6/3/2015 Proposed guidelines for group work M2 meeting FAIR5-CT97-3856 Évora 20-23 January 1999.
Published byModified over 4 years ago
Presentation on theme: "6/3/2015 Proposed guidelines for group work M2 meeting FAIR5-CT97-3856 Évora 20-23 January 1999."— Presentation transcript:
6/3/2015 Proposed guidelines for group work M2 meeting FAIR5-CT97-3856 Évora 20-23 January 1999
6/3/2015 Our TARGET Indicators for eucalyptus stands sustainability evaluation
6/3/2015 Some issues... Forest / Plantations –Forest / Production forest PAN European National CA target Operational Indicators will fill the needs of CERTIFICATION / VERIFICATION
6/3/2015 and... Level for operational / scale –plot, set of plots, Forest Management Units Representation / aggregation –evaluate sustainability WHERE ? Forest Management Units Climatic & soil “homogeneous” regions National
6/3/2015 CRITERIA Following Luis Leal… –We never discussed (or will) them ! –They are settled and the working groups are their image Within each one we are defining INDICATORS / operational INDICATORS for Management / Demonstration purposes
6/3/2015 Indicators Lists Technical Annex lists M1 meeting lists State of the art reports lists & justifications (…) proposals (PT & SP) and can go on and on and on generating more lists –NOT the objective
6/3/2015 Working groups TASKS Based upon – –The national state of the art reports – –Individual contributions & discussions – –Expert knowledge / documentation – –Forestry industry proposal Define OPERATIONAL INDICATORS & methodologies within each CRITERIA, keeping in mind – –management tool in order to guarantee the management plan goals the need for simplicity (we will have to measure them) SIMPLE scientific/technical based RELIABLE RELEVANT redundancy analysis RELEVANT not expensive COST EFECTIVE pragmatic approaches TO GET A RESULT …..even if not what we would like as an optimal
6/3/2015 Based on PT & SP proposals TAKE INTO ACCOUNT methodology –how will it be measured ? methods ? how often ? (EMEU) cost – how much will it cost ? efficiency – is it worthwhile? –can we use another indicator less expensive / easier to measure ?
6/3/2015 Probably a difficult point ! TARGET /CRITICAL Thresholds –indicator selected –measured at the PICL (method) –aggregate the information FMU / HR / National –what is the target ? what is the LEVEL that corresponds to the optimal ? what is the TREND that corresponds to the optimal ?
6/3/2015 In the PAVILHÃO secretariat W G1 W G2 W G3 W G6 W G4 W G5 support documentaton
6/3/2015 Technical support … ask Luisa Computers / printer (WG5) files to load into the computers computers with PP (presentations) overheads / pens copies coffee & water
6/3/2015 Schedules You are on your own suggestion 1: try to follow the Program, although you can work throughout the night… suggestion 2: from time to time “infiltrate” into the other 5 WG… just to get a reference
6/3/2015 On Friday PM, here Working groups reporting –rapporteur –written & oral report indicators & methodologies Synthesis Outline of future work On Saturday AM