 # BHS 204-01 Methods in Behavioral Sciences I April 25, 2003 Chapter 6 (Ray) The Logic of Hypothesis Testing.

## Presentation on theme: "BHS 204-01 Methods in Behavioral Sciences I April 25, 2003 Chapter 6 (Ray) The Logic of Hypothesis Testing."— Presentation transcript:

BHS 204-01 Methods in Behavioral Sciences I April 25, 2003 Chapter 6 (Ray) The Logic of Hypothesis Testing

Degrees of Freedom  Degrees of freedom (df) – how many numbers can vary and still produce the observed result.  Population statistics include the degrees of freedom. Calculated differently depending upon the experimental design – based on the number of groups. T-Test df = (N group1 -1) + (N group2 -1)

Reporting T-Test Results  Include a sentence that gives the direction of the result, the means, and the t-test results.  Example: The experimental group showed significantly greater weight gain (M = 55) compared to the control group (M = 21), t(12) = 3.97, p=.0019, two-tailed. Give the exact probability of the t value. Underline all statistics.

When to Use a T-Test  When two independent groups are compared.  When sample sizes are small (N< 30).  When the actual population distribution is unknown (not known to be normal).  When the variances within the two groups are unequal.  When sample sizes are unequal.

Using Error Bars in Graphs  Error bars show the standard error of the mean for the observed results.  To visually assess statistical significance, see whether: The mean (center point of error bar) for one group falls outside the error bars for the other group. Also compare how large the error bars are for the two groups.

Figure 5.8. (p. 124) Graphic illustration of cereal experiment.

Sources of Variance  Systematic variation – differences related to the experimental manipulation. Can also be differences related to uncontrolled variables (confounds) or systematic bias (e.g. faulty equipment or procedures).  Chance variation – nonsystematic differences. Cannot be attributed to any factor. Also called “error”.

F-Ratio  A comparison of the differences between groups with the differences within groups.  Between-group variance = treatment effect + chance variance.  Within-group variance = chance variance.  If there is a treatment effect, then the between-group variance should be greater than the within-group variance.

Testing the Null Hypothesis  Between-group variance (treatment effect) must be greater than within-group variance (chance variation), F > 1.0.  How much greater? Normal curve shows that 2 SD, p <.05 is likely to be a meaningful difference.  The p value is a compromise between the likelihood of accepting a false finding and the likelihood of not accepting a true hypothesis.

Box 6.1. (p. 135) Type I and Type II Errors.

 Type I error – likelihood of rejecting the null when it is true and accepting the alternative when it is false (making a false claim). This is the p value --.05 is probability of making a Type I error.  Type II error – likelihood of accepting null when it is false and rejecting the alternative when it is true. Probability is , the power of a statistic is 1- .

Reporting the F-Ratio  ANOVA is used to calculate the F-Ratio.  Example: The experimental group showed significantly greater weight gain (M = 55) compared to the control group (M = 21), F(1, 12) = 4.75, p=.05. Give the degrees of freedom for the numerator and denominator.

When to Use ANOVA  When there are two or more independent groups.  When the population is likely to be normally distributed.  When variance is similar within the groups compared.  When group sizes (N’s) are close to equal.

Threats to Internal Validity  It is the experimenter’s job to eliminate as many threats to internal validity as possible.  Such threats constitute sources of systematic variance that can be confused with an effect, resulting in a Type I error.  Potential threats to validity must be evaluated in the Discussion section of the research report.

Download ppt "BHS 204-01 Methods in Behavioral Sciences I April 25, 2003 Chapter 6 (Ray) The Logic of Hypothesis Testing."

Similar presentations