Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court"— Presentation transcript:

1 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court
+ +

2 Personal (Territorial)
Jurisdiction Power Process Minimum Contacts + Substantial Justice & Fair Play Presence? Consent? Domicile?

3 Personal Jurisdiction
ala Yeazell Basis Process Power Consent Minimum Contacts + Substantial Justice & Fair Play Presence Domicile

4 CONSENT CLAUSES The Options
Jurisdictional Waiver Clause John Rudzewicz appoints Alyssa Vegter, resident in Miami, Florida, as his agent for service of process.

5 CONSENT CLAUSES The Options
Jurisdictional Waiver Clause Effect permits, doesn’t require, suit in specified place waives defendant’s jurisdictional objections ½ way to forum clause Valid? Upheld Nat’l Equipment Rental, p. 168

6 CONSENT CLAUSES The Options (cont.)
Choice of Law Clause The parties agree that any litigation arising out of this agreement shall be governed by the law of Florida.

7 CONSENT CLAUSES The Options (cont.)
Choice of Law Clause Effect Specifies applicable law Doesn’t affect where lawsuit is heard Validity Cf. Burger King, p. 141 Permissible to specify “law of Japan”? See Rule 44.1 Limits?

8 CONSENT CLAUSES The Options (cont.)
Forum Selection Clause The parties agree that any litigation arising out of this agreement shall be brought in the Dade County Circuit Court in Miami

9 CONSENT CLAUSES The Options (cont.)
Forum Selection Clause Effect Specifies where litigation must be brought Validity Upheld Carnival Cruise Lines, p. 169

10 CONSENT CLAUSES The Options (cont.)
The Cognovit Note John Rudzewicz appoints Ali Tarbox as his agent for the purpose of confessing judgment.

11 CONSENT CLAUSES The Options (cont.)
The Cognovit Note Effect Lawsuit filed Agent appears for SP & admits allegations Rare (often forbidden by state statute) Validity upheld if “knowing waiver” and consideration Overmyer v. Frick (p. 174)

12 CO NSENT CLAUSES The O ptions (cont.)
The Cognovit Note To challenge Defendant becomes plaintiff seeks to reopen judgment already entered See Rule 60

13 THE POWER OF FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES
Which of the pj cases we’ve already studied could have been resolved by inserting a forum selection clause? (p. 173, note 3a.) Does that mean lawyer commits malpractice by not including one in every contract? (p. 173, note 2b)

14 REVIEW OF PJ RULES Carnival Cruise Lines v. Shutes, p. 169
Review of Personal Jurisdiction Absent forum selection clause Where could Shutes have sued? Where could Carnival have sued? Obstacles?

15 SKILLS: READING CASES Carnival Cruise Lines v. Shutes, p. 169
Rule Choice Options? Court’s Rule Choice? Do you agree? Why?

16 SKILLS: READING CASES Identifying Black Letter Law
What test did the court apply ? Forum clause in form contract upheld if Reasonable Satisfies fundamental fairness Not inserted in bad faith Not used to discourage claims No fraud, etc. to gain consent Notice

17 SKILLS: ARGUING FROM PRECEDENT
Hypothetical: Consent on the Internet WA Brandon owns Divine Chocolates. Sells chocolates over internet. Forum selection clause – KC Superior Ct Must NY Beth sue Brandon in KC?

18 TAKE AWAYS Conceptual Frameworks
How does consent fit into the PJ framework?

19 TAKEAWAYS Consent Clauses Black Letter Law
Lawyers respond to legal doctrine Recognize what consent clauses do Black Letter Law Forum clauses enforceable if Satisfy fundamental fairness Not discourage legitimate claims


Download ppt "CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google