1. DIVERCITY Review Meeting. Stakeholder Perspective Per Christiansson, Aalborg University Yusuf Arayici, Salford University Mikko Soininvaara, EVATA, Finland Jens Ove Skjærbæk, COWI Yves Michel, Spie-Tondella, France 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective

2. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC The DIVERCITY PROTOTYPE and CONCEPT

3. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC BUILDING PROCESS CHANGE? Organisation Person/Team Analyses/simulation tools Information container Models access Framework Collaboration environment Virtual Building The DIVERCITY Framework

4. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC Virtual Building -Virtual Building environment. Product and process models with spatial temporal properties, partly redundant information, early decision support, …. Framework

5. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC Advanced Interface to Models Models access Virtual Building -Higher realism in interaction with underlying models (VR, simulation tools, adapted views, cost/accessibility,...) Analyses/simulation tools

6. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC New Workspace Properties Person/Team Collaboration environment -Physical workspaces with new dimension (‘virtual’, augmented, immersive) and new collaboration tools. -Advanced administration tools (artefacts) for secure distributed personal, team, and project information repositories Organisation Information container

7. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC Knowledge Management Support - Participants; number of, type (persons, agents) - Collaboration subject/context & Form of interaction; design, reviews, purchase, learning, brainstorm, negotiation, discussion, - Communication content to support interaction; e.g. speech, sound, images, music, video, whisper, body language, 3D objects, control information;….. - Meeting spaces and room definitions; physical, virtual, static, dynamic, mobile and combinations. - Collaboration artefacts; communication channels, user applications, and information containers, ‘process managers’

8. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC Competence Collaboration Organisation Person/Team Information container -Competence collaboration in projects enabled (adopted communication, access to knowledge containers with experiences etc.) (client)

9. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC Changes in Process Organisation Dramatic changes in procurement philosophies, as a result of the internet (partnering model). Partnering model showing the stakeholders joining a common project group with mutual goals (COWI A/S Denmark) Nb of important decisions Time Higher quality processes & products

10. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC A)user requirements capture, user environment design and early prototyping; B) implementation of DIVERCITY and end user alpha test (done within the DIVERCITY consortium) of basic functionality of the DIVERCITY products (applications); C)continued implementation and end user beta tests/evaluations of basic functionality of integrated framework and DIVERCITY products; D)final end user evaluation of DIVERCITY, and prototype refinement. COLLABORATION IN PROJECT Socially very good environment We have methodology for efficient user requirements capture, user environment modelling and system development

11. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC DIVERCITY- Stakeholder Perspective PC 14.4.2002 Mikko Soininvaara, EVATA, Finland Jens Ove Skjærbæk, COWI Yves Michele, SPIE, France DIVERCITY contributes to enhance QUALITY on building process and end product!

12. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC DIVERCITY Framework Laurent da Daldo E-viper client handles access to the workspaces and projects The Central eViper Server Source control stores different versions and keeps an history of all that happens on a project User profiling allows the server to identify people connected to, or trying to, connect to it and manage user access rights on projects. Security and integrity of information is permanently controlled by the server. Messages management is one of the most important feature of eViper. It controls information exchanged between users and manages priorities. Thanks to this feature, developers using eViper can build not only distributed but also collaborative applications. This is an open mechanism allowing any third party to use data controlled by the server (as long as they are authorised). The Distribution Manager The distribution manager is the client (user) side of the communication layer of DIVERCITY. It can be included in an application (it in the case of Phooka, the DIVERCITY client application) or can be a stand alone application, controlling data exchange between the client and the central server. The distribution manager has been released in JAVA and C++ and it is platform- independent. In this way, developers will be able to work in their own environment. This interface provides all necessary entries to send and receive message from the server. It also provides a simple way to plug any third party application to the central server of eViper. DSL Data Structure Layer

13. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC END

14. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC EXTRAS

15. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC DIVERCITY - RESULTS Applications integrated into a extendible framework (also loosely coupled application) Framework based on Internet based client-server technology ( eViper). (Model and workflow driven) Framework for building collaborative environments. Methodology for efficient user requirements capture, user environment modelling and system development. Early design support (explain, communicate ideas, solutions)

16. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC Future Virtual Workspace features PC 14.4.2002 The future distributed workspaces will thus possess new features: The advanced administration tools for distributed personal, team, and project information repositories; accessibility to virtual building models and collaboration environments through wireless networked workspaces and low cost virtual reality environments; appropriate security levels for sharing the information over the inter/intranets; process and workflow management tools to support variations in working practices between different projects; definition and design of new ICT tools to support collaboration and communication with end-user. Applications integrated into a extendible framework; Divercity has created a virtual workspace for construction, which includes some of the features listed above and forms a framework and concept for further development.

17. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC Virtual Workspace Definition 'The Virtual Workspace, VW, is the new design room designed to fit new and existing design routines. VW may well be a mixed reality environment. The VW will host all design partners from project start with different access and visibility (for persons and groups) in space and time to the project, and will promote building up shared values in projects. The VW thus acts as a communication space with project information support in adapted appearances. VW gives access to general and specific IT-tools '

18. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC The Virtual Building Model The virtual building contains all documentation of the building including drawings, models, documents etc. It will normally contain redundant information and temporal information describing discipline models and sub models of the building over time.

19. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC DIVERCITY User Environment. DIVERCITY Application data container DIVERCITY Data container -IFC+ Collab. Application data container 'CAD' Appl. Application data container Appl. Application data container Appl. Collab. Virtual Workspace Acoustics Lighting Simulations Thermal Analysis 4D building site Building Model (IFC,…) Client briefing

20. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC COWI EXPERIENCES Divercity is an example on a end-user co-defined developed workspace and, to our knowledge, one of the most coherent at the moment and might be the future platform for further plug-ins. The pro-active end user involvement have made significant modifications to the software architecture as well as to the individual products. The end-user involvement in the preparation and the planning of test scenarios contributed in ensuring that the VE will meet the requirements of the industry. The IFC-standard which is a core component in the Divercity framework is progressively been introduced to the Danish construction industry. At the moment COWI is participating in a test of the standard on the new head- quarters for the National Broadcasting Company (DR)

21. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC END EXTRAS

22. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC DIVERCITY Review Meeting. Architect Perspective SEPARATE SLIDES Mikko Soininvaara, EVATA, Finland

23. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC END

24. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC Jens Ove Skjærbæk, COWI A/S, Denmark Cimbrergaarden Thulebakken 36 DK-9000 Aalborg jeo@cowi.com DIVERCITY Review Meeting. Detailed Design

25. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC Why is Divercity Interesting 1/2 Divercity is an example on a end-user co-defined developed workspace and, to our knowledge, one of the most coherent at the moment and might be the future platform for further plug-ins. The pro-active end user involvement have made significant modifications to the software architecture as well as to the individual products during the development

26. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC Why is Divercity Interesting 2/2 The end-user involvement in the preparation and the planning of test scenarios contributed in ensuring that the VE will meet the requirements of the industry. The IFC-standard which is a core component in the Divercity framework is progressively been introduced to the Danish construction industry. The Divercity concept indicates need for new collaborative patches and organisational challenges

27. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC Organisational challenges Re-organising the project stakeholders in new collaborative structures New procurement paths Strengthen collaboration Utilisation of com- mon experiences

28. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC Benefits Integrated products to use IFC standard Visualisation of technical solutions. Integration of multiple solutions in one distributed model. Presentation of complex solutions in a visual and comprehensible form. Improved mobility. Basic structure for future developments

29. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC END

30. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC DIVERCITY Review Meeting. Contractor Perspective SEPARATE SLIDES Yves Michel, Spie Tondella, France

31. 4th review meeting - September 20,2002, Helsinki, Finland. Stakeholder Perspective/PC END