2.  Explore methods to connect Mission developers to standards experts. Active feedback to new missions to encourage them to use the existing standards or lacking appropriate standard to write up the standards they need. › Better instruction needed on website including steps and timeline tied to mission phases and reviews › SPG meeting invites. › Participation in mission reviews. › Publish success stories › Add data systems standards to "Gold Rules”  Identify interfaces that lack standards.  ESDIS must identify to SPG the missions/projects that require interaction.  Standard review process as driver for standard maturity. 11/3/11 SPG / ES-DSWG / 3 November 2011 / Newport News 1

3.  Level 1 requirement to use SPG standards is a game changer both for projects and for SPG  Expert Committee review as substitute for or to augment community review. › MENDS example  ESDIS development as substitute for SPG › ESDIS provenance and preservation standard example  Review mission proposals to deviate from standards.  Assigned resources to working groups by ESDIS to augments continued participation by interested stakeholders. 11/3/11 SPG / ES-DSWG / 3 November 2011 / Newport News 2

4.  Facilitate community promotion of standards and participation by self- nominated community stakeholders  Advise on data systems standards beyond (only) data and metadata.  Monthly telecon as coordinating activity › TWGs work on discrete work – no standing committees. 11/3/11 SPG / ES-DSWG / 3 November 2011 / Newport News 3

5.  Develop new Charter and process documents to reflect changes  Work with ESDIS-assigned missions to establish/verify compliance with their level 1 requirement to choose standard from SPG list.  Website content review.  Document usage of existing standards  Participate with Reference Architecture Working Group.  Enable social media methods for standards discussion (user community nuggets, suggestions, etc... moderated)  Develop recommendations for how to treat mission/project use of Earth science data systems standards other than data and metadata.  Systematic review of ACCESS and MEASURES use of standards for potential RFC. 11/3/11 SPG / ES-DSWG / 3 November 2011 / Newport News 4

6.  WG session 1 Tues 3:40-5:30pm  Discussion: steps to actively implement new working group structure and goals – Richard Ullman   WG session 2 Wed 8:30 – 10:35am  Implementation of the Lineage Model – Yuanzheng Shao  Provenance Collection and Display Tools for the AMSR-E SIPS – Helen Conover  Provenance Services for Tracking Production of Multi- Sensor Merged Climate Data Records – Hook Hua  Geoscience Data Curation Using a Digital Object Model and Open-Source Frameworks: Provenance Applications: Jerry Pan  Provenance-enabled Automatic Data Publication– Peter Slaughter 5

7.  WG session 3 Wed 10:50-12:15pm  MENDS & ISO study – Siri Jodha Khalsa  Next steps for NASA ISO after MENDS – Ted Habermann  Practical Application of the OpenSearch Convention to Earth Science Data Discovery - Chris Lynnes  WG session 4 Wed 3:50-5:30  Measuring the Quality of Satellite Remote Sensing Data: Update on Efforts with QA4EO– Ross Bagwell  Remote Sensing Level 2+ data quality issues and challenges – Greg Leptoukh  Reference Architecture – Michael Burnett  WG session 5 Thurs 8:30-9:30am  SPG Working Group Business session – Richard Ullman 6