1. CXC Manager’s Status Report Chandra Users’ Committee Meeting Edward M. Mattison 19 October 2005

2. CXC Status Report/CUCPage 2 Topics Program Level Status –Program Management –Spacecraft –Mission Planning –Science Instruments and Calibration –OCC –Data Processing –CXCDS –CDO –Education and Outreach Mission Metrics Chandra Grant Awards

3. 19 October 2005CXC Status Report/CUCPage 3 Program Level Status 1/26/05 – 10/19/05 Program Management –Successfully passed the 6 year milestone on July 23, 2005 –Budget: In FY05 NASA reduced CXC funding about 5% below the level of the POP05 plan. We absorbed the decrease through stretchout of some activities, retiming of subcontract funding, personnel attrition, and other spending reductions. CXC operations were not substantially affected, but we remain sensitive to any future NASA cuts or increases in SAO overhead rates. –Staffing: Approximately 5 FTE decrease through planned reductions and attrition. –Facilities: OCC. Draper Labs has completed remodeling work at the OCC. The former conference room and 5 offices were eliminated. A new conference room was built, and the ACIS equipment has been relocated to the TST room. Operations have not been affected. –Facilities: Move to Cambridge Discovery Park. The CXC Data System group (currently in Harvard Square offices) and three EPO personnel (now at Porter Exchange & OCC) will move 12/2/05 to new leased space about 1.5 miles northwest of 60 Garden Street. To minimize impact on mission operations, critical DS software will be released prior to the move.

4. 19 October 2005CXC Status Report/CUCPage 4 Spacecraft –Continues to operate extremely well overall –Nominal passage through summer 2005 eclipses; uneventful passages through Perseid (8/12) and Draconid (10/10) meteor showers –Patched Flight Software to allow using HRC in lieu of EPHIN for radiation sensing (corrected a bug in the previous patch); patched On-Board Computer for SCS 107 and 84 (improved safety for observations at high sun angles) –ACA dark current calibrations 3/11, 7/10, 9/4 –Anomalies: –ACIS threshold crossing plane latched up; was cleared routinely –After an unexpected radiation safing event, the LETG remained partially inserted due to a low-probability timing condition. A workaround was developed to avoid future occurrences. –Side A of ACIS Digital Electronics Assembly (DEA-A) powered off spontaneously. The event was similar to two instances of Digital Processor Assembly shutdown over 6 years; it is assumed to have resulted from a single event upset due to a cosmic ray. Standard procedures mitigate the effect. Program Level Status 1/26/05 – 10/19/05

5. 19 October 2005CXC Status Report/CUCPage 5 Program Level Status 1/26/05 – 10/19/05 Mission Planning –Temperature control requirements – keeping propulsion line warm and EPHIN cool – resulted in added constraints on mission planning –SCS107 ran 7 times due to high radiation events (includes major event in September and unexpected August timing anomaly); required replans –9 load interrupt TOOs: DateTargetDays 4/15/05GRB0504121 4/20/05RXJ0513.9-69512 5/8/05GRB050509b2 5/11/05High redshift blazar1 5/16/05XRF050509C1 6/6/05SAX J1808.4-36581 7/12/05GRB0507091 7/24/95GRB0507241

6. 19 October 2005CXC Status Report/CUCPage 6 Science Instruments and Calibration –Operating extremely well overall –Decided not to bake out ACIS; will review decision annually –Changed default aimpoint based on motion of HRM optical axis relative to the instrument module –Made significant calibration updates in preparation for Reprocessing 3; new, time-dependent trap map for Charge Transfer Inefficiency –2005 Calibration Workshop will be held 10/31-11/1 OCC –Transitioned from serial GSFC interface to the Deep Space Network to a direct T1 connection (TCP/IP) to JPL –Migration of ground system software from SGI to Linux is nearing completion –Released 2 Online System versions and 4 Offline System version in support of Linux migration –Promotion to operations is scheduled for 22 November Program Level Status 1/26/05 – 10/19/05

7. 19 October 2005CXC Status Report/CUCPage 7 Data Processing –Automatic processing is current; data delivery averages <36 hours from end of observation to delivery to user –Nearing start of third over-all data reprocessing (Repro 3) –Completed all data preparation –Completed and tested scripts for automatic operation –Will use Data System release 7.6.4 after completion of testing –Repro 3 start is planned for Nov-Dec 2005 CXC Data System Releases DateVersionChange 2/9/05CIAO 3.2.1Bugfix & enhancement 2/15/05DS7.5.2Cycle 7 proposer release 3/23/05DS7.5.3Peer Review release 6/14/05DS7.6Pipeline & tool upgrade; Repro3 infrastructure 6/20/05CIAO 3.2.2Repro3 & mkacisrmf patch release 6/25/05DS7.6.2Repro3 corner cases & bugfixes 8/25/05DS7.6.3Repro3 cleanup 10/05 (planned)DS7.6.4Repro3 patch 11/05 (planned)CIAO 3.3Tool enhancements; Cycle 8 release Program Level Status 1/26/05 – 10/19/05

8. 19 October 2005CXC Status Report/CUCPage 8 Calibration Database (CalDB) Releases 5 releases: 3.0.1 (2.8/05); 3.0.2 (3/23/05); 3.0.3 (5/8/05); 3.0.4 (6/14/05) 3.1.0 (6/23/05) GO and Fellows Programs –Cycle 7 GO Peer Review held 6/22-24/05; Stage 2 review in process –Cycle 8 GO Call for Proposals will be released 12/15/05 –Cycle 8 Fellows review held 1/19/05; 4 new Fellows selected and appointed –Cycle 9 Fellows applications due 11/9; review in January 06 –Fellows Symposium held 10/11 Education and Public Outreach –2 media telecons (May, October) –2 press conferences at AAS meetings –14 press releases, 7 image releases –162 print articles, 505 web articles resulting from releases (through 9/30/05) –1 segment on the Today Show (Swarm of black holes; January) Program Level Status 1/26/05 – 10/19/05

9. 19 October 2005CXC Status Report/CUCPage 9 Mission Metrics MUPS Fuel Usage

10. 19 October 2005CXC Status Report/CUCPage 10 Mission Metrics (con’t)

11. 19 October 2005CXC Status Report/CUCPage 11 Mission Metrics (con’t) Scheduled Observing Efficiency Scheduled Observations MonthSeconds in month (ks)Scheduled Observing Time (ks)Scheduled Observing Efficiency Oct-042678.41827.30.68 Nov-042592.01439.60.56 Dec-042678.41796.10.67 Jan-052678.41393.40.52 Feb-052505.61521.40.61 Mar-052678.41723.60.64 Apr-052592.01638.30.63 May-052678.41772.20.66 Jun-052592.01709.00.66 Jul-052678.41781.30.67 Aug-052678.41498.20.56 Sep-052592.01305.10.50

12. 19 October 2005CXC Status Report/CUCPage 12 Mission Metrics (con’t) Observing Efficiency

13. 19 October 2005CXC Status Report/CUCPage 13 Data Delivery Effectiveness As of middle of following monthAs of 10/13/05 MonthNumber of Obs Days to Data Delivery Numbe r Deliv Number Outstanding Numbe r Deliv Number Outstandin g Obsids Outstanding (see below for details) Mi n AvgMax Oct-04440422440 0 Nov- 04 361512360 0 Dec-0473027 0 0 Jan-0563018 0 0 Feb-05670214670 0 Mar-0571018 0 0 Apr-05560111560 0 May- 05 550213541550 Jun-05670120670 0 Jul-0583014 0 0 Aug- 05 43019 0 0 Sep-0535016 0 0

14. 19 October 2005CXC Status Report/CUCPage 14 Chandra Grant Awards As of middle of following monthAs of 10/13/05 Month of Data Delivery No. Grants (1)No. Grants Awarded No. Outstanding Avg days to award (2) No. Grants Awarded No. Outstandin g Outstanding Awards Proposal no, Comments Grants to Non-Federal Institutions Oct-04102822100 Nov-04404n/a40 Dec-043122925310 Jan-055243928520 Feb-051441023140 Mar-059632090 Apr-05137616130 May-0526 015260 Jun-05107311100 Jul-05109116100 Aug-05440940 Sep-056246246300120, 6300176, 6610154, 6800198

15. 19 October 2005CXC Status Report/CUCPage 15 Chandra Grant Awards As of middle of following monthAs of 10/13/05 Month of Data Delivery No. Grants (1) No. Grants Awarded No. Outstanding Avg days to award (2) No. Grants Awarde d No. Outstanding Outstanding Awards Proposal no, Comments Grants to Federal Institutions Oct-04000n/a00 Nov-04000n/a00 Dec-04000n/a00 Jan-05 (3)1 Feb-053 Mar-051 Apr-050 May-050 Jun-052 Jul-053 Aug-052 Sep-054 (1)Number of grants eligible for award, for which data were delivered to the observer in the month (2)Average days from data delivery to grant award to observer. (3)Beginning with Cycle 6, grants to Federal institutions are administered by MSFC. “No. Grants” column represents the number of such observations reported to MSFC.

16. 19 October 2005CXC Status Report/CUCPage 16 Grant Award Efficiency