Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byMorris Cain Modified over 2 years ago

1
28.09.2013NTHEP, Crimea, September 23-29, 2013I1 Correlation Femtoscopy – status & prospects History QS correlations FSI correlations Correlation study of particle interaction Correlation asymmetries Summary In memory of V.L.Lyuboshitz (19.3.1937-4.5.2013) R. Lednický @ JINR Dubna & IP ASCR Prague

2
2 History Fermi’34: e ± Nucleus Coulomb FSI in β-decay modifies the relative momentum (k) distribution → Fermi (correlation) function F(k,Z,R) is sensitive to Nucleus radius R if charge Z » 1 measurement of space-time characteristics R, c ~ fm Correlation femtoscopy : of particle production using particle correlations

3
3 Fermi function(k,Z,R) in β-decay = | -k (r)| 2 ~ (kR) -(Z/137) 2 Z=83 (Bi) β-β- β+β+ R=8 4 2 fm k MeV/c

4
4 2 x Goldhaber, Lee & Pais GGLP’60: enhanced + +, - - vs + - at small opening angles – interpreted as BE enhancement depending on fireball radius R 0 R 0 = 0.75 fm p p 2 + 2 - n 0

5
5 Modern correlation femtoscopy formulated by Kopylov & Podgoretsky KP’71-75: settled basics of correlation femtoscopy in > 20 papers proposed CF= N corr /N uncorr & showed that sufficiently smooth momentum spectrum allows one to neglect space-time coherence at small q* (for non-interacting identical particles) mixing techniques to construct N uncorr clarified role of space-time characteristics in various models |∫ d 4 x 1 d 4 x 2 p 1 p 2 ( x 1,x 2 )... | 2 → ∫ d 4 x 1 d 4 x 2 p 1 p 2 ( x 1,x 2 )| 2...

6
6 QS symmetrization of production amplitude momentum correlations of identical particles are sensitive to space-time structure of the source CF=1+(-1) S cos q x p 1 p 2 x1x1 x 2 q = p 1 - p 2 → {0,2k*} x = x 1 - x 2 → {t*,r*} nn t, t , nn s, s 2 1 0 |q| 1/R 0 total pair spin 2R 0 KP’71-75 exp(-ip 1 x 1 ) CF → | S -k* ( r* )| 2 = | [ e -ik*r* +(-1) S e ik*r* ]/√2 | 2 PRF

7
7 Assumptions to derive KP formula CF - 1 cos q x - two-particle approximation (small freeze-out PS density f ) - smoothness approximation: R emitter R source | p| |q| peak - incoherent or independent emission ~ OK, 1 ? low p t fig. ~ OK in HIC, R source 2 0.1 fm 2 p t 2 -slope of direct particles 2 and 3 CF data ~ consistent with KP formulae: CF 3 (123) = 1+|F(12)| 2 +|F(23)| 2 +|F(31)| 2 +2Re[F(12)F(23)F(31)] CF 2 (12) = 1+|F(12)| 2, F(q)| = e iqx - neglect of FSI OK for photons, ~ OK for pions up to Coulomb repulsion

8
8 Phase space density from CFs and spectra Bertsch’94 May be high phase space density at low p t ? ? Pion condensate or laser ? Multiboson effects on CFs spectra & multiplicities rises up to SPS Lisa..’05

9
“General” parameterization at |q| 0 Particles on mass shell & azimuthal symmetry 5 variables: q = {q x, q y, q z } {q out, q side, q long }, pair velocity v = {v x,0,v z } R x 2 =½ ( x-v x t) 2 , R y 2 =½ ( y) 2 , R z 2 =½ ( z-v z t) 2 q 0 = qp/p 0 qv = q x v x + q z v z y side x out transverse pair velocity v t z long beam Podgoretsky’83, Bertsch, Pratt’95; so called out-side-long parameterization Interferometry or correlation radii: cos q x =1-½ (q x) 2 +.. exp(-R x 2 q x 2 -R y 2 q y 2 -R z 2 q z 2 -2R xz 2 q x q z ) Grassberger’77 RL’78 Csorgo, Pratt’91: LCMS v z = 0

10
10 Examples of NA49 & STAR data 3-dim fit: CF=1+ exp(-R x 2 q x 2 –R y 2 q y 2 -R z 2 q z 2 -2R xz 2 q x q z ) zxy Correlation strength or chaoticity NA49 Interferometry or correlation radii KK STAR Coulomb corrected

11
11 Probing source shape and emission duration Static Gaussian model with space and time dispersions R 2, R || 2, 2 R x 2 = R 2 +v 2 2 R y 2 = R 2 R z 2 = R || 2 +v || 2 2 Emission duration 2 = (R x 2 - R y 2 )/v 2 (degree) R side 2 fm 2 If elliptic shape also in transverse plane R y R side oscillates with pair azimuth R side ( =90°) small R side =0°) large z A B Out-of reaction plane In reaction plane In-planeCircular Out-of plane KP (71-75) …

12
Probing source dynamics - expansion Dispersion of emitter velocities & limited emission momenta (T) x-p correlation: interference dominated by pions from nearby emitters Interferometry radii decrease with pair velocity Interference probes only a part of the source Resonances GKP’71.. Strings Bowler’85.. Hydro P t =160 MeV/cP t =380 MeV/c R out R side R out R side Collective transverse flow F R side R/(1+m t F2 /T) ½ during proper freeze-out (evolution) time R long (T/m t ) ½ /coshy Pratt, Csörgö, Zimanyi’90 Makhlin-Sinyukov’87 } 1 in LCMS ….. Bertch, Gong, Tohyama’88 Hama, Padula’88 Mayer, Schnedermann, Heinz’92 Pratt’84,86 Kolehmainen, Gyulassy’86 Longitudinal boost invariant expansion

13
pion Kaon Proton , , Flow & Radii in Blast Wave model ← Emission points at a given tr. velocity p x = 0.15 GeV/c0.3 GeV/c p x = 0.53 GeV/c1.07 GeV/c p x = 1.01 GeV/c2.02 GeV/c For a Gaussian density profile with a radius R G and linear flow velocity profile F (r) = 0 r/ R G : 0.73c0.91c R z 2 2 (T/m t ) R x 2 = x’ 2 -2v x x’t’ +v x 2 t’ 2 R z = evolution time R x = emission duration R y 2 = y’ 2 R y 2 = R G 2 / [1+ 0 2 m t /T] R x, R y 0 = tr. flow velocity p t –spectra T = temperature t’ 2 ( - ) 2 ( ) 2 BW: Retiere@LBL’05 x = R G x 0 /[ 0 2 +T/m t ] x( ) < x(K) < x(p)

14
BW fit of Au-Au 200 GeV T=106 ± 1 MeV = 0.571 ± 0.004 c = 0.540 ± 0.004 c R InPlane = 11.1 ± 0.2 fm R OutOfPlane = 12.1 ± 0.2 fm Life time ( ) = 8.4 ± 0.2 fm/c Emission duration = 1.9 ± 0.2 fm/c 2 /dof = 120 / 86 Retiere@LBL’05 R β z ≈ z/τ β x ≈ β 0 (r/R)

15
Femto-puzzle I Contradiction with transport and simple hydro calcul. - - small space-time scales - - their weak energy dep. - - R out /R side ~ 1 Basically solved due to the initial flow increasing with energy (likely related to the increase of the initial energy density and partonic energy fraction)

16
16 Femtoscopy Puzzle I basically solved due to initial flow appearing in realistic IC

17
Femtoscopic signature of QGP onset 3D 1-fluid Hydrodynamics Rischke & Gyulassy, NPA 608, 479 (1996) With 1 st order Phase transition Initial energy density 0 Long-standing signature of QGP onset: increase in , R OUT /R SIDE due to the Phase transition hoped-for “turn on” as QGP threshold in 0 is reached decreases with decreasing Latent heat & increasing tr. Flow (high 0 or initial tr. Flow)

18
18 Cassing – Bratkovskaya: Parton-Hadron-String-Dynamics Perspectives at FAIR/NICA energies

19
19 Femto-puzzle II No signal of a bump in R out near the QGP threshold (expected at AGS- SPS energies) !? likely solved due to a dramatic decrease of partonic phase with decreasing energy

20
Femtoscopy of Pb+Pb at LHC ALICE arXiv:1012.4035 All radii increase with N ch from RHIC to LHC (not from SPS to RHIC)! Multiplicity scaling of the correlation volume universal freeze-out density Freeze-out time f from R long = f (T/m t ) 1/2 The LHC fireball: - hotter - lives longer & - expands to a larger size

21
Ridge effect Dense matter (collective flows) also in pp collisions at LHC (for high N ch ) ? - p t increases with n ch and particle mass - BE CF vs n ch and p t points to expansion at high n ch - Ridge effect observed in angular correlations at high n ch R(k t ) at large N ch expansion CMS

22
22 Final State Interaction Similar to Coulomb distortion of -decay Fermi’34: e -ikr -k ( r ) [ e -ikr +f( k )e ikr / r ] eicAceicAc F=1+ _______ + … kr+kr kaka Coulomb s-wave strong FSI FSI f c A c (G 0 +iF 0 ) } } Bohr radius } Point-like Coulomb factor k=|q|/2 CF nn pp Coulomb only | 1+f/r| 2 FSI is sensitive to source size r and scattering amplitude f It complicates CF analysis but makes possible Femtoscopy with nonidentical particles K, p,.. & Study relative space-time asymmetries delays, flow Study “exotic” scattering , K, KK, , p , ,.. Coalescence deuterons,.. | -k (r)| 2 Migdal, Watson, Sakharov, … Koonin, GKW, LL,...

23
Assumptions to derive “Fermi-like” formula CF = | -k* (r*)| 2 t FSI (s-wave) = µf 0 /k* |k * | = ½|q * | hundreds MeV/c - same as for KP formula in case of pure QS & - equal time approximation in PRF typical momentum transfer in production RL, Lyuboshitz’82 eq. time condition |t*| r* 2 OK (usually, to several % even for pions) fig. RL, Lyuboshitz..’98 same isomultiplet only: + 0 0, - p 0 n, K + K K 0 K 0,... & account for coupled channels within the - t FSI d dE > t prod

24
24 Effect of nonequal times in pair cms RL, Lyuboshitz SJNP 35 (82) 770; RL nucl-th/0501065 Applicability condition of equal-time approximation: |t*| m 1,2 r* 2 r 0 =2 fm 0 =2 fm/c r 0 =2 fm v=0.1 OK for heavy particles & small k* OK within 5% even for pions if 0 ~r 0 or lower → |k*t*| m 1,2 r*

25
Resonance contribution to CF vs r-k correl. b R peak (STAR) ----------- 0.025 R peak (NA49) ---------- 0.10 0.14 Smoothness assumption: W P (r,½(k-kn)) W P (r,-kn) W P (r,k) Exact W P (r,k) ~ exp[-r 2 /4r 0 2 + bkrcos ]; = angle between r and k CF suppressed by a factor W P (0,k) ~ exp[-b 2 r 0 2 k 2 ] To leave a room for a direct production b > 0.3 is required for π + - system; however, BW b ~ 0.2; likely eq.-time approx. not valid for π + - at k*~ 150 MeV/c * (k=146 MeV/c), r 0 =5 fm (k=126 MeV/c), r 0 =5 fm -----------

26
FSI effect on CF of neutral kaons STAR data on CF(K s K s ) Goal: no Coulomb. But R may go up by ~1 fm if neglected FSI in = 1.09 0.22 R = 4.66 0.46 fm 5.86 0.67 fm KK (~50% K s K s ) f 0 (980) & a 0 (980) RL-Lyuboshitz’82 couplings from Martin or Achasov t Achasov’01,03 Martin’77 no FSI Lyuboshitz-Podgoretsky’79: K s K s from KK also show BE enhancement R ↓ M t Universal expansion !

27
27 NA49 central Pb+Pb 158 AGeV vs RQMD: FSI theory OK Long tails in RQMD: r* = 21 fm for r* < 50 fm 29 fm for r* < 500 fm Fit CF=Norm [ Purity RQMD(r* Scale r*)+1-Purity] Scale=0.76Scale=0.92 Scale=0.83 RQMD overestimates r* by 10-20% at SPS cf ~ OK at AGS worse at RHIC p

28
28 p CFs at AGS & SPS & STAR Fit using RL-Lyuboshitz’82 with consistent with estimated impurity R~ 3-4 fm consistent with the radius from pp CF & m t scaling Goal: No Coulomb suppression as in pp CF & Wang-Pratt’99 Stronger sensitivity to R =0.5 0.2 R=4.5 0.7 fm Scattering lengths, fm: 2.31 1.78 Effective radii, fm: 3.04 3.22 singlet triplet AGSSPS STAR R=3.1 0.3 0.2 fm

29
Pair purity problem for CF(p )@STAR PairPurity ~ 15% Assuming no correlation for misidentified particles and particles from weak decays Fit using RL-Lyuboshitz’82 (for np) but, there can be residual correlations for particles from weak decays requiring knowledge of , p , , , p , , correlations

30
30 Correlation study of particle interaction - + & & p scattering lengths f 0 from NA49 and STAR NA49 CF( + ) vs RQMD with SI scale: f 0 sisca f 0 (= 0.232fm ) sisca = 0.6 0.1 compare ~0.8 from S PT & BNL data E765 K e Fits using RL-Lyuboshitz’82 NA49 CF( ) data prefer | f 0 ( )| f 0 (NN) ~ 20 fm STAR CF( p ) data point to Re f 0 ( p ) < Re f 0 ( pp ) 0 Im f 0 ( p ) ~ Im f 0 ( pp ) ~ 1 fm But R( p ) < R( p ) ? Residual correlations pp

31
Correlation study of particle interaction - - scattering lengths f 0 from NA49 correlation data Fit using RL-Lyuboshitz (82) with fixed Pair Purity =0.16 from feed-down and PID Data prefer |f 0 | « f 0 (NN) ~ 20 fm - CF=1+ [ CF FSI + S S (-1) S exp(-r 0 2 Q 2 )] 0 = ¼(1-P 2 ) 1 = ¼(3+P 2 ) P=Polariz.=0 CF FSI = 2 0 [½|f 0 (k)/r 0 | 2 (1-d 0 0 /(2r 0 )) +2Re(f 0 (k)/(r 0 ))F 1 (r 0 Q) - 2Im(f 0 (k)/r 0 )F 2 (r 0 Q)] f S (k)=(1/f 0 S +½d 0 S k 2 - ik) -1 k=Q/2 F 1 (z)= 0 z dx exp(x 2 -z 2 )/z F 2 (z)=[1-exp(-z 2 )]/z

32
CF=N{1+ [ CF FSI -½exp(-r 0 2 Q 2 )]} N r0r0 f00f00 d00d00 fm B

33
33 Correlation asymmetries CF of identical particles sensitive to terms even in k*r* (e.g. through cos 2k*r* ) measures only dispersion of the components of relative separation r * = r 1 * - r 2 * in pair cms CF of nonidentical particles sensitive also to terms odd in k*r* measures also relative space-time asymmetries - shifts r * RL, Lyuboshitz, Erazmus, Nouais PLB 373 (1996) 30 Construct CF +x and CF -x with positive and negative k* -projection k* x on a given direction x and study CF-ratio CF +x /CF x

34
34 Simplified idea of CF asymmetry (valid for Coulomb FSI) x x v v v1v1 v2v2 v1v1 v2v2 k*/ = v 1 -v 2 p p k* x > 0 v > v p k* x < 0 v < v p Assume emitted later than p or closer to the center p p Longer t int Stronger CF Shorter t int Weaker CF CF CF

35
35 CF-asymmetry for charged particles Asymmetry arises mainly from Coulomb FSI CF A c ( ) |F(-i ,1,i )| 2 =(k*a) -1, =k*r*+k*r* F 1+ = 1+r*/a+k*r*/(k*a) r* |a| k* 1/r* Bohr radius } ±226 fm for ± p ±388 fm for + ± CF +x /CF x 1+2 x* /a k* 0 x* = x 1 *-x 2 * r x * Projection of the relative separation r* in pair cms on the direction x In LCMS ( v z =0) or x || v : x* = t ( x - v t t) CF asymmetry is determined by space and time asymmetries

36
36 ad hoc time shift t = –10 fm/c CF + /CF Sensitivity test for ALICE a, fm 84 226 249 CF + /CF 1+2 x* /a k* 0 Here x* = - v t CF-asymmetry scales as - t /a Erazmus et al.’95 Delays of several fm/c can be easily detected

37
37 Usually: x and t comparable RQMD Pb+Pb p +X central 158 AGeV : x = -5.2 fm t = 2.9 fm/c x* = -8.5 fm + p-asymmetry effect 2 x* /a -8% Shift x in out direction is due to collective transverse flow RL’99-01 x p > x K > x > 0 & higher thermal velocity of lighter particles rtrt y x FF tTtT tt FF = flow velocity tTtT = transverse thermal velocity tt = F + t T = observed transverse velocity x r x = r t cos = r t ( t 2 + F2 - t T2 )/(2 t F ) y r y = r t sin = 0 mass dependence z r z sinh = 0 in LCMS & Bjorken long. exp. out side measures edge effect at y CMS 0

38
NA49 & STAR out-asymmetries Pb+Pb central 158 AGeV not corrected for ~ 25% impurity r* RQMD scaled by 0.8 Au+Au central s NN =130 GeV corrected for impurity Mirror symmetry (~ same mechanism for and mesons) RQMD, BW ~ OK points to strong transverse flow pp pp KK ( t yields ~ ¼ of CF asymmetry)

39
39 Decreasing R(p t ): x-p correlation usually attributed to collective flow taken for granted femtoscopy the only way to confirm x-p correlations x 2 -p correlation:yes x -p correlation:yes Non-flow possibility hot core surrounded by cool shell important ingredient of Buda-Lund hydro picture Csörgő & Lörstad’96 x 2 -p correlation:yes x -p correlation:no x = R G x 0 /[ 0 2 +T/m t + T/T r ] radial gradient of T decreasing asymmetry ~1 ? problem

40
40 Summary Assumptions behind femtoscopy theory in HIC seem OK at k 0. At k > ~ 100 MeV/c, the usual smoothness and equal-time approximations may not be valid. Wealth of data on correlations of various particle species ( ,K 0,p , , ) is available & gives unique space-time info on production characteristics including collective flows Rather direct evidence for strong transverse flow in HIC at SPS & RHIC comes from nonidentical particle correlations LHC femtoscopic data vs n ch and m t point to a universal fireball freeze- out density settled at RHIC energies and indicate collective expansion in high-multiplicity pp-collisions Absence of femtoscopic signals of QGP 1-st order PT (onset and CEP) at √s NN < 10 GeV is likely due to a dramatic decrease of partonic phase with decreasing energy dedicated high statistics, precise experiments (like planned at NICA and FAIR) are required Info on two-particle strong interaction: & & p scattering lengths from HIC at SPS and RHIC. Good perspective at RHIC & LHC (a problem of residual correlations is to be solved).

41
AGS SPS RHIC: radii STAR Au+Au at 200 AGeV0-5% central Pb+Pb or Au+Au Clear centrality & m t dependence Weak energy dependence R ↑ with centrality & with m t only R long slightly ↑ with energy R side R/(1+m t F2 /T) ½ R long (T/m t ) ½ tr. collective flow velocity F Evolution (freeze-out) time

42
42 hadronization initial state pre-equilibrium QGP and hydrodynamic expansion hadronic phase and freeze-out Expected evolution of HI collision vs RHIC data dN/dt 1 fm/c5 fm/c10 fm/c50 fm/c time Kinetic freeze out Chemical freeze out RHIC side & out radii: 2 fm/c R long & radii vs reaction plane: 10 fm/c Bass’02

43
43 Even stronger effect of KK-bar FSI on K s K s correlations in pp-collisions at LHC ALICE: PLB 717 (2012) 151 e.g. for k t < 0.85 GeV/c, N ch =1-11 the neglect of FSI increases by ~100% and R inv by ~40% = 0.64 0.07 1.36 0.15 > 1 ! R inv = 0.96 0.04 1.35 0.07 fm

44
44 Correlation study of particle interaction - + scattering length f 0 from NA49 CF Fit CF( + ) by RQMD with SI scale: f 0 sisca f 0 input f 0 input = 0.232 fm sisca = 0.6 0.1 Compare with ~0.8 from S PT & BNL E765 K e ++ CF=Norm [ Purity RQMD(r* Scale r*)+1-Purity]

45
45 Large lifetimes evaporation or phase transition x || v | x| | t| CF-asymmetry yields time delay Ghisalberti’95 GANIL Pb+Nb p+d+X CF + (pd) CF (pd) CF + /CF < 1 Deuterons earlier than protons in agreement with coalescence e -t p / e -t n / e -t d /( /2) since t p t n t d Two-phase thermodynamic model CF + /CF < 1 123 1 2 3 Strangeness distillation : K earlier than K in baryon rich QGP Ardouin et al.’99

46
46 Coalescence: deuterons.. E d d 3 N/d 3 p d = B 2 E p d 3 N/d 3 p p E n d 3 N/d 3 p n p p p n ½p d WF in continuous pn spectrum -k* (r*) WF in discrete pn spectrum b (r*) Coalescence factor: B 2 = (2 ) 3 (m p m n /m d ) -1 t | b (r*)| 2 ~ R -3 Triplet fraction = ¾ unpolarized Ns Usually: n p Much stronger energy dependence of B 2 ~ R -3 than expected from pion and proton interferometry radii B2B2 R(pp) ~ 4 fm from AGS to SPS Lyuboshitz (88)..

Similar presentations

OK

Sergey Panitkin Current Status of the RHIC HBT Puzzle Sergey Panitkin Brookhaven National Lab La Thuile, March 18, 2005.

Sergey Panitkin Current Status of the RHIC HBT Puzzle Sergey Panitkin Brookhaven National Lab La Thuile, March 18, 2005.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google