1. S Bozzini* and D Friedman** *Safety Engineering International, Goleta, CA, USA **Center for Injury Research, Santa Barbara, CA, USA Presented by: Susie Bozzini

2. Types of rollover Events This paper was developed to examine to the difference between a lateral rollover test and a ramp rollover test in relation to predicting occupant injury in rollovers.

3. Frequencies of different Rollover Types: Trip-Over and Flip-Over = 72% of all Rollovers

4. Definitions of Trip-Overs The 4 types of trip-overs constituting 59.8% of rollovers are characterized in tests as “lateral” rollovers such as dolly rollovers or JRS rollovers. Trip-Over 1:Curb Trip-Over 2:The vehicle skids sideways on a flat surface and topples over. Trip-Over 3: This is a type of accident where the rollover occurs on a gradient with soft surface and a sideways tilting vehicle. Trip-Over 4:Ascending slope

5. Definitions of Flip-Overs These 3 types of flip-overs constituting 11.7% are characterized in tests as “ramp” rollovers. Flip-Over 1: This is where a vehicle moves mainly along the longitudinal axis of the vehicle, reaches a mound, which causes it to rotate around its longitudinal axis, and topples over. Flip-Over 2: This is where a vehicle moves mainly along the longitudinal axis of the vehicle, reaches a ditch, which causes it to rotate around its longitudinal axis, and topples over. Flip-Over 3: This is where a vehicle falls sideways off the road onto a significantly lower terrain.

6. Injury severity grades of belted not ejected occupants for different kinds of rollover - +300 Trip vs 65 Flip

7. Comparison of Trip-Over and Flip-Over Frequency and Injury Level Count/ Frequency % % Not Injured % MAIS 1 % MAIS 2-4 % MAIS 5/6 Total Trip- Over Rollovers 328/59.8%11.6638.48.680.82 Total Flip- Over Rollovers 66/11.7%1.919.172.290.21 4 times as many MAIS 2-4 and MAIS 5/6 in Trip-overs vs. Flip-overs

8. Trip-Over Test Method Key components of the Jordan Rollover System (JRS): (1) vehicle, (2) cradle/spit mount, (3) moving roadbed, (4) support towers, (5) coupled pneumatic -roadbed propulsion and roll drive

9. Vertical Crush in JRS Tests displayed on Residual Crush Injury Probability Chart

10. Flip-Over Test Method Key components of the Ramp Rollover Test: (1) vehicle, (2) tow motor (3) ramp

11. Ramp Rollover Impact Parameters vs. Lateral Rollover Impact Parameters Parameter:Ramp Rollover TestLateral Rollover Test Roll Rate (Test) 175 deg/sec at near side contact 244 deg/sec at near side contact Pitch Rate (Test) 15 deg/sec, oscillating from 0 - front/nose up Constant at 10 deg (+/-2) Roll Angle (Test) 105 degrees, a little more than 1/4 turn 145 degrees, more than 1/4 turn – injurious rollover are ~ more than 4 quarter turns Pitch Angle (Test) 18 degrees, front/nose UP 10 degrees, front/nose DOWN

12. Production SUV roof crush v. roll angle Typical Rollover Result in Lateral Test Method – Significant Far Side A-Pillar Crush

13. Figure 12. – SUV with HALO™ roof crush v. roll angle

14. 1.Trip-over accidents represent 60% of rollovers and flip-overs represent 12%. Trip-overs are characterized by lateral rollover tests and flip-overs are characterized by ramp rollovers. 2.Typical physical ramp rollover tests at 50 mph are 2 ½ times more energetic than 30 mph lateral tests and do not represent real world flip- over accidents. 3.Comparative virtual testing between ramp rollover and lateral rollover conditions using a typical SUV, suggest that ramp rollovers are typically more benign than lateral rolls. 4.The roof crush in ramp rollover conditions tends to be more significant on the leading impact side and the roll rates at contact with the trailing side are not as high as those observed with lateral roll test conditions 5.Lateral Rollover tests more accurately predict Potential Occupant Injury because the testing parameters are more representative of the real world crash senarios. CONCLUSIONS

15. ACKNOWLEGEMENTS The Authors would like to thank Friedman Research Corporation for their assistance with the data in this paper. Thank you Questions?

16. Figure 7. Spreadsheet and Test, Roll and Pitch Velocity - SUV

17. Figure 8. Spreadsheet and Test, Roll and Pitch Angles - SUV

18. Figure 9. Spreadsheet and Test, Vehicle c.g. Velocity - SUV

19. Figure 10. Spreadsheet and Test, Vehicle c.g. Displacement - SUV

20. Table 7. List of roll sequence segments and serious-to-fatal injury probability