1. Exoplanet Transits with mini-SONG Licai Deng @ NAOC Presented for the NJU group

2. mini-SONG 50cm 2 channel, with dual tube (not really needed, UVI case). 20’x20’ FOV (limited by budget). For SONG-north (where photometry will likely be missing (luck imaging)). Chinese team really want to have that capability for a number of reasons, And, more importantly, want to make good use of that capability

3. Do what mini-SONG is really good at ! There are tons of small telescopes out there with similar or better instruments What makes mini-SONG unique is the SONG network and the way it schedules observations: – High duty cycle, long time baseline – Identical instruments – Can follow ToOs at any time

4. Given all these, we should Stay focus, and just like SONG, stare at only a few targets for the major goals The targets should contain as many stars as possible to accommodate a variety of interests on stellar variabilities All those made us decided to go for open clusters. (need careful selection)

5. Searching for transiting planets in open clusters with mini-SONG Hui Zhang & Ji-Lin Zhou College of Astronomy and Space Science Nanjing University

6. What do we prepare to do? High accuracy, continual photometry observations in a series of open clusters Why do we choose stellar clusters? Stellar members have almost the same age, composition and dynamic environment within a cluster.  know one, know all Stellar members are well studied within a cluster  higher certainty of mass, radius, temperature and distance. Why is the Open Cluster?

7. Characteristics of open cluster ： statistical results of 2094 open clusters Very young stars ： many stars with age of only million years  proto-stellar disk is expected  constraint on the life time of protostellar disk Low metallicity:  the least metallicity required by the formation of planet Diameter < 20’,suit for the FOV of mini-SONG 20’x20’ Stellar density is not too dense nor too low diameter ： most< 20 arcminmetallicity ： -0.8~0.2 age ： 10 6 ~10 10 yr

8. What can we get? – Scientific goals A: Search transiting planets in a series open clusters with varied metallicity  The planet frequency as a function of the metallicity of host star B: Search proto-stellar or debris disk in a series open clusters with varied age, mass and metallicity  The frequency of debris disk and its life time versus the mass, metallicity of the host star C: Detect the spin of stars by analysis their light curves  The relation between spin, age and mass of star  Higher certainties on the mass, radius of planets in the same cluster

9. A. Planet frequency VS. Metallicity of host star Lack of planet around low metallicity stars ： Observation bias ： It is more difficult to detect low mass planet  lack of giant planet around low metallicity star  lack of giant planet around young stars (low metallicity)  time scale required by giant planet formation (agree with the gas accretion time scale ？ ) Formation mechanism ： It is hard to form planet core in a low metallicity proto- stellar disk  Prove a core accretion theory? Lack of planet around low metallicity stars?

10. A. Planet frequency VS. Metallicity of host star Lack of long period planet around low metallicity stars ： Observation bias ： It is hard to detect long period planet around young stars (low metallicity and active) Formation mechanism ： Core accretion theory: Metallicity elements tends to condense at the inner part of the proto-stellar disk Gravitational instability theory: The fragmentation usually happens at the outer part of the disk. Low metallicity makes it even harder. Lack of long period planet around low metallicity stars

11. B. Proto-stellar disk induced light variation AA Tau-likeSpot-likeIrregular. Number VS. Period of two type of disk in NGC2264 The peak at 3~5 days period is coincide with the peak of the hot-Jupiter, the inner boundary of disk? Spot-like AA Tau-like The light variation patterns indicate different type of proto-stellar disks. The variation is caused by the warp of inner disk controlled by magnetic field. (Alencar et al. 2010) The problem is how to distinguish the disk

12. C. The spin-age-mass relation of star Sunspot induced light variation ( Meibom, et al. 2011) Use the slowing spin rate as a clock to measure the age of a star. By Meibom, et al. 2011 How to measure the spin of a star?

13. C. The spin-age-mass relation of star Light curve  Spin rate of star  Spin ~ age 1/2 Law  Age of a star U-V photometry  Color magnitude  Mass of a star  Spin-Age-Mass relation Appling on other stars with planets in the same cluster  planet frequency VS. age of star  born time and life time of planet By Meibom, et al. 2011

14. On going projects ： Space ： Kepler ： NGC 6866, NGC 6811, NGC 6819, NGC 6791 Corot ： NGC2264 Ground ： PISCES: NGC 6791 ， NGC 2158, NGC 188 STEPSS: NGC 1245 MONITOR: ONC ， NGC 2362 ， h & c Per ， IC 4665 ， NGC 2547 ， Blanco 1 ， M50 ， NGC 2516 ， M34 EXPLORE-OC: NGC 2660 ， NGC 6208 Others: M37(Hartman,et al,2007), NGC 7789(Bramich,et al.,2005), NGC 6940(Hood, et al.,2005) A few candidates are found, None of planet is confirmed!

15. It is probably because: 1.The sample is too small. The Kepler project suggests the frequency of hot-Jupiter (and Neptune) is around 5%. However only part of stellar members of a open cluster are bright enough to perform high accuracy photometry.  Need deep field observation (10% accuracy at V<20 ). 2.The continual observation is not long enough: Peak of period is around 3~5 days  At least 10-days uninterrupted observation Peak at 3-5days

16. It is probably because: 3.The dynamic environment of open cluster is not suit for planet formation. So far, no planet is found in old and high metallicity open cluster as well.  If we really can not find any planet in any open cluster (very hard to believe!)  A great challenge to the planet formation theory!!

17. Our scheme 8 open clusters are chosen (preliminary version) Varied age, suitable diameter (20’x20’), has not been observed yet Observation schedule: 5-minutes exposal V and R band 10-15days uninterrupted observation for a single cluster 50cm aperture 300s exposal Limit magnitude vs. SNR 1” seeing

18. Targets (preliminary) ClusterRAJ2000DEJ2000DiamDistE(B-V)Age h:m:sd:m:sarcminpcmag[log 10 yr] IC 5146215324471600208520.5936 NGC 189305 22 4433 24 422560000.456.48 NGC 217506 09 392029122216270.5986.953 NGC 193105 31 253414421730860.7387.002 NGC 69132023573830301011480.7447.111 NGC 216806 08 5424 20 00409120.28.25 NGC 166204 48 2710 56 12204370.3048.625 NGC 688520 12 0126 28 42205970.089.16 NGC 268208 51 1811 48 00259080.0599.409 Increasing age

19. Example: NGC 1893 Very young stellar cluster: 10^6.48 yr total 1483 stars –VRI class 0/I/II: 1068 –VRI diskless: 415 ( 200 V<20 ) 3-6 candidates expected! V bandR band 865 V<201195 R<20