Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byPrudence Nichols Modified about 1 year ago

1
On the relation between probabilistic and deterministic avoidance games Torsten Mütze, ETH Zürich Joint work with Michael Belfrage (ETH Zürich), Thomas Rast (ETH Zürich) and Reto Spöhel (MPI Saarbrücken) TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: A A A A AA A A

2
Introduction The probabilistic intuition in positional games [Chvátal, Erdős ‘78], [Beck ‘93, …] : This talk: Build a similar bridge between two previously disconnected worlds Goal in these games: Avoid some given local substructure Benefit: Transfer insights and techniques between the two worlds and derive new results in each of them clever vs. clever = random vs. random clever vs. random Probabilisti c one-player games Deterministic two-player games clever vs. clever

3
Probabilistic one-player avoidance games (clever vs. random) Edge-coloring game [Friedgut, Kohayakawa, Rödl, Ruci ń ski, Tetali ‘03] The probabilistic world Painter vs. random graph process n Goal: Avoid monochromatic copies of F for as long as possible F = K 3

4
Probabilistic one-player avoidance games (clever vs. random) Edge-coloring game [Friedgut, Kohayakawa, Rödl, Ruci ń ski, Tetali ‘03] Vertex-coloring game [Marciniszyn, Spöhel ‘10] The probabilistic world Painter vs. random graph process Goal: Avoid monochromatic copies of F for as long as possible n F = K 3

5
Probabilistic one-player avoidance games (clever vs. random) Edge-coloring game [Friedgut, Kohayakawa, Rödl, Ruci ń ski, Tetali ‘03] Vertex-coloring game [Marciniszyn, Spöhel ‘10] Achlioptas game [Krivelevich, Loh, Sudakov ‘09] The probabilistic world Chooser vs. random graph process Goal: Avoid the appearance of F for as long as possible n Painter vs. random graph process Goal: Avoid monochromatic copies of F for as long as possible F = K

6
The deterministic world Deterministic two-player avoidance games (clever vs. clever) Ramsey-game [Beck ‘83] [Kurek, Ruci ń ski ‘05] Impose restrictions on Builder [Grytczuk, Haluszczak, Kierstead ‘04] : Restrict to graphs with chromatic number at most Builder can still enforce a monochromatic copy of Restrict to forests Builder can still enforce a monochromatic copy of any forest Painter vs. Builder Goals: Avoid / enforce monochromatic copies of F for as long / as quickly as possible ? Yes for infinitely many values of [Conlon ‘10] Online size-Ramsey number := minimum number of steps necessary for Builder to win

7
A bridge between the two worlds Idea: Replace the random graph process by an adversary with a suitable density restriction Observation: Winning strategies for adversary in the deterministic game yield upper bounds for the duration of the probabilistic game Corresponding lower bound statement much harder to prove Density restriction: Builder must adhere to for all subgraphs H Conrete results for these games later! Painter vs. random graph processBuilder Edge-coloring game Vertex-coloring game H H

8
Achlioptas game Complete solution, i.e., threshold functions for arbitrary fixed F, presented in [M., Spöhel, Thomas ‘10], disproving a conjecture from [Krivelevich, Loh, Sudakov ‘09] Implicit in the analysis: Chooser vs. random graph process Presenter A bridge between the two worlds Idea: Replace the random graph process by an adversary with a suitable density restriction Observation: Winning strategies for adversary in the deterministic game yield upper bounds for the duration of the probabilistic game Corresponding lower bound statement much harder to prove Density restriction: Presenter must adhere to for all subgraphs H

9
A bridge between the two worlds Idea: Replace the random graph process by an adversary with a suitable density restriction Observation: Winning strategies for adversary in the deterministic game yield upper bounds for the duration of the probabilistic game Corresponding lower bound statement much harder to prove This upper bound technique extends straightforwardly to similar avoidance games played on random hypergraphs or random subsets of integers

10
The edge-coloring game [Friedgut, Kohayakawa, Rödl, Ruciński, Tetali ‘03] : The threshold (=typical duration) of the game with F = K 3 and r =2 colors is [Marciniszyn, Spöhel, Steger ‘05] : Explicit threshold functions for F (e.g.) a clique or a cycle and r =2 colors n For any : there is a Painter strategy that succeeds whp. For any : every Painter strategy fails whp. N = number of steps Threshold Painter vs. random graph process

11
The edge-coloring game [Belfrage, M., Spöhel ‘11+] : New upper bound approach… Successfully applied by [Balogh, Butterfield ‘10] to derive the first nontrivial upper bounds for F = K 3 and r R 3 colors Density restriction: Builder must adhere to for all subgraphs H Painter vs. random graph process n Builder H Theorem: If Builder can enforce a monochromatic copy of F in the deterministic game with r colors and density restriction d, then the threshold of the probabilistic game is bounded by

12
Proof idea: Well-known: If F is a fixed graph with for all, then for any, whp. after N steps the evolving random graph contains many copies of F. Can be adapted to: If T is a fixed Builder strategy respecting a density restriction of d, then for any, whp. after N steps the evolving random graph behaves exactly like T in many places on the board. The edge-coloring game Theorem: If Builder can enforce a monochromatic copy of F in the deterministic game with r colors and density restriction d, then the threshold of the probabilistic game is bounded by

13
The edge-coloring game Theorem: If Builder can enforce a monochromatic copy of F in the deterministic game with r colors and density restriction d, then the threshold of the probabilistic game is bounded by Upper bound technique translates straightforwardly to other settings (vertex-coloring game, Achlioptas game, random hypergraphs, random subsets of integers etc.) Corresponding lower bound statements require problem-specific work (if provable at all) Open problem: Define the online Ramsey density as Is it true that ?

14
The vertex-coloring game Painter vs. random graph p = edge probability Threshold For any : there is a Painter strategy that succeeds whp. For any : every Painter strategy fails whp. [Marciniszyn, Spöhel ‘10] : Explicit threshold functions for F (e.g.) a clique or a cycle and r R 2 colors ? For these graphs, a simple greedy strategy is optimal The greedy strategy is not optimal for every graph, the general case remained open

15
The vertex-coloring game [M., Rast, Spöhel ‘11+] : For any fixed F and r, we can compute a rational number such that the threshold is Painter vs. random graph ! For these graphs, a simple greedy strategy is optimal We solve the problem in full generality Builder Density restriction: Builder must adhere to for all subgraphs H H

16
The vertex-coloring game Painter vs. random graph Builder H d Builder can enforce F monochromatically in finitely many steps Painter can avoid monochromatic copies of F indefinitely Define the online vertex-Ramsey density as Density restriction: Builder must adhere to for all subgraphs H

17
Painter vs. Builder Painter vs. random graph Theorem 1: For any F and r is computable is rational infimum attained as minimum Theorem 2: For any fixed F and r, the threshold of the probabilistic one-player game is focus for next few slides

18
Painter vs. Builder – Remarks Theorem 1: For any F and r is computable is rational infimum attained as minimum …nor for the two edge-coloring analogues [Kurek, Ruci ń ski ‘05], [Belfrage, M., Spöhel ‘11+] zloty prize money for [Kurek, Ruci ń ski ‘94] None of those three statements is known for the offline quantity

19
Painter vs. Builder – Remarks The running time of our procedure for computing is doubly exponential in v ( F )… With the help of a computer we determined exactly for all graphs F on up to 9 vertices for F a path on up to 45 vertices Theorem 1: For any F and r is computable is rational infimum attained as minimum

20
Painter vs. Builder Painter vs. random graph Theorem 1: For any F and r is computable is rational infimum attained as minimum Theorem 2: For any fixed F and r, the threshold of the probabilistic one-player game is focus for remainder of this talk

21
Painter vs. random graph – Remarks In the asymptotic setting of Theorem 2, computing is a constant-size computation! So is computing the optimal Painter and Builder strategies for the deterministic game For some of Painter’s optimal strategies in the deterministic game, we can show that they also work in the probabilistic game polynomial-time coloring algorithms that succeed whp. in coloring G n, p online for any Theorem 2: For any fixed F and r, the threshold of the probabilistic one-player game is

22
Painter vs. random graph – Proof ideas Upper bound: Use our general approach to translate an optimal Builder strategy from the deterministic game to an upper bound of for the probabilistic game Theorem 2: For any fixed F and r, the threshold of the probabilistic one-player game is

23
Painter vs. random graph – Proof ideas Theorem 2: For any fixed F and r, the threshold of the probabilistic one-player game is Lower bound : Much more involved… Playing ‘just as in the deterministic game’ does not necessarily work for Painter! Reason: the probabilistic process with p ¿ n -1/ d respects a density restriction of d only locally (the entire random graph has an expected density of £ ( np )!) To overcome this issue, we need to really understand the deterministic game and the structure of Painter’s and Builder’s optimal strategies.

24
Summary Probabilisti c one-player games Deterministic two-player games General upper bound technique for probabilistic one-player avoidance games by replacing randomness by a deterministic adversary subject to a suitable density restriction Open Question: For which scenarios can we prove matching lower bounds, i.e., establish a correspondence between probabilistic and deterministic games as in the vertex-coloring game or the Achlioptas game? In particular, does such a correspondence hold for the edge-coloring game?

25
Thank you! Questions?

Similar presentations

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google