1. Korea Telecom 2007Olson: ERM1 ERM!!! Enterprise Risk Management Not just insurance, auditing, risk analysis A philosophy – A way of business

2. Korea Telecom 2007Olson: ERM1 Definition Systematic, integrated approach –Manage all risks facing organization External –Economic (market - price, demand change) –Financial (insurance, currency exchange) –Political/Legal –Technological –Demographic Internal –Human error –Fraud –Systems failure –Disrupted production Means to anticipate, measure, control risk

3. Korea Telecom 2007Olson: ERM1 DIFFERENCES Traditional Risk MgmtERM Individual hazardsContext - business strategy Identification & assessmentRisk portfolio development Focus on discrete risksFocus on critical risks Risk mitigationRisk optimization Risk limitsRisk strategy No ownersDefined responsibilities Haphazard quantificationMonitor & measure “Not my job”“Everyone’s responsibility”

4. Korea Telecom 2007Olson: ERM1 Risk & Business Taking risk is fundamental to doing business –Insurance Lloyd’s of London –Hedging Risk exchange swaps Derivatives/options Catastrophe equity puts (cat-e-puts) –ERM seeks to rationally manage these risks Be a Risk Shaper

5. Korea Telecom 2007Olson: ERM1 Types of Risk Stroh [2005] External environment –Competitors; Legal; Medical; Markets Business strategies & policies –Capital allocation; Product portfolio; Policies Business process execution –Planning; Technology; Resources People –Leadership; Skills; Accountability; Fraud Analysis & reporting –Performance; Budgeting; Accounting; Disclosure Technology & data –Architecture; Integrity; Security; Recovery

6. Korea Telecom 2007Olson: ERM1 Another view Slywotzky & Drzik, HBR [2005] Financial –Currency fluctuation DEFENSE: Hedging Hazard –Chemical spill DEFENSE: Insurance Operational –Computer system failure DEFENSE: Backup (dispersion, firewalls) New technology overtaking your product –ACE inhibitors, calcium channel blockers ate into hypertension drug market of beta-blockers & diuretics Demand shifts –Gradual – Oldsmobile; Rapid - Station wagons to Minivans

7. Korea Telecom 2007Olson: ERM1 Industry Margin Squeeze Pharmaceutical R&D Cost escalation –Semiconductor industry Airline deregulation Suppliers gain upper hand –Flat panel displays, Intel direct marketing Cycle volatility –DEFENSE: Shift compete/collaborate ratio Coproduction; supply chain coordination; joint R&D; collaborative marketing Airlines, Utilities, Textiles, Steel, Music, Autos

8. Korea Telecom 2007Olson: ERM1 Technology Shift Loss of patent protection Outdated manufacturing process –DEFENSE: Double bet Invest in multiple versions of technology Microsoft: OS/2 & Windows Intel: RISC & CISC Motorola didn’t – Nokia, Samsung entered

9. Korea Telecom 2007Olson: ERM1 Brand Erosion Perrier – contamination Firestone – Ford Explorer GM Saturn – not enough new models –DEFENSE: Redefine scope Emphasize service, quality –DEFENSE: Reallocate brand investment AMEX – responded to VISA campaign, reduced transaction fees, sped up payments, more ads

10. Korea Telecom 2007Olson: ERM1 One-of-a-kind Competitor Competitor redefines market Wal-Mart –DEFENSE: Create new, non-overlapping business design Target – unique product selection

11. Korea Telecom 2007Olson: ERM1 Customer Priority Shift –DEFENSE: Analyze proprietary information Identify next customer shift –Coach leather goods – competes with Gucci –Went trendy, aggressive in-market testing »Customer interviews, in-store product tests –DEFENSE: Market experiments Capital One – 65,000 experiments annually –Identify ever-smaller customer segments for credit cards

12. Korea Telecom 2007Olson: ERM1 New Project Failure Edsel –DEFENSE: Initial analysis Best defense –DEFENSE: Smart sequencing Do better-controllable projects first –Applied Materials – chip-making –DEFENSE: Develop excess options Improve odds of eventual success –Toyota – hybrid: proliferation of Prius options –DEFENSE: Stepping-stone method Create series of projects –Toyota – rolling out Prius

13. Korea Telecom 2007Olson: ERM1 Market Stagnation –DEFENSE: Generate demand innovation House of Quality? –Air Liquide industrial gas »Developed technology allowing customers to establish small gas production facilities on-site

14. Korea Telecom 2007Olson: ERM1 Means to Control Enterprise Risk Honeywell (1997) –Multi-year contract combining property, liability, option hedging risks against adverse currency exchange rates Dickinson [2001] –Holistic approach Extend contingency planning with comprehensive internal risk management systems CRO / CEA –Chief Risk Officer / Chief Auditing Executive

15. Korea Telecom 2007Olson: ERM1 COSO Committee of Sponsoring Organizations Treadway Committee – 1990s Smiechewicz [2001] Assign responsibility –Board of directors Establish organization’s risk appetite establish audit & risk management policies –Executives assume ownership Policies express position on integrity, ethics Responsibilities for insurance, auditing, loan review, credit, legal compliance, quality, security Common language –Risk definitions specific to organization Value-adding framework

16. Korea Telecom 2007Olson: ERM1 COSO Integrated Framework 2004 Levinsohn [2004]; Bowling & Rieger [2005] Internal environment – describe domain Objective setting – objectives consistent with mission, risk appetite Event identification – risks/opportunities Risk assessment - analysis Risk response – based on risk tolerance & appetite Control activities Information & communication – to responsible people Monitoring

17. Korea Telecom 2007Olson: ERM1 Risk Management Tools Simulation (Beneda [2005]) –Monte Carlo – Crystal Ball Multiple criteria optimization (Dash & Kajiji [2005]) –Goal programming - tradeoffs SYSTEMS FAILURE METHOD –Information Systems Project Management

18. Korea Telecom 2007Olson: ERM1 ERM Software Rhoden [2006] Penny [2002] Algorithmics Incorporated – ERM software, global financial institutions Jane’s Defence Industry [2005] Strategic Thought – Active Risk Manager – defence industry Rhoden [2006] Q5AIMS –From Q5 Systems Ltd –Safety audit & corrective action tracking –Mobile devices, Web-link Preceptor –Learning management system –Regulatory compliance, technical training PicketdynaQ –Workplace audit & assessment management –Regulatory references built in

19. Korea Telecom 2007Olson: ERM1 Experiences with ERM Walker [2003] –FirstEnergy Corp – auditing, problem-solving –Wal-Mart – best auditing practices, governance –Unoval – auditing to consultation –Canada Post – auditing efficiency –GM – corporate governance Kleffner et al. [2003] –Canadian risk & insurance 31% adopted ERM

20. Korea Telecom 2007Olson: ERM1 UnitedHealth Management Stroh [2005] Top level Strategic business risk Decompose strategic risks / opportunities Mitigation / acceleration plan Assure leadership that top risks are in sight 2 nd Market / business Internal risk sensing External risk sensing 3 rd Financial Identify gaps in plans Test/verify assumptions 4 th Ops Audit plan Advisory services - controls 5 th Compliance Partner with external audit Financial controls

21. Korea Telecom 2007Olson: ERM1 UHM Lessons Learned ERM value must be apparent to executive sponsors in a timely fashion Begin the process by focusing on the most important risks, thus avoiding swamping the organization with all possible risks, which would likely discourage participation Obtain sponsorship, and assign accountability for specific risks to responsible organizational members Standardize approaches where possible, setting minimum thresholds of execution Develop a diverse set of ERM team members Keep ERM implementation simple

22. Korea Telecom 2007Olson: ERM1 ERM Research Mostly descriptive, frameworks SURVEY –Lynch-Bell [2002] surveyed 52 companies Examined practices of governance, strategy, processes, technology, functions, culture –Milladge [2005]; Gates [2006] surveyed 271 members of the Conference Board Skelton & Thamhain [2003]; Thamhain [2004] –3 year field study R&D product development –Suggest look-ahead simulation, rapid prototyping to anticipate problems Beasley et al. [2005] –Gathered data on 123 organizations, found ERM implementation positively related to: Chief risk officer presence Board independence Top management support Big Four auditor presence Entity size Banking, Education, Insurance