Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Network Biology BMI 730 Kun Huang Department of Biomedical Informatics Ohio State University.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Network Biology BMI 730 Kun Huang Department of Biomedical Informatics Ohio State University."— Presentation transcript:

1 Network Biology BMI 730 Kun Huang Department of Biomedical Informatics Ohio State University

2 Biology Domain knowledge Hypothesis testing Experimental work Genetic manipulation Quantitative measurement Validation Systems Sciences Theory Analysis Modeling Synthesis/prediction Simulation Hypothesis generation Informatics Data management Database Computational infrastructure Modeling tools High performance computing Visualization Systems Biology Understanding! Prediction!

3 Review of Network Topology – Scale Free and Modularity Elements of Dynamical Modeling Network Motif Analysis Integration of Multiple Networks – Several Examples Course Projects

4

5 A Tale of Two Groups A.-L. Barabasi at University of Notre Dame Ten Most Cited Publications: Albert-László Barabási and Réka Albert, Emergence of scaling in random networks, Science 286, 509- 512 (1999). [ PDF ] [ cond-mat/9910332 ]PDFcond-mat/9910332 Réka Albert and Albert-László Barabási, Statistical mechanics of complex networks Review of Modern Physics 74, 47-97 (2002). [ PDF ] [cond-mat/0106096 ]PDFcond-mat/0106096 H. Jeong, B. Tombor, R. Albert, Z.N. Oltvai, and A.-L. Barabási, The large-scale organization of metabolic networks, Nature 407, 651-654 (2000). [ PDF ] [ cond-mat/0010278 ]PDFcond-mat/0010278 R. Albert, H. Jeong, and A.-L. Barabási, Error and attack tolerance in complex networks Nature 406, 378 (2000). [ PDF ] [ cond-mat/0008064 ]PDFcond-mat/0008064 R. Albert, H. Jeong, and A.-L. Barabási, Diameter of the World Wide Web Nature 401, 130-131 (1999). [ PDF ] [ cond-mat/9907038 ]PDFcond-mat/9907038 H. Jeong, S. Mason, A.-L. Barabási and Zoltan N. Oltvai, Lethality and centrality in protein networks Nature 411, 41-42 (2001). [ PDF ] [ Supplementary Materials 1, 2 ] PDF 1, 2 E. Ravasz, A. L. Somera, D. A. Mongru, Z. N. Oltvai, and A.-L. Barabási, Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks, Science 297, 1551-1555 (2002). [ PDF ] [ cond-mat/0209244 ] [ Supplementary Material ]PDFcond-mat/0209244 Supplementary Material A.-L. Barabási, R. Albert, and H. Jeong, Mean-field theory for scale-free random networks Physica A 272, 173-187 (1999). [ PDF ] [ cond-mat/9907068 ]PDFcond-mat/9907068 Réka Albert and Albert-László Barabási, Topology of evolving networks: Local events and universality Physical Review Letters 85, 5234 (2000). [ PDF ] [ cond-mat/0005085 ]PDFcond-mat/0005085 Albert-László Barabási and Zoltán N. Oltvai, Network Biology: Understanding the cells's functional organization, Nature Reviews Genetics 5, 101-113 (2004). [ PDF ]PDF

6 Power Law Small World Rich Get Richer (preferential attachment) Self-similarity HUBS!

7 Modularity Scale-free and Modularity/Hierarchy are thought to be exclusive. Scale-free (a) Modular (b)

8 Subgraphs Subgraph: a connected graph consisting of a subset of the nodes and links of a network Subgraph properties: n: number of nodes m: number of links (n=3,m=3) (n=3,m=2) (n=4,m=4) (n=4,m=5).

9 R Milo et al., Science 298, 824-827 (2002).

10 Review of Network Topology – Scale Free and Modularity Elements of Dynamical Modeling Network Motif Analysis Integration of Multiple Networks – Several Examples Course Projects

11 Genetic Network – Transcription Network Regulation of protein expression is mediated by transcription factors DNA Promoter Gene Y DNA RNA polymerase Gene Y mRNA Protein Y Transcription Translation

12 Genetic Network – Transcription Network TF factor X regulates protein (gene) Y DNA Gene Y mRNA Protein Y X* X SXSX Y Y Y Y Y Y X  Y Activation / positive control, X is called activator.

13 Genetic Network – Transcription Network TF factor X regulates protein (gene) Y DNA Gene Y mRNA X Y Y Y Y DNA Gene Y X* X No transcription Repression / negative control, X is called repressor. X Y

14 Genetic Network – Transcription Network How to model the input-output relationship? Concentration of active TF X* Rate of production of protein Y Concentration of protein Y F(X*) is usually monotonic, S-shaped function.

15 Genetic Network – Transcription Network Hill function Derived from the equilibrium binding of the TF to its target site. Activator K – activation coefficient  – maximal expression level n – Hill coefficient (1<n<4 for most cases) F(X*) approximates step function (logic) for large n X*>>K, F(X*) =  X* = K, F(X*) =  /2 X*/K n=1 n=4 n=2 0 12  

16 Genetic Network – Transcription Network Repressor X*/K n=1 n=4 n=2 0 12   F(X*) approximates step function (logic) for large n

17 Genetic Network – Transcription Network TF factor X regulates protein (gene) Y Timescale for E. Coli 1.Binding of signaling molecule to TF and changing its activity~1msec 2.Binding of active TF to DNA~1sec 3.Transcription + translation of gene~5min 4.50% change of target protein concentration ~1h

18 Genetic Network – Transcription Network Logic function approximation Hill function is for detailed modeling. Logic function is for simplicity and mathematical clarity. Activator K – threshold  – maximal expression level Repressor t0 

19 Genetic Network – Transcription Network Logic function approximation Multiple input X* AND Y* X* OR Y* SUM

20 Genetic Network – Transcription Network The dynamics Change over time Degradation Dilution (cell growth and volume increase) Response time (characteristics) Dynamical equation Equilibrium (steady state)

21 Genetic Network – Transcription Network The dynamics Response time (characteristics) Sudden removal of production 1 0.5

22 Genetic Network – Transcription Network The dynamics Response time (characteristics) Sudden initiation of production 1 0.5

23 Motif Statistics and Dynamics Autoregulation Self-edge in the transcription network

24 Motif Statistics and Dynamics Autoregulation DNA Gene Y mRNA X A Negative autoregulation

25 Motif Statistics and Dynamics Autoregulation DNA Gene Y mRNA X A 10 Time (  t) X(t)/K 1

26 Motif Statistics and Dynamics Autoregulation 1 0 Time (  t) X(t)/K 1 Short response time

27 Motif Statistics and Dynamics Autoregulation Robustness / stabilization If  fluctuates, X ss is stable for negative autoregulation but not for simple regulation.

28 Review of Network Topology – Scale Free and Modularity Elements of Dynamical Modeling Network Motif Analysis Integration of Multiple Networks – Several Examples Course Projects

29 Motif Topology Each edge has 4 choices (why?). Three edges 4X4X4 = 64 choices. There are symmetry redundancy. Despite the choices of activation and repression, there are 13 types.

30 X Y Z X Y Z X Y Z X Y Z X Y Z X Y Z X Y Z X Y Z Coherent Feed Forward Loop (FFL) Incoherent Feed Forward Loop

31 Coherent Feed Forward Loop (FFL) X Y Z X Y Z AND SxSx T on Sign sensitive delay for ON signal SxSx

32 Coherent Feed Forward Loop (FFL) X Y Z X Y Z AND SxSx Sign sensitive delay for ON signal SxSx

33 Coherent Feed Forward Loop (FFL) The Coherent Feedforward Loop Serves as a Sign-sensitive Delay Element in Transcription Networks Mangan, S.; Zaslaver, A.; Alon, U. J. Mol. Biol., 334:197-204, 2003.

34 Coherent Feed Forward Loop (FFL) Timing instrument

35 Coherent Feed Forward Loop (FFL) X Y Z X Y Z AND SxSx SySy Nature Genetics 31, 64 - 68 (2002) Network motifs in the transcriptional regulation network of Escherichia coli Shai S. Shen-Orr, Ron Milo, Shmoolik Mangan & Uri Alon Noise (low-pass) filter

36 Coherent Feed Forward Loop (FFL) X Y Z X Y Z OR SxSx Sign sensitive delay for OFF signal SxSx

37 Coherent Feed Forward Loop (FFL) A coherent feed-forward loop with a SUM input function prolongs flagella expression in Escherichia coli Shiraz Kalir, Shmoolik Mangan and Uri Alon, Mol. Sys. Biol., Mar.2005.

38 Coherent Feed Forward Loop (FFL) A coherent feed-forward loop with a SUM input function prolongs flagella expression in Escherichia coli Shiraz Kalir, Shmoolik Mangan and Uri Alon, Mol. Sys. Biol., Mar.2005.

39 Incoherent Feed Forward Loop (FFL) X Y Z X Y Z AND SxSx Fast response time to steady state SxSx

40 Table 3. Summary of functions of the FFLs * In incoherent FFL with basal level, Sy modulates Z between two nonzero levels. Steady-state logic is sensitive to both Sx and Sy Coherent and incoherent * Types 1, 2 AND Types 3, 4 OR Sign-sensitive delay upon Sx stepsCoherentTypes 1, 2, 3, 4 Sy-gated pulse generator upon Sx steps Incoherent with no basal Y level Types 3, 4 AND Types 1,2 OR Sign-sensitive acceleration upon Sx steps Incoherent with basal Y level Types 1,2,3,4 Mangan, S. and Alon, U. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 11980-11985

41 Review of Network Topology – Scale Free and Modularity Elements of Dynamical Modeling Network Motif Analysis Integration of Multiple Networks – Several Examples Course Projects

42 Barabasi A-L, Network medicine – from obesity to “Diseasome”, NEJM, 357(4): 404- 407, 2007. Integration of Multi-Modal Data

43 Tissue-Tissue Network Dobrin et al. Genome Biology 2009 10:R55 doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-5-r55

44 Tissue-Tissue Network Dobrin et al. Genome Biology 2009 10:R55 doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-5-r55

45 Genotype-Phenotype Network Scoring scheme of CIPHER. First, the human phenotype network, protein network, and gene– phenotype network are assembled into an integrated network. Then, to score a particular phenotype– gene pair (p, g), the phenotype similarity profile for p is extracted and the gene closeness profile for g is computed from the integrated network. Finally, the linear correlation of the two profiles is calculated and assigned as the concordance score between the phenotype p and the gene g. Wu et al. Molecular Systems Biology, 2009 4:189, Network-based global inference of human disease genes

46 Genotype-Phenotype Network Known disease gene Rank in 8919 candidates CIPHER-SP%CIPHER-DN% BRCA110.0120.02 AR30.033 ATM190.2140.04 CHEK2660.74190.21 BRCA21391.56490.54 STK111501.69210.23 RAD511742.00360.40 PTEN1882.10240.26 BARD11962.20410.45 TP532873.22450.50 RB1CC17988.95636071.30 NCOA397310.913433.84 PIK3CA164418.433674.11 PPM1D194621.82731882.04 CASP8497855.81239726.87 TGF1711679.78350239.26 Wu et al. Molecular Systems Biology, 2009 4:189, Network-based global inference of human disease genes

47

48

49 Kelley and Ideker, Nature Biotechnology, 2005 23:561-566, Systematic interpretation of genetic interactions using protein networks

50 Review of Network Topology – Scale Free and Modularity Elements of Dynamical Modeling Network Motif Analysis Integration of Multiple Networks – Several Examples Course Projects


Download ppt "Network Biology BMI 730 Kun Huang Department of Biomedical Informatics Ohio State University."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google