1. If We Build It, Will They Come (Eventually)? : Scholarly Communication and Institutional Repositories A Presentation to the NASIG 2005 Conference May 20 & May 21, 2005 by Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library Services http://libweb.uoregon.edu/catdept/home/ University of Oregon Libraries https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/dspace/handle/1794/843

2. Background Prices rising faster than inflation Movement from paper to electronic New pricing and access models for electronic content Scholarly output increasing

3. Result? Libraries able to provide access to smaller percentage of total scholarly output

4. Responses? Serials cancellations Campus discussions on scholarly communication Consortial purchases Broader sharing of collections Cataloging of e-journals Promotion of open-access journals New management tools (SFX, ERM, etc.)

5. IRs and Open Access IR: digital collections capturing and preserving the intellectual output of a single or multi-university community Open access: allows all members of society to freely access relevant cultural and scientific achievements, in particular by encouraging the free (online) availability of such information

6. SPARC: Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition http://www.arl.org/sparc/

7. The Case for Institutional Repositories http://www.arl.org/sparc/IR/ir.html

8. Rationale for Institutional Repositories New Scholarly Publishing Paradigm Institutional Visibility and Prestige Archive Output not Otherwise Captured

9. ACRL Scholarly Communication http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlissues/scholarlycomm/scholarlycommunication.htm

10. Reforming Scholarly Communication http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlpubs/whitepapers/principlesstrategies.htm

11. Issues in Scholarly Communication http://www.arl.org/scomm/

12. Getting Started

13. Investigate the Software

14. https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu

15. Evolving Local Policy Framework Submission policies Metadata standards Institutional commitment Copyright and licensing Division of responsibilities and clarification of roles

16. Develop Local Context

17. Local Contextual Wrapper Educate on issues and link to broader movement Provide overview of services using meaningful language Personalize the information Answer questions of local interest Provide enough detail Build in redundancy

18. Educate on Issues of Concern

19. Scholarly Communication Crisis : Background

20. Link to Broader Movement

21. Wellcome Trust and Open Access http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/doc_WTD002766.html

22. Berlin Declaration on Open Access http://www.zim.mpg.de/openaccess-berlin/berlindeclaration.html

23. Provide Overview of Services

24. Personalize the Information What’s in it for me page

25. What’s In It For Them?

26. Answer Questions of Local Interest

27. Copyright Concerns

28. SHERPA http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo.php

29. Sample Policy on Copyright

30. Provide Enough Detail

31. License Agreement

32. Structure of Scholars’ Bank Communities Sub-communities (sometimes) Collections  Titles  Items

33. Sample Community

34. Collections within Communities

35. Individual Titles within Collections

36. Individual Files Make Up Titles

37. Items Can Be in Multiple Collections

38. Mediated Submissions

39. Serials In Scholars’ Bank : Issues Locating appropriate content Getting permission to archive Converting to electronic form, if needed Migrating to different file formats, if needed Educating campus editors and authors about serial publishing Presenting them in a useable fashion Deciding on the appropriate metadata Deciding on links between the IR and the catalog

40. Locating appropriate content Newsletters Online journals Online newspapers Integrating web sites

41. CultureWork

42. Getting permission to archive Explain the benefits Pursue them Make it as easy as possible Offer to do all the work, if necessary

43. Conversion of Existing Files

44. Complexities of Harvesting

45. HTML Archives and Multiple Pages How Deep do You Go?

46. Capturing Links

47. Broken or Inaccurate Links

48. Logical or Useful Presentation

49. Numbering or the Lack Thereof

50. Chronological Displays of Issues

52. Actual Issue of Newsletter

53. Appropriate Level of Metadata

54. Links From the Catalog

55. Cataloging Issues

56. Current Efforts Departments, programs, institutes Hosting ejournals, newsletters, web sites Electronic theses Individual class archives Undergraduate Research Award program Individual faculty sites Graduate student community

57. Electronic Theses

58. Individual class archives

59. Undergraduate Library Research Awards

60. Individual Faculty Collections

61. How are we doing? How do we measure success? How are we doing compared to others? How are we doing collectively?

62. MIT

63. California Digital Library

64. University of Toronto

65. University of Glasgow

66. University of Rochester

67. University of Edinburgh

68. University of Kansas

69. University of Arizona

70. University of Oregon’s Scholars’ Bank

71. Are We Changing Scholarly Communication Patterns? Not in the way we planned Slowly Expanding access to grey literature

72. Next Steps at the UO Continue to acquire content Continue to market Align more closely with instructional programs Develop self-submission model among some communities Establish advisory group Develop searching guides Contribute further to software development Refine use statistics

73. Contact Information for Scholars’ Bank Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library Services University of Oregon Libraries chixson@darkwing.uoregon.edu (541) 346-3064