Presentation on theme: "Neural Coding 4: information breakdown. Multi-dimensional codes can be split in different components Information that the dimension of the code will convey."— Presentation transcript:
Multi-dimensional codes can be split in different components Information that the dimension of the code will convey when considered independently Information due to similarities among the stimulus- conditional responses of each dimension Information due to the correlation that the different dimensions have independently from the stimuli Information due to the way the stimuli affect the correlation between dimensions
Signal similarity information The signal similarity component is the part of the redundancy that does not depend on correlation. It’s given by the similarity between the stimulus modulations.
Stimulus independent correlation information The stimulus independent correlation can increase or decrease the overall information. Anyway, in my experience, it always decreased information
Stimulus dependent correlation information The stimulus dependent correlation is the only term that is ALWAYS synergistic. We can only gain information from the fact that the stimulus affects the correlations.
Role of fluctuations of cortical activity in sensory information coding Cortical activity is characterized by wideband oscillations Which frequency bands carry information about sensory variables? Which sensory variables are encoded by each frequency band? Prerequiste to understand function of these fluctuations – important to know what to measure and what to model Crucial for clinical developments – Brain Machine Interfaces
Local Field Potentials LFP Field potentials are operationally obtained by low pass filtering the extracellular signal Field potentials measure (to a 1 st approx) the superposition of dendrosomatic (dipole) fields generated in apical dendrites of pyramidal neurons Being a synaptic signal, the LFP can capture subthreshold effects not captured by spikes Integration area: approx 300 microns from electrode tip (“middle ground” signal)
Two seconds Local Field Potentials from V1 During movie presentations
Two seconds Local Field Potentials from V1 During movie presentations High frequencies
Two seconds Local Field Potentials from V1 During movie presentations Low frequencies
Two seconds Local Field Potentials from V1 During movie presentations Unreliable intervals
Shannon’s Information S = set of different “scenes” of the movies (2 seconds intervals) R = power of different frequency bands (discretized into N levels) s r
Computing Information about movie stimuli Information about which section of the dynamic stimulus elicited the considered neural response. This quantification of information captures information about all possible stimulus features in the movie, including what and when property 1 sec Panzeri, Brunel, Logothetis, Kayser (2010) Trends Neurosci Time
Belitski, Gretton, Magri, Murayama, Montemurro, Logothetis and Panzeri (2008) J Neurosci Information in Power of V1 LFPs with naturalistic movies Two informative power signals: Low frequencies and gamma frequencies High frequencies (γ and high γ) bands and low frequencies (α,θ,δ) carry independent information about the movie Intermediate frequencies (β) do not carry much information γ β δ,θ,αδ,θ,α
Do different LFP bands convey similar or different information about the movie? Signal correlation: the correlation of the trial-averaged power profiles of two frequencies across all movie scenes. Signal correlation tells if two frequencies are selective for the same scenes. Noise correlations: correlations in the trial-by-trial fluctuations in power around the mean at fixed scene. Noise correlation tells if two frequencies share a common source of variability.
Redundancy: the difference between the information carried by the joint knowledge of the two signals and the sum of the information carried by each signal individually Zero redundancy: the two signals carry independent information Positive redundancy (joint information less than the sum): the two signals share at least in part the same information Do different LFP bands convey similar or different information about the movie?
Excursus: how to simulate neurons From cellular automata….. To accurate 3D reconstructions….. (to Blue Brain)
Integrate and fire: la simulation la plus élégante Integration of synaptic inputs with no spike dynamics. Only threshold and reset are defined. Synaptic dynamics given by one rising exponential step and one closing exponential step
I P Unspecific slow cortical activity Thalamic input Leaky integrate and fire neurons 4000 pyramidal AMPA neurons 1000 GABA interneurons. Sparse (p=0.2) random connections Integrate and fire models of local cortical excitatory-inhibitory networks
AMPA SINK GABA SOURCE ELECTRODE Pyramidal neurons Interneurons LFP modeled as sum of absolute values of AMPA and GABA currents on pyramidal neurons Integrate and fire models of local cortical excitatory-inhibitory networks
Interneurons spike rate LFP=|I AMPA |+|I GABA | on pyramidal neurons input: costant signal + noise Pyramidal neurons spike rate Network response to constant input
I Input Gamma oscillations origin I P Input I P Oscillations in the 30-150 Hz range – depending on the inhibition/excitation balance
Network response to constant input Interneurons spike rate LFP=|I AMPA |+|I GABA | on pyramidal neurons Pyramidal neurons spike rate Mazzoni, et al – PLoS Comp Biol (2008) Mazzoni et al (2010) Neuroimage The network internally generates only gamma- range (40-100 Hz) oscillations The gamma power encodes the strength of the input
Modulation of the spectrum of LFP recorded in monkey V1 (Henrie and Shapley J Neurophysiol 05) LFP from simulated cortical circuit Network response to constant input
Each constant signal is injected 20 times, every time with a different noise. In this way we can compute the information content of the spectrum. Since 8 different rates are injected the total entropy is 3 bits. The peak of information is at ~70 Hz, slightly higher than the peak of the oscillations. The information contained in the frequencies of the gamma band is highly redundant information power Network response to constant input
Periodic signals with frequencies ranging from 4 to 16 Hz and 7 different amplitudes are used as input. Each signal is injected with 20 different noises. The total entropy is 5.6 bits. Periodic signals entrain network LFP oscillations (the effect is stronger for lower frequencies). Information about the lowest band of the signal spectrum is then contained in the same band of the network LFP. Network response to periodic input
LFP Signal Delta oscillations origin I P Input Intuitively: the slower network time constant is given by the dy-sinaptic P-I-P rhythm. Whatever is slower (<30/40 Hz) will not interfere with network rhythms and will entrain the network linearly.
Cross-frequency coupling The peak of slowly modulated inputs to the network will cause a peak in the low frequency component of the response LFP (because of entrainment) and a particularly high gamma power (because the latter encodes the strength of the input). This will lead to the cross- frequency coupling that is often observed experimentally.
Responses of the simulated network to input stimuli matching LGN spiking activity during naturalistic movies presentations Stimuli matching LGN spiking activity during naturalistic movies presentations display a broad range of fluctuations. According to the model, input peaks are associated to troughs in the LFP delta band and to a larger amplitude of the LFP gamma band. The model correctly reproduces the information content of recorded LFP frequency bands during presentation of naturalistic movies. Mazzoni et al. (2008) PLoS Comp. Biol.
There are two informative bands: frequencies below 10 Hz (”low frequencies”) and 30-100 Hz (gamma band). The two bands convey independent information. Furthermore low frequencies convey independent information from each other, while gamma frequencies are redundant. Gamma band encodes signal rate Delta band encodes slow signal components Responses of the simulated network to input stimuli matching LGN spiking activity during naturalistic movies presentations
Changes in synaptic strength highlight the role of the different neuro- transmitters and give experimentally testable predictions Synaptic manipulations
Conclusions During naturalistic stimulation, primary visual cortex multiplexes information by generating two complementary temporal information streams: slow (<10 Hz) fluctuations of the excitability of the local network, and fast (40-100 Hz) gamma oscillations. These complementary information channels reflect different aspects of both neural dynamics and of stimulus representations. Slow fluctuations reflect entrainment to the stimulus time course and thus provide “when” information about stimulus history Fast oscillations (which are largely redundant to spiking activity) are internally generated by excitatory-inhibitory interactions and encode “what” information about the current stimulus strength