1. Attention I failures to select information

2. What is attention? How is the word used? Examples: –something bright caught my attention –I didn’t see you, I was paying attention to the game –I struggled to pay attention to the lecture –I don’t remember even cleaning the table, I must not have been paying attention Attention refers to many different kinds of mechanisms

3. Attention enhances some information and inhibits other information. The enhancement enables us to select some information for further processing The inhibition enables us to set some information aside. Attention

4. Attention and limits on information We need attention to limit the amount of information that is processed Why are there limits on the amount of information we can process? –limited sensory systems

5. Example 2: Fovea demo

7. David Hockney’s photo collage might be a metaphor for the way we see scenes 1 photo = 1 gaze

8. Attention and limits on information Human information processing is massively parallel, up to a point where we have serial bottlenecks Bottleneck: a restriction on the amount of information that can be processed at once forcing serial processing Serial bottlenecks: –limited sensory systems –limited effector systems movements must be planned sequentially words can only be spoken sequentially

9. Inattentional Blindness After bottleneck, it is the allocation of our attention that determines what is analyzed. Often, we are unable to process information that is unattended. This can lead to inattentional blindness (aka change blindness) Lots of demos: –http://viscog.beckman.uiuc.edu/djs_lab/demos.htmlhttp://viscog.beckman.uiuc.edu/djs_lab/demos.html –http://dualtask.org/Change_Blindness_Demo/ChangeBlindness.htmlhttp://dualtask.org/Change_Blindness_Demo/ChangeBlindness.html Airplane demo Dinner demo

10. Some of these demos are from: Simons & Levin, 1997, TINS, 1, 261-267

11. Inattentional Blindness Why is it hard to notice the change (initially)? When motion detection is disrupted, it is very difficult to observe changes to unattended image locations Brain makes reasonable assumption that things do not change unexpectedly (in the absence of motion cues).

12. DVD Demo of basketball players Task: count the number of times the white team passes the ball to each other Important to pay close attention to task (Simons & Chabris, Perception, 1999, 28, 1059 – 1074)

13. Other demo’s Dan Simons (University of Illinois): http://viscog.beckman.uiuc.edu/change/demolinks.shtml http://viscog.beckman.uiuc.edu/change/demolinks.shtml see also letter task: http://www.dualtask.org/http://www.dualtask.org/

14. Inattentional Blindness Shows there are remarkable gaps in our perception Human’s interpretation of the visual field is much sparser than the subjective experience of “seeing” suggests Our visual system might be overwhelmed without change blindness -- in a real-world setting with many moving objects, it might make sense to “track” only a few objects

15. Failures of Selection in Time When new information (even if only a small amount) arrives in a rapid stream, spending time processing it will cause you to miss some other incoming information, resulting in what are called failures of selection in time.

16. Attentional Blink Demos: http://www.rit.edu/~gssp400/Blink/blinkinstr.html http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/rpg/pc52/AB_Webscript/instr.html http://psych.hanover.edu/JavaTest/Cognition/Cognition/attentionalblink_instructions.html

17. Sources of Limitation The attentional blink is a short period during which incoming information is not registered, similar in effect to the physical blanking out of visual information during the blink of an eye. Divided-attention studies demonstrate that performance is hampered when you have to attend to two separate sources of visual information or two separate visual events. In all these cases, the decrement in performance is referred to as dual-task interference.

18. Disorders of Visual Attention

19. Hemispatial Neglect Cause –often a stroke that has interrupted the flow of blood to the right parietal lobe that is thought to be critical inattention and selection. Symptoms: –Failure to acknowledge objects in the field contralateral to the lesion Often no perceptual deficit –Neglect patients still activate visual regions in occipital lobes that they claim not to be aware of

20. Patients may: fail to dress the left side of their body disclaim “ ownership ” of left limbs not recognize familiar people presented on the left side deny the illness Neglect of the Visual Field

21. Difficulty crossing out items Difficulty copying items 55 y.o. right handed male R TPJ infarct (Mesulam, 2000)

22. Marshall and Halligan, 1993 Patients can neglect the left side of the object, rather than the left side of space. Black lines show expected left-sided person-centred versus red lines showing actual point where the patient neglected Visual neglect syndrome can be object-based Control Neglect patient

23. Visual neglect syndrome can be object-based  Patient with object neglect cannot detect differences on left side of an object even when falling into right side of space Driver and Halligan (1991)

24. Visual neglect syndrome can be object-based When a right neglect patient is shown a dumbbell that rotates, the patient continues to neglect the object that had been on the right, even though it is now on the left (Behrmann & Tipper, 1999).

25. Simultanagnosic (Balint Syndrome) patients only attend to one object at a time Simultanagnosic patients cannot judge the relative length of two lines, but they can tell that a figure made by connecting the ends of the lines is not a rectangle but a trapezoid (Holmes & Horax, 1919).

26. Balint patients can only attend to one object at a time even if they are overlapping Luria, 1959