Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

© Institute for Fiscal Studies FORTAX: a tax and benefit microsimulation library Jonathan Shaw and Andrew Shephard PRELIMINARY RESULTS – DO NOT CITE.

Published byMariah Johnston Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "© Institute for Fiscal Studies FORTAX: a tax and benefit microsimulation library Jonathan Shaw and Andrew Shephard PRELIMINARY RESULTS – DO NOT CITE."— Presentation transcript:

1 © Institute for Fiscal Studies FORTAX: a tax and benefit microsimulation library Jonathan Shaw and Andrew Shephard PRELIMINARY RESULTS – DO NOT CITE

2 © Institute for Fiscal Studies What FORTAX is A UK tax and benefit calculator –1990 onwards –Working-age families Written in Fortran PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

3 © Institute for Fiscal Studies PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

4 © Institute for Fiscal Studies PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

5 © Institute for Fiscal Studies PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

6 © Institute for Fiscal Studies PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

7 © Institute for Fiscal Studies PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

8 © Institute for Fiscal Studies PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

9 © Institute for Fiscal Studies PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

10 © Institute for Fiscal Studies How FORTAX works A basic call: call calcNetInc(sys,fam,net) Tax system intent(in) Family characteristics intent(in) Net income intent(out) PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

11 © Institute for Fiscal Studies How FORTAX works: tax system files Tax systems stored as.xml files Read and written using xml-fortran library by Arjen Markus PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

12 © Institute for Fiscal Studies How FORTAX works: family characteristics Populate the fam structure fam = fam_gen(married=.true., age1=25, age2=25, hrs1=16.0_8, & earn1=144.0_8, hrs2=0.0_8, earn2=0.0_8, kidage=(/0/)) PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

13 © Institute for Fiscal Studies How FORTAX works: tax calculation A basic call: call calcNetInc(sys,fam,net) Income tax calculation code: PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

14 © Institute for Fiscal Studies How FORTAX works: uprating and updating Frequent need to express tax systems in different years’ prices Frequent need to update (or correct!) tax system implementation Simplified using preprocessor macros if (.true.) sys%inctax%pa = factor*sys%inctax%pa PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

15 © Institute for Fiscal Studies Why Fortran? Need fast implementation Existing code in Fortran (Anecdotally, other economists seem to justify their choice similarly) PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

16 © Institute for Fiscal Studies An application: estimating the effect of tax credit reforms on female decisions Richard Blundell, Monica Costa Dias, Costas Meghir and Jonathan Shaw PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE PRELIMINARY RESULTS – DO NOT CITE

17 © Institute for Fiscal Studies What we do Construct a lifecycle model of female labour supply, human capital and savings –Eckstein and Wolpin (1989) and (1999), Keane and Wolpin (1997), Adda et al (2008), Todd and Wolpin (2006), Eckstein and Lifshitz (2011) Estimate parameters using British panel data (BHPS) Study effect of tax credit reforms on education and employment decisions over the lifecycle PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

18 © Institute for Fiscal Studies Advances over standard approaches Features of traditional welfare evaluations (e.g. Brewer et al, 2006): 1.Estimate impact of particular reform packages 2.Use static framework 3.Focus on short-run labour supply response Counter-examples: Ham and Lalonde (1996), Todd and Wolpin (2006), Haan and Prowse (2010), etc This work: first attempt to study UK tax and benefit system in dynamic context –Focus is on female response to UK tax credit reforms –Dynamic effects via education, experience, productivity and family composition –Also investigate impact on education PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

19 © Institute for Fiscal Studies Background: UK tax credit reforms April 1999 (FC) April 2002 (WFTC) April 2004 (WTC and CTC) Basic award£64.95£88.95£101.63 30-hour premium£11.05£11.65£12.31 Earnings threshold£80.65£94.50£97.31 and £961.54 Taper rate70% of net earnings 55% of net earnings37% and 6.67% of gross earnings Help with childcareDisregard up to £60 childcare expenses Maximum award increased by 70% of childcare expenses up to £135 Award for family with one child aged 0-10 (£ per week, nominal terms) Note: Families with children are eligible if at least one adult works 16+ hours. Help with childcare requires all adults to work 16+ hours. The increase in generosity between WFTC and WTC/CTC is exaggerated because the reform also incorporated elements of other benefits. PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

20 Background: UK tax credit reforms (2) © Institute for Fiscal Studies PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

21 Background: UK tax credit reforms (3) © Institute for Fiscal Studies PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

22 © Institute for Fiscal Studies Literature: employment impact of WFTC + 2-7ppt increase in employment rate for lone parents Smaller, possibly negative impact for second earners in couples Blundell et al (2005), Brewer et al (2006), Francesconi and van der Klaauw (2004), Francesconi et al (2009) PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

23 © Institute for Fiscal Studies Literature: impact of WFTC on other outcomes Anticipation employment effects –Unknown Couple formation and dissolution –Mixed evidence (Francesconi and van der Klaauw (2004), Gregg et al (2007), Francesconi et al. (2009)) Childbearing –Fall in fertility for lone parents, rise for couples (Francesconi and van der Klaauw, (2004), Brewer et al (2008)) => May undermine existing employment estimates PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

24 © Institute for Fiscal Studies Model: overview of female lifecycle Life in three stages: 1.Education (up to 18/21)  Secondary, A-levels or university (determines type of human capital) 2.Working life (18/21-59)  Labour supply {0hrs, 20hrs, 40hrs} and consumption  Partnering and childbearing 3.Retirement (60-69)  Consumption only PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

25 © Institute for Fiscal Studies Model: dynamics of family income Female wage –Depends on education, experience, persistent productivity shock –Experience accumulates while working (Exogenous) family formation dynamics –Children Model youngest child Characterised by age Arrival probability depends on female age, education, presence of partner and older children Departure with certainty when child reaches age 18 –Partners Characterised by education, employment status and wage Arrival probability for male with given education depends on female age and education Departure probability depends on female age, presence of child and male education Detailed model of tax and benefit system (FORTAX) PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

26 © Institute for Fiscal Studies Model: decision-making environment Risk averse individuals faced with uncertainty –Own productivity (health) –Family dynamics: partnering/separation, child bearing –Partner employment and income No insurance market –Only implicit insurance through human capital, savings and public policy Credit constraints during working life –So public policy may facilitate transfers across lifecycle Decisions taken to maximise expected lifetime utility PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

27 © Institute for Fiscal Studies Model: data and estimation Model estimated using BHPS data: –Unbalanced panel of 5,300 females over 16 waves, 1991–2006 Multi-step estimation procedure 1.Fix a few parameters 2.Estimate some parameters outside structural model Male employment and wages Family dynamics and childcare costs 3.Estimate remaining parameters by method of simulated moments (MSM) Parameters include: cost of education, female wage equation, experience accumulation, taste for employment, distribution of unobserved heterogeneity Results below based on data simulated by the model PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

28 Model fit: female log hourly wage © Institute for Fiscal Studies PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

29 Model fit: female employment rate © Institute for Fiscal Studies PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

30 Model fit: female employment rate by age of child © Institute for Fiscal Studies PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

31 All womenSingle women AllNo childMothersChild leftAllNo childMothersChild left 2002 vs 1999 All-0.0040.006-0.0160.0020.0200.0100.0510.005 Employment effects of tax credit reforms © Institute for Fiscal Studies PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

32 All womenSingle women AllNo childMothersChild leftAllNo childMothersChild left 2002 vs 1999 All-0.0040.006-0.0160.0020.0200.0100.0510.005 GCSEs-0.0030.013-0.0160.0030.0340.0240.0630.009 Employment effects of tax credit reforms © Institute for Fiscal Studies PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

33 All womenSingle women AllNo childMothersChild leftAllNo childMothersChild left 2002 vs 1999 All-0.0040.006-0.0160.0020.0200.0100.0510.005 GCSEs-0.0030.013-0.0160.0030.0340.0240.0630.009 2004 vs 1999 All-0.0070.006-0.017-0.0080.0370.0270.0570.034 GCSEs-0.0040.015-0.011-0.0090.0660.0630.0750.059 Employment effects of tax credit reforms © Institute for Fiscal Studies PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

34 Education effects 1999 (baseline) 2002 (increment) 2004 (increment) GCSEs 0.3690.0050.011 A-levels and vocational 0.387-0.002-0.004 University 0.244-0.003-0.007 © Institute for Fiscal Studies PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

35 All womenSingle women AllNo childMothersChild leftAllNo childMothersChild left 2002 vs 1999 All-0.0040.006-0.0160.0020.0200.0100.0510.005 GCSEs-0.0030.013-0.0160.0030.0340.0240.0630.009 2002 vs 1999 cancelling education effect All-0.0030.006-0.0150.0020.0200.0100.0520.005 GCSEs-0.0040.012-0.0180.0020.0320.0220.0620.007 Decomposing employment effects: 2002 vs 1999 © Institute for Fiscal Studies PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

36 All womenSingle women AllNo childMothersChild leftAllNo childMothersChild left 2002 vs 1999 All-0.0040.006-0.0160.0020.0200.0100.0510.005 GCSEs-0.0030.013-0.0160.0030.0340.0240.0630.009 2002 vs 1999 cancelling education effect All-0.0030.006-0.0150.0020.0200.0100.0520.005 GCSEs-0.0040.012-0.0180.0020.0320.0220.0620.007 2002 vs 1999 cancelling all pre-motherhood effects All-0.0060.000-0.0160.0020.0140.0000.0500.005 GCSEs-0.0080.000-0.0190.0020.0250.0000.0600.007 Decomposing employment effects © Institute for Fiscal Studies PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

37 Conclusion FORTAX calculates taxes and benefits rapidly Essential for dynamic models used to evaluate tax and benefit reforms Our application: understanding the effect of UK tax credit reforms Preliminary results suggest: –Substantial employment effects for lone mothers and mothers in couples –Relatively small impact on education choices –Employment effects not due to changing education choices –Possibly some anticipation effects but little impact on employment during eligibility © Institute for Fiscal Studies PRELIMINARY RESULTS - DO NOT CITE

Download ppt "© Institute for Fiscal Studies FORTAX: a tax and benefit microsimulation library Jonathan Shaw and Andrew Shephard PRELIMINARY RESULTS – DO NOT CITE."

Similar presentations

The effect of elderly care-giving on female labour supply in Indonesia Elisabetta Magnani University of New South Wales, Australia Anu Rammohan University.

The effect of elderly care-giving on female labour supply in Indonesia Elisabetta Magnani University of New South Wales, Australia Anu Rammohan University.
Centre for Market and Public Organisation Understanding the effect of public policy on fertility Mike Brewer (Institute for Fiscal Studies) Anita Ratcliffe.

Centre for Market and Public Organisation Understanding the effect of public policy on fertility Mike Brewer (Institute for Fiscal Studies) Anita Ratcliffe.
© Institute for Fiscal Studies In-work poverty: reflections Mike Brewer, Direct Tax and Welfare sector Institute for Fiscal Studies.

© Institute for Fiscal Studies In-work poverty: reflections Mike Brewer, Direct Tax and Welfare sector Institute for Fiscal Studies.
The Economics of Childcare Alan Duncan University of Nottingham and Institute for Fiscal Studieshttp://www.nottingham.ac.uk/~lezad.

The Economics of Childcare Alan Duncan University of Nottingham and Institute for Fiscal Studieshttp://
Session 2.2 Effective policy mixes and target setting in the EU Terry Ward Applica Child poverty and child well-being: better monitoring for better policies.

Session 2.2 Effective policy mixes and target setting in the EU Terry Ward Applica Child poverty and child well-being: better monitoring for better policies.
Mothers’ labour market participation and use of childcare in the UK

Mothers’ labour market participation and use of childcare in the UK
Life Cycle of Financial Planning

Life Cycle of Financial Planning
© Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2007 Government Financial Support for Children across the United Kingdom: how does Northern Ireland compare? Stuart Adam.

© Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2007 Government Financial Support for Children across the United Kingdom: how does Northern Ireland compare? Stuart Adam.
Microsimulation at HM Treasury: methods and challenges David Roe and Doug Rendle {david.roe/doug.rendle}@hm-treasury.gov.uk ESRC/BSPS UK Microsimulation:

Microsimulation at HM Treasury: methods and challenges David Roe and Doug Rendle ESRC/BSPS UK Microsimulation:
The Lifecycle Impact of Alternative Higher Education Finance Systems in Ireland Darragh Flannery 1, Cathal O’Donoghue 2 European meeting of the international.

The Lifecycle Impact of Alternative Higher Education Finance Systems in Ireland Darragh Flannery 1, Cathal O’Donoghue 2 European meeting of the international.
HEALTH AND WEALTH – PRELIM REVISION Critically examine the success of recent government policies to reduce poverty.

HEALTH AND WEALTH – PRELIM REVISION Critically examine the success of recent government policies to reduce poverty.
Spending time and money within the household Martin Browning University of Oxford Mette Gørtz AKF, Copenhagen IFS Family Workshop, September 2006.

Spending time and money within the household Martin Browning University of Oxford Mette Gørtz AKF, Copenhagen IFS Family Workshop, September 2006.
Universal Credit: making work pay in the UK? Paola De Agostini and Mike Brewer Lisbon – October 2 nd, 2013.

Universal Credit: making work pay in the UK? Paola De Agostini and Mike Brewer Lisbon – October 2 nd, 2013.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 6- 1 Topic 3. Chapters 6 & 7 Supply of Labor.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc Topic 3. Chapters 6 & 7 Supply of Labor.
PAYG pensions with endogenous fertility Volker Meier Ifo Institute for Economic Research.

PAYG pensions with endogenous fertility Volker Meier Ifo Institute for Economic Research.
National Institute of Economic and Social Research Means Testing and Retirement Choices in Europe: a Comparison of the British and Danish Systems James.

National Institute of Economic and Social Research Means Testing and Retirement Choices in Europe: a Comparison of the British and Danish Systems James.
Amounts and Accounts: Reforming Private Pension Enrolment Carl Emmerson and Matthew Wakefield Institute for Fiscal Studies © Institute for Fiscal Studies.

Amounts and Accounts: Reforming Private Pension Enrolment Carl Emmerson and Matthew Wakefield Institute for Fiscal Studies © Institute for Fiscal Studies.
EHM Theory and Structure Behavioural Labour Supply Modelling in DWP Alan Duncan, 6 th May 2009.

EHM Theory and Structure Behavioural Labour Supply Modelling in DWP Alan Duncan, 6 th May 2009.
© Institute for Fiscal Studies Recession and recovery: what do they mean for childcare? Mike Brewer.

© Institute for Fiscal Studies Recession and recovery: what do they mean for childcare? Mike Brewer.
IFS Did the Working Families’ Tax Credit work? Analysing the impact of in-work support on labour supply and programme participation Mike Brewer, Alan Duncan,

IFS Did the Working Families’ Tax Credit work? Analysing the impact of in-work support on labour supply and programme participation Mike Brewer, Alan Duncan,

Similar presentations

Ads by Google