Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Load Assumptions for the Design of electro mechanic Pitch Systems

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Load Assumptions for the Design of electro mechanic Pitch Systems"— Presentation transcript:

1 Load Assumptions for the Design of electro mechanic Pitch Systems
Andreas Manjock Germanischer Lloyd Industrial Services GmbH, Business Segment Wind Energy

2 Load Assumptions for the Design of electro mechanic Pitch Systems
Simulation Model Design Load Cases (DLCs) Data Postprocessing Conclusion and Outlook Source: ENERCON EWEC 2007

3 1.1 Pitch System Components
Blade Bearing Gear Box Rotor Blade Drive Motor Symbol Definition JPD Moment of Inertia, Pitch Motor JRB Moment of Inertia, Rotor Blade iPD Ratio of Pitch Drive Gearbox iPB Ratio of Pitch Bearing Mesh iP Ratio of entire Pitch System iP JPD JRB iPB iPD Control Unit Pitch Controller EWEC 2007

4 Load Assumptions for the Design of electro mechanic Pitch Systems
Simulation Model 2.1 Load Components 2.2 System Model 2.3 Local Model for Mesh Moment 2.4 Drive Motor Characteristics 2.5 Drive Motor Limitations 2.6 Drive Control Scheme Design Load Cases (DLCs) Data Postprocessing Conclusion and Outlook Source: ENERCON EWEC 2007

5 Blade Root Coordinate System
2.1 Load Components αP Blade Root Coordinate System MZB Symbol Definition αP Pitch Angle MPDA Pitch Drive Actuator Torque MZB Pitch Torque Rotor Blade MR Friction Torque Blade Bearing MR MPDA MR = M0 + µbend∙ Mres+ µaxial∙ Faxial+ µradial∙ Fradial Source: GL „Guideline for the Certification of Wind Turbines“, 2003 EWEC 2007

6 Global Simulation Model
2.2 System Model Structural Model Global Simulation Model Source: GH Bladed 3.67 i P 2 J PD +J RB α •M PDA M R ZB •i ** EWEC 2007

7 2.3 Local Model for Mesh Moment
Local MM - Assumption“ α +J RB •M M R ZB J •α P ** α P P i P •M PDA M J PD •i P 2 α ** i 2 J P PD Mass System Pitch Drive Mass System Rotor Blade Split of Mass System provides Loads for Drive Train Components MM = MZB+ JRB ∙ αP** - MR EWEC 2007

8 2.4 Drive Motor Characteristics
iP  P MPDA Control Unit Pitch Controller Source: OAT Osterholz Antriebstechnik GmbH EWEC 2007

9 2.5 Drive Motor Limitations
Source: OAT Osterholz Antriebstechnik GmbH EWEC 2007

10 2.6 Drive Motor Control Scheme
Pitch Controller EWEC 2007

11 Load Assumptions for the Design of electro mechanic Pitch Systems
Simulation Model Design Load Cases (DLCs) Identified Load Cases Fatigue DLCs Extreme DLCs Data Postprocessing Conclusion and Outlook Source: ENERCON EWEC 2007

12 3.2 Identified Load Cases Fatigue Load Cases Extreme Load Cases DLC1.2
Turbulence State 1 2 m/s 57.0% idling 5 30.0% power production 3 7 24.9% 4 9 22.0% 11 20.2% 6 13 18.9% 15 18.0% 8 17 17.3% 19 16.7% 10 21 16.3% 23 15.9% 12 25 15.6% 28 15.2% Wind Load Case Wind Gust Type Event DLC1.5 12 m/s EOG1 Grid Loss DLC1.6 25 m/s EOG50 Active Safety Syst. DLC2.2 constant Pitch Runaway EWEC 2007

13 3.3 Fatigue DLCs Control Variables Load Variables EWEC 2007

14 3.4 Extreme DLCs Control Variables Load Variables EWEC 2007

15 Load Assumptions for the Design of electro mechanic Pitch Systems
Simulation Model Design Load Cases (DLCs) Data Postprocessing 4.1 Design Driver 4.2 Loads for Drive Motor 4.3 Loads for Gearbox 4.4 Loads for Blade Bearing Mesh Conclusion and Outlook Source: ENERCON EWEC 2007

16 4.1 Design Driver Pitch System Component Type of Load Drive Motor
MPDA - Pitch Actuator Torque αP* - Speed of Pitch Actuator RMS(MPDA ) - Thermal Loading Gearbox LDD of MM - Mesh Torque (Load Duration Distribution) Mesh of Blade Bearing Distribution of MM vs. αP (Pitch Angle Duration Distribution) EWEC 2007

17 4.2.1 Loads for Drive Motor Operation States of Drive Motor, Confirmation of global Wind Turbine Simulation EWEC 2007

18 4.2.2 Thermal Loads for Drive Motor
Standard Deviation (RMS) of pitch actuator torque for thermal impact Efficiency of gear box and has to be considered Normal bearing friction Increased bearing friction (+50%) EWEC 2007

19 4.3 Loads for Gearbox Load Duration Distribution counting for Mesh Torque M_M Influence of Blade Bearing Friction Level comparatively low M_M > 0 M_M < 0 EWEC 2007

20 4.4 Loads for Blade Bearing Mesh
Load Duration Distribution counting for Mesh Torque M_M Pitch Angle Duration Distribution counting EWEC 2007

21 Load Assumptions for the Design of electro mechanic Pitch Systems
Simulation Model Design Load Cases (DLCs) Data Postprocessing Conclusion and Outlook Source: ENERCON EWEC 2007

22 5 Conclusion and Outlook
Aerodynamic pitch Moment MZB is not sufficient for the design of pitch systems drive train Pitch Actuator Torque is inevitable Blade bearing friction model included in the global simulation model Integration of drive control unit into the global simulation model, e.g. limitations in speed and torque of pitch drive actuator 80% damage within first 20°- 25° of blade bearing mesh Measurements on drive trains of pitch systems to validate MM-assumption EWEC 2007

23 Keep in Contact Andreas Manjock Germanischer Lloyd Industrial Services EWEC 2007


Download ppt "Load Assumptions for the Design of electro mechanic Pitch Systems"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google