1. Open Field Message Bus (OpenFMB) Kickoff Meeting
March 5, 2015

2. Welcome Introductions Meeting Objectives Around the room
Kickoff meeting
Understand history and players involved
Leverage prior work from Duke Energy’s Reference Architecture
Establish key milestones and regular meeting times
Identify the “big pieces” and begin identifying organizational and individual responsibilities
Clarify standards development activities
Discuss team collaboration tools
Build team unity and identify roles

3. Agenda Time Discussion Discussion Lead 0830-0900 Welcome Introductions
Meeting objectives
Agenda
Stuart McCafferty, SGIP
What is OpenFMB?
History
Duke Reference Architecture
The Big Picture
The Past
The Future
The CPS Test Bed
Stuart Laval, Duke Energy
Raiford Smith, CPS Energy
Break
1100-Noon
Team and Tools
Noon
Lunch

4. Agenda Time Discussion Discussion Lead 1300-1330 Project Plan
Key milestones and events
Key work activities
Leads
Stuart Laval, Duke Energy
Stuart McCafferty, SGIP
NAESB Processes and Timelines
OpenFMB Framework/Standard
Standards Development Plan and Deliverables
Jonathan Booe, NAESB
Joe Zhou, Xtensible Solutions
Break
Open Discussion on Standards Process and Output
The Demonstration in New Orleans
All
Next Steps
Dinner Plans

5. What is Open Field Message Bus?
Standard API for Electric Grid interoperability
Secure, peer-to-peer, multi-vendor, outside data center
Common Semantic models based on existing standards (CIM, 61850)
Existing IoT pub/sub protocols (DDS, MQTT, AMQP)
Repository of adapters from utility protocols (Modbus, DNP3, C12, GOOSE/MMS)
Framework and reference architecture for Distributed Intelligence Apps and systems
Cybersecurity, microgrids, DER, DA, AMI

6. OpenFMB: Lower Cost & Risk
Cost Savings
Risk Mitigation
Resiliency
Interoperability
Modularity
Asset Management
Lower O&M
Renewable Integration
Situational Awareness
Cybersecurity
Sustainable Infrastructure
Supply Chain 6

7. Stuart Laval, Duke Energy
Raiford Smith, CPS Energy
OpenFMB History

8. A Short History of the Development of the OpenFMB
(~2007) Initially, we focused on the problem of connecting to multiple devices to backhaul data.
Node-based solution (high volume) with multiple radios to connect to MV sensors, AMI, DA, and others.
(~2012) But use cases evolved and new technologies (battery storage, microgrids, etc.) drove need to get access to data cheaper/better/faster at the edge of the network.
Drove need for node platform hosting 1 or more standards-based message busses and common semantic models.

9. Duke Energy Test Areas: Integrated Grid Ecosystems Pilot (2012)
Substation
Solar PV
Energy Storage
Dist. Mgmt System
PMU (6)
Weather stations (7)
Sherrill’s Ford, Rankin, McAlpine Substations
Customer
Premise
~60 homes served by McAlpine circuits
Home Energy Manager
PEV
Charging Stations
Smart Appliances
Demand Response
In-home load monitoring
Distribution
Circuit
6 McAlpine circuits
Line Sensors (200+)
CES, HES Energy Storage
Comm. Nodes (3,000)
Intelligent Switches
DERMS/DMS
AMI metering (14,000)
Copyright © 2015 Duke Energy Corporation All rights reserved.

10. Lessons Learned from 2012 Smart Grid Pilot
e.g. CIM
e.g. DDS, MQTT
Key Observations:
Single-Purpose Functions
Proprietary & Silo’ed systems
Latent , Error-prone Data
OT/IT/Telecom Disconnected
No Field Interoperability!
Key Observations:
Multi-Purpose Functions
Modular & Scalable HW&SW
End-to-End Situational Awareness
OT/IT/Telecom Convergence
True Field Interoperability!
Copyright © 2015 Duke Energy Corporation. All rights reserved.

11. Enabling of the Integrated Grid
Drivers
Distributed Energy Resources
Demand Response
Electric Vehicles
In-Premise Automation
Cybersecurity Threats
Aging Infrastructure
“Big Data” Complexity
Stranded Assets
New Requirements
Proactive Operations
Situational Awareness
Fast Edge Decisions
Seamless Interoperability
Modularity / Scalability
Hybrid Central/Distributed
Zero Touch Deployments
Refined Utility Skillsets
Source: EPRI
Technology Approach
Internet Protocol
Translation
Common Dictionary
Security
Analytics
Distributed
Intelligence
Platform
(DIP)
Copyright © 2015 Duke Energy and 2014 Electrical Power Research Institute. All rights reserved.

12. DIP: Internet of Things (IoT) Platform for the Utility
Smart Meter
Capacitor Bank
Line
Sensor X
Street Light
Smart
Assets
Distributed
Energy
Resources
Transformer
Intelligent Switch
DEMAND
ELECTRIC GRID
Smart Generation
Continuous
Emission
Monitoring
Weather Sensor
SUPPLY
Other Nodes
Technology Approach
Internet Protocol
Translation
Contextualization
Security
Analytics
OpenFMB
Open Standard
Node
Radio
Internet
Connectivity
Head
End A
End B
End N
Data Center Message Bus
Network
Router
UTILITY
DATA CENTER
CPU
Distributed
Computing
Internet
Protocol (IP)
Network
Copyright © 2015 Duke Energy Corporation All rights reserved.

13. DIP: Internet of Things (IoT) Platform for the Utility
Smart Meter
Capacitor Bank
Line
Sensor X
Street Light
Smart
Assets
Distributed
Energy
Resources
Transformer
Intelligent Switch
DEMAND
ELECTRIC GRID
Smart Generation
Continuous
Emission
Monitoring
Weather Sensor
SUPPLY
Other Nodes
Technology Approach
Internet Protocol
Translation
Contextualization
Security
Analytics
OpenFMB
Open Standard
Node
Core OS
Internet
Connectivity
Head
End A
End B
End N
Data Center Message Bus
Network
Router
UTILITY
DATA CENTER
Virtual OS
Distributed
Computing
Internet
Protocol (IP)
Network
Copyright © 2015 Duke Energy Corporation All rights reserved.

14. Flexible Hardware & Software Platform Using Legacy Equipment
Integrated in
End Device
(as Software)
Substation
Rackmount Server(s)
Retrofit
Inside
Cabinet
Pole Mounted
Enclosure
Padmount
Enclosure
Copyright © 2014 Duke Energy All rights reserved.

15. IoT Reference Architecture: Hybrid Multi-level Hierarchy
Firewall
End Points
Devices
Lower Tier
Nodes
(e.g. grid)
Middle Tier
Nodes
(e.g. substation)
Higher Tier
Central Office
(Utility Datacenter)
Local Area
Network
(LAN)
Wide Area
Network
(WAN)
AMI
Smart
Meters
IP Router
Head
end
MDM
Polling
>15 min
Virtual Software
<5 min
SCADA
No model
model
Enterprise Bus
DMS
Enterprise Bus
IP Router
Enterprise Bus
model
Enterprise Bus
Corporate
Private
Network
Virtual Software
Enterprise Bus
Field Message Bus
No model
model
Field Message Bus
Tier 5
DIP Node
model
Field Message Bus
<50 ms
~1min
Field Area
Network
(FAN)
Legend
Protection
& Control
Local Area
Network
(LAN)
IP Router
Core OS
Application OS
Distributed
Energy
Resources
Field Message Bus
Physical Transport
Virtual Software
No model
model
Virtual Telemetry
Virtual Firewall
Copyright © 2015 Duke Energy Corporation All rights reserved.

16. Open Field Message Bus (OpenFMB) Framework
Firewall
End Points
Devices
Lower Tiers Nodes
(e.g. grid)
Middle Tier Nodes
(e.g. substation)
Higher Tier Node
Central Office
(Utility Datacenter)
Smart
Meter
Breaker
Relay
Battery
Inverter M
C12
MDM
GIS
DMS
OMS
Legacy Protocol Adapter
- +
Line
Sensor
DNP
Common Data Model
GOOSE
Modbus
Open API
FMB protocol
Head
Ends
SCADA
Legacy Protocol Adapter
Other
DNP
Common Data Model
MQTT, DDS
Open API
FMB protocol
Legacy Protocol Adapter
Common Data Model
DDS
Capacitor
Bank
DNP
Open API FMB protocol
Legacy Protocol Adapter
Field
Message
Bus
(FMB)
AMQP, DDS
MQTT
Legend
Common Data Model
Solar PV
Inverter
Legacy Protocol Translation
Modbus
Common Semantic Model
Open API
FMB protocol
DDS, MQTT
Open FMB IoT Protocol
Client/Server Polling
Virtual Firewall
Pub/Sub Messaging
Copyright © 2015 Duke Energy Corporation All rights reserved.

17. Background on Publish-Subscribe IoT Protocols
Leverage existing IoT pub/sub
Data Distribution Service (DDS): OMG standard
Message Queue Telemetry Transport (MQTT): OASIS standard
Advanced Message Queue Protocol (AMQP): OASIS standard
Abstraction of physical, network, & logic layers
Standardized APIs for Multi-Vendor Interoperability
E.g. OMG’s DDS-i RTPS or DCPS API
IoT translators allow interoperability between DDS/MQTT/AMQP
Performance
Scalability: >10000 msg/sec for DDS; >1000 msg/sec for AMQP/MQTT
Latency: ~1 ms
Multi-cast & Fault-Tolerance: DDS & AMQP
Security: Encryption, Quality of Service, Dynamic Discovery
Copyright © 2015 Duke Energy Corporation All rights reserved.

18. OpenFMB Data Modeling Process
Information
Modeling
Use-case Requirements
(Power Systems SME)
Common Semantic Models
(CIM, IEC 61850)
Diagram Business Process
Map Relevant Context
Semantic
Context
Contextual Profiles
(UML)
Model Driven Transformation
Code
Generation
Message
Syntax
Schema
(IDL / XSD)
Programming Languages
(Java, C/C++/C#, XML)
Interoperable Topics
Message
Oriented
Middleware
Pub/Sub Protocols
(DDS, MQTT, AMQP)
Copyright © 2015 Duke Energy Corporation All rights reserved.

19. Example Use-case: Microgrid Solar Smoothing
Power Grid
Point of Common Coupling
for Microgrid
Recloser
12 kV
Transformer
Meter
480/277V
Meter
Solar Smoothing App
Solar PV Inverter
Battery
Inverter
Microgrid
Controller
(MGC)
Copyright © 2015 Duke Energy Corporation All rights reserved.

20. Cloud Hosted Field Message Bus (FMB) Demo Website
Input Datasets
M2M Devices
DDS Field Message Bus Topics
Text-based Message Interfaces
Opengridstandards.org
Node 1
MGC Solar Smoothing App
Sub to Data
Java
DDS
Pub Controls
DDS
Data
Space
Node 2
PV Inverter
2 IDL’s
Pub Data
Java
DDS
User Interface
Meter
1 IDL
MQTT
Broker
Node 3
Sub to Controls
Battery
Inverter
Node 4
3 IDL’s
Pub Data
Pub XML
Java
DDS
Sub to Data
Meter
1 IDL
DDS
Java
7 XSD’s
XML
MQTT
Copyright © 2015 Duke Energy Corporation All rights reserved.
page 20

21. Open Field Message Bus (OpenFMB) Demo Setup
XML/MQTT
Translator
to Cloud Website
CIM/DDS
Solar Smoothing
App
CIM/DDS
Solar PV &
Meter data
CIM/DDS
Battery Inverter
& Meter data
Copyright © 2015 Duke Energy Corporation All rights reserved.

22. Strategies to Gain Adoption
Patent strategy ( ): patent the architecture (so no one can lock utilities or vendors out) and give away the IP (so everyone can adopt it)
Getting vendors on board (2013-today)
Duke Energy Coalition of the Willing (pt 1) – Distributech 2014 demo (6 vendors)
Duke Energy Coalition of the Willing (pt 2) – Distributech 2016 demo (25 vendors)
Getting utilities on board (2013-today)
CPS Energy
Standards strategy (2015)
SGIP
NAESB
Others

23. Duke Energy Test Lab: Mount Holly, NC
PV Installations
Islanding Switch, Transformer, and Battery
Behind the meter and low voltage power electronic equipment
Grid Equipment

24. Duke Energy Mount Holly Microgrid: Electrical One-line
Point of
Common Coupling
Copyright © 2014 Duke Energy All rights reserved.

25. How CPS Energy Will Utilize the OpenFMB
NREL INTEGRATE Microgrid at JBSA Ft. Sam Houston
Grid-of-the-Future deployment
CPSE Coalition of the Willing
Augment existing AMI/DA deployment

26. JBSA Ft. Sam Houston Microgrid Location
NREL Integrate project to build an open-source, interoperable microgrid.
Collaboration between CPS Energy, Duke Energy, and Omnetric Corp.
75kW/48kWh SciB battery from Toshiba, Princeton Power Inverter, Viper Recloser, Schneider Ion meters, Microgrid Management System from Siemens, and ~25kWAC PV.
Operational date Q
Ft. Sam Houston Library
Transformer / Meter Rack Location
Potential Battery & PV Locations

27. CPS Energy Grid of the Future
Walzem Substation (NE San Antonio, off of I-35). This site includes:
15 circuits (13 and 35 kV).
About 30k customers (including HQ of large technology firm and logistics site for major retail firm).
Includes clustered (~70) solar DG and utility-scale solar at 5.5MW Alamo 3 site off O313 circuit.
AMI and DA deployment scheduled for deployment in this area.
Implementation work will be done over a three year period in conjunction with microgrid, smart inverter, and battery storage initiatives.
San Antonio, TX

28. Demand-Side Benefits
One primary purpose of GoF is to avoid divergence of customer and utility services (e.g. 3rd party disaggregation w/o deregulation)
Additional revenues can also be derived from new technologies:
Electric vehicles and charging
Premium power – battery/CHP/PV
Premium reliability – microgrid
Asset control (inverter/battery) and advanced DR
Brand & customer satisfaction improvement though enabling new services
If customers purchase an additional product or service (beyond gas or electricity) they are 3X more likely to favorably rate their service provider.

29. Utility-Side Benefits
Operational metrics (SAIDI, SAIFI, asset utilization, MTBF, etc.,.)
Financial metrics (O&M spend, revenue generation, better asset utilization, and reduced total ownership costs)
Environmental benefits – predominantly extrapolated intangibles through planned work in analytics combined with modeling and simulation of demand and supply
Training and development of professional and wage-scale staff.
Safety and standards updated to reflect new capabilities.
Risk modeling should improve prediction of revenue, expense and customer satisfaction from new products and services.

30. Morning Break: 10:45 – 11:00

31. Stuart McCafferty
Team and Tools

32. OpenFMB Project Objectives
Engage with multiple utilities and vendors
Leverage prior work
Identify one business problem to solve
Identify or develop use case(s)
Develop logical architecture
Establish standards framework at NAESB
Demonstrate working prototype at SGIP Nov 3-5
Create OpenFMB repository
Incorporate SGIP T&C and Cybersecurity processes
Test Bed coordination
Governance policy for OpenFMB implementation and validation
Roadmap for future distributed applications
Regular outside communication and information exchange

33. Research Labs, Gov’t, Test Facilities
OpenFMB Team
Utility Partners
User Groups
SDO
Vendors
Research Labs, Gov’t, Test Facilities

34. OpenFMB Leads SGIP Co-Chairs SGIP OpenFMB Vice Chair
Stuart Laval, Duke Energy / Stuart McCafferty, SGIP
SGIP OpenFMB Vice Chair
TBD
SGIP OpenFMB Secretary
Demonstration planning for November
Aaron Snyder, EnerNex
NAESB Task Force
Co-Chairs: Joe Zhou, Xtensible Solutions / Stuart Laval, Duke Energy
Raiford Smith, CPS / Matt Wakefield, EPRI / Craig Miller, NRECA
Test Bed Coordination
Business and Use Cases
Regulatory awareness

35. Current Interested Parties
AEP
Ameren
BC Hydro
Cisco
Coergon
CPS Energy
DOE
Duke Energy
EnerNex
EPRI
GE Energy
Green Energy Corp
Itron
Leidos Engineering
LocalGrid Technologies
Missouri University of Science and Technology
NIST
OpenADR Alliance
PNNL
Real-Time Innovations (RTI)
Saviva Research
Schneider Electric
SGIP
UCAIUG
ViaSat
Xtensible Solutions

36. Tools Kavi Collaboration environment
Document repository with version control
Action items
Calendar and Schedule
Ballots
Comment manager
Auditing and reporting tools
Listserver
Full privileges to SGIP members
Free access to approved non-SGIP members

37. Tools - Kavi
Project Environment
Group Environment

38. Questions and Closing Thoughts
For Kavi account access: or
Need to recruit more utilities, vendors, and others
Everybody’s job
Interested in volunteering to lead an area?
Contact Stuart or Stuart
Got things to post to Kavi?
SGIP members can post
Non-members can send materials to Billie or Stuart M

39. Lunch: Noon – 13:00

40. Stuart McCafferty, SGIP
Project Plan

41. OpenFMB Program Timelines
Organization
Project
Development Schedule
2015
2016
NAESB
(North America Energy Standards Board)
Standardization of Open Field Message Bus (OpenFMB)
SGIP
(Smart Grid Interoperability Panel)
OpenFMB Project
Test Beds
UCAIug
OpenFMB Repository
OpenFMB Retail Market Quadrant
OpenFMB Wholesale Energy Quadrant
OpenFMB Planning
OpenFMB Phase I
OpenFMB Phase 2
OpenFMB Interoperability Testing & Certification
Duke COW Phase II Demo
CPS Grid of the Future Demo
Utility TBD Demo
Duke Tech Transfer
OpenFMB Data Models/Adapters/Specifications Development
Legend
Duke
CPS
TBD
Planning / Other

42. Milestones

43. NAESB Processes and Timelines
Jonathan Booe, NAESB
NAESB Processes and Timelines

44. Background on NAESB
The North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB), originally the Gas Industry Standards Board (GISB), serves as an industry forum for the development and promotion of standards which will lead to a seamless marketplace for wholesale and retail natural gas and electricity, as recognized by its customers, business community, participants, and regulatory entities.
GISB est / NAESB est. 2001
Roughly 2,700 Wholesale Standards / 1,200 Retail Standards
Strong relationship with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC), Department of Energy (DoE), Department of Commerce (DoC), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), National Petroleum Council (NPC), the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and various state regulators

45. NAESB Quadrant & Segments
Wholesale Gas – 5 Segments
End Users
Local Distribution
Pipelines
Producers
Services
Wholesale Gas – 5 Segments
End Users
Distribution/LSE
Transmission
Generation
Marketers/Brokers
Independent Grid Operators/Planners
Technology and Services
Retail Markets – 4 Segments
Electric Utilities
Gas Market Interests
Electric End Users/Public Agencies
Electric Service Providers/Suppliers
Membership
Retail Market Quadrant - 43
Wholesale Gas Quadrant
Wholesale Electric Quadrant

46. NAESB Organizational Structure

47. NAESB Standards Development Process

48. NAESB Final Products Ratified recommendations = NAESB Final Actions
Copyright protection
Access provided to members, non-member purchasers and through copyright waivers for evaluation
Wholesale standards provided to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and other agencies as appropriate
Retail standards provided to NARUC and requesting state commissions

49. OpenFMB Framework/Standard Standards Development Plan and Deliverables
Joe Zhou, Xtensible Solutions
OpenFMB Framework/Standard Standards Development Plan and Deliverables

50. Agenda Introduction and Background
Industry Drivers and Guiding Principles
OpenFMB Specification Key Components:
Business Requirements (Use Cases)
Reference Architecture and Systems Requirements
Platform Independent Model (Semantic Model, Messages and Services)
Platform Specific Model (DDS, MQTT, etc.)
Implementation Guidelines
Development Plan Timelines, Processes and Roadmap
Open Discussion
NAESB OpenFMB TF

51. Notable IoT Standards Initiatives
March 5, 2015
NAESB OpenFMB TF

52. Introduction and Background
NAESB has been involved in the smart grid standards development
PAP09 – Demand response use cases that led to OpenADR specification
ESPI – Energy Service Provider Interface that led to Green Button.
NAESB, as an ANSI accredited SDO, typically files their standards with FERC and informs NARUC. This increases the exposure and possibilities of utility regulators adopting said standards.
OpenFMB task force will be a special purpose task force under the NAESB Retail Market Quadrant (RMQ).
OpenFMB TF will work closely with SGIP and UCAiug to facilitate the development, implementation, and future enhancements to the standard.
March 5, 2015
NAESB OpenFMB TF

53. Industry Drivers for OpenFMB
Rapid maturing and adoption of IoT Technologies in many industries
Renewable energy resources integration into the Grid – especially at the distribution and end consumer levels
The advent of Distribution Service Platform Provider (DSPP) role and the potential need to support Transactive Energy implementation.
Transition from top down power grid architecture into networked, two way power flow, and distributed supply and demand power network.
An open standard is needed to unlock the value of field devices and networks, and to enable distributed intelligence for more reliable and resilient grid of the future.
March 5, 2015
NAESB OpenFMB TF

54. Guiding Principles
Leverage what has been done before, no reinventing the wheels
Focus on business value and objectives in solving real world problems
Collaborate and coordinate with other relevant smart grid standards bodies, no duplication of effort and scope
Time to market is important to provide real solution and standard to the industry in order to enable field interoperability for on-going deployments
Flexibility, scalability and backwards compatibility (where feasible) are critical
Security should be built into the standard, not an afterthought.
March 5, 2015
NAESB OpenFMB TF

55. OpenFMB Specification – The Key Components
Reference Architecture
Use Cases
Platform Independent Model (Semantic Model, Messages & Services)
Platform Specific Model (DDS, MQTT and Hybrid, etc.)
Implementation Guidelines
March 5, 2015
NAESB OpenFMB TF

56. OpenFMB – Reference Architecture
Duke Energy’s Distributed Intelligence Platform Reference Architecture Volume I: Vision Overview provides a great foundation for the standard development.
Task Force will need to review the work contributed by Duke, and discuss/decide how to leverage it, and what potential areas may require more work, such as:
Security Architecture
Node Classification and Interaction Patterns (EPRI REC-VEN Concept adopted by OpenADR)
Reference Architecture components – what is informative vs. what is normative for the standard
Reference Model relative to other standards
Leverage similar work done from other IoT standards initiatives.
March 5, 2015
NAESB OpenFMB TF

57. OpenFMB – Use Cases NAESB OpenFMB TF March 4, 2015
Use Cases will drive the content of OpenFMB 1.0 Specification in terms of model, messages and services. We must decide a subset of use cases in the following categories to have a manageable scope.
Use Cases will fall into the following two categories:
Functional:
DER Integration
MicroGrid
Distribution Management
DSPP Enablement
Transactive Energy Enablement ……
Technical:
Device Management
Network Management
Security Management
March 4, 2015
NAESB OpenFMB TF

58. OpenFMB – Platform Independent Model
IEC CIM
IEEE
C37
IEEE
1588
IEC 61850
DNP3 ……
OpenFMB Semantic Model
March 5, 2015
NAESB OpenFMB TF

59. OpenFMB – Platform Specific Model
DDS
REST
MQTT
XMPP
CoAP
AMQP
......
OpenFMB
Protocol Specific Message/Services
March 4, 2015
NAESB OpenFMB TF

60. OpenFMB – Implementation and Compliance Guidelines
NAESB OpenFMB TF will develop implementation guidelines
NAESB will look to SGIP to provide framework and guidance on how this should be accomplished.
NAESB will look to UCAiug to setup an OPenFMB Users Group to help promote, implement, and provide testing and certification services.
March 5, 2015
NAESB OpenFMB TF

61. 30 Day Membership Ratification
Timeline
2015
2016
March - May
June - August
Sept.-Nov.
Dec.
Jan. – March
Requirements
Design
Draft
Task Force Voting
30 Day Public Comment
30 Day Membership Ratification
OpenFMB TF
F2F Meeting #2 (TBD)
OpenFMB TF
F2F Meeting #1 (TBD)
DistribuTECH 2016
Feb (Orlando, FL)
OpenFMB Use Case Prioritization
(April 2, 2015)
NAESB Executive Committee Meeting on Feb. 2016
SGIP Engage 2015
(March 4, 2015)
March 5, 2015
NAESB OpenFMB TF

62. OpenFMB Roadmap March 5, 2015 NAESB OpenFMB TF 2015 – OpenFMB 1.0
Enhancements
New Use Cases
Expanded Models, Messages and Services
Expanded Models/Services and New Protocols
Enhancements
March 5, 2015
NAESB OpenFMB TF

63. Next Steps We need broad participation in NAESB OpenFMB Task Force
Bi-weekly calls
F2F meetings (TBD)
Contribution to specification
Review and feedback
We want to manage this to accomplish the goals by the end of this year, with a defined scope and project plan.
March 5, 2015
NAESB OpenFMB TF

64. Afternoon Break: 14:15-14:30

65. Open Discussions Standards Development Process and Deliverable
SGIP Annual Meeting November 3-5