Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Yanxin Shi 1, Fan Guo 1, Wei Wu 2, Eric P. Xing 1 GIMscan: A New Statistical Method for Analyzing Whole-Genome Array CGH Data RECOMB 2007 Presentation.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Yanxin Shi 1, Fan Guo 1, Wei Wu 2, Eric P. Xing 1 GIMscan: A New Statistical Method for Analyzing Whole-Genome Array CGH Data RECOMB 2007 Presentation."— Presentation transcript:

1 Yanxin Shi 1, Fan Guo 1, Wei Wu 2, Eric P. Xing 1 GIMscan: A New Statistical Method for Analyzing Whole-Genome Array CGH Data RECOMB 2007 Presentation 1 School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University 2 Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh

2 Outline Motivation and Background Computational framework Experiments and Results Summary

3 Copy number aberration and Array CGH DNA copy number (a.k.a. dosage state) –Normal: 2 DNA copies –Aberrations: deletion(0 copy), loss (1 copy), gain(3 copies), amplification(>3 copies) –Array CGH: a high throughput method to measure DNA copy number

4 Array CGH data Deletion (0 copy): LR = log(0/2) = Loss (1 copy): LR = log(1/2) = -1 Normal (2 copies): LR = log(2/2) = 0 Gain (3 copies): LR = log(3/2) = 0.58 Amplification (>=4 copies): LR >= log(4/2) = 1 Ideally,

5 However… Factors influencing the LR values  Impurity of the test sample (e.g. mixture of normal and cancer cells)  Variations of hybridization efficiency  Base compositions of different probes  Saturation of array  Divergent sequence lengths of the clones  Many others…  Measurement noises, etc…

6 Segmental pattern and spatial drift Spatial drift Segmental pattern

7 Existing Computational Methods Threshold Method Mixture Models (e.g. Hodgson et al., 2001) –Assume observations are iid samples from a mixture distribution. Regression Models (e.g., Hsu et al., 2005; Myers et al., 2004) –Smoothing for visual inspection to detect copy number states. Segmentation Models (e.g. Hupé et al., 2004) –Directly search for breakpoints in sequential data; Spatial Dynamics Models (e.g. Fridlyand et al., 2004)

8 Hidden Markov Models –Dosage states form a Markov chain of hidden variables –Observed LR ratios are generated from state-specific Gaussian distributions Spatial Dynamic Methods dosage states LR ratios

9 Introduce hidden trajectory to model state- specific LR distributions (no longer fixed mean) Dosage-Specific Kalman Filters Linear Dynamics for dosage state m

10 A SKF generates observations from one of the trajectories. Switching Kalman Filters Dosage state chain Trajectory 1 Trajectory M

11 Posterior Inference Dosage annotation is equivalent to the estimate of the posterior. Recovering the hidden trajectory:.

12 Posterior Inference is intractable. Variational inference: decouple the hidden chains. Decoupled chains have tractable distributions. Variational Inference

13 Use this tractable distribution to approximate the true distribution by minimizing KL divergence. Fixed point equations to update the variational parameters. Variational Inference

14 Parameter Sharing The CGH dataset contains whole-genome measurements for multiple individuals. Chromosome-specific parameters shared across individuals: Individual-specific parameters shared across chromosomes: All other parameters e.g. output noise variance trajectory parameters:

15 Experiment Design Simulation Analysis: –Data generated from SKFs. –Compare with: threshold, HMM. aCGH profiles of 125 colorectal tumors (Nakao et al. 2004) –Case studies of 3 representative chromosomes. –Populational analysis over 125 genomes

16 Simulation Analysis (1) Performance of dosage state prediction (b – noise in hidden dynamics, r – noise in observation, M=5)

17 Simulation Analysis (2) Synthetic Data Prediction by HMM Prediction by SKF

18 Experiment Design Simulation Analysis: –Data generated from SKFs. –Compare with: threshold, HMM. aCGH profiles of 125 colorectal tumors (Nakao et al. 2004) –Case studies of 3 representative chromosomes. –Populational analysis over 125 genomes

19 Real aCGH Profile Spatial Patterns Difficult for Conventional Methods (1) Flat-Arch Pattern

20 Real aCGH Profile Spatial Patterns Difficult for Conventional Methods (2) Step Pattern

21 Real aCGH Profile Spatial Patterns Difficult for Conventional Methods (3) Spikes Pattern

22 Populational Analysis Frequency of dosage state alteration of 125 individuals red bar – copy number gain or amplification blue bar – copy number loss or deletion solid vertical lines – boundary between chromosomes

23 Populational Analysis Frequency of dosage state alteration on 2 chromosomes top, red square – copy number gain top, blue circle – copy number loss bottom, red square – copy number amplification bottom, blue circle – copy number deletion

24 Summary SKF for whole-genome analysis of aCGH data. SKF can capture variations in the hybridization efficiency. Parameter sharing scheme for data integration. Possible Extensions: –Gene expression concordance analysis –Incorporate information about sequence length and distance between clones

25 Thank you!

26 Populational Analysis Detailed spectrum of GIM rates over 125 Colorectal cancer patients in 4 hotspots region with annotation of cancer related gene

27 M is selected by AIC. We also have done experiments to compare SKF with segmentation methods (result now shown here).

28 A SKF generates observations from one of the trajectories. is the switching process as in an HMM. are observed LR ratios. Switching Kalman Filters


Download ppt "Yanxin Shi 1, Fan Guo 1, Wei Wu 2, Eric P. Xing 1 GIMscan: A New Statistical Method for Analyzing Whole-Genome Array CGH Data RECOMB 2007 Presentation."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google