Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

 Performance Goals -> Motivation  Analog/Digital Comparisons  E-flow Algorithm Development  Readout R&D  Summary Optimization of the Hadron Calorimeter.

Published by Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: " Performance Goals -> Motivation  Analog/Digital Comparisons  E-flow Algorithm Development  Readout R&D  Summary Optimization of the Hadron Calorimeter."— Presentation transcript:

1  Performance Goals -> Motivation  Analog/Digital Comparisons  E-flow Algorithm Development  Readout R&D  Summary Optimization of the Hadron Calorimeter for Energy-Flow Jet Reconstruction Stephen R. Magill Argonne National Laboratory

2 Performance Goals for HCAL - Motivation Physics Requirement : separately id W, Z using dijet mass in hadronic decay mode (~70% BR) -> higher statistics physics analyses Detector Goal : measure jets with energy resolution  /E ~ 30%/  E Optimize HCAL to be used with ECAL and Tracker in E-flow jet reconstruction – Charged particles ~ 60% of jet energy -> Tracker Photons ~ 25% of jet energy -> ECAL Neutral Hadrons ~ 15% of jet energy -> HCAL Calorimeter challenge : charged/neutral shower separation requires high granularity, both transverse and longitudinal, to reconstruct showers in 3-D W, ZW, Z 30%/  E 75%/  E

3 HCAL Optimization Performance Measures Study absorber type/thickness with JAS, standalone GEANT3 program -> shower containment, hit density, single particle energy resolution Tune transverse granularity and longitudinal segmentation in JAS -> separation of charged/neutral hadron showers Test both analog and digital readout techniques -> comparison of energy/hit density readout methods Develop and optimize E-flow algorithm(s) ->  dijet mass resolution 

4 Tungsten Copper Uranium SS 4  ’s, 2 K 0 L,  +,  - Standalone GEANT3 Version TESLA TDR Detector Geometry

5 e + e -  ZZ (500 GeV CM) SD Detector : ECAL HCAL 30 layers 34 layers W(0.25 cm)/Si(0.04 cm) SS(2.0 cm)/Scin(1.0 cm) ~20 X 0, 0.8 I ~40 X 0, 4 I ~5 mm X 5 mm cells ~1 cm X 1 cm cells Modified SD A: ECAL 30 layers W(0.25 cm)/Si(0.04 cm) ~20 X 0, 0.8 I ~1 cm X 1 cm cells HCAL 60 layers W(0.7 cm)/Scin(1.0 cm) ~120 X 0, 4.5 I ~1 cm X 1 cm cells Modified SD B: ECAL 30 layers W(0.25 cm)/Si(0.04 cm) ~20 X 0, 0.8 I ~1 cm X 1 cm cells HCAL 60 layers W(0.7 cm)/Scin(1.0 cm) ~120 X 0, 4.5 I ~3 cm X 3 cm cells Java Analysis Studio (JAS) Modified SD C: ECAL 30 layers W(0.25 cm)/Si(0.04 cm) ~20 X 0, 0.8 I ~1 cm X 1 cm cells HCAL 60 layers W(0.7 cm)/Scin(1.0 cm) ~120 X 0, 4.5 I ~5 cm X 5 cm cells

6 Neutral particles in CAL -  in ECAL - K L 0, n, nbar in HCAL e + e - -> ZZ – Neutral Particles in CAL

7 Analog Readout – perfect  cluster Photon Analysis in SD – Analog vs Digital?  /mean ~ 16% 5 mm X 5 mm EM cells Non-linear behavior for dense showers Analog EMCAL Readout

8 Neutral Hadron Analysis – Analog vs Digital

9 K L 0 Analysis – SD Detector Analog Readout Analog Readout  /mean ~ 30% Compare to digital 

10 K L 0 Analysis – SD Detector Digital Readout Digital Readout  /mean ~ 26% Average : ~43 MeV/hit linear behavior for hadron showers Analog EM + Digital HAD x calibration

11 K L 0 Analysis – Modified SD Analog Readout Analog Readout SD A (1 cm X 1 cm) SD B (3 cm X 3 cm)  /mean ~ 26%  /mean ~ 35%

12 K L 0 Analysis – Modified SD Digital Readout Digital Readout SD A (1 cm X 1 cm) SD B (3 cm X 3 cm)  /mean ~ 20%  /mean ~ 25%

13 HCAL (only) Digital Results  /mean ~ 28%  /mean ~ 32% SD SD A SD B 1 cm X 1 cm 3 cm X 3 cm

14 K L 0 Analog vs Digital – Scintillator vs Gas From A. Sokolov, CALICE Scintillator Analog/Digital Scintillator Analog/RPC Digital

15 Compensation in Digital HCAL?

16 Neutral Hadron Measurement Summary

17 No-Clustering E-Flow Algorithm 1 st step - Track extrapolation thru Cal – substitute for Cal cells in road (core + tuned outlyers) – Cal granularity optimized for separation of charged/neutral clusters 2 nd step - Photon finder (use analytic long./trans. energy profiles) 3 rd step - Jet Algorithm on Tracks and Photons 4 th step – include remaining Cal cells in jet (cone?) Systematic Approach : Tracks first (60%), Photons next (25%), Neutral hadrons last (15%)

18 Track Extrapolation/Cal Cell Substitution

19 Starting studies of HCAL optimization for E-Flow jet analysis - optimal transverse cell size and longitudinal segmentation - optimal absorber material/thickness - analog vs digital readout Starting development of E-Flow analysis tools - Track extrapolation -> cal cell substitution analysis - photon analysis Beginning readout R&D -Scintillator in HCAL -RPC Summary

Download ppt " Performance Goals -> Motivation  Analog/Digital Comparisons  E-flow Algorithm Development  Readout R&D  Summary Optimization of the Hadron Calorimeter."

Similar presentations

1 Individual Particle Reconstruction CHEP07, Victoria, September 6, 2007 Norman Graf (SLAC) Steve Magill (ANL)

1 Individual Particle Reconstruction CHEP07, Victoria, September 6, 2007 Norman Graf (SLAC) Steve Magill (ANL)
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements Sufficient data for Energy Flow algorithm development Provide data for calorimeter tracking algorithms  Help setting.

LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements Sufficient data for Energy Flow algorithm development Provide data for calorimeter tracking algorithms  Help setting.
Henri Videau LLR Ecole polytechnique - IN2P3/CNRSCalor2002 1 Calorimetry optimised for jets Henri Videau Jean- Claude Brient Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet.

Henri Videau LLR Ecole polytechnique - IN2P3/CNRSCalor Calorimetry optimised for jets Henri Videau Jean- Claude Brient Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet.
PFA-Enhanced Dual Readout Crystal Calorimetry Stephen Magill - ANL Hans Wenzel - FNAL Outline : Motivation Detector Parameters Use of a PFA in Dual Readout.

PFA-Enhanced Dual Readout Crystal Calorimetry Stephen Magill - ANL Hans Wenzel - FNAL Outline : Motivation Detector Parameters Use of a PFA in Dual Readout.
Particle Flow Template Modular Particle Flow for the ILC Purity/Efficiency-based PFA PFA Module Reconstruction Jet Reconstruction Stephen Magill Argonne.

Particle Flow Template Modular Particle Flow for the ILC Purity/Efficiency-based PFA PFA Module Reconstruction Jet Reconstruction Stephen Magill Argonne.
P. Gay Energy flow session1 Analytic Energy Flow F. Chandez P. Gay S. Monteil CALICE Coll.

P. Gay Energy flow session1 Analytic Energy Flow F. Chandez P. Gay S. Monteil CALICE Coll.
Testbeam Requirements for LC Calorimetry S. R. Magill for the Calorimetry Working Group Physics/Detector Goals for LC Calorimetry E-flow implications for.

Testbeam Requirements for LC Calorimetry S. R. Magill for the Calorimetry Working Group Physics/Detector Goals for LC Calorimetry E-flow implications for.
EF with simple multi-particle states Vishnu V. Zutshi NIU/NICADD.

EF with simple multi-particle states Vishnu V. Zutshi NIU/NICADD.
LC Calorimeter Ideas and R&D Opportunities Ray Frey, U. Oregon Cornell, Apr 19, 2002 Physics implications The environment The “energy flow” concept Current.

LC Calorimeter Ideas and R&D Opportunities Ray Frey, U. Oregon Cornell, Apr 19, 2002 Physics implications The environment The “energy flow” concept Current.
PFA on SiDaug05_np Lei Xia ANL-HEP. PFA outline Calibration of calorimeter –Done –Not tuned for clustering algorithm Clustering algorithm –Done: hit density.

PFA on SiDaug05_np Lei Xia ANL-HEP. PFA outline Calibration of calorimeter –Done –Not tuned for clustering algorithm Clustering algorithm –Done: hit density.
Some early attempts at PFA Dhiman Chakraborty. LCWS05 Some early attempts at PFA Dhiman Chakraborty2 Introduction Primarily interested in exploring the.

Some early attempts at PFA Dhiman Chakraborty. LCWS05 Some early attempts at PFA Dhiman Chakraborty2 Introduction Primarily interested in exploring the.
GEM DHCAL Simulation Studies J. Yu* Univ. of Texas at Arlington ALCW, July 15, 2003 Cornell University (*on behalf of the UTA team; S. Habib, V. Kaushik,

GEM DHCAL Simulation Studies J. Yu* Univ. of Texas at Arlington ALCW, July 15, 2003 Cornell University (*on behalf of the UTA team; S. Habib, V. Kaushik,
 Track-First E-flow Algorithm  Analog vs. Digital Energy Resolution for Neutral Hadrons  Towards Track/Cal hit matching  Photon Finding  Plans E-flow.

 Track-First E-flow Algorithm  Analog vs. Digital Energy Resolution for Neutral Hadrons  Towards Track/Cal hit matching  Photon Finding  Plans E-flow.
Individual Particle Reconstruction Norman Graf SLAC April 28, 2005.

Individual Particle Reconstruction Norman Graf SLAC April 28, 2005.
1 Benchmarking the SiD Tim Barklow SLAC Sep 27, 2005.

1 Benchmarking the SiD Tim Barklow SLAC Sep 27, 2005.
PFA Development – Definitions and Preparation 0) Generate some events w/G4 in proper format 1)Check Sampling Fractions ECAL, HCAL separately How? Photons,

PFA Development – Definitions and Preparation 0) Generate some events w/G4 in proper format 1)Check Sampling Fractions ECAL, HCAL separately How? Photons,
Energy Flow Studies Steve Kuhlmann Argonne National Laboratory for Steve Magill, U.S. LC Calorimeter Group.

Energy Flow Studies Steve Kuhlmann Argonne National Laboratory for Steve Magill, U.S. LC Calorimeter Group.
Energy Flow Studies Steve Kuhlmann Argonne National Laboratory for Steve Magill, Brian Musgrave, Norman Graf, U.S. LC Calorimeter Group.

Energy Flow Studies Steve Kuhlmann Argonne National Laboratory for Steve Magill, Brian Musgrave, Norman Graf, U.S. LC Calorimeter Group.
Scintillator (semi)DHCAL? Vishnu Zutshi for. Introduction Can a scintillator (semi)digital calorimeter work? Cell sizes are necessarily 6-12 cm 2 Can.

Scintillator (semi)DHCAL? Vishnu Zutshi for. Introduction Can a scintillator (semi)digital calorimeter work? Cell sizes are necessarily 6-12 cm 2 Can.
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation Report Venkatesh Kaushik 1 Simulation Study of Digital Hadron Calorimeter Using GEM Venkatesh Kaushik* University of Texas.

1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation Report Venkatesh Kaushik 1 Simulation Study of Digital Hadron Calorimeter Using GEM Venkatesh Kaushik* University of Texas.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google