Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

PLANNING HISTORY: PART II 1900-1930s: persistent and expanded urban problems and a diversity of (inadequate?) responses Industrial hyper-development presented.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "PLANNING HISTORY: PART II 1900-1930s: persistent and expanded urban problems and a diversity of (inadequate?) responses Industrial hyper-development presented."— Presentation transcript:

1 PLANNING HISTORY: PART II 1900-1930s: persistent and expanded urban problems and a diversity of (inadequate?) responses Industrial hyper-development presented new challenges eliciting a diversity of complex responses. Economic depression (1929-39) stimulated “New Deal” action ranging from environmental planning, to urban and industrial/labor as well as social reform.

2

3 Shattered dreams, lost hope

4 The Planning Responses Reflected differing perspectives/philosophies and differing outcomes. Pragmatists (moles) Utopians (Skylarks)

5 The solutions: realistic or utopian? City Efficient – Regulate and Redevelop New Communities – Reject,Recreate, and Relocate

6 City Efficient: Pragmatic professionals Who were they - -Architects: Daniel Burnham (master planner and “father of American architecture”) - Lawyers (Alfred Bettman and Edward Bassett - Engineers (Robert Moses) - Social Critics (Jane Jacobs) - Publicists/strategists (Walter Moody)

7 The Pragmatic Planners Walter Moody Jane Jacobs

8 Pragmatic ideology Their perspective Improve city form for better functioning Engage in new construction to improve infrastructure Adopt policies (control approach) to achieve desired goals Their vision Maintenance of capitalist order Social Order Support for democracy and individualism

9

10 Idealists (utopian) planners Their Perspective: The city needed to be revamped and people relocated. Their vision: Anti-urban Embraced semi-rural landscapes with green belt areas Implementation of mixed use landscape for self sufficiency Urban design - blend of country and city Ideal size of city - 30-40,000 population Social order Prescriptive (at the cost of some laissez faire individualism)

11 Who were labeled the idealists? Best known : Ebenezer Howard (1850-1929) Robert Owen (1771-1858) Patrick Geddes (1854-1932)

12 Frank Lloyd Wright (1867-1959) Edouard de Jeanneret aka LeCorbusier (1887-1990 ) Lewis Mumford (1895-1979) Best known idealists…

13 Frank Lloyd Wright: Architect & Planner

14 LeCorbusier: Seeking economies of scale in late capitalism?

15 To which of these camps do you belong? Idealist? Pragmatist? Contemporary evidence of a blended perspective?

16 III. CITY EFFICIENT MOVEMENT (aka: City Scientific, or City Functional) Application of empiricism (scientific data gathering) Educational and professional institutions promote the planning process and establish professionalism in planning Planners sought public support through systematic marketing efforts. Emergence of public-private partnerships in land developments See works of Robert Moses and Daniel Burnham, Walter Moody for examples

17 Robert Moses: NY Master Builder -bridges, parks, parkways …

18 City efficient: accommodating the automobile.

19 The Automobile Shapes The city (from article by M. V. Melosi) Ford Model T-automobile 1920s

20 A search for new beginnings: Garden Cities- the utopian response A vision realized but never entirely enduring: 1824: New Harmony: a model village for America 1903: Letchworth: England first garden city 1920: Welwyn: England second garden city 1928: Radburn: First Garden City built in USA See Howard’s maps p.143-45 in Platt Refer also to article by Robert Fishman (required reading)

21 Ebenezer Howard’s ideal city design

22 Radburn, NJ:Enduring planning icon

23 A Garden City for USA –Radburn, NJ The American Architect commented (1980): Radburn: Represents the first scientific effort that has ever been made to establish a community designed exclusively to minimize the danger of automobile accidents.…It was also the desire of the builders to create not only a [safe] community..but …one of beauty in appearance and the utmost in modern efficiency. Quoted in Kreukeberg 1087, p. 128

24 Radburn: Lasting contributions to planning 1. “NGO”-private partnership 2.Separation of traffic by mode (the pedestrian path system does not cross any major roads at grade) 3. Creation of mixed use largely residential "superblocks”. 4. Introduced five-step planning process - has been a lasting guide: i) formulate goals ii) collect data iii) develop plan iv) implement plan iv) evaluate at later date

25 Radburn: How ideal? Current population status versus planning goal? Built for which social class(es)? Diverse or homogenous ethnic/social groups? Efficient use of urban space? Access to employment?

26 Recapping planning accomplishments during 1920s 1906: First Major historic preservation act: The Antiquities Act of 1906 1909: First– National Conference on City Planning (NCCP) 1909: Plan of Chicago 1916 National Park Service created 1916: First comprehensive zoning ordinance adopted in NY 1917: American City Planning Institute (ACPI) formed 1926: The rise of Zoning See list of dates in handout

27 Zoning Legalized 1922 – President Hoover’s government issued the Standard State Zoning Enabling Act 1922 - Start of conflict between Village of Euclid and Ambler Realty Co. 1926 - Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of comprehensive zoning (see Euclid v. Ambler Realty Company) 1928 - Standard City Planning Enabling Act (dictated what could occur in the city)

28 Zoning’s seminal court cases (1) Discuss case: Euclid v. Ambler Realty Company See handout

29 New Deal Public Works and Grande Vision of the 1930s President F. D. Roosevelt’s New Deal “Planning” Actions Successes and failures of Roosevelt's "New Deal" programs See chart in the handout.

30 Relief in sight Roosevelt creates new programs CCC gives work to youth Monastery opens soup kitchen !

31 New Deal: pragmatic and utopic The pragmatic: CWA, CCC, Social Security …. The idealistic: Natural Resources Planning Board (1939-43) Became involved in national, state and regional planning.


Download ppt "PLANNING HISTORY: PART II 1900-1930s: persistent and expanded urban problems and a diversity of (inadequate?) responses Industrial hyper-development presented."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google