Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

WH, H->bb MICHAEL WRIGHT, UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW. INTRODUCTION Optimize University of Glasgow WH analysis by comparing with LMU and Wisconsin MC cut flows.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "WH, H->bb MICHAEL WRIGHT, UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW. INTRODUCTION Optimize University of Glasgow WH analysis by comparing with LMU and Wisconsin MC cut flows."— Presentation transcript:

1 WH, H->bb MICHAEL WRIGHT, UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW

2 INTRODUCTION Optimize University of Glasgow WH analysis by comparing with LMU and Wisconsin MC cut flows. Compare cut flows with the new proposed baseline cuts from 05/04/2011 H->bb meeting. Data sets used: Wenu : mc10_7TeV106043.PythiaWenu_no_filter.merge.NTUP_TOP.e574_s933_s946_r183 5_r1700_p406_tid256551_00 : NTUP_TOP.256551._000487.root.2 Wmunu: mc10_7TeV106044.PythiaWmunu_no_filter.merge.NTUP_TOP.e574_s933_s946_r18 31_r1700_p406_tid256552_00 : NTUP_TOP.256552._000350.root.2 MICHAEL WRIGHT, H->BB, 11/04/2011 2

3 BASELINE CUTS WH, H->bb summer conf baseline cuts can be found here:  https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasProtected/WHNoteSummer2011#BaseLine_Selecti on https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasProtected/WHNoteSummer2011#BaseLine_Selecti on New proposed baseline cuts can be found on the Hbb Sharepoint. Main Changes Muons: |eta| < 2.4 from 2.5 pTtrk20/pT < 0.1 from pTtrk20 < 1.8GeV Electrons: |eta| < 2.47 incl. crack from 2.5 excl. crack MET: MET_RefFinal from MET_LocHadTopo Jet: |eta| < 4.5 from 2.5 Jet Cleaning only on Jets with pT > 20 GeV MICHAEL WRIGHT, H->BB, 11/04/2011 3

4 CUT FLOW COMPARISON MC Cut flow Wmunu Wenu ttbar SelectionWisconsinGlasgowWisconsinGlasgowWisconsinGlasgow Initial9998 9995 N Lep > 0575457583777375047614959 Trigger480948123740371343434503 Vertex480948123739371243434503 MET Cleaning 480948053739370943434483 Lepton Veto 480948053739370939423924 MT968 3480345524442430 MET417 2963294622562242 Njet >= 236 55 21702158 Njet = 228 43 417 NBJet = 13311236309 NBJet = 2000073 4

5 NEW BASELINE CUT FLOW COMPARISON MICHAEL WRIGHT, H->BB, 11/04/2011 5 MC Cut flowWmunu SelectionGlasgow (New) Glasgow (old) Initial9998 Author7344 Eta69887225 Pt57675976 Pixel57565962 SCT57315937 SCT/Pixel Holes57285934 b-layer57065912 TRT57005906 Z0/d056875893 Isolation56525799 Mu-jet or56525758 Mu-el56525758 N Lep > 056525758 Trigger47984812 Vertex47984812 MET Cleaning47914805 Lepton Veto47914805 MT4481968 MET3757417 Njet >= 211536 Njet = 29428 NBJet = 183 NBJet = 200

6 MICHAEL WRIGHT, H->BB, 11/04/2011 6 MC Cut flowWenu SelectionGlasgow (New) Glasgow (old) Initial9998 Author7984 IsEM44614694 checkOQ4461 Pt3750 Eta37433750 N Lep > 037433750 Trigger37063713 Vertex37053712 MET Cleaning37023709 Lepton Veto37023709 MT34783455 MET29962946 Njet >= 28355 Njet = 26743 NBJet = 111 NBJet = 200


Download ppt "WH, H->bb MICHAEL WRIGHT, UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW. INTRODUCTION Optimize University of Glasgow WH analysis by comparing with LMU and Wisconsin MC cut flows."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google