Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Verification and Validation of Programmable Logic Devices James A. Cercone Ph.D., P.E.,James A. Cercone Ph.D., P.E., Chair and Professor of Computer ScienceChair.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Verification and Validation of Programmable Logic Devices James A. Cercone Ph.D., P.E.,James A. Cercone Ph.D., P.E., Chair and Professor of Computer ScienceChair."— Presentation transcript:

1 Verification and Validation of Programmable Logic Devices James A. Cercone Ph.D., P.E.,James A. Cercone Ph.D., P.E., Chair and Professor of Computer ScienceChair and Professor of Computer Science WVU-TechWVU-Tech Michael A. BeimsMichael A. Beims Senior Systems EngineerSenior Systems Engineer Science Applications International CorporationScience Applications International Corporation Kenneth G. McGill National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s IV&V FacilityNational Aeronautics and Space Administration’s IV&V Facility Cercone 1 113/MAPLD 2004

2 Abbreviations: IV&V Independent Verification and Validation V&V Verification and Validation PL Programmable Logic FPGA Field Programmable Gate Array VHDL VLSI (Very Large Scale Integration) Hardware Design Language Cercone 2 113/MAPLD 2004

3 PLD/FPGA Software Designs are tested for – –Functionality – –Boundary conditions – –Operational simulation, electrical criteria Designs are not routinely subjected to – –Formal Verification and Validation (V&V) – –Independent Verification and Validation Existing V&V methods adaptable to designs (e.g. Fagan and Gibbs inspections) Cercone 3 113/MAPLD 2004

4 Pilot Project Utilize a current NASA Space System Project A good candidate has – –Significant reliance on PL devices for critical spacecraft control. – –Significant reliance on PL devices for critical science instrument functionality. – –An ongoing IV&V process with an interface to the Project Cercone 4 113/MAPLD 2004

5 Relevance to Safety and Mission Assurance Design methodologies for PLD/FPGAs widely vary Design teams do not always follow the proven practices of software design Problems observed in design reviews at satellite vendors Late in life cycle hardware changes have been driven by faulty PLD logic Cercone 5 113/MAPLD 2004

6 Some types of defects May go undetected during compilation and simulation Reset related: – –Reset inputs derived from sources external to FPGA – –Outputs and internal inputs in unknown state during reset Clocking related: – –Poor clocking strategies – –Asynchronous designs crossing clocking barriers Cercone 6 113/MAPLD 2004

7 Types of Defects (cont.) Coding practices related:Coding practices related: –Coding style – mixing of structural and behavioral modeling –Unstable and unnecessary code “circuitry” included in design –Inappropriate use of commercial core codeware State Machine related:State Machine related: –Poor design of state machines (such as unintentional race and dynamic hazards) –Incorporation of “One Hot” design Finite State Machine Designs that have excess unused states Transient related:Transient related: –Susceptibility to single event effects –Startup transients created by unused (programmed) input/output pin connections Cercone 7 113/MAPLD 2004

8 Methods and Procedures Collection of existing PLD/FPGA fault data from NASA users On site visits and direct contact with NASA PLD/FPGA designers Investigate V&V methodologies that may be adapted – –Inspections: Fagan and Gibbs Other Software Code analysis methods – –Consideration of compiler specific variations Attributes not apparent during simulation (e.g. the number of flip-flops used for finite state machines.) Cercone 8 113/MAPLD 2004

9 Technology Transfer Appears to be a critical need for an upcoming space telescope – –Large number of FPGA’s for domain specific optimized data compression – –High complexity logic – –Numerous design iterations – –Size of the logic may need a larger die late in the life cycle of the instrument Results applicable to other developers – –A spacecraft related to this telescope experienced an FPGA design defect that required a hardware change late in the life cycle Results can be applied to future missions Cercone 9 113/MAPLD 2004

10 Success Criteria a) Identify PLD/FPGA design logic faults. b) Identify applicable existing methodologies by tracing design defects to their common cause. c) Suggest enhancements to the design phase, peer and design reviews. d) Provide field prototyped training materials for PL software V&V. e) Successfully complete a pilot project. Cercone 10 113/MAPLD 2004

11 Uniqueness of Research FPGA “software” is not currently required to undergo V&V evaluation according to: – –Previous studies and standards such as the FAA – DO-254 – –Some European based studies No specific / current guideline for PLD/FPGA IV&V – –Methodology has not evolved much beyond the classical sequential development methodology of: specify requirements, create the design, code, simulate and test. Cercone 11 113/MAPLD 2004

12 Research Team James A. Cercone Ph.D., P.E., Chair and Professor of Computer Science WVU-Tech Michael A. Beims Senior Systems Engineer Science Applications International Corporation William Clark Associate Professor of Computer Science WVU-Tech Sidney Valentine Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering Technology WVU-Tech Cercone 12 113/MAPLD 2004


Download ppt "Verification and Validation of Programmable Logic Devices James A. Cercone Ph.D., P.E.,James A. Cercone Ph.D., P.E., Chair and Professor of Computer ScienceChair."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google