Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Transportation, Transshipment and Assignment Models

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Transportation, Transshipment and Assignment Models"— Presentation transcript:

1 Transportation, Transshipment and Assignment Models

2 Learning Objectives Structure special LP network flow models.
Set up and solve transportation models Extend basic transportation model to include transshipment points. Set up and solve facility location and other application problems as transportation models. Set up and solve assignment models using Excel solver.

3 Overview Part of a larger class of linear programming problems known as network flow models. Possess special mathematical features that enabled development of very efficient, unique solution methods.

4 Transportation Model Transportation problem deals with distribution of goods from several points of supply to a number of points of demand They arise when a cost-effective pattern is needed to ship items from origins that have limited supply to destinations that have demand for the goods. Resources to be optimally allocated usually involve given capacity of goods at each source and a given requirement for the goods at each destination. Most common objective of transportation problem is to schedule shipments from sources to destinations so that total production and transportation costs are minimized

5 Transshipment Model Extension of transportation problem is called transshipment problem in which a point can have shipments that both arrive as well as leave. Example would be a warehouse where shipments arrive from factories and then leave for retail outlets It may be possible for firm to achieve cost savings (economies of scale) by consolidating shipments from several factories at warehouse and then sending them together to retail outlets.

6 Assignment Model Assignment problem refers to class of LP problems that involve determining most efficient assignment of: People to projects, Salespeople to territories, Contracts to bidders, and Jobs to machines, and so on Objective is to minimize total cost or total time of performing tasks at hand, although a maximization objective is also possible.

7 1. Transportation Model Problem definition There are m sources. Source i has a supply capacity of Si. There are n destinations. The demand at destination j is D j. Objective: Minimize the total shipping cost of supplying the destinations with the required demand from the available supplies at the sources.

8 The Transportation Model
Characteristics A product is transported from a number of sources to a number of destinations at the minimum possible cost. Each source is able to supply a fixed number of units of the product, and each destination has a fixed demand for the product. The linear programming model has constraints for supply at each source and demand at each destination. All constraints are equalities in a balanced transportation model where supply equals demand. Constraints contain inequalities in unbalanced models where supply does not equal demand.

9 Transportation Model- Example 1
Executive Furniture Corporation

10 Transportation Model Example 1
Executive Furniture Corporation Transportation Costs Per Desk

11 LP Transportation Model Formulation
Executive Furniture Corporation Objective: minimize total shipping costs = 5 XDA + 4 XDB + 3 XDC + 3 XEA + 2 XEB + 1 XEC + 9 XFA + 7 XFB + 5 XFC Where: Xij = number of desks shipped from factory i to warehouse j i = D (for Des Moines), E (for Evansville), or F (for Fort Lauderdale). j = A (for Albuquerque), B (for Boston), or C (for Cleveland).

12 Supply Constraints Executive Furniture Corporation
Net flow at Des Moines = (Total flow in) - (Total flow out) = (0) - (XDA + XDB + XDC) Net flow at Des Moines = -XDA - XDB - XDC = (Des Moines capacity) and -XEA - XEB - XEC = (Evansville capacity) -XFA - XFB - XFC = (Fort Lauderdale capacity) Multiply each constraint by -1 and rewrite as: XDA + XDB + XDC = 100 (Des Moines capacity) XEA + XEB + XEC = 300 (Evansville capacity) XFA + XFB + XFC = 300 (Fort Lauderdale capacity)

13 Demand Constraints Executive Furniture Corporation
Net flow at Albuquerque = (Total flow in) - (Total flow out) = (XDA + XEA + XFA) - (0) Net flow at Albuquerque = XDA + XEA + XFA = 300 (Albuquerque demand) and XDB + XEB + XFB = 200 (Boston demand) XDC + XEC + XFC = 200 (Cleveland demand)

14 Excel Layout and Solver Entries

15 Total shipping cost is $3,900.
The Optimum Solution SHIP: 100 desks from Des Moines to Albuquerque, 200 desks from Evansville to Boston, 100 desks from Evansville to Cleveland, 200 desks from Fort Lauderdale to Albuquerque, and 100 desks from Fort Lauderdale to Cleveland. Total shipping cost is $3,900.

16 Alternate Excel Layout for the Model

17 Solver Entries for Alternate Layout

18 Transportation Model- Example 2
Carlton Pharmateuticals Carlton Pharmaceuticals supplies drugs and other medical supplies. It has three plants in: Cleveland, Detroit, Greensboro. It has four distribution centers in: Boston, Richmond, Atlanta, St. Louis. Management at Carlton would like to ship cases of a certain vaccine as economically as possible.

19 Data Unit shipping cost, supply, and demand Assumptions Unit shipping cost is constant. All the shipping occurs simultaneously. The only transportation considered is between sources and destinations. Total supply equals total demand.

20 Destinations Boston Sources Cleveland Richmond Detroit Atlanta
NETWORK REPRESENTATION Boston Richmond Atlanta St.Louis Destinations Sources Cleveland Detroit Greensboro D1=1100 37 40 42 32 35 30 25 15 20 28 S1=1200 S2=1000 S3= 800 D2=400 D3=750 D4=750

21 The Mathematical Model
The structure of the model is: Minimize <Total Shipping Cost> ST [Amount shipped from a source] = [Supply at that source] [Amount received at a destination] = [Demand at that destination] Decision variables Xij = amount shipped from source i to destination j. where: i=1 (Cleveland), 2 (Detroit), 3 (Greensboro) j=1 (Boston), 2 (Richmond), 3 (Atlanta), 4(St.Louis)

22 The supply constraints
Cleveland S1=1200 X11 X12 X13 X14 Supply from Cleveland X11+X12+X13+X14 = The supply constraints Detroit S2=1000 X21 X22 X23 X24 Supply from Detroit X21+X22+X23+X = Boston Greensboro S3= 800 X31 X32 X33 X34 Supply from Greensboro X31+X32+X33+X34 = D1=1100 Richmond D2=400 Atlanta D3=750 St.Louis D4=750

23 The complete mathematical model
=

24 Excel Optimal Solution

25 WINQSB Sensitivity Analysis
If this path is used, the total cost will increase by $5 per unit shipped along it Range of optimality

26 Range of feasibility Shadow prices for warehouses - the cost saving resulting from 1 extra case of vaccine demanded at the warehouse Shadow prices for plants - the cost incurred for each extra case of vaccine available at the plant

27 Interpreting sensitivity analysis results
Reduced costs The amount of transportation cost reduction per unit that makes a given route economically attractive. If the route is forced to be used under the current cost structure, for each item shipped along it, the total cost increases by an amount equal to the reduced cost. Shadow prices For the plants, shadow prices convey the cost savings realized for each extra case of vaccine available at plant. For the warehouses, shadow prices convey the cost incurred from having an extra case demanded at the warehouse.

28 The company can use both regular time and overtime to produce skis.
Transportation Model- Example 3 Montpelier Ski Company Using a Transportation model for production scheduling Montpelier is planning its production of skis for the months of July, August, and September. Production capacity and unit production cost will change from month to month. The company can use both regular time and overtime to produce skis. Production levels should meet both demand forecasts and end-of-quarter inventory requirement. Management would like to schedule production to minimize its costs for the quarter.

29 Data: Initial inventory = 200 pairs Ending inventory required =1200 pairs Holding cost rate is 3% per month per ski. Production capacity, and forecasted demand for this quarter (in pairs of skis), and production cost per unit (by months)

30 Analysis of Unit costs Unit cost = [Unit production cost] +
Analysis of demand: Net demand to satisfy in July = = 200 pairs Net demand in August = 600 Net demand in September = = 2200 pairs Analysis of Supplies: Production capacities are thought of as supplies. There are two sets of “supplies”: Set 1- Regular time supply (production capacity) Set 2 - Overtime supply Initial inventory Analysis of Unit costs Unit cost = [Unit production cost] + [Unit holding cost per month][the number of months stays in inventory] Example: A unit produced in July in Regular time and sold in September costs 25+ (3%)(25)(2 months) = $26.50 Forecasted demand In house inventory

31 Network representation
Production Month/period Network representation Month sold July R/T July R/T 25 25.75 26.50 1000 200 July July O/T 500 30 30.90 31.80 +M 26 26.78 +M 37 +M 29 Aug. R/T 800 +M 32 32.96 Aug. 600 Demand Production Capacity Aug. O/T 400 Sept. 2200 Sept. R/T 400 Dummy 300 Sept. O/T 200

32 Source: July production in R/T
Destination: July‘s demand. Source: Aug. production in O/T Destination: Sept.’s demand Unit cost= $25 (production) 32+(.03)(32)=$32.96 Unit cost =Production+one month holding cost

33 Inventory + Production - Demand Summary of the optimal solution
In July produce at capacity (1000 pairs in R/T, and 500 pairs in O/T). Store = 1300 at the end of July. In August, produce 800 pairs in R/T, and 300 in O/T. Store additional = 500 pairs. In September, produce 400 pairs (clearly in R/T). With 1000 pairs retail demand, there will be ( ) = 1200 pairs available for shipment Inventory + Production - Demand

34 Unbalanced Transportation Problems
If supplies do not equal demands, an unbalanced transportation model exists. In an unbalanced transportation model, supply or demand constraints need to be modified. There are two possible scenarios: Total supply exceeds total requirement. Total supply is less than total requirement.

35 Total Supply Exceeds Total Requirement
Total flow out of Des Moines ( XDA + XDB + XDC) should be permitted to be smaller than total supply (100). The constraint should be written as:   XDA + XDB + XDC <= 100 -XDA - XDB - XDC >= (Des Moines capacity)   -XEA - XEB - XEC >= (Evansville capacity) -XFA - XFB - XFC >= (Fort Lauderdale capacity)

36 Total Supply Less Than Total Requirement
Total flow in to Albuquerque (that is, XDA + XEA + XFA) should be permitted to be smaller than total demand (namely, 300). This warehouse should be written as:   XDA + XEA + XFA <= (Albuquerque demand) XDB + XEB + XFB <= (Boston demand) XDC + XEC + XFC <= (Cleveland demand)

37 Transportation Example 5: Formulation
Determine linear programming model formulation and solve using Excel:

38 Transportation Example 5: Formulation
Minimize Z = $8x1A + 5x1B + 6x1C + 15x2A + 10x2B + 12x2C x3A + 9x3B + 10x3C subject to: x1A + x1B + x1C = 120 x2A + x2B + x2C = 80 x3A + x3B + x3C = 80 x1A + x2A + x3A  150 x1B + x2B + x3B  70 x1C + x2C + x3C  100 xij  0

39 Transportation Example 5: Solution Computer Solution with Excel

40 Transportation Model-Example 6
 Hardgrave Machine Company (1 of 5) - New Factory Location Produces computer components at its plants in Cincinnati, Kansas City, and Pittsburgh. Plants not able to keep up with demand for orders at four warehouses in Detroit, Houston, New York, and Los Angeles. Firm has decided to build a new plant to expand its productive capacity. Two sites being considered: Seattle, Washington and Birmingham, Alabama. Both cities attractive in terms: labor supply, municipal services, and ease of factory financing.

41 Demand, Supply Data and Shipping Costs
Hardgrave Machine Company (2 of 5)

42 Shipping Costs Hardgrave Machine Company (3 of 5)

43 Excel Layout and Solver Entries
Hardgrave Machine Company (4 of 5)

44 Excel Layout and Solver Entries
Hardgrave Machine Company (5 of 5)

45 2. The Transshipment Model
Characteristics Extension of the transportation model. Intermediate transshipment points are added between the sources and destinations. Items may be transported from: Sources through transshipment points to destinations One source to another One transshipment point to another One destination to another Directly from sources to to destinations Some combination of these

46 Transshipment Model Transshipment problem flows can occur both out of and into same node in three ways:  1. If total flow into a node is less than total flow out from node, node represents a net creator of goods (a supply point). - Flow balance equation will have a negative right hand side (RHS) value. 2. If total flow into a node exceeds total flow out from node, node represents a net consumer of goods, (a demand point). - Flow balance equation will have a positive RHS value. 3. If total flow into a node is equal to total flow out from node, node represents a pure transshipment point. - Flow balance equation will have a zero RHS value.

47 Executive Furniture Corporation

48 Executive Furniture Corporation – Revisited
Assume it is possible for Executive Furniture to ship desks from Evansville factory to its three warehouses at very low unit shipping costs. Considering shipping some of the desks produced at other two factories (Des Moines and Fort Lauderdale) to Evansville. Considering using new shipping company to move desks from Evansville to all its warehouses.

49 Executive Furniture Corporation - Revisited
Revised unit shipping costs are shown here. Note Evansville factory shows up in both the “From” and “To” entries.

50 LP Model for Transshipment Problem
Executive Furniture Company Two new additional decision variables for new shipping routes. XDE = number of desks shipped from Des Moines to Evansville XFE = number of desks shipped from Fort Lauderdale to Evansville  Objective Function: minimize total shipping costs = 5XDA + 4XDB + 3XDC + 2XDE + 3XEA + 2XEB + +1XEC + 9XFA + 7XFB + 5XFC + 3XFE

51 LP Model for Transshipment Problem
Executive Furniture Company Relevant flow balance equations written as:  (0) - (XDA + XDB + XDC + XDE) = (Des Moines capacity) (0) - (XFA + XFB + XFC + XFE) = (Fort Lauderdale capacity) Supplies have been expressed as negative numbers in the RHS.  Net flow at Evansville = (Total flow in) - (Total flow out) = (XDE + XFE) - (XEA + XEB + XEC) Net flow equals total number of desks produced (the supply) at Evansville. Net flow at Evansville = (XDE + XFE) - (XEA + XEB + XEC) = -100 No change in demand constraints for warehouse requirements:  XDA + XEA + XFA = (Albuquerque demand) XDB + XEB + XFB = (Boston demand) XDC + XEC + XFC = (Cleveland demand)

52 Excel Solution Executive Furniture Company

53 Transshipment Model Example 2 Problem Definition and Data
Extension of the transportation model in which intermediate transshipment points are added between sources and destinations. An example of a transshipment point is a distribution center or warehouse located between plants and stores Data:

54 Transshipment Model Example 2 Problem Definition and Data

55 Transshipment Model Example 2
Model Formulation Minimize Z = $16x x x x x x25 + 6x36 + 8x x38 + 7x x x48 + 4x56 + 5x57 + x58 subject to: x13 + x14 + x15 = 300 x23+ x24 + x25 = 300 x36 + x46 + x56 = 200 x37+ x47 + x57 = 100 x38 + x48 + x58 = 300 x13 + x23 - x36 - x37 - x38 = 0 x14 + x24 - x46 - x47 - x48 = 0 x15 + x25 - x56 - x57 - x58 = 0 xij  0

56 Transshipment Model Example 2 Computer Solution with Excel

57 Transshipment Model Example 2 Computer Solution with Excel

58 3. The Assignment Model Problem definition
m workers are to be assigned to m jobs A unit cost (or profit) Cij is associated with worker i performing job j. Minimize the total cost (or maximize the total profit) of assigning workers to job so that each worker is assigned a job, and each job is performed.

59 The Assignment Model Characteristics
Special form of linear programming model similar to the transportation model. Supply at each source and demand at each destination limited to one unit. In a balanced model supply equals demand. In an unbalanced model supply does not equal demand.

60 Assignment Model Example 1 (1 of 7)
Fix-It Shop Example Received three new rush projects to repair: (1) a radio, (2) a toaster oven, and (3) a broken coffee table. Three workers (each has different talents and abilities). Estimated costs to assign each worker to each of the three projects.

61 Assignment Model Example 1 (2 of 7)
Fix-It Shop Rows denote people or objects to be assigned, and columns denote tasks or jobs assigned. Numbers in table are costs associated with each particular assignment.

62 Assignment Model Example 1 (3 of 7)
Fix-It Shop: Assignment Alternatives and Costs Owner's objective is to assign three projects to workers in a way that result is lowest total cost.

63 Assignment Model Example 1 (4 of 7)
Fix-It Shop Owner's objective is to assign three projects to workers in a way that results in lowest total cost.

64 Assignment Model Example 1 (5 of 7)
Fix-It Shop Formulate LP model - Xij = “Flow” on arc from node denoting worker i to node denoting project j. Solution value will equal 1 if worker i is assigned to project j : i = A (for Adams), B (for Brown), or C (for Cooper) j = 1 (for project 1), 2 (for project 2), or 3 (for project 3) Objective Function: minimize total assignment cost = 11XA1 + 14XA2 + 6XA3 + 8XB1 + 10XB2 + 11XB3 + + 9XC1 + 12XC2 + 7XC3

65 Assignment Model Example 1 (6 of 7)
Fix-It Shop Constraints expressed using standard convention flow balance equations are as follows: -XA1 - XA2 - XA3 = (Adams availability) -XB1 - XB2 - XB3 = -1 (Brown availability) -XC1 - XC2 - XC3 = -1 (Cooper availability) XA1 + XB1 + XC1 = 1 (Project 1 requirement) XA2 + XB2 + XC2 = 1 (Project 2 requirement) XA3 + XB3 + XC3 = 1 (Project 3 requirement)

66 Excel Layout and Solver Entries (7 of 7)

67 Assignment Model- Example 2 (1 of 3)
Ballston Electronics Five different electrical devices produced on five production lines, are needed to be inspected. The travel time of finished goods to inspection areas depends on both the production line and the inspection area. Management wishes to designate a separate inspection area to inspect the products such that the total travel time is minimized.

68 Assignment Model- Example 2 (2 of 3)
Data: Travel time in minutes from assembly lines to inspection areas.

69 Assignment Model Example 2: Network Representation (3 of 3)
Assembly Line Inspection Areas S1=1 S2=1 S3=1 S4=1 S5=1 D1=1 1 A 2 B D2=1 3 C D3=1 D4=1 4 D D5=1 5 E

70 Assumptions and restrictions
The number of workers equals the number of jobs. Given a balanced problem, each worker is assigned exactly once, and each job is performed by exactly one worker. For an unbalanced problem “dummy” workers (in case there are more jobs than workers), or “dummy” jobs (in case there are more workers than jobs) are added to balance the problem.

71 Computer solutions A complete enumeration is not efficient even for moderately large problems (with m=8, m! > 40,000 is the number of assignments to enumerate). The Hungarian method provides an efficient solution procedure. Special cases A worker is unable to perform a particular job. A worker can be assigned to more than one job. A maximization assignment problem.

72 Assignment Model Example 3 (1 of 8) Problem Definition and Data
Problem: Assign four teams of officials to four games in a way that will minimize total distance traveled by the officials. Supply is always one team of officials, demand is for only one team of officials at each game. Data:

73 Assignment Model Example 3 (2 of 8)
Model Formulation Minimize Z = 210xAR + 90xAA + 180xAD + 160xAC + 100xBR xBA + 130xBD + 200xBC + 175xCR + 105xCA xCD + 170xCC + 80xDR + 65xDA + 105xDD xDC subject to: xAR + xAA + xAD + xAC = 1 xij  0 xBR + xBA + xBD + xBC = 1 xCR + xCA + xCD + xCC = 1 xDR + xDA + xDD + xDC = 1 xAR + xBR + xCR + xDR = 1 xAA + xBA + xCA + xDA = 1 xAD + xBD + xCD + xDD = 1 xAC + xBC + xCC + xDC = 1

74 Assignment Model Example 3 (3 of 8) Computer Solution with Excel
Exhibit 6.12

75 Assignment Model Example 3 (4 of 8) Computer Solution with Excel

76 Assignment Model Example 3 (5 of 8) Computer Solution with Excel

77 Assignment Model Example 3 (6 of 8) Computer Solution with Excel QM

78 Assignment Model Example 3 (7 of 8)
Computer Solution with QM for Windows

79 Assignment Model Example 3 (8 of 8)
Computer Solution with QM for Windows

80 Summary Three network flow models were presented: Transportation model deals with distribution of goods from several supplier to a number of demand points. Transshipment model includes points that permit goods to flow both in and out of them. Assignment model deals with determining the most efficient assignment of issues such as people to projects.


Download ppt "Transportation, Transshipment and Assignment Models"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google