Presentation is loading. Please wait. # Introduction to Hypothesis Testing

## Presentation on theme: "Introduction to Hypothesis Testing"— Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Hypothesis Testing
Chapter 11 Introduction to Hypothesis Testing

11.1 Introduction The purpose of hypothesis testing is to determine whether there is enough statistical evidence in favor of a certain belief about a parameter. Examples Is there statistical evidence in a random sample of potential customers, that support the hypothesis that more than 10% of the potential customers will purchase a new products? Is a new drug effective in curing a certain disease? A sample of patients is randomly selected. Half of them are given the drug while the other half are given a placebo. The improvement in the patients conditions is then measured and compared.

11.2 Concepts of Hypothesis Testing
The critical concepts of hypothesis testing. Example: An operation manager needs to determine if the mean demand during lead time is greater than 350. If so, changes in the ordering policy are needed. There are two hypotheses about a population mean: H0: The null hypothesis m = 350 H1: The alternative hypothesis m > 350 This is what you want to prove

11.2 Concepts of Hypothesis Testing
Assume the null hypothesis is true (m= 350). m = 350 Sample from the demand population, and build a statistic related to the parameter hypothesized (the sample mean). Pose the question: How probable is it to obtain a sample mean at least as extreme as the one observed from the sample, if H0 is correct?

11.2 Concepts of Hypothesis Testing
Assume the null hypothesis is true (m= 350). m = 350 Since the is much larger than 350, the mean m is likely to be greater than 350. Reject the null hypothesis. In this case the mean m is not likely to be greater than 350. Do not reject the null hypothesis.

Types of Errors Two types of errors may occur when deciding whether to reject H0 based on the statistic value. Type I error: Reject H0 when it is true. Type II error: Do not reject H0 when it is false. Example continued Type I error: Reject H0 (m = 350) in favor of H1 (m > 350) when the real value of m is 350. Type II error: Believe that H0 is correct (m = 350) when the real value of m is greater than 350.

Controlling the probability of conducting a type I error
Recall: H0: m = 350 and H1: m > 350. H0 is rejected if is sufficiently large Thus, a type I error is made if when m = 350. By properly selecting the critical value we can limit the probability of conducting a type I error to an acceptable level. Critical value m = 350

11.3 Testing the Population Mean When the Population Standard Deviation is Known
Example 11.1 A new billing system for a department store will be cost- effective only if the mean monthly account is more than \$170. A sample of 400 accounts has a mean of \$178. If accounts are approximately normally distributed with s = \$65, can we conclude that the new system will be cost effective?

Testing the Population Mean (s is Known)
Example 11.1 – Solution The population of interest is the credit accounts at the store. We want to know whether the mean account for all customers is greater than \$170. H1 : m > 170 The null hypothesis must specify a single value of the parameter m, H0 : m = 170

Approaches to Testing There are two approaches to test whether the sample mean supports the alternative hypothesis (H1) The rejection region method is mandatory for manual testing (but can be used when testing is supported by a statistical software) The p-value method which is mostly used when a statistical software is available.

The Rejection Region Method
The rejection region is a range of values such that if the test statistic falls into that range, the null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis.

The Rejection Region Method – for a Right - Tail Test
Example 11.1 – solution continued Recall: H0: m = H1: m > therefore, It seems reasonable to reject the null hypothesis and believe that m > 170 if the sample mean is sufficiently large. Reject H0 here Critical value of the sample mean

The Rejection Region Method for a Right - Tail Test
Example 11.1 – solution continued Define a critical value for that is just large enough to reject the null hypothesis. Reject the null hypothesis if

Determining the Critical Value for the Rejection Region
Allow the probability of committing a Type I error be a (also called the significance level). Find the value of the sample mean that is just large enough so that the actual probability of committing a Type I error does not exceed a. Watch…

Determining the Critical Value – for a Right – Tail Test
Example 11.1 – solution continued a P(commit a Type I error) = P(reject H0 given that H0 is true) = P( given that H0 is true) … is allowed to be a. we have:

Determining the Critical Value – for a Right – Tail Test
Example 11.1 – solution continued a = 0.05

Determining the Critical value for a Right - Tail Test
Conclusion Since the sample mean (178) is greater than the critical value of , there is sufficient evidence to infer that the mean monthly balance is greater than \$170 at the 5% significance level.

The standardized test statistic
Instead of using the statistic , we can use the standardized value z. Then, the rejection region becomes One tail test

The standardized test statistic
Example continued We redo this example using the standardized test statistic. Recall: H0: m = 170 H1: m > 170 Test statistic: Rejection region: z > z.05 =

The standardized test statistic
Example continued Conclusion Since Z = > 1.645, reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis.

P-value Method The p-value provides information about the amount of statistical evidence that supports the alternative hypothesis. The p-value of a test is the probability of observing a test statistic at least as extreme as the one computed, given that the null hypothesis is true. Let us demonstrate the concept on Example 11.1

P-value Method The probability of observing a test statistic at least as extreme as 178, given that m = 170 is… The p-value

Interpreting the p-value
Because the probability that the sample mean will assume a value of more than 178 when m = 170 is so small (.0069), there are reasons to believe that m > 170. Note how the event is rare under H0 when but... …it becomes more probable under H1, when

Interpreting the p-value
We can conclude that the smaller the p-value the more statistical evidence exists to support the alternative hypothesis.

Interpreting the p-value
Describing the p-value If the p-value is less than 1%, there is overwhelming evidence that supports the alternative hypothesis. If the p-value is between 1% and 5%, there is a strong evidence that supports the alternative hypothesis. If the p-value is between 5% and 10% there is a weak evidence that supports the alternative hypothesis. If the p-value exceeds 10%, there is no evidence that supports the alternative hypothesis.

The p-value and the Rejection Region Methods
The p-value can be used when making decisions based on rejection region methods as follows: Define the hypotheses to test, and the required significance level a. Perform the sampling procedure, calculate the test statistic and the p-value associated with it. Compare the p-value to a. Reject the null hypothesis only if p-value <a; otherwise, do not reject the null hypothesis. a = 0.05 The p-value

Conclusions of a Test of Hypothesis
If we reject the null hypothesis, we conclude that there is enough evidence to infer that the alternative hypothesis is true. If we do not reject the null hypothesis, we conclude that there is not enough statistical evidence to infer that the alternative hypothesis is true. The alternative hypothesis is the more important one. It represents what we are investigating.

A Left - Tail Test The SSA Envelop Example.
The chief financial officer in FedEx believes that including a stamped self-addressed (SSA) envelop in the monthly invoice sent to customers will decrease the amount of time it take for customers to pay their monthly bills. Currently, customers return their payments in 24 days on the average, with a standard deviation of 6 days.

A Left - Tail Test The SSA envelop example – continued
It was calculated that an improvement of two days on the average will cover the costs of the envelops (checks can be deposited earlier). A random sample of 220 customers was selected and SSA envelops were included with their invoice packs. The times customers’ payments were received were recorded (SSA.xls) Can the CFO conclude that the plan will be profitable at 10% significance level? 

A Left - Tail Test The SSA envelop example – Solution
The parameter tested is the population mean payment period (m). The hypotheses are: H0: m = 22 H1: m < 22 (The CFO wants to know whether the plan will be profitable)

A Left - Tail Test The SSA envelop example – Solution continued
The rejection region: It makes sense to believe that m < 22 if the sample mean is sufficiently smaller than 22. Reject the null hypothesis if

Define the rejection region
Left-tail test A Left -Tail Test The SSA envelop example – Solution continued The standardized one tail left hand test is: Define the rejection region Since -.91 > –1.28 do not reject the null hypothesis. The p value = P(Z<-.91) = Since > .10, do not reject the null hypothesis

A Two - Tail Test Example 11.2
AT&T has been challenged by competitors who argued that their rates resulted in lower bills. A statistics practitioner determines that the mean and standard deviation of monthly long-distance bills for all AT&T residential customers are \$17.09 and \$3.87 respectively.

A Two - Tail Test Example 11.2 - continued
A random sample of 100 customers is selected and customers’ bills recalculated using a leading competitor’s rates (see Xm11-02). Assuming the standard deviation is the same (3.87), can we infer that there is a difference between AT&T’s bills and the competitor’s bills (on the average)?

A Two - Tail Test Solution Is the mean different from 17.09?
H0: m = 17.09 Define the rejection region

A Two – Tail Test Solution - continued a/2 = 0.025 a/2 = 0.025 17.09
We want this erroneous rejection of H0 to be a rare event, say 5% chance. If H0 is true (m =17.09), can still fall far above or far below 17.09, in which case we erroneously reject H0 in favor of H1

A Two – Tail Test Solution - continued From the sample we have:
17.55 a/2 = 0.025 17.09 a/2 = 0.025 -za/2 = -1.96 za/2 = 1.96 Rejection region

A Two – Tail Test Two-tail test There is insufficient evidence to infer that there is a difference between the bills of AT&T and the competitor. Also, by the p value approach: The p-value = P(Z< -1.19)+P(Z >1.19) = 2(.1173) = > .05 a/2 = 0.025 a/2 = 0.025 -1.19 1.19 -za/2 = -1.96 za/2 = 1.96

11.4 Calculating the Probability of a Type II Error
To properly interpret the results of a test of hypothesis, we need to specify an appropriate significance level or judge the p-value of a test; understand the relationship between Type I and Type II errors. How do we compute a type II error?

Calculation of the Probability of a Type II Error
To calculate Type II error we need to… express the rejection region directly, in terms of the parameter hypothesized (not standardized). specify the alternative value under H1. Let us revisit Example 11.1

Calculation of the Probability of a Type II Error
Express the rejection region directly, not in standardized terms Let us revisit Example 11.1 The rejection region was with a = .05. Let the alternative value be m = 180 (rather than just m>170) H0: m = 170 H1: m = 180 a=.05 m= 170 m=180 Specify the alternative value under H1. Do not reject H0

Calculation of the Probability of a Type II Error
A Type II error occurs when a false H0 is not rejected. A false H0… H0: m = 170 …is not rejected H1: m = 180 a=.05 m= 170 m=180

Calculation of the Probability of a Type II Error
H0: m = 170 H1: m = 180 m=180 m= 170

Effects on b of changing a
Decreasing the significance level a, increases the value of b, and vice versa. a2 > b2 < a1 b1 m= 170 m=180

Judging the Test A hypothesis test is effectively defined by the significance level a and by the sample size n. If the probability of a Type II error b is judged to be too large, we can reduce it by increasing a, and/or increasing the sample size.

Judging the Test Increasing the sample size reduces b
By increasing the sample size the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean decreases. Thus, decreases.

Judging the Test Increasing the sample size reduces b
Note what happens when n increases: a does not change, but b becomes smaller m=180 m= 170

Judging the Test Increasing the sample size reduces b
In Example 11.1, suppose n increases from 400 to 1000. a remains 5%, but the probability of a Type II drops dramatically.

Judging the Test Power of a test
The power of a test is defined as 1 - b. It represents the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is false.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google