1. Chapter 3 Comparative Advantage Link to syllabus Questionable example on page 36

2. Adam Smith (1723-1790): The Wealth of Nations 1776 Scottish Philosopher. In a free market society, individuals, acting out of their own self interest, will be guided, as if by an invisible hand, to make socially beneficial economic decisions. Also: benefits of free trade, criticism of mercantilism. Smith mistakenly focused on Absolute Advantage, not Comparative Advantage.

3. David Ricardo. 1772-1823 Born in London; father was a stockbroker. In addition to major contributions in Economics, he was a member of the British Parliament, a businessman and financier. Said to have become interested in economics at the age of 27, after reading Adam Smith, while on vacation. Was friends with James Mill, Bentham, Malthus, and other classical economists.

4. Ricardian example of comparative advantage. Page 36 1.5 0.67 It’s not clear to mt why Pugel makes the numbers for the US the same in the two tables on pages 36 and 37, while the numbers for the Rest of the World are different. It is the case that the discussion in the text on page 36 refers to the numbers as they appear in the table on page 36. So perhaps this is not a case of typographical errors, but poor selection of an example.

5. Ricardian example of comparative advantage. Page 37 Notation: let a W be the labor hours to produce one unit of wheat, and a C be labor hours for one unit of cloth (4 and 2 in the US in this example). ‘W/C’ means units of wheat to get a unit of cloth: 2W/C is two units of wheat for one unit of cloth, P C / P W = 2. If labor is the only cost and it is paid ‘wage’, then the price (or cost) of producing one unit of wheat, P W, is equal to ‘wage’ x a W, and similarly P C = ‘wage’ x a C. Thus, P C / P W = a C / a W. In other words, the (relative) price of a good is higher if the country is (relatively) inefficient in the production of the good. Pre-trade Prices in Ricardian example p. 38 Assume:

6. Figure 3.1 page 41 Gains from trade: constant cost case

7. (From next chapter’s Figure 4.1 p. 51). Production Possibilities with Increasing Costs. With increasing costs, free trade will generally not lead to complete specialization.

8. Figure 2.3 Page 25 Effects of trade on production, consumption and price

9. Absolute Advantage Does Matter p. 43

10. Handouts Description of argument of comparative advantage Numerical example of comparative advantage

11. Chapter 3 p. 45. Question #8

12. Solution: P. 45 #8 Country V (Labor=30)Country MR (Labor =20) Pre-TradePost-TradePre-TradePost-Trade winecheeswinecheeswineCheeswinecheese Labor input/unit Q1510same104same Labor allocation15 300812020 Production1.01.5200.8305 Net Imports-- 2-- 1-2 Consumption1.01.5120.8313 Percentage changes w: 100*(1-1)/1 = 0 c: 100*(2-1.5)/1.5 = 33 w: 100*(1-0.8)/0.8 = 25 c: 100*(3-3)/3 = 0 The pre-trade relative price of wine in terms of cheese in V is 15/10=1.5; in MR it is 10/4 =2.5, so V has comparative advantage in wine, and will export it. The post-trade relative price of wine in both V and MR is 2; the book’s phrase is that ‘1/2 bottle of wine is worth 1 kilo of cheese ‘

13. Exam Question #5, Fall 2010 Consider now a Ricardian world composed of two countries, (Input/Q) Spain (S) and Chile (C ), and two goods, food (f) and games (g). Spain Chile Suppose the labor input per unit of output for these Food 20 25 activities is as indicated in the accompanying table. Games 50 75 Which country has absolute advantage in which good? Why? Which country has comparative advantage in which good? Why? What are the limits to the free trade relative price of Food? What will happen to the relative price of food in Spain, if both countries agree to free trade? Assume that Chile has 150 workers. Draw a production possibility curve for Chile, Pre-trade P F /P G is 20/50 in Spain, and 25/75 in Chile, so Chile has comp adv in Food. Limits to free trade price of food are.25 and.4 With free trade, the price of food in Spain will fall