1. Revision of the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing: Overview Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 25 th Annual Conference, Atlanta, Georgia April 9, 2010 Jo-Ida Hansen University of Minnesota

2. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards2 Presentation: Four Substantive Areas Access – Nancy Tippins Accountability – Laurie Wise Technology – Fritz Drasgow Workplace – Paul Sackett

3. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards3 Joint Committee Members Barbara Plake, Co Chair Lauress Wise, HumRRO, Co Chair Linda Cook, ETS Fritz Drasgow, University of Illinois Brian Gong, NCIEA Laura Hamilton, Rand Corporation Jo-Ida Hansen, University on MN Joan Herman, UCLA

4. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards4 Joint Committee Members Michael Kane, Bar Examiners Michael Kolen, University of Iowa Antonio Puente, UNC-Wilmington Paul Sackett, University of MN Nancy Tippins, Valtera Corporation Walter (Denny) Way, Pearson Frank Worrell, Univ of CA- Berkeley

5. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards5 Scope of Revision Based on comments each organization received from invitation to comment Summarized by the Management Committee in consultation with the Co- Chairs Wayne Camara, Chair, APA Suzanne Lane, AERA David Frisbie, NCME

6. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards6 Four Substantive Areas for Revisions Technology Accountability Workplace Access Plus attention to format issues

7. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards7 Theme Teams Working teams Cross team collaborations Chapter Leaders Focusing of bringing into chapters content related to themes in coherent and meaningful ways

8. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards8 Timeline First meeting January, 2009 Projected 4 meetings per year Three year process for completing text of revision Open comment/Organization reviews Projected for December 2010 – April 2011 Projected publication Summer, 2012

9. Revising our Test Standards: Access for All Examinee Populations Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 25 th Annual Conference, Atlanta, Georgia April 9, 2010 Nancy Tippins Valtera

10. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards10 Overview Standards related to Access appear throughout many of the chapters but are concentrated in Chapter 9: Testing Individuals of Diverse Linguistic Backgrounds Chapter 10: Testing Individuals with Disabilities Comments on Access were received by the management committee and summarized for the committee charge

11. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards11 Elements of the Charge Accommodations/modifications Impact/differentiation of accommodation and modification Appropriateness for English language learners and examinees with disabilities Appropriateness for variety of groups, e.g., pre-K, older populations Flagging Comparability/validity Adequacy and comparability of translations Universal Design

12. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards12 Key Access Issues Included in our Charge - 1 Impact/differentiation of accommodations/modifications What are the appropriate ways to determine or establish the impact of accommodations/modifications on inferences, interpretations, and uses of scores? How do you differentiate clearly between what is an accommodation and what is a modification?

13. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards13 Key Access Issues Included in our Charge - 2 Appropriate ways to accommodate English- language learners and examinees with disabilities Selecting the appropriate accommodation for the individual Who should select the accommodation? What evidence should the selection be based on? Administering the appropriate accommodation What evidence is available to determine impact on test scores, given purpose of the test? how effective is the accommodation? Providing alternative assessments/modified achievement standards

14. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards14 Key Access Issues Included in our Charge - 3 Appropriate ways to accommodate a wider variety of groups Pre-K Older populations Number of older adults with cognitive impairments is rising Tested is often used to determine mental status changes There are many complexities associated with testing this population Combined effects of medical problems, medication side effects, multiple sensory deficits, testing environment

15. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards15 Key Access Issues Included in our Charge - 4 Flagging Current treatment needs to be updated to reflect changes in practice since 1999 standards Most testing organizations no longer flag Decisions about flagging should be based on empirical evidence

16. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards16 Key Access Issues Included in our Charge - 5 Comparability and validity of inferences made based on scores from accommodated or modified tests Foundational issues such as comparability and validity need to be addressed in foundational chapters If sample sizes do not support analyses such as DIF, other evidence of validity should be pursued

17. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards17 Key Access Issues Included in our Charge - 6 Adequacy and comparability of translations (language to language and language to symbol, e.g., Braille) Evidence is needed to demonstrate adequacy of translation and comparability of scores from translated tests Fluency, rather than primary language, should be used to describe target population for a test Quality of translation/adaptation needs to be emphasized Interaction of language proficiency and construct needs to be considered

18. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards18 Key Access Issues Included in our Charge - 7 Universal Design 1999 Standards focus too much on accommodations and modifications and not enough on building accessibility features into design and development process

19. Revising our Test Standards: Issues for Accountability Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 25 th Annual Conference, Atlanta Georgia April 9, 2010 Laurie Wise HumRRO

20. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards20 Overview There has been a dramatic expansion of the use of tests for various forms of accountability and other uses related to educational policy- setting. The Joint Committee has been charged with considering how these uses in accountability should impact revisions to the Standards As with the other themes, comments on the standards that related to accountability were compiled by the Management Committee and summarized in their charge to the Joint Committee

21. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards21 Overview Standards related to accountability currently are especially relevant to Chapter 13 (Educational Testing and Assessment) and Chapter 15 (Testing in Program Evaluation and Public Policy) Examples of emerging issues associated with use of tests for accountability Test results have important consequences for third parties such as school administrators and teachers, although not always for the examinees themselves. Federal peer review procedures have required assurances of reliability and validity that often go beyond requirements of the current Standards.

22. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards22 Key Accountability Topics Included in our Charge Validity and reliability requirements Issues with scores, scaling, and equating Policy and practice Formative and interim assessments

23. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards23 1. Validity, Reliability and Reporting Issues for Accountability Use of a single test (whether or not scores resulting from retesting or repeat testing are sufficient for using more than one score for high stakes decisions) as the sole source of high stakes decisions (e.g., graduation, promotion). How test alignment studies should be documented and used to demonstrate the validity of score interpretations regarding mastery of required content standards.

24. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards24 1. Validity, Reliability, and Reporting Issues - continued Provide additional guidance on score accuracy, especially when used to classify individuals or groups into performance regions or other bands on a score scale. Validity and reliability requirements for reporting individual or aggregate performance on subscales (skills or diagnostics). Incorporating error estimates and interpretive guidance in score reports, including subscores and diagnostic reports for individuals and groups.

25. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards25 2. Issues with Scores, Scaling, and Equating Growth modeling, gain scores, and other methods of estimating the value added by teachers and schools. Issues or requirements when linking different assessments (e.g., concordances, linkages and equating)

26. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards26 3. Policy and Practice How to balance privacy concerns for individual examinees, teachers, and administrators while meeting information needs for policy-makers. Issues related to the appropriate role of practice and test preparation, especially in contrast to admissions testing or credentialing.

27. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards27 4. Addressing formative and interim assessments Schools are increasingly developing or purchasing interim or formative assessments to identify study problems well before the end- of-year summative assessments Some issues: Appropriate uses of such tests Validity evidence required for interpreting scores As mastery As predictions

28. Revising our Test Standards: Technological Advances Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 25 th Annual Conference, Atlanta Georgia April 9, 2010 Fritz Drasgow University of Illinois

29. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards29 Overview Technological advances are changing the way tests are delivered, scored, interpreted and in some cases, the nature of the tests themselves The Joint Committee was charged with considering the implications of technological advances for the Standards As with the other themes, comments on the standards that related to technology were compiled by the Management Committee and summarized in their charge to the Joint Committee

30. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards30 Key Technology Issues Included in our Charge Reliability & validity of innovative item formats Validity issues associated with the use of: Automated scoring algorithms Automated score reports and interpretations Security issues for tests delivered over the internet Issues with web-accessible data, including data warehousing

31. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards31 Resources for Consideration Guidelines for Computer-Based Testing, Copyright 2002 Association of Test Publishers (ATP) International Guidelines on Computer- Based and Internet Delivered Testing, Copyright 2005 International Test Commission (ITC)

32. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards32 Reliability & Validity of Innovative Item Formats What special issues exist for innovative items with respect to access for various groups? How might the standards reflect these issues? What steps should the standards suggest with regards to “usability” of possibly unfamiliar innovative items?

33. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards33 Automated Scoring Algorithms What level of documentation/disclosure is appropriate and tolerable for proprietary (i.e. secret) automated scoring algorithms? What sorts of evidence seem most important for demonstrating the validity and “reliability” of automated scoring systems?

34. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards34 Automated Score Reports and Interpretation Use of computer for score interpretations “Actionable” reports (e.g., routing students and teachers to instructional materials and lesson plans based on test results)

35. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards35 Security issues for tests delivered over the internet Issues include: Protecting examinee privacy Threats to validity due to breach of security Are the reported scores correct? Considerations likely to affect standards related to test administration and responsibilities of test users

36. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards36 Web-Accessible Data, including Data Warehousing Applicability of general technology standards? Security IT standards similar to ISO Revision to commentary vs. drafting additional standards

37. Revising our Test Standards: Issues for Work-Place Testing Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 25 th Annual Conference, Atlanta Georgia April 9, 2010 Paul Sackett University of Minnesota

38. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards38 Overview Standards for testing in the work place are currently covered in Chapter 14 (one of the testing application chapters) Work-place testing includes employment testing as well as licensure, certification, and promotion testing. Comments on standards related to work place testing were received by the Management Committee and summarized in their charge to the Joint Committee.

39. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards39 Key Work-Place Testing Issues Included in our Charge 1. Validity and reliability requirements for certification and licensure tests. 2. Issues when tests are administered only to small populations of job incumbents. 3. Requirements for tests for new, innovative job positions that do not have incumbents or job history to provide validity evidence. 4. Assuring access to licensure and certification tests for examinees with disabilities that may limit participation in regular testing sessions? 5. Differential requirements for certification and licensure and employment tests.

40. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards40 1. Validity and Reliability Requirements Some specific issues: Documenting and communicating the validity and reliability of pass-fail decisions in addition to the underlying scores How cut-offs are determined How validity and reliability information is communicated to relevant stakeholders

41. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards41 2. Issues with Small Examinee Populations Including: Alternatives to statistical tools for item screening Assuring fairness Assuring technical accuracy Alternatives to empirical validity evidence Maintaining comparability of scores from different test forms

42. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards42 3. Requirements for New Jobs Issues include: Identifying test content Establishing passing scores Assessing reliability Demonstrating validity

43. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards43 4. Assuring Access to Employment Testing See also separate presentation on fairness Issues include: Determining appropriate versus inappropriate accommodations Relating testing accommodations to accommodations available in the work place

44. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards44 5. Certification and Licensure versus Employment Testing Currently, two sections in the same chapter Examples of relevant issues: Differences in how test content is identified Differences in validation strategies Differences in test score use Who oversees testing: Private company versus professional board/organization

45. April 9, 2010Revising our Test Standards45 Questions? or Comments?