1. Observational Evidence for Black Holes in Globular Clusters Karl Gebhardt (UT Austin)

2. Results to Date from Dynamical Studies M15 has been painful for many years Gerssen et al. 2003 claim a 2000 Msun BH from radial vels Baumgardt et al. 2003 say no evidence McNamara et al. 2003 say no evidence from proper motions G1 Gebhardt, Rich, & Ho claim 2e4 Msun BH Baumgardt et al. 2003 say no evidence New data being analyzed NGC 6752 Drukkier et al. 2003 claim large M/L increase from pm’s Xie et al. 2003 claim little M/L increase from radial vels Colpi et al. 2003 use pulsars to argue for something massive

3. Current BH/sigma correlation using published results

4. Comparing M15 radial velocities with proper motions (McNamara et al), using distance as measured from Kraft and Ivans 2003 (11.2 kpc )

5. Comparison with Baumgardt et al dispersion profile, including a BH of 1700 Msun.

6. Models with adding a BH to Baumgardt profile for the 100% and 0% ns population

7. G1 with WFPCG1 with HRC

12. NGC6752 Pulsar Strangeness

13. Rotation in Galactic clusters

14. Central Rotation in Galactic clusters

20. Central Surface Brightness Profiles

22. BH/sigma correlation using isotropic models

23. Conclusions M15 and G1 still have black holes as the best fitting model central light profiles for clusters show a range of slopes rotation in clusters is important to consider many clusters show a statistically significant increase in the central rotation, which has a PA that is not correlated with that of the main body rotation