Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0516r0 Submission April 2015 CCA for Clauses 16, 17 and 19 Date: 2015-April Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1 NOTE: Includes.

Published byVictoria Houston Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0516r0 Submission April 2015 CCA for Clauses 16, 17 and 19 Date: 2015-April Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1 NOTE: Includes."— Presentation transcript:

1 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0516r0 Submission April 2015 CCA for Clauses 16, 17 and 19 Date: 2015-April Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1 NOTE: Includes inputs from Brian Hart (Cisco) and Guido Hiertz (Ericsson)

2 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0516r0 Submission The standard presently allows an 11b Clause 16 STA to just use one of three CCA schemes: ED-CCA, CS and CS with ED threshold. Similarly Clause 17 devices also have a choice. However, because many (if not all) 11b devices use just CS, 11g OFDM transmissions must use protection mechanism that is usually a RST/CTS or CTS-to-self. As it stands an 11b device using only CS-CCA is not compliant with EN 300 328 V1.8.1 which specifies ED-CCA at -58dBm minimum. Clause 19 and 20 devices must use both CS-CCA and ED-CCA. NOTE: This proposal would not affect present 11b devices but would affect new 11b implementations. Background April 2015 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 2

3 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0516r0 Submission Summary of existing CCA Specs April 2015 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 3 ClauseDescriptionMin RXCCA -CSCCA-ED 16 DSSS 1, 2Mbps 16.4.6.3 -80dBm @ 2Mbps) One of following: 1 – above ED 2 – any DSSS 3 – DSSS above ED -80dBm >100mW -76dBm >50<100mW -73dm <50mW 17 CCK 5.5, 11Mbps 17.3.8.2 -76dBm @ 11Mbps One of following: 1 – above ED 4 – any HR (with timer) 5 – HR above ED -76dBm >100mW -73dBm >50<100mW -70dm <50mW 18 11a OFDM 18.3.10.6 -82dBm 20MHz -85dBm 10MHz -88dBm 5MHz -82dBm 20MHz -85dBm 10MHz -88dBm 5MHz Mandatory -62dBm 20MHz -65dBm 10MHz -68dBm 5MHz 19 11g ERP 19.4.6 -82dBm 20MHz Valid signal -76dBm No Spec 20 11n 20.3.20.5.2 -82dBm 20MHz -79dBm 40MHz HT signal -82dBm 20MHz -79dBm 40MHz -62dBm 20MHz -59dBm 40MHz If not support HT-GF -72dBm for HT-GF (20MHz) -69dBm for HT-GF (40MHz) 2211ac 22.3.18.5 Primary Channel -82dBm 20MHz -79dBm 40MHz -76dBm 80MHz -73dBm 160MHz Secondary channel Any signal -62dBm 20MHz -59dBm 40MHz -72dBm in any 20MHz of 40MHz -82dBm -62dBm 11b devices tends to use these

4 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0516r0 Submission “The energy detection threshold for the CCA shall be proportional to the transmit power of the transmitter: for a 20 dBm e.i.r.p. transmitter the CCA threshold level (TL) shall be equal or lower than -70 dBm/MHz at the input to the receiver (assuming a 0 dBi receive antenna). For power levels below 20 dBm e.i.r.p. the CCA threshold level may be relaxed to TL = -70 dBm/MHz + 20 - Pout e.i.r.p. (Pout in dBm).” In a 20MHz channel, this requirement equates to about -62dBm. This creates the Upper Limit for ED CCA. ETSI EN 300 328 V1.8.2 April 2015 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 4

5 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0516r0 Submission OFDM, 11g and 11n recognize the 11b preamble and hence in practice we have the -82dBm CCA threshold between 11g/n and 11b DSSS and CCK do not recognize an OFDM preamble even though they share the band AND are 802.11. Hence OFDM 11g/11n need to use “protection” which reduces throughput. This is because 11b can choose the ‘valid signal only’ option (which they do) BUT OFDM 11g and 11n DO recognize DSSS and CCK at the -82dBm threshold because they understand 11b. For ‘Fair Sharing’, 11b could recognize OFDM at about the -82dBm threshold, and this would be CCA-ED –Note: The CCA-ED is presently set to -80dBm BUT not mandated –IF Clause 16, 17 CCA-ED was mandated, then 11g, 11n and 11b could share ‘equally’ and OFDM 11g/n would not need to send CTS or protective mechanism. Discussion on 11b CCA April 2015 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 5

6 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0516r0 Submission A.Make CCA-ED mandatory for Clause 16 and 17. –Minor change, just make “CCA-Mode 1” mandatory. –Still allow ‘valid signal’ threshold –Provides for 11b, 11g and 11n all sharing fairly and could eliminate the need for 11g/n OFDM to use protection with the associated efficiency improvement B.Leave all the clause 16/17 CCA as is (select one of 3) BUT add mandatory -62dBm CCA-ED requirement. –Minimum change but does bring 11b into line with ETSI. –If device chooses the CCA-ED then same as A, but not mandated. – As OFDM is seen as ED, 11g/n may need to use protection for themselves. C.Bring 11b CCA into line with others, mandate -82dBm valid signal, with -62dBm ED-CCA –As OFDM is seen as ED, 11g/n may need to use protection for themselves. Basic Options April 2015 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 6

7 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0516r0 Submission Existing Text: “The DSSS PHY shall provide the capability to perform CCA according to at least one of the following three methods — CCA Mode 1: Energy above threshold. CCA shall report a busy medium upon detection of any energy above the ED threshold. (Note: This is -80dBm) — CCA Mode 2: CS only. CCA shall report a busy medium only upon detection of a DSSS signal. This signal may be above or below the ED threshold. — CCA Mode 3: CS with energy above threshold. CCA shall report a busy medium upon detection of a DSSS signal with energy above the ED threshold.” Revised Text: “The DSSS PHY shall perform CCA according to CCA Mode 1 and may also provide the capability to perform CCA according to CCA Mode 2 or CCA mode 3. — CCA Mode 1: Energy above threshold. CCA shall report a busy medium upon detection of any energy above the ED threshold — CCA Mode 2: CS only. CCA shall report a busy medium only upon detection of a DSSS signal. This signal may be above or below the ED threshold. — CCA Mode 3: CS with energy above threshold. CCA shall report a busy medium upon detection of a DSSS signal with energy above the ED threshold.” Similar change for Clause 17.3.8.5 Option A – Clause 16.4.6.5 April 2015 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 7

8 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0516r0 Submission Existing Text: “The DSSS PHY shall provide the capability to perform CCA according to at least one of the following three methods — CCA Mode 1: Energy above threshold. CCA shall report a busy medium upon detection of any energy above the ED threshold. (NOTE: This is -80dBm) — CCA Mode 2: CS only. CCA shall report a busy medium only upon detection of a DSSS signal. This signal may be above or below the ED threshold. — CCA Mode 3: CS with energy above threshold. CCA shall report a busy medium upon detection of a DSSS signal with energy above the ED threshold.” Revised Text: “The DSSS PHY shall provide the capability to perform CCA according to both: A – At least one of the following options: — CCA Mode 1: Energy above threshold. CCA shall report a busy medium upon detection of any energy above the ED threshold. — CCA Mode 2: CS only. CCA shall report a busy medium only upon detection of a DSSS signal. This signal may be above or below the ED threshold. — CCA Mode 3: CS with energy above threshold. CCA shall report a busy medium upon detection of a DSSS signal with energy above the ED threshold. And B – CCA-ED coarse: Energy above threshold. CCA shall report a busy medium upon detection of any energy above -62dBm. Similar change for Clause 17.3.8.5 Option B – Clause 16.4.6.5 April 2015 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 8

9 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0516r0 Submission Existing Text: “The DSSS PHY shall provide the capability to perform CCA according to at least one of the following three methods — CCA Mode 1: Energy above threshold. CCA shall report a busy medium upon detection of any energy above the ED threshold. — CCA Mode 2: CS only. CCA shall report a busy medium only upon detection of a DSSS signal. This signal may be above or below the ED threshold. — CCA Mode 3: CS with energy above threshold. CCA shall report a busy medium upon detection of a DSSS signal with energy above the ED threshold.” Revised Text: “The DSSS PHY shall provide the capability to perform CCA according to both: — CCA Mode 1: Energy above threshold. CCA shall report a busy medium upon detection of any energy above -62dBm. — CCA Mode 3: CS with energy above threshold. CCA shall report a busy medium upon detection of a DSSS signal with energy above the ED threshold Then change the ED threshold The ED threshold shall be 100mW, -78 dBm for 50mW <TX power<=100mW, and -72 dBm for TX power <=50mW. Alternative might be simply: — CCA Mode 3: CS with energy above threshold. CCA shall report a busy medium upon detection of a DSSS signal with energy above -82dBm Similar change for Clause 17.3.8.5 Option C – Clause 16.4.6.5 April 2015 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 9

10 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0516r0 Submission The following note would be inserted {Note to 802.11REVmc reader, to be removed before publication. The following change has no force until REVmc is ratified (for anticipated ratification date, see http://www.ieee802.org/11/Reports/802.11_Timelines.htm). Pre-existing HR/DSSS STAs compliant to 802.11-2012 remain compliant to 802.11-2012.}http://www.ieee802.org/11/Reports/802.11_Timelines.htm Simply clarifying that the change would only affect new 11b devices. Aside April 2015 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 10

11 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0516r0 Submission Option A – Mandate CCA-ED for 11b Already a choice Meets ETSI requirement Puts 11b and 11g/n on equal sharing, fairness –11g/n recognize 11b at -82dBm –11b would recognize 11g/n at -80dBm Could eliminate ‘protection’ requirement and improve efficiency for 11g/n (Clause 9.26.2 Protection mechanism for non-ERP receivers) –Only point is that NAV not set by OFDM. Option B – Mandate -62dBm CCA-ED for 11b Meets ETSI requirement Still requires ‘protection’ for 11g/n Option C – Mandate -62dBm CCA-ED, -82dBm for valid signal 11b Meets ETSI requirement Common requirement, Still requires ‘protection’ for 11g/n Quick Recap (Intro to Straw Poll) April 2015 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 11

12 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0516r0 Submission Would you support a change to the CCA for DSSS and CCK along the lines as described for Option A, B or C Yes No Straw Poll - A April 2015 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 12

13 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0516r0 Submission Which Option would you prefer for 11b devices? Option A – Mandate CCA-ED (-80dBm, 100mw TX) Option B - Add mandatory -62dBm ED-CCA Option C – Mandate -82dB valid signal and -62dBm CCA-ED. A B C No preference Straw Poll - B April 2015 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 13

Download ppt "Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0516r0 Submission April 2015 CCA for Clauses 16, 17 and 19 Date: 2015-April Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1 NOTE: Includes."

Similar presentations

Doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/301R0 Submission May 2002 Terry Cole, AMDSlide 1 A More Efficient Protection Mechanism Terry Cole AMD Fellow +1.

Doc.: IEEE /301R0 Submission May 2002 Terry Cole, AMDSlide 1 A More Efficient Protection Mechanism Terry Cole AMD Fellow +1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/771r0 July 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 FILS STA Support for QoS, HT and VHT? Date: 2012-07-04 Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/771r0 July 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 FILS STA Support for QoS, HT and VHT? Date: Authors:
Dynamic Sensitivity Control V2

Dynamic Sensitivity Control V2
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-13/1012r0 Submission Sept 2013 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Improvement to area throughput Date: 2013-09 Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide.

Doc.: IEEE /1012r0 Submission Sept 2013 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Improvement to area throughput Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-08-0982-02-000p Submission September 2008 Carl Kain, Noblis (USDOT) Response to Comments on Optional Enhanced ACR and AACR Values Date:

Doc.: IEEE p Submission September 2008 Carl Kain, Noblis (USDOT) Response to Comments on Optional Enhanced ACR and AACR Values Date:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0025r0 Submission Jan 2015 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Roaming Date: 2015-January Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /0025r0 Submission Jan 2015 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Roaming Date: 2015-January Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Channel Sensing in UL-OFDMA

Channel Sensing in UL-OFDMA
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: 2014-11-03 NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneEmail.

Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: 2014-09-11 NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneEmail.

Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Discussions on the Definition of CCA Threshold

Discussions on the Definition of CCA Threshold
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/1303r5 Submission November 2010 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Overlapping BSS Co-Existence Date: 2010-11-11 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /1303r5 Submission November 2010 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Overlapping BSS Co-Existence Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.15-11-0435-00-0000 Submission doc.: IEEE 802.15-14-0167-00-wng0 March 2014 Tim Harrington (Zebra)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group.

Doc.: IEEE Submission doc.: IEEE wng0 March 2014 Tim Harrington (Zebra)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-13/1290r0 Submission Nov 2013 Dynamic Sensitivity Control for HEW SG Date: 2013-11 Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /1290r0 Submission Nov 2013 Dynamic Sensitivity Control for HEW SG Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0804r0 Submission July 2015 TG ax Outdoor Enterprise Scenario and DSC Date: 2015-05 Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /0804r0 Submission July 2015 TG ax Outdoor Enterprise Scenario and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11/06-1790r1 Submission November 2006 Bill McFarland, Atheros Communications, Inc.Slide 1 Energy Detect CCA Threshold Notice: This document.

Doc.: IEEE / r1 Submission November 2006 Bill McFarland, Atheros Communications, Inc.Slide 1 Energy Detect CCA Threshold Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0494r9 Agenda May 2015 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 1 IEEE 802.11 TGmc May 2015 Agenda Date: 2015-05-14 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0494r9 Agenda May 2015 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 1 IEEE TGmc May 2015 Agenda Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0562r0 Submission May 2011 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 CCA – CID 537 discussion Date: 2011-05-03 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0562r0 Submission May 2011 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 CCA – CID 537 discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/1062r0 Submission Zhendong Luo, CATR September 2010 RF Feasibility of 120 MHz Channelization for China Date: 2010-09-12 Authors: Slide.

Doc.: IEEE /1062r0 Submission Zhendong Luo, CATR September 2010 RF Feasibility of 120 MHz Channelization for China Date: Authors: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/0799r2 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Modifications to Simulation Scenarios and Calibration Process Date: 2014-07-01.

Doc.: IEEE /0799r2 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Modifications to Simulation Scenarios and Calibration Process Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/1289r2 Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 1 RTS/CTS Operation for Wider Bandwidth Date: 2010-11-09 Authors: Nov. 2010.

Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 1 RTS/CTS Operation for Wider Bandwidth Date: Authors: Nov

Similar presentations

Ads by Google