Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

D C I CIDS: Center of Interface Dynamics for Sustainability D C I Dynamics of molecular interactions at surfaces Experiments and Eley-Rideal reactions.

Published byElla Booth Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "D C I CIDS: Center of Interface Dynamics for Sustainability D C I Dynamics of molecular interactions at surfaces Experiments and Eley-Rideal reactions."— Presentation transcript:

1 D C I CIDS: Center of Interface Dynamics for Sustainability D C I Dynamics of molecular interactions at surfaces Experiments and Eley-Rideal reactions with hyperthermal N atoms Aart W. Kleyn 1 Materials innovation institute (M2i), The Netherlands 2 FOM Institute DIFFER, The Netherlands 3 Center of Interface Dynamics for Sustainability, Chengdu Development Center for Science and Technology, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Chengdu, China 4 HIMS, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands 5 Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, The Netherlands

2 D C I Dalian 2/ 56 Outline 1.Mechanisms and experiments on dynamics at surfaces 2.Physisorption interaction: Ar + Ag(111) or Ru(0001) 3.Chemisorption: N-atom scattering at Ag(111) 4.Role of electronically excited N-atoms 5.Interactions at adsorbates: and with fast N 2 6.Eley – Rideal or direct reactions: 7.Conclusions

3 D C I Dalian 3/ 56 Dynamics of Gas-Surface Interactions: Direct scattering Trapping desorption Chemisorption Often used in molecular flow simulation codes such as DSMC

4 D C I Dalian 4/ 56 Dynamics of Gas-Surface Reactions: A + BC → AB + C Langmuir Hinschelwood: Trapping Dissociation / Diffusion Recombination Eley-Rideal: Direct concerted reaction without accomodation of kinetic and potential energy

5 D C I Dalian 5/ 56 Hyperthermal Gas surface dynamics is relevant for (esoteric) applications: fusion, space, semiconductor manufacturing

6 D C I Dalian 6/ 56 Shuttle glow: a surface reaction courtesy Edmond Murad

7 D C I Dalian 7/ 56 Background: EUV lithography 7  Goal: study the interaction of reactive nitrogen environments (N-atoms) with Ru surfaces Multilayer mirror with capping layer

8 D C I Dalian 8/ 56 Dynamics of gas-surface reactions: N+O ads →NO 8 Langmuir Hinschelwood: (LH): Trapping, (Dissociation), Diffusion, Reaction, Desorption Eley-Rideal:Direct pick-up reaction NO acc LH dominant by far

9 D C I Dalian 9/ 56 Distribution of HCl formed in H+Cl ads 9 HCl formed between specular and normal directions Parallel momentum H conserved Light atom ER, heavy atom??? Fast HCl peak (ER) and thermal HCl (LH) Rettner, JCP 101 (1994) 1529

10 D C I Dalian 10/ 56 ER abstraction O + + O ads → O 2 -, E i > 20 eV O removed from Si(100)-O Abstraction with ions at excess translational energy Sputtering excluded (isotopic labeling) Quinteros, Tzvetkov, Jacobs, J.Chem.Phys. 113 (2000) 5119. O 2 - yield

11 D C I Dalian 11/ 56 HARPOEN scattering experiments 11

12 D C I Dalian 12/ 56 Energy determination by TOF technique: ‘effusive’ 4-5 eV fast beam (400-500 kJ/Mol) Energy of N and N 2 plasma produced neutral beam N: E i FWHM / ~1.16 N 2 : E i FWHM / ~1.14 Operation of cascaded arc source: total tip current ~60 A, ~88(150) V for Ar(N 2 ) stagnation pressure ~230(325) mbar for Ar(N 2 ) plasma cascaded arc plates (  =2.5 mm) nozzle (  =3 mm), skimmer (  =0.5 mm) collimator (  =1 mm) Created at Technische Universiteit Eindhoven cathode tips Gas

13 D C I Dalian 13/ 56 HARPOEN set-up

14 D C I Dalian 14/ 56

15 D C I Dalian 15/ 56 Outline 1.Mechanisms and experiments on dynamics at surfaces 2.Physisorption interaction: Ar + Ag(111) or Ru(0001) 3.Chemisorption: N-atom scattering at Ag(111) 4.Role of electronically excited N-atoms 5.Interactions at adsorbates: and with fast N 2 6.Eley – Rideal or direct reactions: 7.Conclusions

16 D C I Dalian 16/ 56 6 eV Ar scattering at Ru(0001): T S dependence (  i =60 o ) Angular E f /E i distribution 60 ° T S =xx K Ueta, Gleeson, Kleyn, J. Chem. Phys, 138 (2011) 034704 Beam normalized Angular flux distribution

17 Dalian 17/ 56 D C I Probing physisorption: Ar scattering – M Ru =101, M Ag =108 – Ru: hcp, Ag: fcc potential energy surface (PES) z V(z) Ar-Ag(111) potential: Lahaye et al, Surf. Sci.338 (1995) 169

18 Dalian 18/ 56 D C I Comparison Ru and Ag (D-)Ru(0001)Ag(111) 40 ° Energy transfer Scattered intensity

19 Dalian 19/ 56 D C I (D-)Ru(0001) (T S =0 K) MD simulations: Ar/Ag(111)* Ag(111) * Lahaye, Kleyn, Stolte and Holloway, Surf. Sci., 338, 169 (1995). Comparison Ru and Ag

20 Dalian 20/ 56 D C I (T S =0 K) (D-)Ru(0001)Ag(111) MD simulations: Ar/Ag(111)* * Lahaye, Kleyn, Stolte and Holloway, Surf. Sci. 338 (1995) 169 Comparison Ru and Ag

21 Dalian 21/ 56 D C I (T S =0 K) MD simulations: Ar/Ag(111)* Ru is stiffer and exhibits structure scattering (D-)Ru(0001) * Lahaye, Kleyn, Stolte and Holloway, Surf. Sci., 338, 169 (1995). rainbow scattering** Increasing E i Less surface atom vibration

22 Dalian 22/ 56 D C I Physisorption:Ar => Ru(0001) & Ag(111) low T S & adding D – rainbow scattering (presence of structure scattering) high T S – remaining structure scattering  Ru has much higher stiffness than Ag  D makes Ru even stiffer Ueta, Gleeson, Kleyn, J. Chem. Phys, 138 (2011) 034704

23 D C I Dalian 23/ 56 Outline 1.Mechanisms and experiments on dynamics at surfaces 2.Physisorption interaction: Ar + Ag(111) or Ru(0001) 3.Chemisorption: N-atom scattering at Ag(111) 4.Role of electronically excited N-atoms 5.Interactions at adsorbates: and with fast N 2 6.Eley – Rideal or direct reactions: 7.Conclusions

24 Dalian 24/ 56 D C I Probing chemisorption N atom probes chemisorption well Ar atom probes repulsive wall z V(z) N & Ar atoms scattering from Ag(111)

25 Dalian 25/ 56 D C I Experimental 4-6 eV N, N 2, Ar at Ag(111) Incident angle of 40°and 60° Surface temperature 600 K (zero N coverage limit), 300 K full N-coverage 600 K 40 ° 60 ° thermal desorption

26 Dalian 26/ 56 D C I Experimental conditions N and N 2 mixed beam Incident angle of 40°and 60° TOF technique: ‘effusive’ 4-5 eV fast beam (400-500 kJ/Mol) 600 K 40 ° 60 ° N: E i FWHM / ~1.16 N 2 : E i FWHM / ~1.14

27 D C I Dalian 27/ 56 DFT Potentials for N-Ag(111) Note the corrugation at hollow sites Note the distance of closest approach, due to well From: N-Ag(111) potential: Ludovic Martin-Gondre et al., Comp. Theor. Chem. 990 (2012) 126.

28 D C I Dalian 28/ 56 Potentials for Ar-Ag(111) and N-Ag(111) Note the big difference in corrugation Trajectory calculations give broad angular distributions N-Ag(111) potential: Ludovic Martin-Gondre et al., Comp. Theor. Chem. 990 (2012) 126. Ar-Ag(111) potential: Lahaye et al, Surf. Sci.338 (1995) 169

29 D C I Dalian 29/ 56 N & Ar scattering angular distribution (Θ i =60 o ) 60 ° T S =600 K ExperimentTheory N flux distribution: Sharp distribution (Ar like) + Broad distribution (non-Ar) DFT + CTC Theory misses the specular contribution, for all lattice dynamics models Specular contribution is attributed to excited N-atoms in the beam. Ueta, Gleeson, Kleyn, J. Chem. Phys, 138 (2011) 034704; Martin-Gondre, Bocan, Blanco-Rey, Alducin, Juaristi, Diez Muino, J. Phys. Chem. C 117 (2013) 9779.

30 D C I Dalian 30/ 56 Outline 1.Mechanisms and experiments on dynamics at surfaces 2.Physisorption interaction: Ar + Ag(111) or Ru(0001) 3.Chemisorption: N-atom scattering at Ag(111) 4.Role of electronically excited N-atoms 5.Interactions at adsorbates: and with fast N 2 6.Eley – Rideal or direct reactions: 7.Conclusions

31 D C I Dalian 31/ 56 Presence of excited state of N atoms in beam Beam contains not only ground state N( 4 S) but also electronically excited states atoms N( 2 P) + N( 2 D) Ratio not determined Appearance potential measurements N( 4 S) : N( 2 D) : N( 2 P)=100 : 30 : 10, Alagia et al., Isr. J. Chem., 37, 329 (1997). N( 4 S) : N( 2 D) : N( 2 P)=100 : 4 : 1.3, Lin and Kaufman, J. Chem. Phys., 55, 3760 (1971). N( 4 S) : N( 2 D) : N( 2 P)=100 : 17 : 6, Foner and Hudson, J. Chem. Phys., 37, 1662 (1962).

32 D C I Dalian 32/ 56 Interpretation: 2 D specular scattering cluster calculations* * Kokh, Buenker and Whitten, Surf. Sci., 600, 5104 (2006). ** Wang, Jiang, Pang, Nakamura, J. Phys. Chem. B, 109, 17943 (2005) & Martin-Gondre et al. Two-component angular distribution Broad (non-Ar) >> Sharp dist. (Ar like) Presence of two states of N atoms in incident beam Potential crossing in MRD-CI * E b (N-Ag)  2.5 - 4 eV (DFT) ** Z eq  1.1 – 1.5 Å (fcc hollow) ** N( 2 D) appears inert: large coupling

33 D C I Dalian 33/ 56 Harpooning van Salm (1706-1719))

34 Dalian 34/ 56 D C I Polanyi’s flame experiments 1932 Oversized cross sections Los and Kleyn, in Alkali halide vapors,1979, Academic Press: New York. p. 275. Alkali age: Harpooning and large cross sections K + Br 2  KBr + Br

35 D C I Dalian 35/ 56 Ion-pair formation, Landau-Zener transitions in Na + I → Na + + I - Simple physics thanks to discrete states Surface science situation more difficult (Wodtke, AuerbachTully et al.) Experimental sophistication needed: state selection

36 D C I Dalian 36/ 56 Outline 1.Mechanisms and experiments on dynamics at surfaces 2.Physisorption interaction: Ar + Ag(111) or Ru(0001) 3.Chemisorption: N-atom scattering at Ag(111) 4.Role of electronically excited N-atoms 5.Interactions at adsorbates: and with fast N 2 6.Eley – Rideal or direct reactions: 7.Conclusions

37 D C I Dalian 37/ 56 N atoms scattering from N-covered Ag(111) Ueta, Gleeson, Kleyn, J. Chem. Phys. 135 (2011) 074702. For N atoms: Ag(111) = N-Ag(111 Corrugation remains Reactivity remains? => potential unchanged?? Do Eley-Rideal reactions occur? 60 ° T S =300 K

38 D C I Dalian 38/ 56 Good agreement on absolute scale! Specular peak absent (Excited states?) Similarity between bare and N-covered surface coincidental? Calculations indicate presence of ER reactions Blanco-Rey, Martin-Gondre, Díez Muiño, Alducin, Juaristi, J. Phys. Chem. C 116 (2012) 21903. N interaction at N-Ag(111): angular distributions 60 ° T S =300 K

39 D C I Dalian 39/ 56 N 2 and Ar scattering at Ru (900K) 39 Specular scattering for 5 eV N 2. No dissociation visible. No corrugation, no intensity at 20 o, Ru is flat for N 2 and Ar T. Zaharia, Kleyn, Gleeson, Zeitschrift Phys. Chem 227 (2013) 1511

40 D C I Dalian 40/ 56 Outline 1.Mechanisms and experiments on dynamics at surfaces 2.Physisorption interaction: Ar + Ag(111) or Ru(0001) 3.Chemisorption: N-atom scattering at Ag(111) 4.Role of electronically excited N-atoms 5.Interactions at adsorbates: and with fast N 2 6.Eley – Rideal or direct reactions: 7.Conclusions

41 D C I Dalian 41/ 56 Ar, N or N 2 scattering at N-Ru (400K) 41 Direct pick-up reactions? N + N  N 2 N and Ar scattering similarly broadened Large broadening for scattered N 2. Extra scattering pathway?? T. Zaharia, Kleyn, Gleeson, Zeitschrift Phys. Chem 227 (2013) 1511

42 D C I Dalian 42/ 56 Very deep wells for N-atoms throughout the unit cell! Blanco-Rey, Martin-Gondre, Díez Muiño, Alducin, Juaristi, J. Phys. Chem. C 116 (2012) 21903. N interaction at N-Ag(111): potentials T S =300 K

43 D C I Dalian 43/ 56 N+N 2 scattering & formation at N-Ag(111) theory & experiment 43 Broadening for scattered N 2. Extra scattering pathway?? ER reaction!! Maria Blanco-Rey et al. J.Phys.Chem.Lett 4 (2013) 3704 Hirokazu Ueta et al. J.Chem.Phys. 135 (2011) 074702

44 D C I Dalian 44/ 56 Cross section for reaction N + N ads → N 2 σ ER < 5 Å 2 << σ unit cell Maria Blanco-Rey et al. J.Phys.Chem.Lett 4 (2013) 3704

45 D C I Dalian 45/ 56 Formation in N scattering at O-Ru 45 NO formed in sub-specular direction with strongly above thermal energy (5 eV); thermal desorption impossible/invisible here. Strong evidence for direct pick-up reaction

46 D C I Dalian 46/ 56 NO formation from N + O ads 46 NO formed between specular and normal directions Parallel momentum N conserved Heavy atom ER Zaharia, Kleyn, Gleeson, PRL in press.

47 D C I Dalian 47/ 56 NO energy and kinetics of decay Not all N can react (cutoff on NO energy), in fact about 0.4 I NO =ke -60 → σ NO ≈ 34Å 2 assuming O-removal only. Cross section larger than unit cell size: contradiction Zaharia, Kleyn, Gleeson, PRL in press. τ≈50 s

48 D C I Dalian 48/ 56 Ru(0001)-O(2×1) surface 48 Ru O 2.8 Å σ unit cell ≈ 13 Å 2

49 D C I Dalian 49/ 56 Decay and rise times for NO and N 2 production using full beam exposure Other processes to decrease NO decay: competition with N deposition and removal; not all NO removed in ‘fast’ process, also LH active N 2 increase factor 11 higher than NO decrease (vibrational effect?) σ O-removal ≈ 5 Å 2 Zaharia, Kleyn, Gleeson, PRL in press. Eley-Rideal Langmuir- Hinschelwood

50 D C I Dalian 50/ 56 50 O Ru N NO Eley-Rideal – fast NO

51 D C I Dalian 51/ 56 51 O Ru N NO Hot Atom – fast NO

52 D C I Dalian 52/ 56 52 O Ru N NO Langmuir-Hinschelwood – thermal NO

53 D C I Dalian 53/ 56 53 Ru N N2N2 ER – fast N 2

54 D C I Dalian 54/ 56 Simultaneous ER reactions forming NO and N 2 ER reactions cause rapid removal of strongly bound surface species Hyperthermal N-atom beams deposit and remove at the same time Zaharia, Kleyn, Gleeson, PRL in press.

55 D C I Dalian 55/ 56 Summary and conclusions  Eley Rideal reactions conclusively observed for incident N atoms; first time for non hydrogenic reactants  fast N atoms can pick up N or O from Ru surfaces – potential cleaning application  cross section of N+O  NO ER reaction is ~30 Å 2 Mainly due to efficient N 2 formation with deposited N-atoms  State resolved experiments needed! 55

56 D C I Dalian 56/ 56 Future plans:

Download ppt "D C I CIDS: Center of Interface Dynamics for Sustainability D C I Dynamics of molecular interactions at surfaces Experiments and Eley-Rideal reactions."

Similar presentations

Adsorption and self-assembly of alkanethiols on GaAs (001) surface

Adsorption and self-assembly of alkanethiols on GaAs (001) surface
Atkins & de Paula: Atkins’ Physical Chemistry 9e

Atkins & de Paula: Atkins’ Physical Chemistry 9e
Program Degrad.1.0 Auger cascade model for electron thermalisation in gas mixtures produced by photons or particles in electric and magnetic fields S.F.Biagi.

Program Degrad.1.0 Auger cascade model for electron thermalisation in gas mixtures produced by photons or particles in electric and magnetic fields S.F.Biagi.
“Rotational Energy Transfer in o - / p -H 2 + HD” Renat A. Sultanov and Dennis Guster BCRL, St. Cloud State University St. Cloud, MN June 20, 2007 OSU.

“Rotational Energy Transfer in o - / p -H 2 + HD” Renat A. Sultanov and Dennis Guster BCRL, St. Cloud State University St. Cloud, MN June 20, 2007 OSU.
motivation Dynamics of spin-triplet and spin-singlet O 2 on clean Ag(100) surfaceson clean Ag(100) surfaces M. AlducinM. Alducin H. F. BusnengoH. F. Busnengo.

motivation Dynamics of spin-triplet and spin-singlet O 2 on clean Ag(100) surfaceson clean Ag(100) surfaces M. AlducinM. Alducin H. F. BusnengoH. F. Busnengo.
ChE 553 Lecture 11 New Topic: Kinetics Of Adsorption 1.

ChE 553 Lecture 11 New Topic: Kinetics Of Adsorption 1.
Ivan Janeček, Daniel Hrivňák, and René Kalus Department of Physics, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic Supported by the Grant Agency of the.

Ivan Janeček, Daniel Hrivňák, and René Kalus Department of Physics, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic Supported by the Grant Agency of the.
1 EFFECTS OF CARBON REDEPOSITION ON TUNGSTEN UNDER HIGH-FLUX, LOW ENERGY Ar ION IRRADITAION AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURE Lithuanian Energy Institute, Lithuania.

1 EFFECTS OF CARBON REDEPOSITION ON TUNGSTEN UNDER HIGH-FLUX, LOW ENERGY Ar ION IRRADITAION AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURE Lithuanian Energy Institute, Lithuania.
L.B. Begrambekov Plasma Physics Department, Moscow Engineering and Physics Institute, 115409 Moscow, Russia Peculiarities, Sources and Driving Forces of.

L.B. Begrambekov Plasma Physics Department, Moscow Engineering and Physics Institute, Moscow, Russia Peculiarities, Sources and Driving Forces of.
Y. Ueda, M. Fukumoto, H. Kashiwagi, Y. Ohtsuka (Osaka University)

Y. Ueda, M. Fukumoto, H. Kashiwagi, Y. Ohtsuka (Osaka University)
Ultra-Low Coverage Spontaneous Etching and Hyperthermal Desorption of Aluminum Chlorides from Cl 2 /Al(111) Tyler J. Grassman, Gary C. Poon, and Andrew.

Ultra-Low Coverage Spontaneous Etching and Hyperthermal Desorption of Aluminum Chlorides from Cl 2 /Al(111) Tyler J. Grassman, Gary C. Poon, and Andrew.
1 Particle-In-Cell Monte Carlo simulations of a radiation driven plasma Marc van der Velden, Wouter Brok, Vadim Banine, Joost van der Mullen, Gerrit Kroesen.

1 Particle-In-Cell Monte Carlo simulations of a radiation driven plasma Marc van der Velden, Wouter Brok, Vadim Banine, Joost van der Mullen, Gerrit Kroesen.
Alloy Formation at the Epitaxial Interface for Ag Films Deposited on Al(001) and Al(110) Surfaces at Room Temperature* N.R. Shivaparan, M.A. Teter, and.

Alloy Formation at the Epitaxial Interface for Ag Films Deposited on Al(001) and Al(110) Surfaces at Room Temperature* N.R. Shivaparan, M.A. Teter, and.
Chemical kinetics Lecture IV Jenny Frodelius & Jonas Lauridsen.

Chemical kinetics Lecture IV Jenny Frodelius & Jonas Lauridsen.
European Joint PhD Programme, Lisboa, 10.2.2009 Diagnostics of Fusion Plasmas Spectroscopy Ralph Dux.

European Joint PhD Programme, Lisboa, Diagnostics of Fusion Plasmas Spectroscopy Ralph Dux.
Surface and volume production of negative ions in a low-pressure plasma E. Stoffels, W.W. Stoffels, V.M. Kroutilina*, H.-E. Wagner* and J. Meichsner*,

Surface and volume production of negative ions in a low-pressure plasma E. Stoffels, W.W. Stoffels, V.M. Kroutilina*, H.-E. Wagner* and J. Meichsner*,
Infrared spectroscopy of Li(methylamine) n (NH 3 ) m clusters Nitika Bhalla, Luigi Varriale, Nicola Tonge and Andrew Ellis Department of Chemistry University.

Infrared spectroscopy of Li(methylamine) n (NH 3 ) m clusters Nitika Bhalla, Luigi Varriale, Nicola Tonge and Andrew Ellis Department of Chemistry University.
Lecture 11.0 Etching. Etching Patterned –Material Selectivity is Important!! Un-patterned.

Lecture 11.0 Etching. Etching Patterned –Material Selectivity is Important!! Un-patterned.
Salamanca.ppt, © Thomas Schwarz-Selinger, 03. Juni 2008 G. S. Oehrlein*, T. Schwarz-Selinger, K. Schmid, M. Schlüter and W. Jacob Interaction of Deuterium.

Salamanca.ppt, © Thomas Schwarz-Selinger, 03. Juni 2008 G. S. Oehrlein*, T. Schwarz-Selinger, K. Schmid, M. Schlüter and W. Jacob Interaction of Deuterium.
Measurement and modeling of hydrogenic retention in molybdenum with the DIONISOS experiment G.M. Wright University of Wisconsin-Madison, FOM – Institute.

Measurement and modeling of hydrogenic retention in molybdenum with the DIONISOS experiment G.M. Wright University of Wisconsin-Madison, FOM – Institute.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google