Breakdown of the adiabatic approximation in low-dimensional gapless systems Anatoli Polkovnikov, Boston University Vladimir Gritsev Harvard University.
Published byModified over 5 years ago
Presentation on theme: "Breakdown of the adiabatic approximation in low-dimensional gapless systems Anatoli Polkovnikov, Boston University Vladimir Gritsev Harvard University."— Presentation transcript:
Breakdown of the adiabatic approximation in low-dimensional gapless systems Anatoli Polkovnikov, Boston University Vladimir Gritsev Harvard University AFOSR
Adiabatic theorem in quantum mechanics http://lab-neel.grenoble.cnrs.fr/themes/nano/fe8/15.gif
Adiabatic theorem in QM suggests adiabatic theorem in thermodynamics: 1.Transitions are unavoidable in large gapless systems. 2.Phase space available for these transitions decreases with Hence expect Is there anything wrong with this picture? Hint: low dimensions. Similar to Landau expansion in the order parameter.
More specific reason. Equilibrium: high density of low-energy states destruction of the long-range order, strong quantum or thermal fluctuations, breakdown of mean-field descriptions. Dynamics population of the low-energy states due to finite rate breakdown of the adiabatic approximation.
This talk: three regimes of response to the slow ramp: A.Mean field (analytic): B.Non-analytic C.Non-adiabatic
Example: crossing a second order phase transition. tuning parameter tuning parameter gap t, 0 t, 0 Gap vanishes at the transition. No true adiabatic limit! How does the number of excitations scale with ? Non-analytic regime B.
Transverse field Ising model. There is a phase transition at g=1. This problem can be exactly solved using Jordan-Wigner transformation:
Spectrum : Critical exponents: z= =1 d /(z +1)=1/2. Correct result (J. Dziarmaga 2005): Linear response (Fermi Golden Rule): A. P., 2003 Interpretation as Kibble-Zurek mechanism: W. H. Zurek, U. Dorner, Peter Zoller, 2005
Possible breakdown of the Fermi-Golden rule (linear response) scaling due to bunching of bosonic excitations. Zero temperature.
Most divergent regime: Agrees with the linear response. Assuming the system thermalizes
Same at a finite temperature. d=1,2 d=1; d=2; d=3 Artifact of the quadratic approximation or the real result?
Numerical verification (bosons on a lattice). Expand dynamics in powers of U/Jn 0 (Truncated Wigner method + more, very accurate for these parameters.)
Results (1d, L=128) Predictions : finite temperature zero temperature zero temperature
Conclusions. A.Mean field (analytic): B.Non-analytic C.Non-adiabatic Three generic regimes of a system response to a slow ramp: There are interesting and open problems beyond computing Z for various models.