Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Comparison of Power Depositions X. Ding, D. B. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg, BNL Collaboration Meeting July 2, 2010.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Comparison of Power Depositions X. Ding, D. B. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg, BNL Collaboration Meeting July 2, 2010."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Comparison of Power Depositions X. Ding, D. B. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg, BNL Collaboration Meeting July 2, 2010

2 2 Part 1: Vary Shielding Material

3 3 Part1: Introduction Using MARS15 to study energy deposition. Study II geometry and magnetic field map. Using optimized target parameters for Hg jet & Proton Beam (length of 75cm on z- axis, radius of 4mm for target, tilt of 78.13 mrad for beam and 96.68mrad for Hg Jet to z-axis). The number of particles in a given pulse of beam (4MW, 8GeV) is 3.125*10 15 s -1.

4 4 Part 1: Target Geometry Res Sol Hg Jet SC1 SC2 SC3 SC4 SC5 FeCo Pre-Trgt Air BeWindow (z=600cm) Hg Pool WC Shield STST Bottle Hg Jet

5 5 Part 1: Power Deposition 8GeV & 4MW Proton beam Shielding Material Density (g/cm 3 ) Power Dep. In SC1 (kW) Power Dep. in Shielding material (kW) 80%WC+20%Water12.68 24.7801828 100%HG13.54633.1151668 100%W19.320.6051903 60%W+40%HG16.99423.9151768

6 6 Part 1: Power Deposition 8GeV & 4MW Proton beam Shielding Material Assumed Density (g/cm 3 ) Power Dep. In SC1 (kW) Power in Shielding material (kW) TA (Z=73)13.546 29.961757 W (Z=74)13.54628.961807 AU (Z=79)13.54632.5451668.5 HG (Z=80)13.54633.1151668 PB (Z=82)13.54633.8051714 BI (Z=83)13.54631.354589 (unbelievable ?) ( Increase from low energy neutrons)

7 7 Part 2: Beryllium Target

8 8 Part 2: Introduction Using MARS15 to study energy deposition. Study II geometry and magnetic field map. Using optimized target parameters for Beryllium Target & Proton Beam (length of 70cm on z-axis, radius of 6mm for Be target, tilt of 45 mrad for both target and beam to z-axis). The number of particles in a given pulse of beam (4MW, 8GeV) is 3.125*10 15 s -1.

9 9 Part 2: Target Geometry

10 10 Part 2: Power Deposition (PD) and Meson Production TargetPD in SC1 (kW)PD in WC Shield (kW) Beryllium12.0951888.5 Mercury24.7801828 TargetMesonsMesons normalized to beam power (Mesons/Protons/GeV) Beryllium183440.02293 Mercury282400.03530 TargetBeam power (MW) MesonsScaled Beam Power (MW) Scaled Mesons Beryllium6.15828240 Mercury428240 Proton beam: 8GeV & 4MW; Shielding: 80%WC+20%Water KE Cut: 40MeV<KE<180MeV

11 11 Part 2: Distribution of Energy Deposition Beryllium Mercury

12 12 Part 2: Power Depositions Proton beam: 8GeV & 4MW; Shielding: 80%WC+20%Water Regional Name MercuryBeryllium Power [kW] Scaled Power [kW] WC Shield18281888.52907.285 Hg Pool13.285 Hg Jet378.6 Beryllium Target145.5223.99 Be Window2.841.121.724 STST Bottle416.25687.751058.769 Resistive Sol116.859.8592.137 Fe Plug11.3710.77

13 13 Part 2: Energy Deposition Proton beam: 8GeV & 4MW; Shielding: 80%WC+20%Water Regional Name MercuryBeryllium Power [kW] Scaled Power [kW] SC124.7812.09518.62 SC22.7691.95753.014 SC31.09450.84351.299 SC40.3760.76551.178 SC50.0710.4390.676 SC60.0710.2770.426 SC72.33313.89521.39 SC80.9925.859.0 SC90.60753.75055.774 SC100.2752.6414.066 SC110.3331.7362.673 SC120.2321.442.217 SC131.9758.9213.73


Download ppt "1 Comparison of Power Depositions X. Ding, D. B. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg, BNL Collaboration Meeting July 2, 2010."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google