAR Simulations so far … Rejection/Efficiency: Working on AuAu low multiplicity simulations only up to now. Need dAu simulations, can probably get higher rejection with lower multiplicity events. Use S eff = S/(2B/S + 1) Background: Minbias Au+Au (only last weekend did d+Au begin running…) Select most peripheral 50% x-section: dN/d  = 11 (5.6 at 40%) to approx. d+Au multiplicity Signal: J/Psi simulated flat in pt and h to see efficiency vs pt Will use more realistic pt distribution to see where most signal sits. Throw one J/Psi in an empty event Need to also mix them into a background event. Using 3 cuts: Tower Energy (L0), Mass, Cos  L2)

3 STAR Algorithm 1) Approximate the electron daughters with towers (or clusters) Energy, Position 2) Obtain vertex from BBC timing 3) Need at least 2 towers to make a pair (could require this at L0?) 4) Take all selected towers and make all possible pairs M inv  2E 1 E 2 (1-cos(   )) 5) Do cuts in M and cos(  )… Still exploring possibilities Towers, clusters, cluster size?

4 STAR Algorithm : Need to explore various ideas What are the best energy thresholds to use? 1, 1.5, 2 GeV? Want acceptable resolution and not to kill the signal. First tested with Tower Energy only: resolution not good! Now testing various cluster approaches: 2 towers, or patches of various sizes (3x3, 5x5, 7x7, 9x9) Single Tower 2-Tower Cluster

5 STAR Acceptance and Trigger Efficiency J/  1) Done at mid-rapidity with full EMC 2) Trigger efficiency using Tower Energy (no clustering), and both towers with same threshold (1 GeV)

6 STAR Half EMC acceptance (pT -  ) Raw Accepted electrons with E>1 GeV, 0.1 <  < 0.9

7 STAR Acceptance and Trigger Efficiency (Half Emc, Cluster) Half Emc, 0.2 <  < 1

8 STAR J/  Mass at Level 2 Thrown mass L2 Mass, real E, real cos(  ) L2 Mass, cluster E, real cos(  ) L2 Mass, real E, cluster cos(  ) L2 Mass, cluser E and cos(  ) J/  flat in pt-  Background To do: simulate with some pT slope

9 STAR J/  Mass at Level 2 (from today!) Thrown mass L2 Mass, real E, real cos(  ) L2 Mass, cluster E, real cos(  ) L2 Mass, real E, cluster cos(  ) L2 Mass, cluser E and cos(  ) J/  with slope 600 MeV Background (w/ dAu) Rejection Factor at L2 for loose cuts: 35 Goal: ~48 KHz/1KHz not too far = 2.93, 2.68 GeV  M = 300, 668 MeV

10 STAR Decay Topology: large opening angle for most J/  Accepted J/  (flat in pt-  Background

11 STAR Isolation cuts… Compare tower (or “cluster”) energy to surrounding energy in patch For 3x3 patch Electrons

12 STAR To Do: Still many simulations and tests to do to arrive at a good L2 Algorithm: + Low multiplicity in d+Au will reduce the backgrounds - Signal is faint ~ “one in a million” - Half EMC drastically reduces acceptance  Need to try out l various patches, 3x3, 5x5 l Energy Thresholds l Mass Thresholds l Opening Angles l Isolation cuts


Download ppt "STAR J/  Simulations for RUN III Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Analysis Meeting at BNL October 23, 2002."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google