Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ECIV 720 A Advanced Structural Mechanics and Analysis

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ECIV 720 A Advanced Structural Mechanics and Analysis"— Presentation transcript:

1 ECIV 720 A Advanced Structural Mechanics and Analysis
Lecture 15: Quadrilateral Isoparametric Elements (cont’d) Force Vectors Modeling Issues Higher Order Elements

2 Integration of Stiffness Matrix
BT(8x3) D (3x3) ke (8x8) B (3x8)

3 Integration of Stiffness Matrix
Each term kij in ke is expressed as Linear Shape Functions is each Direction Gaussian Quadrature is accurate if We use 2 Points in each direction

4 Integration of Stiffness Matrix
h

5 Choices in Numerical Integration
Numerical Integration cannot produce exact results Accuracy of Integration is increased by using more integration points. Accuracy of computed FE solution DOES NOT necessarily increase by using more integration points.

6 FULL Integration A quadrature rule of sufficient accuracy to exactly integrate all stiffness coefficients kij e.g. 2-point Gauss rule exact for polynomials up to 2nd order

7 Reduced Integration, Underintegration
Use of an integration rule of less than full order Advantages Reduced Computation Times May improve accuracy of FE results Stabilization Disadvantages Spurious Modes (No resistance to nodal loads that tend to activate the mode)

8 Spurious Modes Consider the 4-node plane stress element 1 t=1 E=1 v=0.3 1 8 degrees of freedom 8 modes Solve Eigenproblem

9 Spurious Modes Rigid Body Mode Rigid Body Mode

10 Spurious Modes Rigid Body Mode

11 Spurious Modes Flexural Mode Flexural Mode

12 Spurious Modes Shear Mode

13 Uniform Extension Mode
Spurious Modes Stretching Mode Uniform Extension Mode (breathing)

14 Element Body Forces Total Potential Galerkin

15 Body Forces Integral of the form

16 Body Forces In both approaches Linear Shape Functions Use same quadrature as stiffness maitrx

17 Element Traction Total Potential Galerkin

18 Element Traction Similarly to triangles, traction is applied along sides of element 3 u v Tx Ty h 4 4 x 2 1

19 Traction For constant traction along side 2-3 Traction components along 2-3

20 More Accurate at Integration points Stresses h x
Stresses are calculated at any x,h

21 Modeling Issues: Nodal Forces
In view of… A node should be placed at the location of nodal forces Or virtual potential energy

22 Modeling Issues: Element Shape
Square : Optimum Shape Not always possible to use Rectangles: Rule of Thumb Ratio of sides <2 Larger ratios may be used with caution Angular Distortion Internal Angle < 180o

23 Modeling Issues: Degenerate Quadrilaterals
Coincident Corner Nodes 1 2 3 4 2 1 4 x x Integration Bias 3 Less accurate

24 Modeling Issues: Degenerate Quadrilaterals
Three nodes collinear 1 2 3 4 Integration Bias 1 2 3 4 x x Less accurate

25 Modeling Issues: Degenerate Quadrilaterals
2 nodes Use only as necessary to improve representation of geometry Do not use in place of triangular elements

26 All interior angles < 180
A NoNo Situation y 3 (7,9) Parent x h (6,4) 4 1 2 J singular (3,2) (9,2) x All interior angles < 180

27 Another NoNo Situation
x, y not uniquely defined x

28 FEM at a glance It should be clear by now that the cornerstone in FEM procedures is the interpolation of the displacement field from discrete values Where m is the number of nodes that define the interpolation and the finite element and N is a set of Shape Functions

29 FEM at a glance m=2 x x1=-1 x2=1 x1=-1 1 x 3 x2=1 2 m=3

30 FEM at a glance 1 2 3 q6 q5 q4 q3 q2 q1 v u x h m=3 x h 4 1 2 3 m=4

31 FEM at a glance In order to derive the shape functions it was assumed that the displacement field is a polynomial of any degree, for all cases considered 1-D 2-D Coefficients ai represent generalized coordinates

32 FEM at a glance For the assumed displacement field to be admissible we must enforce as many boundary conditions as the number of polynomial coefficients x1=-1 1 x 3 x2=1 2 e.g.

33 FEM at a glance This yields a system of as many equations as the number of generalized displacements that can be solved for ai

34 FEM at a glance Substituting ai in the assumed displacement field and rearranging terms…

35 FEM at a glance 1 3 2 u(x)=a0+a1 x +a2 x 2 u(-1)=a0 -a1 +a2 =u1
u(0)=a0 =u3

36 Let’s go through the exercise
1 x2 2 Assume an incomplete form of quadratic variation

37 Incomplete form of quadratic variation
x1 1 x2 2 We must satisfy

38 Incomplete form of quadratic variation
And thus,

39 Incomplete form of quadratic variation
And substituting in

40 Incomplete form of quadratic variation
Which can be cast in matrix form as

41 Isoparametric Formulation
The shape functions derived for the interpolation of the displacement field are used to interpolate geometry x1 1 x2 2

42 Intrinsic Coordinate Systems
Intrinsic coordinate systems are introduced to eliminate dependency of Shape functions from geometry 1 (-1,-1) 2 (1,-1) 4 (-1,1) 3 (1,1) x h The price? Jacobian of transformation Great Advantage for the money!

43 Field Variables in Discrete Form
Geometry Displacement e = B un Strain Tensor s = DB un Stress Tensor

44 FEM at a glance Element Strain Energy Work Potential of Body Force Work Potential of Surface Traction etc

45 Higher Order Elements Quadrilateral Elements Recall the 4-node Complete Polynomial 4 Boundary Conditions for admissible displacements 4 generalized displacements ai

46 Assume Complete Quadratic Polynomial
Higher Order Elements Quadrilateral Elements Assume Complete Quadratic Polynomial 9 generalized displacements ai 9 BC for admissible displacements

47 BT18x3 D3x3 B3x18 ke 18x18 9-node quadrilateral
9-nodes x 2dof/node = 18 dof BT18x3 D3x3 B3x18 ke 18x18

48 9-node element Shape Functions
Following the standard procedure the shape functions are derived as 1 2 3 4 Corner Nodes x h 5 6 7 8 Mid-Side Nodes 9 Middle Node

49 9-node element – Shape Functions
Can also be derived from the 3-node axial element x1=-1 1 x x2=1 3 2

50 Construction of Lagrange Shape Functions
x (1,h) (1,1) 1 (-1,-1)

51 N1,2,3,4 Graphical Representation

52 N5,6,7,8 Graphical Representation

53 N9 Graphical Representation

54 Polynomials & the Pascal Triangle
Degree 1 x y 1 2 x2 xy y2 3 x3 x2y xy2 y3 4 x4 x3y x2y2 xy3 y4 5 x5 x4y x3y2 x2y3 xy4 y5 …….

55 Polynomials & the Pascal Triangle
To construct a complete polynomial Q1 4-node Quad 1 x y x2 xy y2 x3 x2y xy2 y3 x4 x3y x2y2 xy3 y4 ……. x5 x4y x3y2 x2y3 xy4 y5 Q2 9-node Quad etc

56 Incomplete Polynomials
1 x y x2 xy y2 x3 x2y xy2 y3 x4 x3y x2y2 xy3 y4 ……. x5 x4y x3y2 x2y3 xy4 y5 3-node triangular

57 Incomplete Polynomials
1 x y x2 xy y2 x3 x2y xy2 y3 x4 x3y x2y2 xy3 y4 ……. x5 x4y x3y2 x2y3 xy4 y5

58 8 coefficients to determine for admissible displ.
8-node quadrilateral Assume interpolation 1 2 3 4 x h 5 6 7 8 8 coefficients to determine for admissible displ.

59 BT16x3 D3x3 B3x16 ke 16x16 8-node quadrilateral
8-nodes x 2dof/node = 16 dof BT16x3 D3x3 B3x16 ke 16x16

60 8-node element Shape Functions
Following the standard procedure the shape functions are derived as 1 2 3 4 Corner Nodes h 5 6 7 8 Mid-Side Nodes x

61 N1,2,3,4 Graphical Representation

62 N5,6,7,8 Graphical Representation

63 Incomplete Polynomials
1 x y x2 xy y2 x3 x2y xy2 y3 x4 x3y x2y2 xy3 y4 ……. x5 x4y x3y2 x2y3 xy4 y5

64 6 coefficients to determine for admissible displ.
6-node Triangular Assume interpolation 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 coefficients to determine for admissible displ.

65 BT12x3 D3x3 B3x12 ke 12x12 6-node triangular
6-nodes x 2dof/node = 12 dof 1 2 3 4 5 6 BT12x3 D3x3 B3x12 ke 12x12

66 6-node element Shape Functions
Following the standard procedure the shape functions are derived as Corner Nodes 1 2 3 Mid-Side Nodes 4 5 6 Li:Area coordinates

67 Other Higher Order Elements
1 x y x2 xy y2 x3 x2y xy2 y3 x4 x3y x2y2 xy3 y4 ……. x5 x4y x3y2 x2y3 xy4 y5 12-node quad x h 1 2 3 4

68 Other Higher Order Elements
1 x y x2 xy y2 x3 x2y xy2 y3 x4 x3y x2y2 xy3 y4 ……. x3y2 16-node quad x h 1 2 3 4 x5 x4y x3y2 x2y3 xy4 y5


Download ppt "ECIV 720 A Advanced Structural Mechanics and Analysis"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google