Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Remote Virtual Machine Monitor Detection Jason Franklin, Mark Luk, Jonathan McCune, Arvind Seshadri, Adrian Perrig, Leendert van Doorn
2
Remote Virtual Machine Monitor Detection Problem Statement Determine if a remote machine is virtual or real Challenges VMM provides an accurate abstraction of the underlying hardware VMM controls execution of code and may return arbitrary values External Verifier Remote Machine Are you virtual?
3
VMM Detection and Botnets (1/2) Scenario 1 Bots may install a stealthy virtual machine based rootkit (VMBR) to avoid detection by traditional malware scanners Stealthy rootkits prevent administered machines from removing bots You run an AV, update, patch, yet never locate/remove the bot Detecting VMMs allows us to detect bots
4
VMM Detection and Botnets (2/2) Scenario 2 Bots may check for the existence of a VMM in order to prevent dynamic analysis “Detecting the sandbox” Real threat & mentioned several times yesterday Agobot uses a heuristic to check for VMWare Studying VMM detection helps us understand how to enable VMM-based dynamic analysis
5
State of the Art in VMM Detection Check for software-implementation artifacts Redpill checks the location of the IDT (different location under VMWare) VMWare’s Back checks for VMWare I/O port Other approaches Make restrictive assumptions Easy to thwart Require benchmarking
6
Our Goals Develop a VMM detection algorithm: VMM implementation independent Accurate Practical/relies on few assumptions Leverage fundamental differences between virtual and real machines
7
VMM Model Popek and Goldberg ’74 formally defined the properties a control program must satisfy to be deemed a VMM Efficiency Property Resource Control Property Equivalence Property Program execution in a virtual environment must be indistinguishable from execution in a real environment
8
Indistinguishable? Oh no! If a program executes indistinguishably, we can’t detect a virtual execution environment Don’t worry! There are exceptions to the equivalence property Timing dependency exception Certain sequences of instructions may take longer to execute Resource availability exception
9
Does the timing dependency exception necessarily exist? Empirically, yes. Programs executing in a VMM experience VMM overhead In theory, yes. Intuition is that VMM must maintain control of executing code by interposing on the operations or rewrite the binary
10
Exploiting the timing dependency exception to detect a VMM Algorithm: Given: Real machine R with configuration C e.g., C={Pentium IV, 2.0GHz} Remote machine M with configuration C Program P with control-modifying instructions 1: Time the execution of P on R and store the value in r 2: Time the execution of P on M and store the value in m 3: IF m > r + k THEN M is virtual [note: k is the detection constant] 4: ELSE M is real
11
Tasks Remaining Achieve accurate high-integrity execution timing Construct program P with externally noticeable VMM overhead Determine configuration of remote machine Determine detection constant k
12
Accurate High-Integrity Execution Timing Can’t trust the integrity of the timing measurements returned by the VMM Use an external source of time (e.g., remote machine, watch, etc…)
13
Constructing P with VMM Overhead P is a sequence of sensitive (potentially control modifying) instructions that requires VMM interposition P is designed to invoke VMM overhead Design decisions in developing P include: Sensitive instruction selection Number of instructions
14
Selecting Sensitive Instructions R/W cr3R/W cr2 R/W cr0cli
15
Number of Instructions in P Assume we have complete configuration information for remote machine M Easy to determine the number of instructions required to overcome experimental noise Variance in execution time Variance in network latency
16
Complete Configuration Information Given an estimate of the noise N in the environment (i.e., 10 ms variation in network latency) Select x s.t. FV(x) – RM(x) >> N Fastest VMM = FV(x) Real Machine = RM(x)
17
Incomplete Configuration Information Unreasonable to assume complete configuration information is available for a remote machine Use “hardware discovery” heuristic Intuition: certain properties of the underlying hardware are difficult to mask through the VMM and are unique to a particular architecture Discovering these hardware artifacts gives us partial configuration information about a remote machine
18
Incomplete Configuration Information Given a subset C’ of the complete configuration information C C = {Pentium IV, 2.0 GHz} and C’ = {Pentium IV} Bound the execution time of P on the fastest and slowest machines that satisfy C’ Works because P is CPU bound We can time the execution of P on a x GHz machine and then use the ratio of the fastest and slowest machines to bound the execution times
19
Hardware Discovery on the Pentium IV P4 has a unique trace cache which “shines” through the VMM With sequences of register-to-register arithmetic instructions without data hazards populate the trace cache of the Intel Pentium IV, a CPI of 1/3 is attainable Once an instruction sequence exceeds the trace cache’s size of 12KB, the CPI becomes 1
20
Remote Trace Cache Discovery 11264 instructions fit in the trace cache 11328 instructions exceeds the size of the trace cache A considerable jump in overhead occurs when the trace cache overflows
21
Putting it All Together Remotely timed overhead from reading and writing x86 Control Register 3 multiple times consecutively Despite not being included in our analysis, remote detection works against a machine running Xen with hardware virtualization support (HVM Xen) We conclude that hardware virtualization support is not sufficient to prevent VMM detection
22
Detection Algorithm Limitations VMM could tamper with execution of detection code Countermeasure: Leverage software-based attestation (Pioneer) VMM could prevent communication to external timer Countermeasure: Containment policy-based detection Receive incorrect response from hardware discovery heuristic VMM may be incorporated with OS Malware can still own the lowest layer Virtual-machine-based rootkits are a threat today
23
Conclusion Developed a remote VMM detection algorithm Attempts to be independent of VMM software implementation details Practical/relies on fewer assumptions than previous schemes Accurate, configurable, and effective over the Internet Hardware virtualization support is not sufficient to mask differences between real and virtual environments
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.