1. 1 English teacher training, enhanced by mTech A model for teacher training A comprehensive RME framework Evidence of impact at (reasonable) scale: Tom Power, Director, English in Action the Open University t.j.m.p.power@open.ac.uk

2. 2 A £50M DFID funded project for the G.o.Bangladesh to reach 25 M people English language for social and economic purposes Primary & Secondary Schools Adult learners Partnership: BMB Mott McDonald, BBC Word Service Trust, the Open University, UCEP FIVDB 3 x 3 year phases R&D with 800 teachers, 20,000+ students to 2011 16,000 teachers in phase 2011 - 2014 110,000 teachers by 2017 English in Action

3. 3 existing teacher training institutions cannot hope to meet the needs of the 21st Century...most teacher education … will happen in schools... …it will be practically focussed on improving the day to day work of teachers… … we have the glimmer, perhaps more, of hope offered by new technologies and new forms of communication. an approach to achieving impact at scale? (Moon, 2007)

4. A.Rahman on BRAC-PACE (2006) “most reform attempts have suffered from a lack of planning… not providing supportive resources… lack of co-ordinated long-term focus… In spite of a general improvement in T’s knowledge about ELT…. there is little evidence of much difference in classroom practice” Previous approaches to ELT teacher training in Bangladesh

5. the approach in most lessons did not encourage a communicative approach... throughout the lessons, teaching from the blackboard was the predominant approach... teachers also read from the textbook and asked closed questions, or moved around the classroom monitoring and facilitating students as they worked individually. In 90% of the lessons, no other pedagogic activities were observed Pre-EIA classroom practices

9. 9 scale impact

10. 10 “There really is no evidence to suggest the use of language laboratories improved the efficiency of language learning overall... computers & language labs? [Computers for language learning are] “...something of an oddity...no clear method or best practice for using them.” (Milton, 2002, p16-17)

11. 11 recorded audio? “...multiple examples of good practice... [which] can yield immense learning gains...” (Milton, ibid)

12. peer support through meetings and visits; wider project support support beyond school professional development materials for teachers and classroom use, new tools, HT & peer support support in school new classroom activities for teachers & students Supporting changes in classroom practices

18. 18 school basedpeer-supported ODL enhanced by MTech high impact on practice achieving large scale bringing target language into the classroom cost-effective the EIA model for impact at scale

19. Research, Monitoring & Evaluation indicators

20. 98% of teachers (primary & secondary) were confident to use the EIA technologies and materials for their professional development, and in their classroom practice. “EIA is not like other projects. In other projects we go for training and after the training is finished everything is forgotten when we go back to the school” Secondary teacher from Khulna Indicator 1: Reach

21. Impact 1 Substantial increase in teachers’ spoken English 71% of all observed primary T talk now in English. 86% of all observed secondary teacher talk now in English. Impact 2 Substantial increase in students’ speaking, and speaking English On average, over 1/3 of all observed lesson time now given to student talk. Most (88%) observed student talk now in English, in both primary and secondary EIA classrooms. Impact 3 Substantial Increase in students’ participation in communicative practices e.g. in typical primary lesson: there were 12 minutes student talk, of which there was:  5 minutes choral  3.5 minutes individual  2 minutes group  2 minutes pair Based upon direct observations of 491 teachers’ classroom practice, triangulated with 152 T interviews; 900 student group interviews, and 1,693 secondary student questionnaires. Indicator 2: Impacts on Practice

22. 22 Indicator 3: Impacts on English Language Competence Teachers’ English Language Competence Based upon independent fieldwork by Trinity college assessors, carrying out diagnostic interviews with 1,104 students and 96 Teachers.

23. 23 Indicator 3: Impacts on English Language Competence Primary Students’ English Language Competence Based upon independent fieldwork by Trinity college assessors, carrying out diagnostic interviews with 1,104 students and 96 Teachers.

24. 24 Indicator 3: Impacts on English Language Competence Primary Students’ English Language Competence Based upon independent fieldwork by Trinity college assessors, carrying out diagnostic interviews with 1,104 students and 96 Teachers.

25. 25 Summary A model for achieving impact at scale, through teacher training School Based Peer-supported ODL Enhanced through MTech A comprehensive RME framework Reach Classroom Practice Target Competence Evidence of impact at (reasonable) scale: 800 teachers; 20,000+ students Student participation Tt & Ss use of English Competence in English Tom Power, Director, English in Action the Open University t.j.m.p.power@open.ac.uk