Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

– Ukrainian input in ILWS program O. FEDOROV Institute of Space Research, Kyiv, Ukraine V. KOREPANOV Lviv Centre of Institute of Space Research, Lviv,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "– Ukrainian input in ILWS program O. FEDOROV Institute of Space Research, Kyiv, Ukraine V. KOREPANOV Lviv Centre of Institute of Space Research, Lviv,"— Presentation transcript:

1 – Ukrainian input in ILWS program O. FEDOROV Institute of Space Research, Kyiv, Ukraine V. KOREPANOV Lviv Centre of Institute of Space Research, Lviv, Ukraine G. LIZUNOV Institute of Space Research, Kyiv, Ukraine YU. YAMPOLSKY Institute of Radio Astronomy, Kharkiv, Ukraine Contact: (vakor@isr.lviv.ua / Phone: +380-322-639163)

2 William Liu, IONOSAT

3 “Ionosat”. History EnvironmentISS2008Space weather, plasma flow around super large body PotentialRemote sensing satellite “Sich-2” 2009Neutral atmosphere and ionosphere parameters registration RadioastronSatellite2009Radio astronomy, plasma physics ChibisMicrosatellite2009Lightning activity Phobos-GruntInterplanetary station 2009Phobos study, space plasma physics Ionosat3 microsatellites2012Ionosphere, space weather, seismo- ionospheric coupling Resonance4 satellite2012Mazer effects in magnetosphere InterballSatellites1995Waves in the magnetosphere VariantSatellite “Sich-1M” 2004Fields and currents in the inonosphere Kompas-2Microsatellite2005Ionospheric earthquake precursors SPACE EXPERIMENTS IN UKRAINE

4 GMES – oriented ionospheric multi-satellites mission National Space Agency of Ukraine proposal for First European Space Program GMES – oriented ionospheric multi-satellites mission National Space Agency of Ukraine proposal for First European Space Program

5 IONOSAT project main tasks Scientific and methodological substantiation of the efficiency of the LEO satellites use for SW monitoring, corresponding technological realization development and tests. Systematic study of the dynamic response of the ionosphere to the influences “from above” (solar and geomagnetic activity) and “from below” (meteorological, seismic and technologic processes), seismo-ionospheric coupling. Synchronous operation with the existing sub-satellite electromagnetic and meteorological polygons. Calibration of modern prognostic models of quiet and disturbed ionosphere.

6 1.Orbit group is the cluster of three satellites with identical payload composition– multipoint measurements 2.Satellite group is at the orbit with ~ 400 km perigee– ionospheric project 3.The orbit of satellite group is polar but is not solar- synchronous one– covering of all the Globe at all range of local time 4.Mutual distance between satellites changed in the range 50 – 3000 km– multipoint diagnostics of medium- and big-scale disturbances “Ionosat”: Main features

7 “Ionosat”: Orbital cluster Iо-1 Iо-2 Io-1: liftetime = 2 years, perigee = 400 km, apogee = 780 km, inclination = 82.5 Io-2: The same, Moving off from Iо-1 increase up to 2000 km Basic orbit for two space vehicles (SV)

8 “Ionosat”: Orbital cluster Iо-1 Iо-2 Iо-3 has the same operational orbit as Iо-1 and Iо-2, but with another argument of a latitude:  ~ 2 Third SV:

9 Iо-1 Iо-2 Iо-3 Group lifetime = 2 years For high solar activity period: perigee = 400 km, apogee = 780 km Orbit inclination = 82.5 Moving off of Iо-1 – Iо-2: up to 2000 km Iо-1 – Iо-3: up to 3000 km SV positioning accuracy – less than 20 m SV attitude accuracy – less than 10 SV attitude determination accuracy – less than 0.1 “Ionosat”: Orbital cluster

10 “Ionosat”. Scientific tasks This is an ionospheric project This is an ionospheric project magnetosphere DEMETER h max F 2 Concentration (cm -3 ) Height, IONOSAT

11 EXPECTED PARAMETERS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC AND PLASMA DISTURBANCES AT HEIGHTS ~ 400 KM Particles Maximal disturbances of neutral particles concentration and temperature n n ~ 10 7 cm -3  n n ~ 10 5 cm -3,  T n ~ 10 3 К Maximal disturbances of ion and electron concentration and temperature n i ~ 10 5 cm -3  n i ~ 10 4 cm -3,  T e ~  T i ~  T n ~10 3 K Level of non-isothermicityT e / T i = 1-4 Fields Electric field: Quasi-stationary fields, ionic sound, MHD structures Whistlers, wide-band electrostatic noise 1- 1000 mV/m, DC-40 kHz 10-100  V/Hz 1/2 m, 1-200 kHz Magnetic field: MHD structures Whistlers: 0,1 - 100 nT, DC-100 Hz 10 -1 – 10 -4 nT,100 Hz-40 kHz Electric current Quasi-stationary structures: Whistlers: 1 – 10  A/m 2, DC-100 Hz 1 – 200 mV/m, 100 Hz-40 kHz

12 IDEAL COMPOSITION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC SATELLITE Sensors Neutral gas concentration Neutral gas temperature (pressure) Plasma concentration and temperature Supra-thermal electrons DC magnetic and electric fields (< 10 Hz) AC magnetic field. (1 Hz -100 k Hz ) AC electric field (1 Hz-200 kHz) … and ions Radio frequency analyzer (100 kHz-15 МHz) Parameters Gas kinetic: N, T, N e, T e, T i Distribution function and precipitating particles flux DC electric and magnetic fields, field aligned currents E, B, J ULF-VLF waveforms  E,  B and total spectrum of plasma waves I(  ) Processes GPS TEС Tasks CALIBRATION OF MODELS:  of upper atmosphere,  ionosphere,  EMF  Space Weather  Terragenic effects  EQ precursors Plasma waves:  generation,  structure,  turbulence ATMOSPHERE- IONOSPHERE INHOMOGENEITIES:  АGW,  coherency,  turbulence Magnetic hydrodynamics of upper atmosphere Regular course of atmospheric ionospheric parameters EMF and geomagnetic activity Ionospheric emissions and propagation of radiowaves

13 Special requirements Satellite orientation error ~ 10 Satellite orientation error ~ 10  Precision of satellite orientation determination ~ 0.1 Precision of satellite orientation determination ~ 0.1  Precision of satellite position determination ~ 20 mPrecision of satellite position determination ~ 20 m Very high requirements to the measurement synchronization at all three satellitesVery high requirements to the measurement synchronization at all three satellites Wide range of sampling frequencies: from 100 Hz (  min = 160 m) in monitoring mode to 100 kHz in burst modeWide range of sampling frequencies: from 100 Hz (  min = 160 m) in monitoring mode to 100 kHz in burst mode

14 Minimized payload model structure

15 IONOSAT on МС2- 8 platform Tentative sensors layout STEP – energetic particles sensor DN-DE – neutral particles sensor EP – electric probe FGM – flux-gate magnetometer WP – wave probe ТМ – telemetric antenna radio frequency analyzer RFA – radio frequency analyzer GPS – for TEC monitoring

16 DevicesWeight Power cons. 3 wave probes WP 0.7 kg  0.5 W Electric probe EP  0.2 kg  0.2 W Flux-gate magnetometer FGM  0.7 kg  0.6 W Radio frequency analyzer RFA 3 kg 3 W Sensor of kinetic parameters DN-DE 1.07 kg < 2 W Energetic particles sensorSTEP-E Energetic particles sensor STEP-E 2 kg 6 W6 W6 W6 W DCPUBooms ~ 12 kg 4 W4 W--4 W4 W--- Total: ~ 22 kg ~ 16 W “Ionosat”. Scientific payload

17 DATA COLLECTION AND PROCESSING UNIT MAIN PARAMETERS: SciWay interface with data transmission rate up to 50 Мb/s, 3 ports, Up to 32 requesters at each port, 4 GB memory, consumed power 4 W, weight < 2kg

18 EXPECTED INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION Space support: CSES (China) Mazowie (Poland) Vulkan or Kanopus (Russia) Other ? Ground support Ukraine (Kharkiv and Antarctica) Russia (Kamchatka polygon) Japan (EMSEV community) Swiss (COGEAR project) Norway (University of Tromso)

19 2008-2009 2009-2010 2011-2012 Decision-making, sending of invitations, feasibility study. (Stage А) (Stage B) Development and manufacturing of the devices, autonomous tests. (Stage B) (Stage C) Assembling, full- scale test and launch. (Stage C) “Ionosat”. Working shedule PARTICIPATION PROPOSALS ARE WELCOME Georgy Lizunov: liz@ikd.kiev.ua Valery Korepanov: vakor@isr.lviv.ua

20 THANK YOU FOR ATTENTION!


Download ppt "– Ukrainian input in ILWS program O. FEDOROV Institute of Space Research, Kyiv, Ukraine V. KOREPANOV Lviv Centre of Institute of Space Research, Lviv,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google