Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Comparison of Solar Power Generation:

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Comparison of Solar Power Generation:"— Presentation transcript:

1 Comparison of Solar Power Generation:
PERIDOT TECHNOLOGY PERIDOT HOLDINGS Comparison of Solar Power Generation: PERIDOT PHOTOVOLTAIC OTHER CONCENTRATED SOLAR

2 PERIDOT HOLDINGS Peridot Technology Photovoltaic General Overview
Uses CSP with to produce hot water under pressure, flashed to steam without a boiler to power a bladeless turbine to produce AC power. Can use rolling hills without levelling prior to installation (lower land preparation costs) Construction time is reduced versus other technologies Photovoltaic PV cells produce DC power – must use inverter to convert to AC. Must use level ground for installation. Capacity for production of PV cells is limited and expansion of capacity takes a long time. PERIDOT HOLDINGS

3 PERIDOT HOLDINGS Peridot Technology Other CSP General Overview
Uses CSP with to produce hot water under pressure, flashed to steam without a boiler to power a bladeless turbine to produce AC power. Can use rolling hills without levelling prior to installation (lower land preparation costs) Construction time is reduced versus other technologies Other CSP Use mirrors to reflect sunlight to focal point for heat to make steam to power standard turbines. Installation is tedious and focal point is difficult to maintain. Limited life of mirrors and must clean often to maintain power production goals. PERIDOT HOLDINGS

4 Tracking , Storage, Degradation
Peridot Technology PERIDOT HOLDINGS Tracking , Storage, Degradation PV Standard fixed installation will produce less power versus single or dual axis tracking of the sun. Only batteries can be used with PV to store power. These are expensive and have limited life (5-10 yrs.) Well known degradation in capacity over some years Peridot Technology Supplied with dual axis tracking to produce 30% more power versus fixed systems. Can use efficient heat sinks (such as molten salt) which are low cost and last a lifetime. No degradation in capacity because lens does not degrade as a PV cell does.

5 Maintenance, Operation, Replacement
Peridot Technology PERIDOT HOLDINGS Maintenance, Operation, Replacement PV After years – virtually 100% of original cost to replace both panels and inverters. High cost of maintenance increases operation costs. Peridot Technology After years – about 20% of original cost to replace lenses. Likely not needed until 60 years. Very low maintenance and operation costs.

6 Well suited for on - site residential installations.
Peridot Technology PERIDOT HOLDINGS Efficiency PV Well suited for on - site residential installations. Does not utilize the sun’s heat – energy wasted Peridot Technology US DOE says solar thermal (not PV) is most reliable for utility scale power plants. Heat remaining after electricity production can be used for many useful purposes (heat storage, water purification, manufacturing processes, etc.). Thus, Peridot CSP system is 3 times more efficient vs. PV.

7 Refracts sunlight – more easily focused
Peridot Technology PERIDOT HOLDINGS Lens, Mirrors Peridot Technology: Refracts sunlight – more easily focused Flat surface lens does not need regular cleaning Other CSP: Reflects sunlight – 4 times more difficult to focus Dust or dirt buildup on mirror requires regular cleaning

8 Refracts sunlight – receiver is behind lens not in front
Peridot Technology PERIDOT HOLDINGS Versus Areva Peridot Technology: Refracts sunlight – receiver is behind lens not in front Flat surface lens does not need regular cleaning – no mirror Comes with bladeless turbine for AC power generation Areva: Reflects sunlight to pipes in front of mirror(s) using Fresnel lens to concentrate sunlight. Dust or dirt buildup on mirror requires regular cleaning Lacking technology for power generation (only steam)

9 PERIDOT HOLDINGS Peridot Technology
Other CSP Peridot Technology With receiver behind the lens, easier, lower cost installation and much wider focal point Uses hot water under pressure in pipes (not standard steam cycle) and bladeless turbine / generator for low cost operation (no need for boiler, dry steam, etc.) Other CSP With receiver pipes in front of the mirror, expensive installation and difficult focal point Uses traditional steam cycle (boilers, superheaters, expansion tanks) to turn a bladed turbine and generator


Download ppt "Comparison of Solar Power Generation:"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google