1. 1 SCG’s Practice: Collaboration in R&D 3

2. SCG’s Collaboration Portfolio External Collaboration Collaboration Portfolio by expenses (770 MB) Supplier, 22% Local Institute/ University, 47% International Institute/ University, 14% Others, 1% Source: R&D report 2009 – 2012 included both completed & ongoing projects Customer, 15%

3. MIT PSU UFL Waterloo GATECH TITECH CBMA ABDN Karlsruhe OXFORD EPFL WASEDA Stanford KAIST, KIST, STEPI British Columbia CAL TECH UC Berkley International Partners: 78 projects Build relationships and collaborate with all stakeholders - “Win-Win strategy” IPST Collaborative partners Developing project partners Relationship partners D Tech SCG’s Collaborative Network: International Osaka U. National Inst. Of standard and tech. Technique U of Darmstadt HiBot Certech Fraunhofer Zhejiang U. JAIST KYOTO U China Academy of Science Ecole des Mines Albi CIRAD IFP Aachen Tianjin U. Source: R&D report 2009 – 2012 included both completed & ongoing projects

4. SCG’s Collaborative Network: Domestic Domestic Partners:169 projects Build relationships and collaborate with all stakeholders - “Win-Win strategy” 4

5. Organic fertilizer : Utility of waste material from paper for agricultural usage - Reducing landfill - Improving plant growth - Lowering cost of chemical fertilization 5 SCG’s Collaboration with Universities Co-Research Lab: For researchers & students - Extended research facility - Industrial experienced students Green Building Marine Cement: C ement composition that resist against chloride ingress from external marine environment UniversityIndustry

6. 6 How to… Enhance Effective Collaboration 4

7. Be Fair & Respect Share Resource Establish Common Interests How to Enhance our Effective Collaboration 7

8. Frontier or Self-interest Business and Social needs Publishable Research VS. Commercialization Collaboration between University & Industry Conducting research for commercialization to support business and social needs 8 & UniversityIndustry

9. University Industry 9 Resource sharing between University and Industry Collaboration between University & Industry & Engineering expertiseScientific expertise Access to technical information Access to business & social needs Pools of education networks Some testing & lab equipment and capital

10. University Industry 10 Collaboration between University & Industry & Gaps in Intellectual Property (IP) Management Own IP for organization asset Own IP for career advancement KPI-driven IP Business-driven IP Prefer co-ownership of IP Prefer exclusive ownership of IP Prefer royalty fee Prefer royalty Free! University wants to own IP because IP ownership is part of Government’s KPI to measure university performance Company wants to own IP to maintain exclusive right over technology and others can’t copy.

11. Concept Development Research by Corporate Research by University Product Development Product Prototype Plan and Production Commercialization % of investment By Corporate By University/Institute IP Benefit Sharing often becomes obstacle of R&D collaboration R&D Collaboration and Business Process 11

12. 12 Final Thoughts on Collaboration

13. Thank you 13