Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Scott Kleinberg, USAID / EGAT/MD March 20, 2008

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Scott Kleinberg, USAID / EGAT/MD March 20, 2008"— Presentation transcript:

1 Scott Kleinberg, USAID / EGAT/MD March 20, 2008
Business Enabling Environment and the Value Chain ‘The Path to Strategic Policy Reform’ Talking Points: Background for this was the lack of integration between enabling environment programs within broader EG portfolios Scott Kleinberg, USAID / EGAT/MD March 20, 2008

2 What is successful Policy Reform?
It is NOT changing laws It is changing: implementation of the laws regulatory burdens business relationships incentives that determine business decisions This is what we want from policy reform! What can you do to achieve this? You can change the laws and not change the business environment. Informality is an economic decision that responds to the business enabling environment How to identify policy reforms that contribute to country strategies How to choose among policy reform options to target binding constraints How can your policy reform program support your other programs

3 Monitoring & Impact Assessment
How Does Business Enabling Environment (BEE) fit with Value Chain Analysis? Critical to VC Selection (Evaluate constraints) Value Chain Selection Monitor & assess BEE Monitoring & Impact Assessment Integral part of VC Analysis (Detail policy constraints & develop list of options) Value Chain Analysis Talking Points: Underscore how BEE is critical to VC selection; how BEE needs to be part and parcel of the VC analysis, and how it is key to any competitiveness strategy Implementation Design Design strategy for policy reform Key to any Design (Identify where most effective to work)

4 The Value Chain can be a reform FRAMEWORK
Key benefits more easily value impact of binding constraints on Value Chain identify policy reforms that really matter to Value Chain participants national policy studies might not reflect what issues most effect players in Value Chain Value Chains have constituency who can advocate for change Can use Value Chain as: context for assessing policy barriers framework for advocacy Local / National Business Enabling Environment Global Business Enabling Environment Main Points: 4) VCs have constituency who can advocate for change: … if armed with data that can show comparisons! Extensive repository of information could be obtained from, for example: FIAS study, Doing Business Indicators, Commercial and Regional Reform Analysis (CLIR) Challenge for many countries is that they get a large shopping list of policy reforms BUT (1) not easy to calculate total costs of policy reform, (2) total benefit, and (3) how easy it is to achieve reform. Could use Value Chain as: - context for assessing policy barriers - starting point for framing policy program Notes to the Facilitator Measures on Impact of Policy barriers on the Value Chain can be absolute or qualitative FIAS = Foreign Investment Advisory Service

5 Typical Value Chain BEE Constraints
Policy Issues Explicit trade barriers (especially inputs) Customs, standards Foreign Direct Investment constraints Licensing restrictions Government subsidies Enforcement Issues Unequal enforcement industry policies Taxes Licensing, permits Unequal access to land Unequal access to public infrastructure Unequal access to energy Talking Points: Explicit trade barriers (especially inputs): Also, protectionist barriers weaken sector competitiveness

6 BEE: Critical to Value Chain Selection
Does success in value chain depend on resolving certain constraints? Is successful reform feasible within value chain activity time frame? Do you or another donor have resources to resolve constraint? Selection Monitoring & Impact Assessment Analysis Implemen- tation Design Talking Points: Stress that there are sector constraints and economy wide constraints

7 BEE: Integral part of Value Chain Analysis
Selection Design Implemen- tation Monitoring & Impact Assessment Value chain analysis permits informed decisions: Impact Cost Time Difficulty Identification of complementary donor activities that support reforms

8 How Can We identify Reforms?
Target of opportunity Government expresses interest in particular area, such as business registration reform Barrier in programming Program identifies barrier to achieving results Previous successful experience Mission Director did successful banking reform in previous country so start focus there Talking Points: Reforms can be opportunistic – 85% of reforms happen in the first 100 days of an administration – the IFC BEE has different context to ED and FS programs: Often the entry point is more unclear. Number of entry points much broader than in the case of Enterprise Development / Financial Sector work. In FS and ED programs the target group is often already identified. (but maybe not most important barrier or one project / Mission should focus on) Facilitator Notes: This slide provides a background to how policy reform is usually conducted, rather than representing good practice for the audience to replicate. You may want to ask the audience which of the selection methods they might identify with most for their own projects. To emphasize that this is indeed how selection of starting points for policy reform occurs in reality. But: Is it strategic? Does it reach

9 BUT IS IT STRATEGIC? Target of opportunity Barrier in programming
Value Chain Analysis Target of opportunity Government expresses interest in particular area, such as business registration reform Barrier in programming Program identifies a particular issue that is barrier to achieving results Previous successful experience Mission Director did successful banking reform in previous country so start focus there BUT IS IT STRATEGIC? Facilitator Notes: Selection of the point of entry for policy reform should be far more strategic. Challenge: How do we generate questions that give you a good point of origination? … To know which policies to focus on. How do you sustain reforms if legitimacy and leverage depend on a single minister – Reforms may not be strategic if there is no thought in how it fits into a broader reform strategy. Emphasize that most people don’t even ask question on how to find a good starting point

10 Making Strategic Choices – Value Chain Reform Assessment & Selection
Reform of Shrimp Feedstock Import Constraint Impact Removing constraint reduces feedstock cost by 50% Cost Will require parliamentary action – significant education, analysis of impact and advocacy involved Time Parliament could pass it in one year Difficulty There is little current support outside of industry No lead firms appears willing to champion this Current licensee holds significant sway in parliament Example: I. Cotton in Zambia: Significant exchange rate problem effecting profitability of cotton. An advocacy group could take this on. Depends on size of sector and ability to effect policy. II. Egypt: (Chemonics / World Bank project) – make entire process transparent, rather than changing regulation law) Talking Points: How can policy reform assist you in achieving broader economic growth results in enterprise development, jobs creations, etc? Narrower reforms may be more likely to succeed and easier to identify negative impacts  E.g. Local policy barriers are often lower cost and easier to change than national barrier Reforms with broad impact may be easy to achieve within an opportunistic window but more difficult to identify negative impacts  E.g. Sweeping electoral changes or crisis may provide key officials with a short mandate to effect a few important changes How do you choose? Consider Impact of Policy Reform against Ease of Change It’s not a tradeoff – you want to maximize both - Local and Regional policy barriers - Often lower cost and much easier to change; could be significant constraint to business and is easier to change than a national law or policy e.g. if it is how the law is implemented in a region rather than how the law is written - National policy barriers - Could be more important Small window of time principal: Very relevant to post conflict / disaster areas where much opportunity for reform but people often focus on relief – but this is when governments often have most flexibility to change Best practice says that domestic advocacy matters for long run success Local ownership of the reform process is essential to long term success: If serious about policy reform and really want results, need to know who is going to advocate for, support, and monitor. Identify barriers BALANCED WITH who is going to advocate for reform E.g. An issue could be a high barrier but do not know who is going to advocate for it In face of opposition to reform, there is room for creativity e.g. relax labor law in particular region and see what happens Challenge: time frame for reform is long so can help to get initial successes under belt; BUT working with business does show ST economic response therefore VC link can make sense because in one season can see change in competitiveness of that product because price is going to drop E.g. banking reform could be important … but then taking away from Value Chain related policy reform – which could be fine, but this does need to be a conscious choice Positive Negative

11 Reform Assessment & Selection
Vary by sector / geography Impact Removing constraint reduces feedstock cost by 50% Cost Will require parliamentary action – significant education, analysis of impact and advocacy involved Time Parliament could pass it in one year Difficulty There is little current support outside of industry no lead firms appears willing to champion this Current licensee holds significant sway in parliament Don’t Forget: “Who will lose?” “Who will oppose?” Talking Points: While advocacy is important, it isn’t the only determinant of success … it’s important to consider those who will lose in the process …

12 BEE Constraints in the Value Chain
Examples: Kenya agrochemical regime - cotton to garment value chain Kenya Coffee value chain Nigeria Export Processing Zone Talking Points: Kenya agrochemical regime - cotton to garment value chain Regulations discourage local reformulation of agrochemicals and delay the import of new formulations Poor quality raw cotton also leads to higher waste and poor quality yarn Kenya imparts 3x the cotton it exports – there is a domestic market sufficient for increased production In Kenya, it costs smallholders 2.5 times more to process coffee through cooperatives that it costs large estates The cooperatives can also take from 6-9 months to pay the farmer Imported agrochemicals account for over 90% of spraying costs – the low yield for kenyan coffee is in part due to the suboptimal application of pesticide and fertilizer Agrochemical distorts costs, constrains production – only 40k/340k ha. in production Also reduces staple length and quality Kenya Coffee value chain Cost structure distorted by government licensing and taxes Illegal for exporters to purchase directly from farmers All smallholders must process through coop Again … agrochemicals Nigeria Export Processing Zone Does not achieve its purpose Conflicting regulatory interpretation Failure of customs to grants exemptions Affects shrimp processing and leather industries Key to any Competitiveness Strategy: The key to competitiveness is rising productivity Critical constraint to rising productivity in Africa is the enabling environment Sectoral approach may provide a good entry point to accomplishing key policy reforms

13 BEE: Design & Implementation – Principles & Guidelines
Selection Know where you’re going – have a strategy for reform Start with smaller, manageable reforms that build credibility Avoid high risk strategies Information (usually from the donor) supports effective dialogue Ownership is important Do not advocate Monitoring & Impact Assessment Analysis Implemen- tation Design So if you agree with this, then you’ll have a realtively clear understanding of the nature of the binding constraints by the time you have seelected a value chain for support and development You need a strategy to avoid falling into the one-off solution trap. It may be easy to develop a quick solution that only addresses the immediate problem, but leave you at zero when you need to address the next constraint. How do you build the dialogue, advocacy, trust, momentum, necessary to accelerate reform or at least make it easier to attack larger issues. How does this fit with a broader reform process.

14 Using Value Chain as Strategic Point of Entry
Reform at the value chain level may be more achievable within program timeframes Constituencies may be fewer and more closely aligned Advocacy groups may be more coherent Existing program relationships Complementarity to other program objectives

15 Using Value Chain as Strategic Point of Entry
Selecting policy targets … that would achieve the most impact on your enterprise program … for which you have a strong constituent or advocacy group Facilitator Notes: Selecting policies that most benefit your other programs Need to leverage / benefit other programs Question: Do you want to work on policy reform projects that are most important and beneficial to the overall economy OR on policy reform projects that would also achieve the most impact for other programs that you are working on This would be achieve leverage for these and support greater success for the other things that you are working on As a program officer you may want to work on policies that are most beneficial to the other programs that you are working on These often exist in conjunction with one another … If you are working on policies that are most beneficial to your other programs Then you already have (1) identified a local advocacy group (because know players & can leverage their knowledge of other people & resources) Critical to successful policy reform Most effective policy reform happens when constituent locally supporting Is there a domestic constituency for change or are you going to have to create one? (If you have a Minister who is largely into reform, the Minister is the constituency (but could lose them if they go away)) (2) identified what the relevant costs are because you have already evaluated the sector (3) easier access to feed into relevant conversations / dialogues (e.g. think tank studies) so can support policy dialogues more USAID often has local governance projects / issues that could link to e.g. if local governance programs running where VC is operating, can use other USAID programs as entry pts – because know players – can leverage their knowledge of people and other resources identified local advocacy group (2) identified what relevant costs are (3) easier access to feed into relevant dialogues

16 Implementation of Laws Makes a Difference
Can make huge impact on policy without changing any laws Implementing well matters as much as passing new laws Example: The provincial implementation of the national framework varies broadly  if work in a particular sector that is in only in one region of the country, better to work on only that one region’s policy level rather than nationally Bac Ninh Hai Phong Binh Dinh # of Steps 98 70 51 # of Requirements 13 6 7 # of Days 28 24 11 # of Visits Needed 10 Facilitator Notes: Examples: Bosnia: Bulldozer Process “Guillotine” – got rid of all laws if could not give reason for them. Vietnam: Table on slide: Overall comparison between 3 provinces, Source: International Finance Corporation (IFC) Mozambique, Kenya It’s not just changing laws – you can improve implementation of current laws and make a big difference The most significant policy reform is sometimes not in creating new laws or policies, but instead changing or improving the implementation of existing laws or policies. Improving implementation is also policy reform – say it twice! A common impulse is to rewrite the legal policy framework but this will often not make as much of a difference on the ground as an improvement in implementation would. Implementation can often act as a small step towards reforming policy, as can demonstrate improvement and make the case for then changing laws too. Also, if the implementation cannot be improved first, then it may not be beneficial to add more laws anyway.

17 Keep in mind: Local Governments Matter
Local governments enforce both national and local laws, regulations, and decrees Transaction costs Incentives to formalize Affects business relationships and upgrading Talking Points: Developing BE reform support functions: which sustainably help local BE reformers to function effectively. For example, programs encourage the media to better cover businesses, link stakeholders to specialist service providers for services such as IT or research and analysis, and strengthen local institutions such as universities to conduct BE-related work.

18 Keep in mind: Success may require creativity
Institutional incentives matter Example: Egypt business registration reform replaced incentives for corruption with incentives for efficient behavior through transparency and performance awards T: Mention that a standard indicator for policy reform is the Number of Laws Drafted. This indicator does not measure the Number of Laws actually Passed, as so many do not get passed. For this reason too, Policy Reform cannot only entail advocacy and laws passed, etc.

19 Successful reform programs include:
How do you get there? Successful reform programs include: Building advocacy capacity Public private dialogue Building the capacity of local governments Develop Business Environment reform support functions Changing institutional incentives – implementation matters Advocacy capacity joint studies on specific BE iissues Advocacy training fund advocacy initiatives Link value chain to businesses or institutions that could support reform PPD often starts as consultation on a particular issue – this permits a more organic development of the dialogue Some programs have been successful in developing formal committees composed of public and private members – but critical in these cases that the public and private sector drive the agenda and that small and informal enterprises have voice in the process. Build capacity of local gov’ts local gov’t have benefitted and been burdened by decentralization. Result is sometimes poor practices in supporting private sector growth.Training, facilitating dialogue between local gov’t agencia sn and private sector associations or representatives Develop BE reform support structures (sustainable structures) Encourage media to cover BE issues Link stakeholders to specialist service providers, like research and analysis strengthen local institutions, such as universities, to do BE-related work and research

20 Success Story Tanzania coffee chain developed a premium brand Analysis revealed high taxes compared to “peer” countries and sales channel constraints Coffee Board and key industry stakeholders presented findings to Government Ministry reduced taxes, levies and local fees by 21% Coffee Board permitted growers to sell directly to specialty buyers, and negotiate directly with roasters

21 Key Lesson: You Need to Build Momentum
Small successes lead to support for broader reforms Value chains can provide the opportunity for quick reforms and often respond quickly to the reform of binding constraints LESSONS LEARNED : START SMALL AND WORK UP manageable, successful reforms are often a good way to begin. It’s easier to build on success than be muddled in a process - unsuccessful or prolonged reforms close doors

22 THANK YOU! Please visit for seminar presentations and papers Scott Kleinberg March 20, 2008


Download ppt "Scott Kleinberg, USAID / EGAT/MD March 20, 2008"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google