1. XML Data Bill la Forge, CTO JXML, Inc. www.jxml.com b.laforge@jxml.com  JXML, Inc. 2000 All Rights Reserved January 18, 2000 The JXML Vision

2. Overview 1. Historical View 2. What is XML? 3. Protocol Issues  JXML, Inc. 2000 All Rights Reserved

3. 1. Historical View n 1960’s: Data Centric n 1970’s: Process Centric n 1980’s: Object Oriented n 1990’s: Component Based n 2000’s: XML?  JXML, Inc. 2000 All Rights Reserved

4. Data was our First Focus 60’s Data Record Layouts Printer Layouts System Flow Charts Decision Tables Batch Jobs were a Series of small Programs  JXML, Inc. 2000 All Rights Reserved

5. 60’s Data 70’s Logic Then we Focused on Logic GOTO-Less Programming Structured Programming Top-Down Design Programs Became Very Large  JXML, Inc. 2000 All Rights Reserved

6. 60’s Data 80’s OO 70’s Logic Common Terms for Analysis and Design Tightly Coupled Code Object Oriented Programming Focused on Runtime Behavior Code Reuse was the Holy Grail, Rarely Achieved  JXML, Inc. 2000 All Rights Reserved

7. 60’s Data 90’s Comp 70’s Logic 80’s OO Component Programming Shifted the Focus to Interfaces Serialization Tied to Code Code Reuse IDE-Based Composition Limited Acceptance  JXML, Inc. 2000 All Rights Reserved

8. 00’s XML 70’s Logic 80’s OO 90’s Comp XML Wrappers for Incompatible Systems Industry-Specific Markup Languages XML for Persistent Data and Composition XML Returns the Focus to Data XML Enables Middleware for Application-Specific Data  JXML, Inc. 2000 All Rights Reserved

9. 2. What is XML? n Just Tagged Text n DTDs & Schema n Namespaces & Schema n Recommended Practice  JXML, Inc. 2000 All Rights Reserved

10. Just Tagged Text An XML file is called a Document Documents have one top-level Element Elements have Matched Start & End Tags, or a Combined Tag The Content Between the Tags can be Text or Elements Attributes are Name/Value Pairs within the Start or Combined Tag 123  JXML, Inc. 2000 All Rights Reserved

11. DTDs and Schema DTDs n Define Structure, but Not Content n Author can Override a DTD within a Document n Best Used for Interactively Authoring an XML Document Schema n Define Structure And Data Content n Author can Not Override a Schema within a Document n Best Used to Validate Program Input  JXML, Inc. 2000 All Rights Reserved

12. n Namespaces enable the use of more than one Schema with a Document n Each Namespace has a unique URL n Each Schema defines a Namespace (More than one kind of Schema can be used to define the same Namespace) n Namespaces Enable Modular & Reusable Schema Namespaces & Schema  JXML, Inc. 2000 All Rights Reserved

13. n Do Not mix Text and Elements at the Same Level text1 n Avoid Attributes on Elements with Text Content some text n Text is Preferred over Attributes u Difficult to Format Attributes for Display Recommended Practice  JXML, Inc. 2000 All Rights Reserved

14. 3. Protocol Issues n Document-Based Protocols n Packaging n Opaque Data n Digital Signatures n Serialization—The Wrong Focus n Beyond RPC  JXML, Inc. 2000 All Rights Reserved

15. Document-Based Protocols n Emphasis on Message Format n Separation of Validation and Processing  JXML, Inc. 2000 All Rights Reserved

16. Packaging Routing Signature Transactional Application  JXML, Inc. 2000 All Rights Reserved

17. n Protocol Stacks, N-Tier Applications, and Data Mining must all deal with information outside of their Domain. n It is sufficient that a Document is well-formed. n Validation only Selected Elements Increases the Robustness of these Processes Opaque Data  JXML, Inc. 2000 All Rights Reserved

18. n End-to-End Non-Repudiation n Entire Documents or Individual Elements can be signed n Signature can be in the Same or Separate Document n Changes to Whitespace does Not Invalidate an XML Digital Signatures XML Digital Signatures  JXML, Inc. 2000 All Rights Reserved

19. Serialization —The Wrong Focus n Focused on Objects, Not Data Objects->XML->Objects n XML produced is either a specific XML Markup Language or is not conformant to any Markup Language u BeanML (IBM) is one-way, but fast XML->Objects u Archiver (Sun) is roundtrip and compact, but slow u SOAP (Microsoft) is language-neutral, but non-conformant  JXML, Inc. 2000 All Rights Reserved

20. Beyond RPC XML does not lend itself to a direct implementation of RPC, per say, as such efforts lean to the use of Serialization. Consider instead an XML Messaging System, where the Document as a Whole specifies the Intent of the Requestor. The key here is to stay Focused on the Data being passed, rather than trying to Model an RPC call.  JXML, Inc. 2000 All Rights Reserved