Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 1 Project IEEE 802.20 Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access.

Published bySharleen Paul Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 1 Project IEEE 802.20 Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access."— Presentation transcript:

1 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 1 Project IEEE 802.20 Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/20/ Title BEST-WINE: Technology Performance Presentation 1 Date Submitted 2005-OCT-28 Source(s) Radhakrishna Canchi 2480 N. First Street #280 San Jose, CA 95131 Kazuhiro Murakami 2-1-1 Kagahara, Tsuzuki-ku, Yokohama, KANAGAWA 224-8502, JAPAN Miinako Kithara 2-1-1 Kagahara, Tsuzuki-ku, Yokohama, KANAGAWA 224-8502, JAPAN Voice: +1-408-952-4701 Fax: +1-408-954-8709 Email: cradhak@ktrc-na.comcradhak@ktrc-na.com Voice: +81 45 943 6130 Fax: +81 45 943 6175 Email: kazuhiro_murakami@csg.kyocera.co.jpkazuhiro_murakami@csg.kyocera.co.jp Voice: +81 45 943 6102 Fax: +81 45 943 6175 Email: minako.kitahara.nf@kyocera.jp Re: MBWA Call for Proposal AbstractThis document presents the Technology Performance and Evaluation Crtieria Report 1 of the Tehcnlogy Proposal BEST-WINE for IEEE 802. 20 MBWA Purpose To disucus and Adopt BEST-WINE for Draft Specfications of IEEE802.20 MBWA NoticeThis document has been prepared to assist the IEEE 802.20 Working Group. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. ReleaseThe contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.20. Patent PolicyThe contributor is familiar with IEEE patent policy, as outlined in Section 6.3 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual and in Understanding Patent Issues During IEEE Standards Development.Section 6.3 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manualhttp://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/guide.html

2 IEEE C802.20-05/79 Submission BEST-WINE (Broadband MobilE SpaTial Wireless InterNet AcEess ) Technology Performance Presentation IEEE 802.20 Plenary Meeting Vancouver, Canada November 14-18, 2005

3 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 3 BEST-WINE (Broadband MobilE SpaTial Wireless InterNet AcEess )  Proposed Draft Technology Specifications ■Enhanced MAC Layer and PHY layer Draft Specifications to the base specifications of HC-SDMA* ■AND ●Base Technical Specifications “ATIS-PP-0700004-2005, High Capacity-Spatial Division Multiple Access (HC-SDMA)*”. ●* The copyright of this document is owned by the Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions. Any request to reproduce this document, or portion thereof, shall be directed to ATIS, 1200 G Street, NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC 20005. ●* For Electornic Downloads, Paper Copy or CD-ROM please follow the link https://www.atis.org/atis/docstore/doc_display.asp?ID=3617https://www.atis.org/atis/docstore/doc_display.asp?ID=3617

4 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 4 BEST-WINE Technology Performance Outline of Presentation  System Model  RF Parameters  Link budget  Basic PHY layer (link level) information  Simulation environment  Simulation Results ■Link Level ■System Level  Conclusion

5 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 5 System Calibration Model

6 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 6 System Model

7 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 7 RF Parameters #RF Parameter TDD System BW Base Value 1 MHz Channel 2.5 MHz TDD - SYSTEM 1Transmitter Power -- BS43 dBm/MHz+44 dBm 2Transmitter Power -- MS27 dBm+27 dBm 3Out of Band emission limits – BS and MS (emission measured in 1 MHz resolution bandwidth) Attenuation of the transmit power P by: 43 +10 log(P) dB -13 dBm 4*ACLR - Attenuation of emissions into an adjacent channel (same Ch BW) – BS 43 dB50.2 dB 5*ACLR - Attenuation of emissions into an adjacent channel (same Ch BW) – MS 36.8 dB35.4 dB 6Receiver noise figure -- BS5 dB 7Receiver noise figure -- MS10 dB 8Receiver reference sensitivity (to be proposed by each technology) Specify at BER of 0.1% See linkbudget 9*Receiver Selectivity -- BSMod 1 /Mod 7 : 30 dB 30 dB 10*Receiver Selectivity -- MSMod 1 : 30 dB Mod 8 : 27 dB 30 dB 27 dB # Frequency offset for Blocking4MHz off5MHz off 11[*] Receiver Blocking – BS (level of same technology blocking signal at frequency offset of 2 times Channel BW) Mod 1 : -49.6 dBm Mod 7 : -35.6 dBm -49.6 dBm -35.6 dBm 12[*] Receiver Blocking – MS (level of same technology blocking signal at frequency offset of 2 times Channel BW) Mod 1 : -57.5 dBm Mod 8 : - 41.6 dBm -57.5dBm -41.6dBm

8 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 8 BEST-WINE System’s PHY and MAC Layer information  Channel Configuration 2.5MHz frequency 625kHz

9 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 9 BEST-WINE System’s PHY and MAC Layer information  Modulation class *1 24QAM+ perform error coding which has 3/4 coding rate. *2 64QAM perform error coding which has 5/6 coding rate.

10 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 10 Simulation Channel Environments  Suburban Macro at 3KMPH  Suburban Macro at 120 KMPH

11 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 11 Basic PHY layer (link level) information  Link Level simulation Parameters ■TDD /TDMA system ■3 timeslot structure ■BS antenna number 12antennas ■UT antenna number 4antennas ■Tx 1antenna / Rx 4 or 1 antennas ■Adaptive Array Antenna (MMSE) ■Equalizer : Equalizer has been employed to over come multipath Distortion effects.

12 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 12 Channel models used in Link Level Simulations  Link Level simulation specified channel model

13 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 13 Sub-path Spatial parameters AoD and AoA offset  sub-path AoD and AoA offset

14 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 14 System level Simulation environment  simulation target feature TDD system 3 timeslot structure Spatial Divison multiple Access feature (Max. 4 ) Power control Link adaptation

15 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 15 System level Simulation environment simulation parameters BS antenna number 12antennas (10λ) UT antenna number 4antennas(0.5λ) 19BS 3sector BS max Tx power 39dBm/12ant UT max Tx power 27dBm BS antenna gain 17dBi UT antenna gain 0dBi BS NF 5dB UT NF 10dB Temperature 15 ℃ BS cable loss 3dB UT body loss 3dB 1carrier (625KHz). Simulation ( 1.25MHz BW= 625kHz ×4carrier)

16 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 16  channel model System level simulation channel model

17 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 17 Link level simulation Result  Uplink (VehicularB model) FER vs SINR Performance

18 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 18 Link level simulation Result  Downlink (Vehicular B model) FER vs SINR Performance

19 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 19 Link level simulation Result  Uplink (PedestrianB model) FER vs SINR Performance

20 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 20 Link level simulation Result  Downlink (PedestrianB model) FER vs SINR Performance

21 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 21 Link level simulation Result  Uplink (Vehicular B model) Throughput vs SINR

22 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 22 Link level simulation Result  Downlink( Vehicular B model) Throughput vs SINR

23 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 23 Link level simulation Result  Uplink (Pedestrian B model) Throughput vs SINR

24 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 24 Link level simulation Result  Downlink (Pedestrian B model) Throughput vs SINR

25 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 25 System level simulation calibration result  System level simulation calibration condition and parameters Path number: 1 Environment: Suburban macro BS & MS antenna number: 1 Inter BS separation: 2.5km 1carrier(625kHz). 1 user/timeslot @sector user1 (-60, R/2) @timeslot1 user2 (0,R/2)@timeslot2 user3 (60, R)@ timeslot3 (degree, distance from the BS)

26 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 26 System level simulation result  User Date Rate CDF

27 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 27  120km/h User Date Rate CDF Blue line shows downlink throughput CDF. Red line shows uplink throughput CDF.

28 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 28  3km/h Uplink and Downlink Blue line shows downlink throughput CDF. Red line shows uplink throughput CDF.

29 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 29  Aggregated Throughput vs Base station Sepparation Downlink 3 Kmph

30 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 30  Aggregated Throughput vs Base station Sepparation Downlink 120 Kmph

31 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 31  Aggregated Throughput vs Base station Sepparation Uplink 3 Kmph

32 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 32  Aggregated Throughput vs Base station Sepparation Uplink 120 Kmph

33 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 33  Fairness criteria The CDF of the Normalized throughput with Respect to average user throughput was deatermined for Cell radius 1km. Table 8 ‑ 1 Suburban Pedestrian B Case Normalized throughput with Respect to average user throughput UplinkDownlink <0.10.142%0.0% <0.20.285%0.142% <0.50.285%0.142% Table 8 ‑ 2 Suburban Vehicular B Case Normalized throughput with Respect to average user throughput UplinkDownlink <0.10%0 <0.20%0 <0.50.432%0.519%

34 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 34 Summary Results-Simulation Spectral Efficiency @pedestrian BSpectral Efficiency @Vehicular B Uplink 3.1552.592 Downlink 4.2481.776

35 IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 35 Practical System Results Data Flow Direction Typical/TerminalTotal Data Rates/Basestation Spectrum Efficiency (bit/sec/Hz/sector) Downlink942kbps22.6Mbps6.8 Uplink290kbps7.0Mbps4.2 Uplink1,232kbps29.6Mbps5.9 Figure 7 ‑ 14: Date Rate and Spectrum Efficency Test Results of HC-SDMA in Australia

Download ppt "IEEE C802.20-05/79 SubmissionR.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 1 Project IEEE 802.20 Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access."

Similar presentations

Doc.: IEEE 802.19-06/0028r0 Submission July 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Coexistence Scenario – A Pair of Unlicensed Wireless Networks Notice:

Doc.: IEEE /0028r0 Submission July 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Coexistence Scenario – A Pair of Unlicensed Wireless Networks Notice:
ProjectIEEE 802.20 Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access TitleEvaluation criteria: The Segment Approach.

ProjectIEEE Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access TitleEvaluation criteria: The Segment Approach.
ProjectIEEE 802.20 Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access TitleRepeater issues for MBWA Date Submitted.

ProjectIEEE Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access TitleRepeater issues for MBWA Date Submitted.
Constellation Rearrangement for IEEE802.16m IEEE 802.16 Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-08/807 Date Submitted:

Constellation Rearrangement for IEEE802.16m IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-08/807 Date Submitted:
Sounding Antenna Switching for IEEE 802.16m Amendment Working Document IEEE 802.16 Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C80216m-0848.

Sounding Antenna Switching for IEEE m Amendment Working Document IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C80216m-0848.
IEEE 802.21.1 MEDIA INDEPENDENT SERVICES DCN: 21-14-0122-00-SAUC Title: Needs of Link_Resource_Report and MIS_Resource_Report primitives/messages Date.

IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT SERVICES DCN: SAUC Title: Needs of Link_Resource_Report and MIS_Resource_Report primitives/messages Date.
Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks(WPANs) Submission Title: Link Budget for 802.15.4m Date Submitted: 5 March 2012.

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks(WPANs) Submission Title: Link Budget for m Date Submitted: 5 March 2012.
1 Performance comparison of Modulation and Coding set for IEEE 802.16m system Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0555r3 Date Submitted: 2009-03-02 Source:

1 Performance comparison of Modulation and Coding set for IEEE m system Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0555r3 Date Submitted: Source:
Performance Evaluation of Transformation Codebook for 8TX IEEE 802.16 Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/2731.

Performance Evaluation of Transformation Codebook for 8TX IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/2731.
1 Performance comparison of Modulation and Coding set for IEEE 802.16m system Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0555r2 Date Submitted: 2009-03-02 Source:

1 Performance comparison of Modulation and Coding set for IEEE m system Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0555r2 Date Submitted: Source:
MU-MIMO System Performance of 8TX codebook IEEE 802.16 Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0803 Date Submitted:

MU-MIMO System Performance of 8TX codebook IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0803 Date Submitted:
21-06-0501-02-0000 IEEE 802.21 MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: 21-06-0501-02-0000 Title: Amendments for Event Register Date Submitted: July, 10, 2006 Presented.

IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: Amendments for Event Register Date Submitted: July, 10, 2006 Presented.
21-08-0001-00-0000 IEEE 802.21 MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: 21-08-0001-00-0000 Title: Instructions to get a Free IEEE Web Account Date Submitted: January.

IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: Instructions to get a Free IEEE Web Account Date Submitted: January.
Vancouver1 ProjectIEEE 802.20 Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access TitleSchedule Considerations Date.

Vancouver1 ProjectIEEE Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access TitleSchedule Considerations Date.
Doc.: IEEE 802.22-12-0101-00-000b Submission Nov., 2012 NICTSlide 1 Investigation on meeting the TVWS Spectrum Mask IEEE P802.22 Wireless RANs Date: 2011-11-9.

Doc.: IEEE b Submission Nov., 2012 NICTSlide 1 Investigation on meeting the TVWS Spectrum Mask IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-05/0340r0 Submission April 2005 Marianna Goldhammer, AlvarionSlide 1 CBP-SG Contention Based Protocol and 802.16 QoS Notice: This document.

Doc.: IEEE /0340r0 Submission April 2005 Marianna Goldhammer, AlvarionSlide 1 CBP-SG Contention Based Protocol and QoS Notice: This document.
C80216m-08_216 ProjectIEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group TitleDownlink Physical Resource Allocation Unit Date Submitted.

C80216m-08_216 ProjectIEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group TitleDownlink Physical Resource Allocation Unit Date Submitted.
21-07-xxxx-00-0000 IEEE 802.21 MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: 21-07-xxxx-00-0000 Title: Problem Scenario Date Submitted: September, 2007 Presented at.

21-07-xxxx IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: xxxx Title: Problem Scenario Date Submitted: September, 2007 Presented at.
Doc.: IEEE 802.19-06/0018r0 Submission March 2006 Steve Berger, TEM ConsultingSlide 1 Exploration of Structure for IEEE P1900.2 Recommended Practice for.

Doc.: IEEE /0018r0 Submission March 2006 Steve Berger, TEM ConsultingSlide 1 Exploration of Structure for IEEE P Recommended Practice for.
21-09-0034-01-00001 IEEE 802.21 MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: 21-09-0034-01-0000 Title: FMCA MIH Work Item Date Submitted: March, 2009 Presented at IEEE.

IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: FMCA MIH Work Item Date Submitted: March, 2009 Presented at IEEE.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google