Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

PHYSIQUE MESOSCOPIQUE

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "PHYSIQUE MESOSCOPIQUE"— Presentation transcript:

1 PHYSIQUE MESOSCOPIQUE
IPCMS - DMONS Rodolfo Jalabert Dietmar Weinmann Post-docs: Jérôme Roccia (DMONS-DON) Guillaume Weick Etudiants: Guido Intronati (Strasbourg – Buenos Aires) Wojciech Szewc

2 Domaines de recherche :
Conductance à travers de systèmes fortement corrélés Relaxation du spin Transport dépendant de spin Nanoparticules métalliques Electronique moléculaire (G.W.) Courants permanents et interactions (D.W.) Décohérence et dissipation (R.J.)

3 Conductance à travers de systèmes fortement corrélés

4 Quantum transport universality interactions nano size non-local
effects individual object universality interactions size nano

5 Landauer: conductance from scattering
Two terminal conductance: - Separation of sample, leads and reservoirs - Mean field, quasi-particle scattering states at the Fermi energy - Equilibration in the reservoirs leads to dissipation - Contact resistance

6 Conductance through an interacting region
- Is the scattering approach still valid ? without inelastic process (zero temperature) embedding method - How do we calculate the transmission coefficient T ? persistent current for interacting region + leads Ground-state property!

7 Numerical implementation

8 Conductance through a correlated region
g decreases with U g decreases with LS W = 0 Mott insulator g ≈ 1 for LS odd Perfect conductance only with adiabatic contacts

9 Even-odd asymmetry and Coulomb blockade
LS odd: Resonance NS NS +1 electrons in the interacting region Coulomb blockade resonance (half filling) LS even: Transport involves charging energy U Interacting region is a barrier Observation of a parity oscillation in the conductance of atomic wires: R.H.M. Smit, et al, PRL ’03 Fabry-Perot interference in a nanotube electron waveguide Llang, et al, Nature ’01.

10 Can we describe an interacting region by
an effective one-particle scatterer? R = R+ + R- ohmic composition Quantum mechanics, non-locality S+ S- R ≠ R+ + R- S = S+ * S- Electron-electron interactions S ≠ S+ * S- non local effect !

11 Interaction-induced non-local effects
universal correction!

12 Conductance quantization
0.7 anomaly M.A. Topinka et al, Nature, 2001 Conductance quantization in a point contact D.A. Wharam et al, J. Phys. C, 1988

13 Nanoparticules métalliques

14 On the color of gold colloids - 1908
MIE THEORY On the color of gold colloids λ >> 2a in a metal: resonance pour surface plasmon

15 Plasmon resonance in free clusters
(visible) Bréchignac et al, PRL 1993 Photo-absorption cross section of 12C nucleus

16 TIME RESOLVED EXPERIMENTS, POMP-PROBE
Differential transmission (ps) (eV) ps ps ps ps f(E): juste une image naïve “Thermalisation” energy transfer to the matrix e-phonons scattering relaxation to the lattice cooling of the distribution correlated electrons collective modes nonthermal regime e-e & e-surface scattering, thermal distribution Bigot et al., Chem. Phys., 2000

17 COLLECTIVE AND RELATIVE COORDINATES
relative coordinates: mean field center of mass: harmonic oscillator One-particle potential: uniform jellium background with a Coulomb tail plasmon coupling: dipole field

18 SIZE-OSCILLATIONS OF THE LINEWIDTH
Drude, τ‾1 confinement, a < τ vF Kawabata & Kubo, 1966 Na Semiclassical approach gamma^osc: rough estimation (curve: from numerical integration) in addition of gamma^0 Nonmonotonic behavior !! Time-Dependent Local Density Approximation

19 PLASMON AS A COLLECTIVE EXCITATION
RPA eigenenergies : Emphasize the importance & relevance of this result restricted subspace additional subspace Plasmon = superposition of low-energy e-h coupled to high-energy e-h

20 SPIN DIPOLE EXCITATION dipole absorption cross-section

21 Décohérence et dissipation

22 Spin echo (Hahn) H  -H

23 M(t) = |y0| exp[+i(H0+S)t] exp[-iH0t] |y0|2
Loschmidt echo (fidelity) in the presence of a weak coupling to the environment |yH0(t) |yH(t) |yH0(t) H0 H H0 - H |yH0 , -H (2t) |y0 |y0 H=H0+S environment M(t) = |y0| exp[+i(H0+S)t] exp[-iH0t] |y0|2 How does M(t) depend on H0 , S , and t ?

24 Time-reversal focusing
C. Draeger, M. Fink, PRL 1997


Download ppt "PHYSIQUE MESOSCOPIQUE"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google