Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Some problems in BEM applications J. T. Chen 陳正宗 特聘教授 Department of Harbor and River Engineering National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan March.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Some problems in BEM applications J. T. Chen 陳正宗 特聘教授 Department of Harbor and River Engineering National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan March."— Presentation transcript:

1

2 1 Some problems in BEM applications J. T. Chen 陳正宗 特聘教授 Department of Harbor and River Engineering National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan March 1, 2005 Presentation for 台科大營建系

3 2 Overview of BIE and BEM Mathematical tools Hypersingular BIE Degenerate kernel Circulants SVD updating term SVD updating document Fredholm alternative theorem Nonuniqueness and its treatments Degenerate scale Degenerate boundary True and spurious eigensolution (interior prob.) Fictitious frequency (exterior acoustics) Corner Conclusions and further research Outlines

4 3 Related works since 1984 Research topics of NTOU MSV LAB (1984-2005)

5 4 Numerical phenomena (Degenerate scale) Error (%) of torsional rigidity a 0 5 125 Previous approach : Try and error on a Present approach : Only one trial

6 5 Numerical phenomena (Fictitious frequency) t(a,0)

7 6 Numerical phenomena (Spurious eigensolution)

8 7 Numerical phenomena (Degenerate boundary) Singular integral equation Hypersingular integral equation Cauchy principal valueHadamard principal value Boundary element method Dual boundary element method degenerate boundary normal boundary

9 8 Numerical phenomena (Corner) Boundary

10 9 Motivation Numerical instability occurs in BEM ? (1) degenerate scale (2) degenerate boundary (3) fictitious frequency (4) corner Spurious eigenvalues appear ? (5) true and spurious eigenvalues Five pitfalls in BEM Mathematical essence—rank deficiency ? (How to deal with ?) nonuniqueness ?

11 10 Mathematical tools Hypersingular BIE Degenerate kernel Circulants SVD updating term SVD updating document Fredholm alternative theorem

12 11 Mathematical tools Hypersingular BIE Degenerate kernel Circulants SVD updating term SVD updating document Fredholm alternative theorem

13 12 Dual integral equations for a boundary point Singular integral equation Hypersingular integral equation where U(s,x) is the fundamental solution.

14 13 Mathematical tools Hypersingular BIE Degenerate kernel Circulants SVD updating term SVD updating document Fredholm alternative theorem

15 14 Degenerate kernel (step1) Step 1 S x R x: variable s: fixed

16 15 Degenerate kernel (step2, step3) x s A B Step 2 RARA Step 3 x B A s RBRB

17 16 Mathematical tools Hypersingular BIE Degenerate kernel Circulants SVD updating term SVD updating document Fredholm alternative theorem

18 17 Circulant

19 18 Mathematical tools Hypersingular BIE Degenerate kernel Circulants SVD updating term SVD updating document Fredholm alternative theorem

20 19 SVD Diagonal matrix Unitary matrix,

21 20 Direct method for Dirichlet B. C. : SVD updating terms SVD updating terms Singular equation (UT method) Hypersingular equation (LM method)

22 21 Mathematical tools Hypersingular BIE Degenerate kernel Circulants SVD updating term SVD updating document Fredholm alternative theorem

23 22 For double-layer potential approach: SVD updating documents A b x

24 23 Mathematical tools Hypersingular BIE Degenerate kernel Circulants SVD updating term SVD updating document Fredholm alternative theorem

25 24 Fredholm ’ s alternative theorem: For solving an algebraic system: Fredholm alternative theorem Alternative theorem Infinite solution No solution : the transpose conjugate matrix of where  satisfies

26 25 1.Degenerate scale for torsion bar problems 2.Degenerate boundary problems 3.True and spurious eigensolution for interior eigenproblem 4.Fictitious frequency for exterior acoustics 5. Corner Five pitfalls in BEM

27 26 The degenerate scale for torsion bar using BEM Error (%) of torsional rigidity a 0 5 125 Previous approach : Try and error on a Present approach : Only one trial

28 27 Direct searching for the degenerate scale Trial and error---detecting zero singular value by using SVD [Lin (2000) and Lee (2001)] Determination of the degenerate scale by trial and error

29 28 Cross Section Normal scale Torsional rigidity Reference equation, where, x on B,. 1.4480 1.45091.5539 (N.A.)2.6972 (N.A.)6.1530 (6.1538) Expansion ratio 0.5020 (0.5) 0.5019 (0.5)0.5254 (N.A.)0.6902 (N.A.)0.8499 (0.85) Degenerate scale R=1.0040 (1.0) = 2.0058 (2.0)a=1.0508 (N.A.)h=2.0700 (N.A.)a=0.8499 (0.85) h R a b 2a2a 2a2a Determination of the degenerate scale for the two-dimensional Laplace problems Note: Data in parentheses are exact solutions. Data marked in the shadow area are derived by using the polar coordinate.

30 29 Three regularization techniques to deal with degenerate scale problems in BEM Hypersingular formulation (LM equation) Adding a rigid body term (U*(s,x)=U(s,x)+c) CHEEF concept

31 30 Degenerate scale for torsion bar problems with arbitrary cross sections 0.1840.50 Unregularized Regularized c=1.0 Shifting Normal scale Original degenerate scale New degenerate scale

32 31 Degenerate scale for torsion bar problems with arbitrary cross sections 

33 32 Normal scale ( =3.0, =1.0) Degenerate scale ( =1.5, =0.5) Normal scaleDegenerate scale Analytical solution 8.48230.53012.2491.174 U T Conventional BEM 8.7623 (3.30%)-0.8911 (268.10%)2.266 (0.76%)2.0570 (75.21%) L M formulation 0.4812 (9.22%)1.1472 (2.31%) Add a rigid body term c=1.0 0.5181 (2.26%)1.1721(0.19%) c=2.0 0.5176 (2.36%)1.1723 (0.17%) CHEEF concept 0.5647 (6.53%) CHEEF POINT (2.0, 2.0) 1.1722 (0.18%) CHEEF POINT (5.0, 5.0) Ellipse 2a2a 2a2a Square cross section Torsion rigidity method Regularization techniques are not necessary. (a=1.0)(a=0.85) Numerical results Note: data in parentheses denote error.

34 33 Normal scale h=3.0 Degenerate scale h=2.07 Normal scaleDegenerate scale Analytical solution 3.11770.706712.64880.9609 U T Conventional BEM 3.1829 (2.09%)1.1101 (57.08%)12.5440 (0.83%)1.8712 (94.73%) L M formulation 0.6837 (3.25%)0.9530 (0.82%) Add a rigid body term c=1.0 0.7035 (0.45%)0.9876 (2.78%) c=2.0 0.7024 (0.61%)0.9879 (2.84%) CHEEF concept 0.7453 (5.46%) CHEEF POINT (15.0, 15.0) 0.9272 (3.51%) CHEEF POINT (20.0, 20.0) Triangle Keyway cross section Torsion rigidity method Regularization techniques are not necessary. (a=2.0)(a=1.05) Numerical results Note: data in parentheses denote error. h a b

35 34 Error using three methods

36 35 Multiply-connected problem

37 36 1.Degenerate scale for torsion bar problems 2.Degenerate boundary problems 3.True and spurious eigensolution for interior eigenproblem 4.Fictitious frequency for exterior acoustics 5. Corner Five pitfalls in BEM

38 37 Engineering problems Thin-airfoill Aerodynamics Seepage with sheetpiles 12 3 4 56 7 8 oblique incident water wave Free water surface I IIIII Pseudo boundary O S x S y d z  x Top view O

39 38 Degeneracy of the Degenerate Boundary geometry node the Nth constant or linear element (0,0) (-1,0.5) (-1,-0.5) (1,0.5) (1,-0.5) 12 3 4 56 7 8 N 5(+) 6(+) 5(+) 6(-) 5(+) 6(+) 5(+) 6(+) 5(+) 6(+) 5(+) 6(-) 5(+) 6(-) 5(+) 6(-)

40 39 The constraint equation is not enough to determine the coefficient p and q, Another constraint equation is required Theory of dual integral equations

41 40 Successful experiences

42 41 X-ray detection

43 42 FEM simulation

44 43 Stress analysis

45 44 BEM simulation

46 45 V-band structure (Tien-Gen missile)

47 46 FEM simulation

48 47

49 48 Shong-Fon II missile

50 49 IDF

51 50 Flow field

52 51 Seepage flow

53 52 Meshes of FEM and BEM

54 53 Screen in acoustics b a e c t=0

55 54 Water wave problem Free water surface S x Top view O y z O x z S breakwater oblique incident water wave

56 55 Reflection and Transmission

57 56 Cracked torsion bar

58 57

59 58

60 59 Dual BEM Degenerate boundary problems u=0 r=1 u=0 r=1 u=0 r=1 interface Subdomain 1 Subdomain 2 Subdomain 1 Subdomain 2 Multi-domain BEM

61 60 Conventional BEM in conjunction with SVD Singular Value Decomposition Rank deficiency originates from two sources: (1). Degenerate boundary (2). Nontrivial eigensolution N d= 5 N d= 4

62 61 Dual BEM Multi-domain BEM UT BEM + SVD (Present method) versus k Determinant versus k

63 62 Two sources of rank deficiency (k=3.09) N d= 5 None trivial sol. EigensolutionDegenerate boundary

64 63 k=3.14 k=3.82 k=4.48 UT BEM+SVD k=3.09 k=3.84k=4.50 FEM (ABAQUS)

65 64 1.Degenerate scale for torsion bar problems 2.Degenerate boundary problems 3.True and spurious eigensolution for interior eigenproblem 4.Fictitious frequency for exterior acoustics 5. Corner Five pitfalls in BEM r2r2 r1r1

66 65 11 k r2r2 r1r1 r 1 =0.5 m r 2 =2.0 m Spurious eigenvalue of membrane

67 66 Treatments SVD updating term Burton & Miller method CHIEF method

68 67 11 k SVD updating term for true eigenvalue True eigenvalues s s s

69 68 Burton & Miller method

70 69 Two CHIEF points for spurious eigenvalues of multiplicity two 11 k s

71 70 Spurious eigenvalue of plate

72 71 Treatments SVD updating term Burton & Miller method CHIEF method

73 72 SVD updating term

74 73 The Burton & Miller concept

75 74 The CHIEF concept

76 75 1.Degenerate scale for torsion bar problems 2.Degenerate boundary problems 3.True and spurious eigensolution for interior eigenproblem 4.Fictitious frequency for exterior acoustics 5. Corner Five pitfalls in BEM ka t(a,0)

77 76 On the Mechanism of Fictitious Eigenvalues in Direct and Indirect BEM incident wave radiation Physical resonance Numerical resonance

78 77 CHIEF and Burton & Miller method ka

79 78 1.Degenerate scale for torsion bar problems 2.Degenerate boundary problems 3.True and spurious eigensolution for interior eigenproblem 4.Fictitious frequency for exterior acoustics 5. Corner Five pitfalls in BEM

80 79 Boundary Theory of Dual Integral Equations for a Corner

81 80 Domain Boundary Domain Boundary Domain Boundary Domain Boundary (1) U(s,x) (4) M(s,x) (2) T(s,x) (3) L(s,x) The related symbols around the corner

82 81 kernelLaplace equationHelmholtz equation U(s,x)U(s,x) T(s,x) L(s,x) M(s,x) Free terms

83 82 Conclusions The nonuniqueness in BIEM and BEM were reviewed and its treatment was addressed. The role of hypersingular BIE was examined. The numerical problems in the engineering applications using BEM were demonstrated. Several mathematical tools, SVD, degenerate kernel, …, were employed to deal with the problems.

84 83 The End Thanks for your kind attention

85 84 歡迎參觀海洋大學力學聲響振動實驗室 烘焙雞及捎來伊妹兒 http://ind.ntou.edu.tw/~msvlab/ E-mail: jtchen@mail.ntou.edu.tw


Download ppt "1 Some problems in BEM applications J. T. Chen 陳正宗 特聘教授 Department of Harbor and River Engineering National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan March."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google